Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion of “Effect of Site Conditions on Site Amplification Factors and Seismic Design Spectra for Bridges” by Muhammad Tariq A. Chaudhary

  • Structural Engineering
  • Discussions & Replies
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

In the present discussion, reliability of input parameters of site response analysis utilized by the author is investigated. Various issues such as selection of modulus reduction and damping curves, compatibility of input motion with reference site condition, and type of site response analysis are discussed here. Hence it seems that further clarifications by the author should be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Darendeli, M. B. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin, pp. 1–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskandarinejad, A., Jahanandish, M., and Zafarani, H. (2017). “Divergence between nonlinear and equivalent-linear 1D site response analyses for different VS realizations of typical clay sites.” Pure and Applied Geophysics, DOI: 10.1007/s00024-017-1586-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss, I. M. (2011). “Use of Vs30 to represent local site conditions.” Proc, 4th LASPEI/IAEE Int. Symposium Effects of Surface Geology on Strong Ground Motions, Santa Barbara, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaklamanos, J., Baise, L. G., Thompson, E. M., and Dorfmann, L. (2015). “Comparison of 1D linear, equivalent-linear, and nonlinear site response models at six KiK-net validation sites.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 69, pp. 207–219, DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.10.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, B., and Hashash, Y. M. A., Stewart, J. P., Rathje, E. M., Harmon, J. A., Musgrove, M. I., Campell, K. W., and Silva, W. J. (2016). “Relative differences between nonlinear and equivalent-linear 1D site response analyses.” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 1845–1865, DOI: 10.1193/051215EQS068M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottke, A. R. and Rathje, E. M. (2008). Technical Manual for Strata, PEER Report 2008/10. University of California, Berkeley, California, https://doi.org/nees.org/resources/strata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok, A. O. L., Stewart, J. P., and Hashash, Y. M. A. (2008). “Nonlinear ground-response analysis of Turkey Flat shallow stiff-soil site to strong ground motion.” Bulletin of Seismolgical Society of America, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 331–343, DOI: 10.1785/0120070009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathje, E. M., Kottke, A. R., and Trent, W. L. (2010). “Influence of input motion and site property variabilities on seismic site response analysis.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 607–619, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alireza Eskandarinejad.

Additional information

Author: Chaudhary, M. T. A. (2018) KSCE J. Civ. Eng., Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 2441–2450, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-017-1926-6 /Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Kuwait University, Safat, Kuwait (E-mail: mtariqch@hotmail.com)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eskandarinejad, A. Discussion of “Effect of Site Conditions on Site Amplification Factors and Seismic Design Spectra for Bridges” by Muhammad Tariq A. Chaudhary. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 3988–3989 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1507-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1507-3

Keywords

Navigation