Skip to main content
Log in

Normal Forms, Moving Frames, and Differential Invariants for Nondegenerate Hypersurfaces in \({\mathbb {C}}^2\)

  • Published:
The Journal of Geometric Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use the method of equivariant moving frames to revisit the problem of normal forms and equivalence of nondegenerate real hypersurfaces \(M \subset {\mathbb {C}}^2\) under the pseudo-group action of holomorphic transformations. The moving frame recurrence formulae allows us to systematically and algorithmically recover the results of Chern and Moser for hypersurfaces that are either non-umbilic at a point \({{\varvec{p}}}\in M\) or umbilic in an open neighborhood of it. In the former case, the coefficients of the normal form expansion, when expressed as functions of the jet of the hypersurface at the point, provide a complete system of functionally independent differential invariants that can be used to solve the equivalence problem. We prove that under a suitable genericity condition, the entire algebra of differential invariants for such hypersurfaces can be generated, through the operators of invariant differentiation, by a single-real differential invariant of order 7. We then apply the method of moving frames to construct new convergent normal forms for the intermediate but overlooked case of nondegenerate real hypersurfaces at singularly umbilic points, namely those umbilic points where the hypersurface is not identically umbilic in a neighborhood thereof.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This is similar to the ambiguity in the curvature invariant \(\kappa \) of a curve C in the Euclidean plane \({\mathbb {R}}^2\), whose sign changes under a \(180^{\circ }\) rotation, and hence depends on the curve’s orientation.

  2. For this purpose, we ignore the order 2 term \(z {\bar{z}}\).

  3. The reader should not confuse our use of this term with the standard definition of generic submanifolds in CR geometry [12].

  4. They would be required if one wishes to compute the explicit formulae for the normalized differential invariants through the equivariant moving frame calculus, but here we choose to work purely symbolically.

  5. This describes what is known as a “coordinate cross-section”; more general cross-sections are rarely used and will not concern us here.

  6. The multi-index J on \(v_J\) contains all lower case letters, in \(\{z,{\bar{z}},u\}\), whereas on \(V_J\) it denotes the multi-index with the corresponding capital letters, in \(\{Z,{\overline{Z}},U\}\), and should perhaps be denoted \(\iota (J)\). However, since the type of a multi-index subscript is always clear from context, we choose not to unnecessarily clutter the notation.

  7. Note that when \(\ell = 0\), terms involving \(u^{\ell -1}\) are undefined, but have a vanishing coefficient and so do not appear.

  8. A polynomial is superquadratic if it contains no constant or linear terms.

  9. The non-symbolic moving frame calculus would write out the explicit expressions for these lifted invariants and explicitly solve (3.2) for the pseudo-group parameters, with the (far more complicated) process continuing in a similar fashion throughout.

  10. The choice of 48 as the normalization constant is so that we can precisely reproduce the normal form (1.2) of Chern and Moser. Any other nonzero constant would work equally well, with corresponding modifications to the coefficients of the resulting formulae.

  11. As always, we are ignoring contact forms and only writing out the horizontal components of the differential.

  12. An important but difficult question is to determine a minimal set of generating differential invariants for a given (pseudo-) group action. If the set consists of a single differential invariant, it is obviously minimal. Otherwise, except in the case of curves (one-dimensional submanifolds), there is no known criterion for determining whether or not a given generating set is minimal.

  13. This and subsequent formulae were obtained with the help of Mathematica. They are quite complicated and we have chosen not to write them down here. Details are available from the authors upon request.

  14. As before, we suppress any contributions from contact forms.

  15. In general, differentiated invariants can have many such formulae owing to the variety of syzygies among the differential invariants.

  16. If more than one is nonzero, then one can construct several such expressions; their equivalence is a consequence of the various syzygies among \({\mathfrak {J}},{{\overline{{\mathfrak {J}}}}},{\mathfrak {K}}\) and their invariant derivatives.

  17. One should keep in mind that the signature so constructed retains the sign ambiguities (4.5). These can be eliminated by replacing \({\mathfrak {J}}\) and \( V_{Z^j{\overline{Z}}{}^kU^\ell }\) for \(j+k\) odd by \({\mathfrak {J}}^2\) and \({\mathfrak {J}}\, V_{Z^j{\overline{Z}}{}^kU^\ell }\), respectively, when parametrizing the signature.

  18. One should not confuse this definition of generic hypersurface M with the standard definition of generic manifold in CR geometry.

  19. The transformation must be real so as not to complexify the translation generators.

References

  1. Arnaldsson, Ö.: Involutive moving frames. Differ. Geom. Appl. 69, 101603 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baouendi, M.S., Ebenfelt, P., Rothschild, L.R.: CR automorphisms of real analytic manifolds in complex space. Commun. Anal. Geom. 6(2), 291–315 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beloshapka, V.K.: On the dimension of the group of automorphisms of an analytic hypersurface. Math. USSR Izv. 14(2), 223–245 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Beloshapka, V.K., Kossovskiy, I.G.: Classification of homogeneous CR-manifolds in dimension 4. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 374, 655–672 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cartan, É.: Sur la géométrie pseudo-conforme des hypersurfaces de l’espace de deux variables complexes I. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 11, 17–90 (1933) and II. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa 1(4), 333–354 (1932)

  6. Cartan, É.: La Méthode du Repère Mobile, la Théorie des Groupes Continus, et les Espaces Généralisés, Exposés de Géométrie, no. 5, Hermann, Paris (1935)

  7. Cartan, É.: Les problèmes d’équivalence. Sém. Math. (Julia) 4, 1–40 (1936–1937). In: Oeuvres Complètes, part. II, vol. 2, Gauthier–Villars, Paris, 1953, pp. 1311–1334

  8. Chern, S.S., Moser, J.K.: Real hypersurfaces in complex spaces. Acta Math. 133, 219–271 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fels, M., Olver, P.J.: Moving coframes: II. Regularization and theoretical foundations. Acta Appl. Math. 55, 127–208 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Guggenheimer, H.W.: Differential Geometry. McGraw-Hill, New York (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Horn, R.A., Johnson, C.R.: Matrix Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jacobowitz, H.: An Introduction to CR Structures, Math. Surveys and Monographs, vol. 32. AMS, Providence (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen, G.R.: Higher Order Contact of Submanifolds of Homogeneous Spaces. Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 610. Springer-Verlag, New York (1977)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kogan, I.A., Olver, P.J.: Invariant Euler–Lagrange equations and the invariant variational bicomplex. Acta Appl. Math. 76, 137–193 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kolář, M., Kossovskiy, I., Zaitsev, D.: Normal forms in Cauchy–Riemann geometry. Contem. Math. 681, 153–177 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kruglikov, B., Lychagin, V.: Global Lie-Tresse theorem. Sel. Math. New Ser. 22, 1357–1411 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Merker, J., Sabzevari, M.: Explicit expression of Cartan’s connections for Levi-nondegenerate 3-manifolds in complex surfaces, and identification of the Heisenberg sphere. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 10(5), 1801–1835 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Olver, P.J.: Equivalence, Invariants and Symmetry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995). (xvi+525 pp)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Olver, P.J.: Moving frames and singularities of prolonged group actions, Selecta Math. New Series 6, 41–77 (2000)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Olver, P.J.: Differential invariants of surfaces. Differ. Geom. Appl. 27, 230–239 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Olver, P.J.: Recursive moving frames. Results Math. 60, 423–452 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Olver, P.J.: Modern developments in the theory and applications of moving frames. Lond. Math. Soc. 1, 14–50 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Olver, P.J.: The symmetry groupoid and weighted signature of a geometric object. J. Lie Theory 26, 235–267 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Olver, P.J.: Normal forms for submanifolds under group actions. In: Kac, V.G., et al. (eds.) Symmetries, Differential Equations and Applications, pp. 3–27. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Olver, P.J., Pohjanpelto, J.: Maurer–Cartan forms and the structure of Lie pseudo groups. Sel. Math. New Ser. 11, 99–126 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Olver, P.J., Pohjanpelto, J.: Moving frames for Lie pseudo-groups. Can. J. Math. 60(2), 1336–1386 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Olver, P.J., Pohjanpelto, J.: Differential invariant algebras of Lie pseudo-groups. Adv. Math. 222, 1746–1792 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Olver, P.J., Valiquette, F.: Recursive moving frames for Lie pseudo-groups. Results Math. 73, 57 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Poincaré, H.: Les fonctions analytiques de deux variables et la représentation conforme. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 23, 185–220 (1907)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Sabzevari, M.: Convergent normal forms for five dimensional totally nondegenerate CR manifolds in \({\mathbb{C} }^4\). J. Geom. Anal. 31, 7900–7946 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Sabzevari, M., Merker, J.: The Cartan equivalence problem for Levi-non-degenerate real hypersurfaces \(M^3\subset {\mathbb{C} }^2\). Izv. Math. 78(6), 1158–1194 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Valiquette, F.: Equivariant moving frame method and the local equivalence of \(u_{xx}=r(x, u, v, u_x, v_x)\) under fiber-preserving transformations. J. Dyn. Cont. Syst. 17(4), 555–589 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Valiquette, F.: Solving local equivalence problems with the equivariant moving frame method. Sym. Int. Geom. 9, 029 (2013). (43 pp)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Webster, S.M.: On the Moser normal form at a non-umbilic point. Math. Ann. 233, 97–102 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Howard Jacobowitz for his helpful comments and discussions during the preparation of this paper. We also thank Valerii Beloshapka for introducing us to [3] and helpful discussions. We further thank Niky Kamran for reading a draft version and sending many helpful comments. The research of the second author was supported in part by a grant from IPM, No. 1400510415.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Sabzevari.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olver, P.J., Sabzevari, M. & Valiquette, F. Normal Forms, Moving Frames, and Differential Invariants for Nondegenerate Hypersurfaces in \({\mathbb {C}}^2\). J Geom Anal 33, 192 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-023-01243-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12220-023-01243-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation