Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How a nonprofit organization delivers online accountability through social media

  • Original research article
  • Published:
International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media act as primary means of connection between the stake-holding public and varied enterprises, including nonprofit entities. The media also have great potency to assist nonprofit organizations (NPOs) to deliver real-time transparency to the public. While prior studies have assessed how NPO online accountability is discharged through organization website, fewer ones discussed on social media usage to deliver online accountability. This study, therefore, aims to find out how social media act as online accountability channels for NPOs and observe which social media is the most effective in performing such an objective. The study follows a qualitative case study approach on a nonprofit Indonesian humanitarian organization. While the data was collected through a document review, semi-structured interviews, and content analysis of massive social media statistical data (including 18,929 posts made by the NPO from January 1, 2012 to August 28, 2020). The data was subsequently analyzed through the use of the thematic method. Using NPO accountability framework developed from former literature, it is found that NPOs can fulfill various dimensions of accountability through social media: formal-informal and upward-downward. Nonetheless, their current use of social media is still restricted to short-term rather than strategic accountability. In terms of effectiveness, Facebook followed by Instagram surpassed other media in terms of attracting fans, engagement, and total reactions-comments-shares. This study offers several implications for the management of NPOs by outlining a framework of optimizing social media for discharging online accountability as well as further research agendas to scholars interested in the subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adnan, S. M., & Sulaiman, M. (2006). Religion, religiosity, and slack creation: some empirical evidence. Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 1, 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: theory, management, policy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaboldi, M., Busco, C., & Cuganesan, S. (2017). Accounting, accountability, social media and big data: revolution or hype? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 762–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avina, J. (1993). The evolutionary life cycles of non-governmental development organizations. Public Administration and Development, 13(5), 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baydoun, N., & Willett, R. (1997). Islam and accounting: ethical issues in the presentation of financial information. Accounting, commerce & finance: the Islamic Perspective Journal, 2, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belluci, M., & Manetti, G. (2017). Facebook as a tool for supporting dialogic accounting? Evidence from large philanthropic foundations in the United States. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 875–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, L. M. (2012). The potential of outcome measurement for strengthening nonprofits’ accountability to beneficiaries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1224–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernritter, S. F., Verlegh, P. W. J., & Smit, E. G. (2016). Why nonprofits are easier to endorse on social media: the roles of warmth and brand symbolism. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 33, 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blouin, M. C., Lee, R. L., & Erickson, G. S. (2018). The impact of online financial disclosure and donations in nonprofits. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 30(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., & Moore, M. H. (2001). Accountability, strategy, and international nongovernmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R. A., & Ebrahim, A. (2006). How does accountability affect mission? The case of a nonprofit serving immigrants and refugees. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coule, T. M. (2015). Nonprofit governance and accountability: broadening the theoretical perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(1), 75–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creed, W. E. D., & Miles, R. E. (1996). Trust in organizations: a conceptual framework linking organizational forms, managerial philosophies, and the opportunity costs of controls. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. London: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMers, J. (2017). Why social media keeps brands accountable (and 5 key lessons for marketers). Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jaysondemers/2017/06/12/why-social-media-keeps-brands-accountable-and-5-key-lessons-for-marketers/#5e3ea461f50f

  • Dewi, M. K. (2017). An in-depth case study of beneficiary accountability practices by an Indonesian NGO. (PhD), Aston University, Birmingham.

  • Dewi, M. K., Manochin, M., & Belal, A. (2019). Towards a conceptual framework of beneficiary accountability by NGOs: an Indonesian case study. Critical Perspective on Accounting, In Press.

  • Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. Harvard Business School.

  • Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1995). NGO Performance and Accountability. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goncharenko, G. (2019). The accountability of advocacy NGOs: insights from the online community of practice. Accounting Forum, 43(1), 135–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: how social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2010). The Two Ws of Islamic Accounting Research. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 1, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, N. S., & Conklin, T. (2012). A thematic analysis of a leadership speaker series. The Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 826–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A., & Wilford, R. (2010). Listen first: a pilot system for managing downward accountability in NGOs. Development in Practice, 20(7), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski, D., Salmona, M., & Smith, T. (2014). Qualitative research in finance. Australian Journal of Management, 39(1), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, K. P. (1994). The strategic management of accountability in nonprofit organizations: an analytical framework. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutsen, W. L., & Brower, R. S. (2010). Managing expressive and instrumental accountabilities in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: a qualitative investigation. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 588–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. L., Pendharkar, P. C., & Blouin, M. C. (2012). An exploratory examination of the implementation of online accountability: a technological innovation perspective. Journal of Information Technology Management., 23(3), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, G. (2007). The accountability of NGOs in civil society and its public spheres. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18(6), 645–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, B., Zhang, S., & Fan, W. (2016). Social representations of social media use in government. Social Science Computer Review, 34(4), 416–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najam, A. (1996). NGO Accountability: a conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 39–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E. K. (2019). Come on feel the noise: the relationship between stakeholder engagement and viral messaging through an association’s Twitter use. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 16, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability: aligning imposed and felt accountability in NGO-funder accountability relationships accounting. Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 36–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. M. (1992). Accountability and governmental financial reporting. Financial Accountability and Management, 8(3), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, G., Moggi, S., Pierce, P., & Leardini, C. (2018). Stakeholder accountability through the world wide web: insights from nonprofits. In L. Rita, A. Cardoni, R. P. Dameri, & D. Mancini (Eds.), Network, Smart and Open. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmons, J. (2012). Cases in online interview research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011). Accountability online: understanding the web-based accountability practices of nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(2), 270–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, H. P., Raggo, P., & Vijfeijken, T. B.-V. (2012). Accountability of transnational NGOs: aspirations vs. practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1175–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2012). Reconfiguring relations of accountability: materialization of social media in the travel sector. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 37(1), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2013). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, T. (2002). Ethics and accountability: from the for-itself to the for-the-other. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 27(6), 541–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slatten, L. A. D., Hollier, B. N. G., Stevens, D. P., Austin, W., & Carson, P. P. (2016). Web-based accountability in the nonprofit sector: a closer look at arts, culture, and humanities organizations. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 46(5), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statista.com. (2020). Number of social network users in selected countries in 2020 and 2025(in millions). In Statista - The Statistics Portal. Retrieved July 15, 2020, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/278341/number-of-social-network-users-in-selected-countries/

  • Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2006). On James Bond and the importance of NGO accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(3), 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2003). Handbook on non-profit institutions in the system of national accounts retrieved from New York:

  • Walker, S. P. (2016). Revisiting the roles of accounting in society. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 49, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, İ. G., Aygün, D., & Tanrikulu, Z. (2017). Social media’s perspective on Industry 4.0: A twitter analysis. Social Networking, 6, 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. A. (2017). Facebook, twitter, and blogs: the adoption and utilization of social media in nonprofit human service organizations. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mitsui Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Seyla Rizky Amelia

  2. Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

    Miranti Kartika Dewi

Authors
  1. Seyla Rizky Amelia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miranti Kartika Dewi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranti Kartika Dewi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amelia, S.R., Dewi, M.K. How a nonprofit organization delivers online accountability through social media. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 18, 317–334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00274-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00274-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation