Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of axisymmetric scramjet inlet flow fields using anti-diffusive WENO Navier-Stokes solver

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is based on the theory of gas dynamics and uses the Navier-Stokes equations as the governing equations to solve the hypersonic flow problems of the scramjet. For the turbulent flow, we use the Spalart-Allmaras one equation turbulence model, which produces better results for near wall and boundary layer flow field problems. The lower-upper symmetric Gauss-Seidel implicit scheme, which enables results to converge efficiently under steady state conditions, is combined with the anti-diffusive weighted essentially nonoscillatory (WENO) scheme to yield an accurate and efficient simulation tool for an axisymmetric scramjet flow field analysis. Using the WENO scheme’s high-order accuracy and its non-oscillatory solution at discontinuous regions, we can solve the hypersonic flow problems involving complex shock-shock/shock-boundary layer interactions inside the flow path. This simulation procedure is first verified against two existing partial examples to ensure its accuracy, and is then applied to a complete scramjet model with different initial conditions for a full flow field analysis. The aerodynamic data of Mach number, density, static temperature and pressure are obtained and the results discussed. The anti-diffusive WENO scheme produces more accurate resolution of shock and slip lines and their complex multiple interactions than other numerical approaches. This is of crucial importance for the scramjet complete flow field analysis as multiple shock-boundary layer and discontinuities interactions often occur within the long flow path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Andreadis, Scramjets integrate air and space, The Industrial Physicist (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Bouchut, An antidiffusive entropy scheme for monotone scalar conservation law, J. of Scientific Computing, 21 (2004) 1–30.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. E. T. Curren and S. B. N. Murthy, Ed. scramjet propulsion, AIAA Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, 189 (2001) 447–512.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. R. Henry, E. H. Jr. Andrews, S. Z. Pinckney and C. R. McClinton, Boundary layer and starting problems on a short axisymmetric scramjet inlet, Compressible Turbulent Boundary Layers, NASA SP-216 (1969) 481–508.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. C. Huang, H. Lin and J. Y. Yang, Implicit preconditioned WENO schemes for steady viscous flows, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009) 420–438.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. C. McClinton, A. Roudakov, V. Semenov and V. Kopehenov, Comparative flow path analysis and design assessment of an axisymmetric hydrogen fueled scramjet flight test engine at a Mach number of 6.5, AIAA Paper 96-4571 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Oevermann, Numerical investigation of turbulent hydrogen combustion in a SCRAMJET using flamelet modeling, Aerospace Science and Technology, 4 (2000) 463–480.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Pandey and T. Sivasakthivel, CFD analysis of mixing and combustion of a scramjet combustor with a planer strut injector, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 2 (2011) 463–480.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. J. Roache, K. Ghia and F. White, Editorial policy statement on the control of numerical accuracy, ASME Journal of Fluids Engineering, 108 (1) (1986) 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. G. Rodriguez, CFD analysis of the CIAM/NASA scramjet, AIAA Paper 2002-4128, 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Indianapolis, Indiana.

  11. C. J. Roy and F. G. Blottner, Review and assessment of turbulence models for hypersonic flows, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 42 (2006) 469–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. C. Rumsey, Compressibility considerations for twoequation turbulence models in hypersonic boundary layer applications, NASA-TM-145 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. R. Spalart and S. R. Allmaras, A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, AIAA Paper 92-257 (1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. Ungewitter, J. D. Ott, V. Ahuja and S. M. Dash, CFD capabilities for hypersonic scramjet propulsive flowpath design, AIAA-2004-4131 (2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. R. T. Voland, A. H. Auslender, M. Smart, A. Roudakov, V. Semenov and V. Kopehenov, CIAM/NASA Mach 6.5 Scramjet Flight and Ground Test, AIAA 99-4848 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. J. Wright, K. Sinha, J. Olejniczak, G. Candler, T. Magruder and A. Smits, Numerical and experimental investigation of double-cone shock interactions, AIAA J., 38 (2000) 2268–2276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. D. W. Wilcox, Formulation of the k-ω turbulence model revisited, AIAA J., 46 (11) (2008) 2823–2838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Xu and C. W. Shu, Anti-diffusive flux corrections for high order finite difference WENO scheme, J. Comput. Physics, 205 (2005) 458–485.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Y. Yang, Y. C. Perng and R. H. Yen, Implicit weighted ENO schemes for the three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA J., 39 (11) (2001) 2082–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Y Yang, T. J. Hsieh and C. H Wang, Implicit antidiffusive weighted ENO schemes for the three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes Equations, AIAA Journal, 47 (6) (2009) 1435–1444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. H. C. Yee, Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD Schemes and Their Applications, J. Comp. Phys., 68 (1987) 151–179.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Yoon and A. Jameson, Lower-upper symmetric-Gauss-Seidel method for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations, AIAA J., 26 (9) (1988) 1025–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaw-Yen Yang.

Additional information

This paper was presented at the 10th ACFD, Jeju, Korea, October 2014. Recommended by Guest Editor Hyoung-Gwon Choi

Juan-Chen Huang received, in 1995, the Ph.D. from the Institute of Applied Mechanics, National Taiwan University. He is currently an associate professor in National Taiwan Ocean University. His research interests are in the areas of computational mechanics and science.

Jaw-Yen Yang received, in 1983, the Ph.D. from Aeronautics & Astronautics, Stanford University, CA USA. He is currently a University Distinguished Professor in National Taiwan University. His research interests are in the areas of computational mechanics and science.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, JC., Yang, JY., Lai, YH. et al. Simulation of axisymmetric scramjet inlet flow fields using anti-diffusive WENO Navier-Stokes solver. J Mech Sci Technol 29, 1875–1882 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0408-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0408-3

Keywords

Navigation