Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated Approaches for National Ecosystem Assessment in South Korea

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecosystem services are the benefits people obtain from ecosystem functions. Ecosystem services can be quantified through an ecosystem assessment. Its goal is to assess the effects of changes in the ecosystem to support human welfare. Ecosystem services assessment approaches support policy, decision-making, and implementation to protect biodiversity and ecosystem at national, regional and global levels. For natural resources management National Ecosystem Assessment (NEA) was recently undertaken in Belgium, Spain, France and the UK, along with other ecosystem assessments at the national level. In South Korea, sustainable use of ecosystem services has attracted the interest of a range of policy makers. Although there is a greater concern for biodiversity and ecosystem services, linking ecosystems with conservation planning in South Korea remains a challenge. There is no implementation, framework or manual for NEA at the national level. Thus, this study proposes integrated assessment approaches that could be applied for decision-making at the national level in South Korea. This study demonstrated conceptual approaches step by step description for supporting natural resources management at national level. The proposed approaches can provide useful information for ecosystem services assessment, habitat conservation, conservation planning, and decision-making at the national level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, S. (2013). “Definition and classification of ecosystem services for decision making.” Journal of Environmental Policy, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad, K. J., Semmens, D. J., and Winthrop, R. (2013). “Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona.” Ecosystem Services, Vol. 5, pp. 40–50, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagstad, K., Villa, F., Johnson, G., and Voigt, B. (2011). ARIES–ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services: A guide to models and data, version 1.0. ARIES report series, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, Y., Zhuang, C., Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., and Jiang, B. (2011). “Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed.” Ecological Complexity, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 177–183, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2011.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, B. A., Raymond, C., Crossman, N. D., and King, D. (2011). “Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies.” Conservation Biology, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 172–181, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739. 2010.01560.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2011). Conference of the Parties Decision X/2: Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020.

  • Chan, K. M., Shaw, M. R., Cameron, D. R., Underwood, E.C., and Daily, G. C. (2006). “Conservation planning for ecosystem services.” PLoS Biology, Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. e379, DOI: 10.1371/journal. pbio.0040379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H., Lee, W., Song, C., Forsell, N., Jeon, S., Kim, J. S., and Kim, S. R. (2016). “Selecting and applying quantification models for ecosystem services to forest ecosystems in South Korea.” Journal of Forestry Research, pp. 1–12, DOI: 10.1007/s11676-016-0259-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christin, Z. L., Bagstad, K. J., and Verdone, M. A. (2016). “A decision framework for identifying models to estimate forest ecosystem services gains from restoration.” Forest Ecosystems, Vo. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–12, DOI: 10.1186/s40663-016-0062-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M. G. and Kang, H. (2013). “A review of ecosystem service studies: concept, approach and future work in Korea.” Journal of Ecology and Environment, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.5141/ecoenv.2013.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., Groot, R.d., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., and Paruelo, J. (1997). “The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital.” Nature, Vol. 387, pp. 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., and Willemen, L. (2010). “Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making.” Ecological Complexity, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 260–272, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte, G. T., Ribeiro, M. C., and Paglia, A. P. (2016). “Ecosystem services modeling as a tool for defining priority areas for conservation.” PloS One, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 1–19, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0154573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBM Tools Database (2016). Ecosystem-Based Management (EBM) Tools Database, Available at http://ebmtoolsdatabase.org/, accessed 12 May 2016.

  • Egoh, B. N., Reyers, B., Carwardine, J., Bode, M., O’Farrell, P. J., Wilson, K. A., Possingham, H. P., Rouget, M., De Lange, W., and Richardson, D. M. (2010). “Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Little Karoo, South Africa.” Conservation Biology, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 1021–1030, DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01442.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Bode, M., and Richardson, D. M. (2009). “Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa.” Biological Conservation, Vol. 142, No. 3, pp. 553–562, DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egoh, B., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., and van Jaarsveld, A. S. (2008). “Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 127, No. 1, pp. 135–140, DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011). Our life insurance, our natural capital: An EUbiodiversity strategy to 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrier, S. and Wintle, B. A. (2009). Quantitative approaches to spatial conservation prioritization: Matching the solution to the need, Spatial conservation prioritization: Quantitative methods and computational tools, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frélichová, J., Vackár, D., Pártl, A., Loucková, B., Harmácková, Z. V., and Lorencová, E. (2014). “Integrated assessment of ecosystem services in the Czech Republic.” Ecosystem Services, Vol. 8, pp. 110–117, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.03.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Nieto, A. P., García-Llorente, M., Iniesta-Arandia, I., and Martín-López, B. (2013). “Mapping forest ecosystem services: From providing units to beneficiaries.” Ecosystem Services, Vol. 4, pp. 126–138, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimona, A. and van der Horst, D. (2007). “Mapping hotspots of multiple landscape functions: A case study on farmland afforestation in Scotland.” Landscape Ecology, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 1255–1264, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9105-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfenstein, J. and Kienast, F. (2014). “Ecosystem service state and trends at the regional to national level: A rapid assessment.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 36, pp. 11–18, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind. 2013.06.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, A. R., Mears, M., Maltby, L., and Warren, P. (2015). “Understanding spatial patterns in the production of multiple urban ecosystem services.” Ecosystem Services, Vol. 16, 33–46, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser. 2015.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ]KFRI (2011). The 5th national forestry inventory report, Korea Forest Research Institute (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, F., Treweek, J., Stickler, M. M., Henninger, N., and Venn, O. (2013). Weaving Ecosystem Services into Impact Assessment, Washington DC: World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, F. W., Londoño-Murcia, M. C., and Turner, W. R. (2011). “Global priorities for conservation of threatened species, carbon storage, and freshwater services: scope for synergy?.” Conservation Letters, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 355–363, DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X. 2011.00183.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, G. W., Chan, K. M., and Klien, C. J. (2012). “Identifying spatial priorities for protecting ecosystem services.” F1000Research, Vo. 1, pp. 1–17, DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.1-17.v1.

    Google Scholar 

  • MA (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being, Island Press, Washington, DC.

  • Maes, J., Egoh, B., Willemen, L., Liquete, C., Vihervaara, P., Schägner, J. P., Grizzetti, B., Drakou, E.G., Notte, A. L., Zulian, G., Bouraoui, F., Luisa Paracchini, M., Braat, L., and Bidoglio, G. (2012). “Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union.” Ecosystem Services, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 31–39, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules, C. R. and Pressey, R. L. (2000). “Systematic conservation planning.” Nature, Vol. 405, No. 6783, pp. 243–253, DOI: 10.1038/35012251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment (2012). A basic operational plan of the National Ecological Institute (in Korean).

  • Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Korea (2014). Korea’s national biodiversity strategy 2014-2018, Sejong special self-governing City, Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Mittermeier, C. G., and Robles Gil, P. (1999). Hotspots: Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions, CEMEX, SA,Agrupación Sierra Madre, SC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, M., Guerry, A., Arkema, K., Bagstad, K., and Villa, F. (2010). Capturing and quantifying the flow of ecosystem services in Silvestri S., Kershaw F., (eds.), Framing the flow: Innovative Approaches to Understand, Protect and Value Ecosystem Services Across Linked Habitats, UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A., and Kent, J. (2000). “Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities.” Nature, Vol. 403, No. 6772, pp. 853–858, DOI: 10.1038/35002501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R. and Ricketts, T. H. (2006). “Mapping the economic costs and benefits of conservation.” PLoS Biol, Vol. 4, No. 11, e360, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T. H., and Rouget, M. (2006). “Integrating economic costs into conservation planning.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vo. 21, No. 12, pp. 681–687, DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E., Mendoza, G., Regetz, J., Polasky, S., Tallis, H., Cameron, D., Chan, K. M., Daily, G. C., Goldstein, J., and Kareiva, P. M. (2009). “Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 4–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, E., Polasky, S., Lewis, D. J., Plantinga, A. J., Lonsdorf, E., White, D., Bael, D., and Lawler, J. J. (2008). “Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, No. 28, pp. 9471–9476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M. and Dinerstein, E. (2002). The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation, Annals of the Missouri Botanical garden, pp. 199–224, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings, C., Duraiappah, A., Larigauderie, A., and Mooney, H. (2011). “The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface.” Science, Vol. 331, No. 6021, pp. 1139–1140, DOI: 10.1126/science.1202400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, M.C., Martensen, A.C., Metzger, J. P., Tabarelli, M., Scarano, F., and Fortin, M. J. (2011). The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: A shrinking biodiversity hotspot, in: Biodiversity hotspots, Springer, pp. 405–434.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, E. W., Jaiteh, M., Levy, M. A., Redford, K. H., Wannebo, A. V., and Woolmer, G. (2002). “The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild The human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not.” BioScience, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 891–904, DOI: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter, M. and Remme, R. P. (2016). “Spatial prioritisation for conserving ecosystem services: Comparing hotspots with heuristic optimisation.” Landscape Ecology, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt, R., Dormann, C. F., Eppink, F. V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S. (2011). “A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead.” Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 630–636, DOI:10.1007/s10980-015-0258-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serna-Chavez, H., Schulp, C., Van Bodegom, P., Bouten, W., Verburg, P., and Davidson, M. (2014). “A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services.” Ecological Indicators, Vol. 39, pp. 24–33, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A., Wood, S., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., and Olwero, N. (2014). InVEST user’s guide, The natural capital project, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J., and Wege, D. C. (2005). Endemic bird areas of the world: Priorities for biodiversity conservation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. D., Anderson, B. J., Moilanen, A., Eigenbrod, F., Heinemeyer, A., Quaife, T., Roy, D. B., Gillings, S., Armsworth, P. R., and Gaston, K. J. (2013). “Reconciling biodiversity and carbon conservation.” Ecology Letters, Vol. 16, No. s1, pp. 39–47, DOI: 10.1111/ele.12054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, A. and Wilson, M. A. (2006). “Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer.” Ecological Economics, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 435–449, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, W. R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T. M., Costanza, R., Da Fonseca, G. A. B., and Portela, R. (2007). “Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services.” BioScience, Vol. 57, No. 10, pp. 868–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainger, L. A., King, D. M., Mack, R. N., Price, E. W., and Maslin, T. (2010). “Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions?.” Ecological Economics, Vol. 69, No. 5, pp. 978–987, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.12.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, L., Secades, C., Narloff, U., Bowles-Newark, N., Mapendembe, A., Booth, H., Brown, C., and Tierney, M. (2014). The role of national ecosystem assessments in influencing policy making. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 60, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: 10.1787/5jxvl3zsbhkk-en.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Haans Seidel Foundation Korea Office, Seoul, 04419, Korea

    Hyun-Ah Choi

  2. Dept. of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Korea

    Cholho Song, Woo-Kyun Lee & Seongwoo Jeon

  3. NuriNet, Anyang, 14054, Korea

    Jin Hyuk Gu

Authors
  1. Hyun-Ah Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cholho Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Woo-Kyun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seongwoo Jeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin Hyuk Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woo-Kyun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, HA., Song, C., Lee, WK. et al. Integrated Approaches for National Ecosystem Assessment in South Korea. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 1634–1641 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1664-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1664-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation