Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Behavior of Precast Concrete Shear Walls with Different Confined Boundary Elements

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

To ensure the mechanical property of lapped spliced reinforcement and concrete confinement of boundary elements for precast concrete shears, two kinds of constraints, local constraint by additional spiral stirrups placed around each reinforcement splicing and overall constraint by lapped welding closed stirrups replacing traditional stirrups and ties, were proposed in this paper. Low-cyclic reversed loading tests were conducted on three full scale specimens, including one reference cast-in-situ specimen, one precast concrete specimen with local constraint and one precast concrete specimen with overall constraint. By comparing the aspects of strength, stiffness, ductility and energy-dissipation capacity with that of cast-in-situ specimen, it is found that local constraint and overall constraint can be considered equivalent. However, due to the over restraint by local constraint detail, the specimen with local constraint exhibited earlier yielding, poorer energy-dissipation capacity and better ductility than that with overall constraint. Coupled with the consideration of steel usage and construction simplicity, overall constraint detail should be preferred in practical engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2009). Guide to emulating cast-inplace detailing for seismic design of precast concrete structures, ACI, Farmington Hills, MI, p. 2.

  • American Concrete Institute (ACI) (2011). Building code requirements for structural concrete, ACI, Farmington Hills, MI, p. 230.

  • Einea, A., Yamane, T., and Tadros, M. K. (1995). “Grout-filled pipe splices for precast concrete construction.” PCI Journal, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 82–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henin, E. and Morcous, G. (2015). “Non-proprietary bar splice sleeve for precast concrete construction.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 83, pp. 154–162, DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.10.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, P. O. (2008). Evaluation of grout-filled mechanical splices for precast concrete construction, Report No. R-1512, Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wang, Y., Lu, Z., and Li, J. (2017). “Experimental study and numerical simulation of a laminated reinforced concrete shear wall with a vertical seam.” Applied Sciences-Basel, Vol. 7, No. 6, p. 629, DOI: 10.3390/app7060629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wang, Y., Lu, Z., and Xia, B. (2018). “Shaking table test and numerical simulation of a superimposed reinforced concrete shear wall structure.” Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 27, No. 2, p. e1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Wang, L., Lu, Z., and Wang, Y. (2018). “Experimental study of Lshaped precast RC shear walls with middle cast-in-situ joint.” Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. e1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Z., Wang, Z., Li, J., and Huang, B. (2017). “Studies on seismic performance of precast concrete columns with grouted splice sleeve.” Applied Sciences-Basel, Vol. 7, No. 6, p. 571, DOI:10.3390/app7060571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, D. I. and Smith, C. L. (1997). Noncontact lap splices in bridge column-shaft connections, Report No. WA-RD 417.1, Washington State Department of Transportation, Pullman, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Y. H., Han, S. W., and Lee, L. H. (2002). “Effect of boundary element details on the seismic deformation capacity of structural walls.” Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1583–1602, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, R. (1989). “Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural subassemblages from laboratory testing.” Bull. New Zealand Natl. Soc. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen IV, J. H. and Wallace, J. W. (2004). “Displacement-based design of slender reinforced concrete structural walls -experimental verification.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 4, pp. 618–630, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:4(618).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, J. W. and Moehle, J. P. (1992). “Ductility and detailing requirements of bearing wall buildings.” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 6, pp. 1625–1644, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:6 (1625).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. L., Wight, J. K., and Moehle, J. P. (1987). The 1985 Chile earthquake: observations on earthquake-resistant construction in Viña del Mar, Report UILU-ENG-87-2002, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, A. A. (2001). “Social and environmental benefits of precast concrete technology.” PCI Journal, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhangfeng Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, Z., Guo, Z. Seismic Behavior of Precast Concrete Shear Walls with Different Confined Boundary Elements. KSCE J Civ Eng 23, 711–718 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0700-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-0700-8

Keywords

Navigation