Abstract
The Slater-type orbital basis with non-integer principal quantum numbers is a physically and mathematically motivated choice for molecular electronic structure calculations in both non-relativistic and relativistic theory. The non-analyticity of these orbitals at \(r=0\), however, requires analytical relations for multi-center integrals to be derived. This is nearly insurmountable. Previous papers by the present authors eliminated this difficulty. Highly accurate results can be achieved by the procedure described in these papers, which place no restrictions on quantum numbers in all ranges of orbital parameters. The purpose of this work is to investigate computational aspects of the formulae given in the previous paper. It is to present a method which helps to increase computational efficiency. In terms of the processing time, evaluation of integrals over Slater-type orbitals with non-integer principal quantum numbers is competitive with those over Slater-type orbitals with integer principal quantum numbers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA (1972) Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover Publications, New York
Allouche A (1974) Les orbitales de Slater à nombre quantique \(<<n>>\) non-entier. Theoretica Chimica Acta 34(1):79–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553235
Allouche A (1976) Non-integer Slater orbital calculations. Theoretica Chimica Acta 42(4):325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00548474
Ángyán JG, Gerber I, Marsman M (2006) Spherical harmonic expansion of short-range screened Coulomb interactions. J Phys A Math Gen 39(27):8613–8630. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/27/005
Arfken G (1985) Modified Bessel functions, \(I_{\nu }(x)\) and \(K_{\nu }(x)\). In: Arfken G (ed) Mathematical methods for physicists. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 573–622
Backeljauw F, Becuwe S, Cuyt A, Deun JV, Lozier DW (2014) Validated evaluation of special mathematical functions. Sci Comput Program 90:2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2013.05.006
Barnett MP (2002) Digital erosion in the evaluation of molecular integrals. Theor Chem Acc 107(4):241–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-002-0322-5
Bağcı A, Hoggan PE (2014) Performance of numerical approximation on the calculation of overlap integrals with noninteger Slater-type orbitals. Phys Rev E 89(7):053307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.053307
Bağcı A, Hoggan PE (2015a) Benchmark values for molecular three-center integrals arising in the Dirac equation. Phys Rev E 92(4):043301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043301
Bağcı A, Hoggan PE (2015b) Benchmark values for molecular two-electron integrals arising from the Dirac equation. Phys Rev E 91(2):023303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.023303
Bağcı A, Hoggan PE (2016) Solution of the Dirac equation using the Rayleigh–Ritz method: flexible basis coupling large and small components. Results for one-electron systems. Phys Rev E 94(1):013302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.013302
Bağcı A, Hoggan PE (2018) Analytical evaluation of relativistic molecular integrals. I. Auxiliary functions. Rend Fis Acc Lincei 29(1):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-018-0669-8
Belpassi L, Tarantelli F, Sgamellotti A, Quiney HM (2008) All-electron four-component Dirac–Kohn–Sham procedure for large molecules and clusters containing heavy elements. Phys Rev B 77(23):233403. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.233403
Bouferguene A (2005) Addition theorem of Slater type orbitals: a numerical evaluation of Barnett–Coulson/Löwdin functions. J Phys A Math Gen 38(13):2899–2916. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/38/13/006
Chaudhry MA, Zubair SM (2002) On a class of incomplete gamma functions with applications. Chapman & Hall/CRC Publications, Boca Raton
Corbató FJ (1956) On the computation of auxiliary functions for two-center integrals by means of a high-speed computer. J Chem Phys 24(2):452–453. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1742496
Condon EU, Shortley GH (1935) The theory of atomic spectra. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cuyt A, Becuwe S (2006) Towards reliable software for the evaluation of a class of special functions. In: Iglesias A, Takayama N (eds) Mathematical Software-ICMS 2006. ICMS 2006. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4151. Springer, Heidelberg
Esteban MJ, Séré E (1999) Solutions of the Dirac–Fock equations for atoms and molecules. Commun Math Phys 203(3):499–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050032
Gautschi W (1999) A note on the recursive calculation of incomplete gamma functions. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 25(1):101–107. https://doi.org/10.1145/305658.305717
Geller M (1962) Two-center, nonintegral, Slater-orbital calculations: integral formulation and application to the hydrogen molecule-ion. J Chem Phys 36(9):2424–2428. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1732902
Gradshteyn IS, Ryzhik IM (1980) Table of integrals, series and products, 4th edn. Academic Press, New York
Grant IP (2007) Relativistic quantum theory of atoms and molecules. Springer, New York
Grant IP (2010) Relativistic atomic structure: past, present and future. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 43(7):074033. http://stacks.iop.org/0953-4075/43/i=7/a=074033
Greengard P, Rokhlin V (2018) An algorithm for the evaluation of the incomplete gamma function. Adv Comput Math. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10444-018-9604-x (accepted)
Guseinov II (1970) Analytical evaluation of two-centre Coulomb, hybrid and one-electron integrals for Slater-type orbitals. J Phys B At Mol Phys 3(111):1399–1412. http://stacks.iop.org/0022-3700/3/i=11/a=001
Guseinov II (1995a) On the evaluation of multielectron molecular integrals over Slater-type orbitals using binomial coefficients. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 335(1):17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-1280(94)04101-W
Guseinov II (1995b) Spherically symmetrical properties of two-center overlap integrals over arbitrary atomic orbitals and translation coefficients for Slater-type orbitals. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 343:173–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-1280(95)90551-0
Guseinov II, Ertürk M (2009) Use of noninteger \(n\)-Slater type orbitals in combined Hartree–Fock–Roothaan theory for calculation of isoelectronic series of atoms Be to Ne. Int J Quantum Chem 109(2):176–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.21760
Guseinov II, Ertürk M (2012) Use of noninteger \(n\)-generalized exponential type orbitals with hyperbolic cosine in atomic calculations. Int J Quantum Chem 112(6):1559–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.23133
Guseinov II, Mamedov BA (1999) Computation of molecular integrals over Slater type orbitals I. Calculations of overlap integrals using recurrence relations. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 465(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(98)00129-8
Guseinov II, Mamedov BA (2002) Evaluation of overlap integrals with integer and noninteger \(n\) Slater-type orbitals using auxiliary functions. Mol Model Annu 8(9):272–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-002-0098-5
Guseinov II, Mamedov BA (2007) On the accurate evaluation of overlap integrals over Slater type orbitals using analytical and recurrence relations. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A 62(9):467–470. https://doi.org/10.1515/zna-2007-0901
Harris FE (2004) Efficient evaluation of the molecular auxiliary function \(B_n\) by downward recursion. Int J Quantum Chem 100(2):142–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.10812
Hobson EW (1931) The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Iikura H, Tsuneda T, Yanai T, Hirao K (2001) A long-range correction scheme for generalized-gradient-approximation exchange functionals. J Chem Phys 115(8):3540–3544. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1383587
Koga T, Kanayama K (1997a) Noninteger principal quantum numbers increase the efficiency of Slater-type basis sets: heavy atoms. Chem Phys Lett 266(1):123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(96)01500-X
Koga T, Kanayama K (1997b) Noninteger principal quantum numbers increase the efficiency of Slater-type basis sets: singly charged cations and anions. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 30(7):1623–1631. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/30/7/004
Koga T, Kanayama K, Thakkar AJ (1997) Noninteger principal quantum numbers increase the efficiency of Slater-type basis sets. Int J Quantum Chem 62(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1997)62:1<1::AID-QUA1>3.0.CO;2-#
Koga T, García de la Vega JM, Miguel B (1998) Double-zeta Slater-type basis sets with noninteger principal quantum numbers and common exponents. Chem Phys Lett 283(1):97–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01322-5
Koga T, Shimazaki T, Satoh T (2000) Noninteger principal quantum numbers increase the efficiency of Slater-type basis sets: double-zeta approximation. J Mol Struct THEOCHEM 496(1):95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(99)00176-1
Kutzelnigg W (2012) Solved and unsolved problems in relativistic quantum chemistry. Chem Phys 395:16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.06.001
Lee YS, McLean AD (1982) Relativistic effects on Re and De in AgH and AuH from all-electron Dirac–Hartree–Fock calculations. J Chem Phys 76(1):735–736. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.442680
Lewin M, Séré E (2014) Spurious modes in Dirac calculations and how to avoid them. In: Bach V, Site LD (eds) Many-electron approaches in physics, chemistry and mathematics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06379-9-2
Mulliken RS, Rieke CA, Orloff D, Orloff H (1949) Formulas and numerical tables for overlap integrals. J Chem Phys 17(12):1248–1267. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747150
NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions (2018) Recurrence relations and derivatives. In: Olver FWJ, Daalhuis Olde AB, Lozier DW, Schneider BI, Boisvert RF, Clark CW, Miller BR, Saunders BV (eds) Incomplete gamma and related functions. https://dlmf.nist.gov/8.8. Release 1.0.18
Parr RG, Joy HW (1957) Why not use Slater orbitals of nonintegral principal quantum number? J Chem Phys 26(2):424. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1743314
Pople JA, Beveridge DL (1970) Approximate molecular orbital theory. Mc-Graw Hill, New York
Quiney HM, Belanzoni P, Sgamellotti A (2002) Evaluation of the Coulomb energy in relativistic self-consistent-field theory. Theor Chem Acc 108(2):113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-002-0369-3
Richard ES, Stephen H (1984) Kinetic balance: a partial solution to the problem of variational safety in Dirac calculations. J Chem Phys 81(4):1910–1918. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447865
Rico JF, López R, Ramirez G, Ema I (2013) Repulsion integrals involving Slater-type functions and Yukawa potential. Theor Chem Acc 132(1):1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-012-1304-x
Roothaan CCJ (1951) New developments in molecular orbital theory. Rev Mod Phys 23(2):69–89. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.23.69
Santos FD (1973) Finite range approximations in direct transfer reactions. Nucl Phys A 212(2):341–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90568-X
Seth M, Ziegler T (2012) Range-separated exchange functionals with Slater-type functions. J Chem Theory Comput 8(3):901–907. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300006h
Slater JC (1930) Atomic shielding constants. Phys Rev A 36(1):57–64. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.36.57
Temme NM (1994) Computational aspects of incomplete gamma functions with large complex parameters. In: Zahar RVM (ed) Approximation and computation: a festschrift in honor of Walter Gautschi: proceedings of the Purdue conference, December 2–5, 1993. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, pp 551–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7415-2-37
Temme NM (2011) Special statistical distribution functions. In: Temme NM (ed) Special functions. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118032572.ch11
Weatherford CA, Red E, Joseph D, Hoggan PE (2006) Poisson’s equation solution of Coulomb integrals in atoms and molecules. Mol Phys 104(9):1385–1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970500462248
Weniger EJ (2000) Addition theorems as three-dimensional Taylor expansions. Int J Quantum Chem 76(2):280–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 461X(2000)76:2<280::AID-QUA16>3.0.CO;2-C
Weniger EJ (2002) Addition theorems as three-dimensional Taylor expansions. II. B functions and other exponentially decaying functions. Int J Quantum Chem 90(1):92–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.948
Weniger EJ (2008) On the analyticity of Laguerre series. J Phys A Math Theor 41(42):425207. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/41/42/425207
Yukawa H (1935) On the interaction of elementary particles. I. In: Proceedings of the physico-mathematical society of Japan. 3rd series, vol 17, pp 48–57. https://doi.org/10.11429/pmsj1919.17.0-48
Acknowledgements
In this study the author M.A. was supported by the Scientific Research Coordination Unit of Pamukkale University under the project number 2018HZDP036.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This contribution is the written, peer-reviewed version of a paper presented at the International Conference “The Quantum World of Molecules: from Orbitals to Spin Networks”, held at the Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei in Rome on 27–28 April, 2017.
Appendices
Appendix A
Integrating Eq. (30) by parts twice while \(q=0\): in the first operation we use, for Eq. (35),
for Eq. (36),
thus we have
Performing the second operation on the first terms on the right-hand side of Eqs. (59, 60) with,
the Eqs. (35, 36) are obtained, respectively.
Appendix B
Using the series expansion of exponential functions \(\mathrm{e}^z\), where \(z=-p_{3}\nu \) in the Eq. (30) while \(q=0\) we have
Dividing and multiplying the integral on the right-hand side, by \(\xi ^{s}\) gives:
Equation (40) is obtained by analogously generalizing power functions \(\xi ^{-s}\), \(\left( \xi \nu \right) ^{s}\) to \(\xi ^{-q_{1}}\), \(\left( \xi \nu \right) ^{q_{2}}\), respectively.
Appendix C
The normalized form of incomplete beta functions is used:
They are usually represented by “I”; however, we use “\(\mathfrak {B}\)” in order to avoid any confusion with the Bessel functions. Thus, the recurrence relations and the derivatives used in the present work have the following form:
\(B_{nn'}=B_{n'n}\) and \(z=\frac{\xi +1}{2\xi }\), \(1-z=\frac{\xi -1}{2\xi }\).
Appendix D
Two-center overlap integrals over STO with integer n.
This defines the two-center overlap integrals for STOs. Thus, the binomial series expansion may be used for the power functions \(\left( \xi +\nu \right) ^{n_{2}}\), \(\left( \xi -\nu \right) ^{n_{3}}\):
where \(F_{s}{\left( n,n' \right) }\): generalized binomial coefficients (Guseinov 1970; Pople and Beveridge 1970),
where the coefficients \(F_{s}(n)\) are the binomial coefficients indexed by n, s which is usually written as \(\left( \begin{array}{cc} n \\ s \end{array} \right) \) with,
If the orbital parameters \(\left\{ \zeta , \zeta ' \right\} \) are equal \(\left( p_{2}=p,p_{3}=0 \right) \), the only integral to be computed takes the form:
and for \(p>0\) are easily and stably generated by up-ward recursion in \(\alpha \) for all positive p.
If the orbital parameters are different \(\left( p_{2}=p,p_{3}=p t \right) \), then an additional and much more difficult integral arises:
A down-ward recursive procedure,
for these integrals, stable for all \(\alpha \) and pt was given in Corbató (1956). It uses modified Bessel functions. Bessel functions are first generated by Eq. (70), after which the \(B_{\alpha }\) are given as linear combinations of them. This procedure, however, requires more computational effort than an optimal use of up- and down-ward recursion directly in \(B_{\alpha }\). By representing the starting values of down-ward recursion formula as incomplete gamma functions, the behavior of the \(B_{\alpha }\) integrals was also investigated in Harris (2004). In another study (Guseinov and Mamedov 2007), in order to calculate the \(B_{\alpha }\) integrals for large values of pt, the following sum (Mulliken et al. 1949) was used:
For small values of pt, the finite series representations of \(A_{\alpha }\) integrals,
by replacing s with \(\alpha -s+1\); \(0 \le s \le \alpha \), were used first. Afterwards, the infinite series representations of exponential functions were used in the resulting expression. Improvements on this formulae were made according to comments in Barnett (2002) on results in Guseinov and Mamedov (1999) (in fact, the formulae given in Guseinov and Mamedov (2002) were more carefully coded, not expressed with any significant change). Regardless of the method, an infinite sum that needs to be accurately calculated, is obtained in fine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bağcı, A., Hoggan, P.E. & Adak, M. Analytical evaluation of relativistic molecular integrals. II: Method of computation for molecular auxiliary functions involved. Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 29, 765–775 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-018-0734-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-018-0734-3