Skip to main content
Log in

Survivability assessment of a soldier wearing a ballistic helmet collided by a non-penetrating high speed projectile

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since combat capability depends on the survivability of a soldier, it is important to estimate the survivability properly. Head and neck injuries are major incidents that affect the survivability in battle field. Although a soldier usually wears a ballistic helmet, he can be injured by a ballistic impact which results in the deformation and energy propagation of the helmet. Previous research activities focused on the head injury only. In this study, a finite element model including the neck as well as head was developed using LS-DYNA. It consists of a skull, brain, cerebrospinal fluid, cervical vertebrae, neck muscle, helmet, and bullet. The helmet consists of a shell and interior cushion system. The bullet speeds of 250, 360, 410 and 460 m/s were used for the simulation. The pressure of the brain and von Mises stress/ strain of the skull and brain were calculated. Head and neck injury criteria were used to assess the survivability of a soldier. Effects of firearm type on head and neck injuries were also investigated. Generally, the head injury turned out to be more dangerous than the neck injury under the same condition. Among firearms, the riffle type turned out to be generally much more dangerous than the pistol type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. D. Owens, J. F. Kragh Jr., J. C. Wenke, J. Macaitis, C. E. Wade and J. B. Holcomb, Combat wounds in operation iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom, J. Trauma-Injury Infect. Crit. Care, 64 (2) (2008) 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B. L. Bachulis, W. Sangster, G. W. Gorrell and W. B. Long, Patterns of injury in helmeted and nonhelmeted motorcyclists, Am. J. Surg., 155 (5) (1988) 708–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Kostopoulos, Y. P. Markopoulos, G. Giannopoulos and D. E. Vlachos, Finite element analysis of impact damage response of composite motorcycle safety helmets, Compos. Part B-Eng., 33 (2) (2002) 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. H. Chang, L. T. Chang, G. L. Chang, S. C. Huang and C. H. Wang, Head injury in facial impact-a finite element analysis of helmet chin bar performance, J. Biomech. Eng.-T. ASME, 122 (6) (2000) 640–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Afshari and S. M. Rajaai, Finite element simulations investigating the role of the helmet in reducing head injuries, Int. J. Simul. Model., 7 (1) (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. S. Liu, C. M. Fan, M. C. Lee and C. Y. Yen, Development and application of a 3D finite element simulation model of impact of motorcycle helmet, 1st Int. Crashworthiness Conf. (IJCRASH), Dearborn, Michigan, USA (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. K. Pinnoji, P. Mahajan, N. Bourdet, C. Deck and R. Willinger, Impact dynamics of metal foam shells for motorcycle helmets: Experiments & numerical modeling, Int. J. Impact Eng., 37 (3) (2010) 274–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Halldin, Prevention and prediction of head and neck injury in traffic accidents-using experimental and numerical methods, Report, Department of Aeronautics (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Willinger, D. Baumgartner and T. Guimberteau, Dynamic characterization of motorcycle helmets: modelling and coupling with the human head, J. Sound Vib., 235 (4) (2000) 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. F. M. Shuaib, A. M. S. Hamouda, R. S. R. Umar, M. M. Hamdan and M. S. J. Hashmi, Motorcycle helmet Part I. Biomechanics and computational issues, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 123 (2002) 406–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. H, Kim, O. S. Lee and S. S. Yoo, Experimental study on impact absorbing performance of motorcycle helmets, J. Mech. Sci. Technol, 11 (3) (1997) 292–299.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. J. Mills and A. Gilchrist, Finite-element analysis of bicycle helmet oblique impacts, Int. J. Impact Eng., 35 (2008) 1087–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Van Hoof, M. J. Deutekom, M. J. Worswick and M, Bolduc, Experimental and numerical analysis of the ballistic response of composite helmet materials, Proceed. 18th Int. Symp. Ballistics, San Antonio, TX, USA (1999) 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. van Hoof, D. S. Cronin, M. J. Worswick, K. V. Williamsand D. Nandlall, Numerical head and composite helmet models to predict blunt trauma, Proceed. 19th Int. Symp. Ballistics, Interlaken, Switzerland (2001) 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Baumgartner and R Willinger, Finite element modelling of human head injuries caused by ballistic projectiles, Revue Européenne des Eléments, 14 (4) (2005) 559–576.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Aare and S. Kleiven, Evaluation of head response to ballistic helmet impacts using the finite element method, Int. J. Imp. Eng., 34 (2007) 596–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Y. Tham, V. B. C. Tan and H. P. Lee, Ballistic impact of a KEVLARs helmet: Experiment and simulations, Int. J. Impact Eng., 35 (2008) 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. P. Lee and S. W. Gong, Finite element analysis for the evaluation of protective functions of helmets against ballistic impact, Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng., 13 (5) (2010) 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. J. Yang and J. Dai, Simulation-based assessment of rear effect to ballistic helmet impact, Comput. Aided Design, 7 (1) (2010) 59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Kim, A study on the Injury and deformation behavior of human head by Non-penetrating impact, Master’s Thesis, Hanyang University (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. M. Ansari and A. Chakrabarti, Impact behavior of GFRP and Kevlar/epoxy sandwich composite plate: Experimental and FE analyses, J. Mech. Sci. Tech., 31 (2) (2017) 771–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Y. Choi, Numerical human head model for traumatic injury assessment, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 15 (7) (2001) 995–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA3D theoretical manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Mendes, C. Silvestri and M. H. Ray, Investigation of LSDYNA ® modeling for active muscle tissue, 11th Int. Users LS-DYNA Conf., Dearborn, Michigan, USA (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. E. Zajac, Muscle and tendon properties models scaling and application to biomechanics and motor, Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 17 (4) (1989) 359–411.

