Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Project Coordinators’ Perceptions according to the Organization Structure to Reduce Communication Risks in Multinational Project

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Increasing risks about deficient communication and difficulties in communication management in multinational projects lead to the deployment of project coordinators (PCs). The role of coordinators and their responses to communication issues differ with the organization structure. This study focuses on the communication tendencies in different organization structures to facilitate the work of PCs. Based on the literature review, this study identified representative communication risks and organization structures in multinational projects. Thereafter, a survey and semi-structured interviews with 30 PCs were conducted to understand their perceptions, which were then analyzed by applying text-mining. Cultural and linguistic risks, such as differences in terminology, nuances, and visual gestures, occur frequently in communication. The resulting construction and design changes may lead to conflicts among stakeholders. To alleviate these risks, PCs in functional, projectized, and matrix organizations must consider the hierarchy, expert presence, and systematic approach adoption, respectively. PCs typically prefer matrix organizations, in which each department acts as a team to deliver information uniformly, and the personnel must adapt to differences in the terminology and behavioral cultures of multinational stakeholders. The systematic deployment of PCs with experience and knowledge of multinational projects in each team can help set unified goals among stakeholders. By coordinating the communication of PCs, the technology and resources of participating countries can be timely utilized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Rubaye ZR Mahjoob AMR (2020) Identify the main factors affecting labor productivity within different organizational structures in the Iraqi construction sector, in IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering 745(1):012146, IOP Publishing, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012146

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameyaw EE, Hu Y Shan M, Chan AP, Le Y (2016) Application of Delphi method in construction engineering and management research: A quantitative perspective. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 22(8):991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ani AA, Kriyantono R, Wulandari MP (2018) The analysis of public relations position within an organization structure and the implication of its role and function in various organizations. Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies 20(4)

  • Aureli S (2017) A comparison of content analysis usage and text mining in CSR corporate disclosure. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research 17:1–32, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v17_1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell E, Bryman A (2007) The ethics of management research: An exploratory content analysis. British Journal of Management 18(1): 63–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bočková K, Škoda M, Lengyelfalusy T (2019) Project management and its aspects in global organisation: Case study. Journal of Financial Economics 1(1):39–58, DOI: https://doi.org/10.12955/cbup.v7.1337

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett J, Behfar K, Kern MC (2007) Managing multi-cultural teams. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston, MA, Retrieved January 3, 2008, http://34.219.95.87/pdfs/Multicultural%20teams.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes N (2017) An island of constancy in a sea of change: Rethinking project temporalities with long-term megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management 35(7):1213–1224, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budayan C, Dikmen I, Talat Birgonul M, Ghaziani A (2018) A computerized method for delay risk assessment based on fuzzy set theory using MS Project™. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22(8):2714–2725, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0810-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo T, Alarcón LF, Pellicer Armiñana E (2018) Finding differences among construction companies management practices and their relation to project performance. Journal of Management in Engineering 34(3):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham JA, O’Reilly P (2019) Roles and responsibilities of PCs: A contingency model for PC effectiveness (No. JRC117576). Joint Research Centre (Sevillesite), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2760/55062

  • Demirkesen S, Ozorhon B (2017) Impact of integration management on construction project management performance. International Journal of Project Management 35(8):1639–1654, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit D, Mouton HDT, Kennel R, Stolze P (2012) Predictive control of series stacked flying-capacitor active rectifiers. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 9(2):697–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani N (2003) Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 8(4):597–607, DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara JM, Boyer LT (1981) Communication problems within construction. Journal of the Construction Division 107(4):551–557, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JCCEAZ.0000986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF, Money AH, Samouel P, Page M (2007) Research methods for business. Education+ Training

  • Hu Y, Chan AP, Le Y (2014) Understanding the determinants of program organization for construction megaproject success: Case study of the shanghai expo construction. Journal of Management in Engineering 31(5):05014019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Zhao X, Yu GS (2016) Risk identification and allocation in underground rail construction joint ventures: Contractors’ perspective. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 22(6):758–767, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.914095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irfan M, Malik MSA, Khel SSUHK (2020) Effect of factors of organizational structure influencing nonphysical waste in road projects of developing countries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 27(10):3135–3153, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2019-0327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha KN (2005) Attributes of a project coordinator. Proceedings of the 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, (7th-9th September), SOAS, University of London. Association of Researchers in Construction Management (1):115–124, https://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2005-0115-0124_Jha.pdf

  • Jha KN, Iyer CK (2006) What attributes should a PC possess?. Construction Management and Economics 24(9):977–988, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600781826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Diette JS, Dean RS, Cobb M, Brennan ML (2019) Validation of text-mining and content analysis techniques using data collected from veterinary practice management software systems in the UK. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 167:61–67, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen JT, Farid P, Torvatn T (2020) Project manager roles in a public change project: The case of a municipal merger. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior

  • Kerzner HR (2017) Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Ahn S, Park Y (2020) Risk identification and priority evaluation of military facility relocation by endowment and concession project. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 21(3):3–10, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2020.21.3.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwofie TE, Aigbavboa CO, Thwala WD (2019) Communication performance challenges in PPP projects: Cases of Ghana and South Africa. Built Environment Project and Asset Management

  • Kwon T-W, Lee K-T, Kim J-H, Kim J-J (Forthcoming) Proposal of hierarchical organization structure for negotiation consensus in multinational joint-client megaprojects: Case of US force relocation program in Korea. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4/COENG-12567

  • Lee S (2015) A study on the organizational communication difficulties: Focusing on overseas plant construction project. A Master’s Degree. Ewha Womans University

  • Lee K-T, Ann H, Kim J-W, Kim J-H (2021a) A comparative analysis of risk impacts on cost overrun between actual cases and managers’ perception on overseas construction projects. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 22(3):52–60, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2021.22.3.052

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee KT, Lee JM, Kim JH (2021b) Guidelines to support negotiation for sustainable international development based on hierarchical roles and responsibilities of project-based organizations. Journal of Management in Engineering 37(5):04021043, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000945

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KT, Park SJ, Kim JH (2022) Comparative analysis of managers’ perception in overseas construction project risks and cost overrun in actual cases: A perspective of the Republic of Korea. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2116940

  • Leung MY, Yu J, Chan YS (2013) Focus group study to explore critical factors of public engagement process for mega development projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 140(3): 04013061, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Arditi D, Wang Z (2015) Determinants of transaction costs in construction projects. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 21(5):548–558, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.897973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Amini-Abyaneh A, Hertogh M, Houwing EJ, Bakker H (2021) Collaborate to learn and learn to collaborate: A case of exploitative learning in the inter-organizational project. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 28(3):809–830, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manata B, Miller V, Mollaoglu S, Garcia AJ (2018) Measuring key communication behaviors in integrated project delivery teams. Journal of Management in Engineering 34(4):06018001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhieieva O, Waidmann M (2017) Communication management tools for managing projects in an intercultural environment. PM World Journal 6(8):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H, Van der Heyden L (1999) Organigraphs: Drawing how companies really work. Harvard Business Review 77:87–95, PMID: 10621269

    Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu B, Ochieng EG, Moobela C, Pretorius A (2017) Profiling causative factors leading to construction project delays in the United Arab Emirates. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 24(2):346–376, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-05-2015-0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen HV (2011) Risk and visibility in global supply chains: An empirical study. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Georgia State University

  • Ochieng EG, Price ADF (2009) Framework for managing multicultural project teams. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management 16(6):527–543, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980911002557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochieng EG Price ADF (2010) Managing cross-cultural communication in multicultural construction project teams: The case of Kenya and UK. International Journal of Project Management 28(5):449–460, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Othman E, Ahmed A (2013) Challenges of megaconstruction projects in developing countries. Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: An International Journal 5(1):730–746, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5592/otmcj.2013.1.10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petro Y, Gardiner P (2015) An investigation of the influence of organizational design on project portfolio success, effectiveness and business efficiency for project-based organizations. International Journal of Project Management 33(8):1717–1729, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute (PMI) (2021) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (7th ed.). Pennsylvania, USA: Project Management Institute, Inc. ISBN: 9781628256659

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose J, Lennerholt C (2017) Low cost text mining as a strategy for qualitative researchers. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 15(1):2–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryynänen H, Salminen RT (2014) Promoters in a matrix organization’s social network during industrial project sales. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 7(4):701–719, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-11-2013-0066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabri OK, Lædre O, Bruland A (2019) Why conflicts occur in roads and tunnels projects in Norway. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 25(3):252–264, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.8566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safakish G, Wood DA (2011) Approaches to communications and cultural issues to aid planning and execution of oil and gas sector mega projects. Energy Sources, Part B:Economics, Planning, and Policy 6(2):126–135, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567240802053277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • San Cristóbal JR, Fernández V, Diaz E (2018) An analysis of the main project organizational structures: Advantages, disadvantages, and factors affecting their selection. Procedia Computer Science 138:791–798, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm W (1954) The process and effects of mass communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055400297268

    Google Scholar 

  • Senaratne S, Ruwanpura M (2016) Communication in construction: A management perspective through case studies in Sri Lanka. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 12(1):3–18, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2015.1056721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usman A (2017) The effect of psychological wellbeing on employee job performance: Comparison between the employees of projectized and non-projectized organizations. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Organization Management 6(1):8–12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-026x.1000206

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan SK, Jha KN (2020) Critical risk factors in international construction projects: An Indian perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 27(5):1169–1190, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-04-2019-0220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang TK, Ford DN, Chong HY, Zhang W (2018) Causes of delays in the construction phase of chinese building projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 25(11):1534–1551, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2016-0227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikforss Ö, Löfgren A (2007) Rethinking communication in construction. Journal of Information Technology in Construction 12(23):337–346, https://www.itcon.org/2007/23

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram Cox J, Hassard J (2010) Discursive recontextualization in a public health setting. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 46(1):119–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu G, Liu C, Zhao X, Zuo J (2017) Investigating the relationship between communication-conflict interaction and project success among construction project teams. International Journal of Project Management 35(8):1466–1482, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue H, Zhang T, Wang Q, Liu S, Chen K (2022) Developing a unified framework for data sharing in the smart construction using text analysis. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 26(11):4359–4379, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-022-2037-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RJ, Jayasuriya S, Gunarathna C, Arashpour M, Xue X, Zhang G (2018) The evolution of stakeholder management practices in Australian mega construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 25(6):690–706, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2016-0168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Wang Z, Tang Y, Zhang Y (2020) Collaborative innovation for sustainable construction: The case of an industrial construction project network. IEEE Access 8:41403–41417, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2976563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Hwang BG, Phng W (2014) Construction project risk management in Singapore: Resources, effectiveness, impact, and understanding. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 18(1):27–36, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0045-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Ng ST, Lee SH, Xu FJ, Yang Y (2019) A domain knowledge incorporated text mining approach for capturing user needs on BIM applications. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 27(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-02-2019-0097

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, 04763, Korea

    Kyung-Tae Lee & Ju-Hyung Kim

  2. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 61801, USA

    Hannah Ahn

Authors
  1. Kyung-Tae Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hannah Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ju-Hyung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ju-Hyung Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, KT., Ahn, H. & Kim, JH. Project Coordinators’ Perceptions according to the Organization Structure to Reduce Communication Risks in Multinational Project. KSCE J Civ Eng 27, 915–929 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0862-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-0862-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation