Skip to main content
Log in

Modified finance-based scheduling model with variable contractor-to-subcontractor payment arrangement

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finance-based scheduling approaches have been proposed in the literature to produce financially executable schedules in construction projects. Although some research has reported the importance of considering the time interval between subcontractors’ requests for payment and the actual disbursements on the cash flow calculation, which affects the accuracy of cash flow analysis, none of literature has considered the subcontractor payment time delay to help resolve the cash available limitation problems in the finance-based scheduling model. This paper modified the existing finance-based scheduling models to account for varying contractor-to-subcontractor payment arrangements (Billing Date: BD and Payment Time Delay: PTD) for individual work packages. The proposed method was validated using a five-activity project and was compared with the solution of the traditional method. The comparison of the results showed considerable differences of the financial performance of the proposed method. Finally, the sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the effect of two factors (BD and PTD) on the projected maximum overdrafts and financing costs. The analysis showed that shifting the BD toward the end of period increased the project finances but that extending the PTD decreased the project finances when the project period elapsed. Thus, the modified model enables managers to produce fewer project overdrafts and lower financing costs. In addition, the analysis demonstrates the usefulness of properly arranging subcontractor payments to meet the financial constraints of the contractor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abido, M. A., and Elazouni, A. M. (2011). “Multiobjective evolutionary finance-based scheduling: entire projects portfolio.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 85–97, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afshar, A. and Fathi, H. (2009). “Fuzzy multi-objective optimization of finance-based scheduling for construction projects with uncertainties in cost.” Engineering Optimization, Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 1063–1080, DOI: 10.1080/03052150902943004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, H. N. (1976). Construction performance control by networks, Willey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, H. N. and Walsh, M. A. (1983). Successful cost engineering, Willey, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alghazi, A., Selim, S. Z., and Elazouni, A. (2012). “Performance of shuffled frog-leaping algorithm in finance-based scheduling.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 396–408, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, M. M. and Elazouni, A. (2009). “Finance-based CPM/LOB scheduling of projects with repetitive non-serial activities.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 839–856, DOI: 10.1080/01446190903191764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au, T. and Hendrickson, C. (1986). “Profit measures for construction projects.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 273–286, DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1986)112:2(273).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. L., O’Brien, W. J., and Herbsman, Z. J. (2005). “Assessing the accuracy of cash flow models: The significance of payment conditions.” Journal of Mangement in Engineering and Mangement, Vol. 131, No. 6, pp. 669–676, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005).31:6(669).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elazouni, A. (2009). “Heuristic method for multi-project finance-based scheduling.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 199–211, DOI: 10.1080/01446190802673110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elazouni, A. M. and Gab-Allah, A. A. (2004). “Finance-based scheduling of construction projects using integer programming.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1, pp. 15–24, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:1(15).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elazouni, A. M. and Metwally, F. G. (2005). “Finance-based scheduling: tool to maximize project profit using improved genetic algorithms.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 4, pp. 400–412, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:4(400).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elazouni, A. M. and Metwally, F. G. (2007). “Expanding finance-based scheduling to devise overall-optimized project schedules.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 133, No. 1, pp. 86–90, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2007)133:1(86).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fathi, H. and Afshar, A. (2010). “GA-based multi-objective optimization of finance-based construction project scheduling.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 627–638, DOI: 10.1007/s12205-010-0849-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegazy, T. (2002). Computer-based construction project management, 1st Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, W., Liu, X., Chen, D., Cai, B., and Zhou, C. (2012). “Financebased scheduling for construction in China with improved genetic algorithms.” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, Vol. 7, No. 18, pp. 29–38, DOI: 10.4156/jcit.vol7.issue18.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, I. J. and Gilliam, M. H. (1999). Financial management for contractors, 3rd Ed., FMI, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K.-C., Ning, X., and Gao, H. (2009). “The fuzzy GA-based multiobjective financial decision support model for Chinese state-owned construction firms.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 402–414, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. E., Lim, T. K., and Arditi, D. (2012). “Stochastic project financing analysis system for construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 138, No. 3, pp. 376–389, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. S. and Wang, C. J. (2009). “Two-stage profit optimization model for linear scheduling problems considering cash flow.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 27, No. 11, pp. 1023–1037, DOI: 10.1080/01446190903233111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S.-S. and Wang, C.-J. (2008). “Resource-constrained construction project scheduling model for profit maximization considering cash flow.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 17, No. 8, pp. 966–974, DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S.-S. and Wang, C.-J. (2010). “Profit optimization for multiproject scheduling problems considering cash flow.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 12, pp. 1268–1278, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, R. (1995). “Resource-based model for automatic cash-flow forecasting.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 501–510, DOI: 10.1080/01446199500000058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navon, R. (1996). “Company-level cash-flow management.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 122, No. 1, pp. 22–29, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1996)122:1(22).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wisitsak Tabyang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tabyang, W., Benjaoran, V. Modified finance-based scheduling model with variable contractor-to-subcontractor payment arrangement. KSCE J Civ Eng 20, 1621–1630 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0581-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0581-z

Keywords

Navigation