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Brolin, P. Halldin and I. Leijonhufvud, The effect of muscle activation on neck response, Traffic. Inj. Prev., 6 (1) (2005) 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Kleiven and H. von Holst, Consequences of reduced brain volume following impact in prediction of subdural hematoma evaluated with numerical techniques, Traffic Inj. Prev., 3 (4) (2002) 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. M. Kleinberger, Application of finite element techniques to the study of cervical spine mechanics, SAE Technical Paper (933131) (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. Belytschko and M. O. Neal, Contact-impact by the pinball algorithm with penalty and Lagrangian methods, Int. J. Numeric. Meth. Eng., 31 (3) 547–572 (1991).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Vehicle Standard (FMVSS) 208 (1999).

  31. G. Bellavia and G. V. Mariotti, Development of an anthropomorphic model for vehicle-pedestrian crash test -XXI science and motor vehicles, JUMV Int. Conf. Exhibition, Belgrade, Serbia (2007) 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. A. Gennarelli and E. Wodzin, AIS 2005: A contemporary injury scale, Injury, 37 (12) (2006) 1083–1091.

    Google Scholar 

  33. R. Eppinger, E. Sun, F. Bandak, M. Haffner, N. Khaewpong, M. Maltese and A. Zhang, Development of improved injury criteria for the assessment of advanced automotive restraint systems-II, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1-70 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  34. C. C. Ward, M. Chan and A. M. Nahum, Intracranial pressure -a brain injury criterion, Proceed. 24th Stapp Car Crash Conf., SAE, 801304 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. C. Tyrell, K. J. Severson and B. P. Marquis, Analysis of occupant protection strategies in train collisions, ASME Appl. Mech. Div.-Publ.-AMD, 210 (1995) 539–557.

    Google Scholar 

  36. A. W. Carroll and C. A. Soderstrom, A new nonpenetrating ballistic injury, Ann. Surg., 188 (6) (1978) 753–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. E. Liden, R. Berlin, B. Janzon, B. Schantz and T. Seeman, Some observations relating to behind-body armour blunt trauma effects caused by ballistic impact, J. Trauma Acute Care Surg., 28 (1) (1988) S145–S148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. S. Margulies and L. E. Thibault, A proposed tolerance criteria for diffuse axonal injury in man, J. Biomech., 25 (1992) 917–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Hee Yoo.

Additional information

Recommended by Associate Editor Seungbum Koo

Moon Jeong Kang received her B.S. degree in the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea in 2012. She is working as a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. Her research interests include biomechanics and multibody dynamics.

Hong Hee Yoo received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in the Department of Mechanical Design in Seoul National University in 1980 and 1982. He received his Ph.D. degree in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics in the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor in 1989. He is a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea. His research interests include multi-body dynamics, structural vibration and statistical uncertainty analysis in mechanics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, M.J., Yoo, H.H. Survivability assessment of a soldier wearing a ballistic helmet collided by a non-penetrating high speed projectile. J Mech Sci Technol 32, 2425–2433 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0455-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0455-7

Keywords

Navigation