Abstract
Despite having a lengthy screening process, the efficacy of airport security is a moot point, primarily due to the fact that there is a massive workload on the screeners. Passenger profiling will reduce the load on the screeners, hence improving security, while also reducing wait times for passengers. In order to summarize the overall process involved in the passenger profiling system, a systematic literature review of 85 sources has been conducted. The paper primarily focuses upon four research objectives, namely: Describing the models that can be utilized to develop a passenger's risk profile in airport security; Examining the strategies using which profiling can be utilized effectively; Pointing out potential challenges while also highlighting potential privacy concerns that may arise while using passenger profiling systems. In the end, the paper has a detailed case study of CAPPS II (Computer-Assisted Passenger Pre-screening Technology II), a real-life model, and an analysis of the factors that lead to its termination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
About FLYSEC - FLYSEC (2018) https://www.fly-sec.eu/about.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Act on the Protection of Personal Information, Japan (2020) https://www.ppc.go.jp/files/pdf/APPI_english.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Air Traffic Expansion is the biggest challenge facing airports (2017) ADB SAFEGATE Blog. https://blog.adbsafegate.com/air-traffic-expansion-is-biggest-challenge-facing-airports/. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Airport | History, Design, Layout, & Facts (1998, October 9). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/airport/Airport-security. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Airports must do more to increase operating capacity - De Juniac | Airlines (2018) IATA. https://airlines.iata.org/news/airports-must-do-more-to-increase-operating-capacity-de-juniac. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
American Civil Liberties Union (2003a) The Five Problems with CAPPS II. https://www.aclu.org/other/five-problems-capps-ii. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
American Civil Liberties Union (2003b) ACLU, Conservatives, Civil Rights Groups Agree: CAPPS II Raises. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-conservatives-civil-rights-groups-agree-capps-ii-raises-serious-privacy-and. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Barnett A (2004) CAPPS II: The Foundation of Aviation Security? Risk Anal 24(4):909–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00489.x
BBC News (2010). Would-be suicide bombers jailed for life. https://www.bbc.com/news/10600084. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Blast Mitigation Strategies for Non-Secure Areas at Airports (2018) PARAS Program for Applied Research in Airport Security, Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration. https://www.sskies.org/images/uploads/subpage/PARAS_0014.BlastMitigationStrategies.FinalGuidebook.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Bradley K, Rafter R, Smyth B (2000) Case-Based User Profiling for Content Personalization. Lecture Notes Comput Sci 62–72 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44595-1_7
California Consumer Privacy Act, 1.81.5 CA § 1798 (2018) https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?division=3.&part=4.&lawCode=CIV&title=1.81.5
Caulkins JP (2004) CAPPS II: A Risky Choice Concerning an Untested Risk Detection Technology. Risk Anal 24(4):921–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00491.x
Cavusoglu H, Kwark Y, Mai B, Raghunathan S (2013) Passenger profiling and screening for aviation security in the presence of strategic attackers. Decis Anal 10(1):63–81. https://doi.org/10.1287/deca.1120.0258
Chakrabarti S, Strauss A (2002) Carnival booth: an algorithm for defeating the computer-assisted passenger screening system. First Monday 7(10) https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i10.992
Charu A (2003) Flying while brown: federal civil rights remedies to post-9/11 airline racial profiling of South Asians. Asian Am Law J 10(2):215 https://doi.org/10.15779/z381z9q
Chen W, Huang Y, Yang H, Li J, Lu X (2021) A passenger risk assessment method based on 5G-IoT. EURASIP J Wireless Commun Network 2021(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-020-01886-z
Cole M (2014) Towards proactive airport security management: Supporting decision making through systematic threat scenario assessment. J Air Transp Manag 35:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.11.002
Colorado Privacy Act, CO, SB190 (2021) https://leg.colorado.gov/sites/default/files/2021a_190_signed.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Connecticut Data Privacy Act, CT, § 22–15 (2022) https://www.cga.ct.gov/2022/ACT/PA/PDF/2022PA-00015-R00SB-00006-PA.PDF. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Consumer Data Privacy Act, PA, HB2202 (2021a) https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billInfo/billInfo.cfm?sYear=2021a&sInd=0&body=h&type=b&bn=2202. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Consumer Data Protection Act, PA, HB2257 (2022) https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/billinfo/billinfo.cfm?syear=2021s&sind=0&body=H&type=B&bn=2257. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Consumer Data protection Act, VA § 59.1–575 (2021) https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacodefull/title59.1/chapter53/. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Consumer Privacy Act, UT, SB227 (2022) https://le.utah.gov/~2022/bills/static/SB0227.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Consumer Privacy Protection Act, Canada (2022) https://www.parl.ca/legisinfo/en/bill/44-1/c-27. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Cooper S (2012) Aviation security: biometric technology and risk based security aviation passenger screening program. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California
Data Protection Act, United Kingdom (2018) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2018/12/contents. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
DeGrave M J (2004) Airline passenger profiling and the fourth amendment: will CAPPS II be cleared for takeoff. BUJ Sci & Tech L 10:125
Department of Homeland Security (2008) Privacy impact assessment for the screening of passengers by observation Techniques (SPOT) Program. In dhs.gov. Link: https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy_pia_tsa_spot.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
DHS (2016) Budget-in-brief fiscal year 2016. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC
Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, Republic of India (2022) https://www.meity.gov.in/content/digital-personal-data-protection-bill-2022. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Ergün N, Açıkel BY, Turhan U (2017) The appropriateness of today’s airport security measures in safeguarding airline passengers. Secur J 30(1):89–105. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2014.41
Fiala IJ (2003) Anything new? The racial profiling of terrorists. Crim Justice Stud 16(1):53–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08884310309610
Fishel JPT (2015) EXCLUSIVE: Undercover DHS Tests Find Security Failures at US Airports. ABC News. https://abcnews.go.com/US/exclusive-undercover-dhs-tests-find-widespread-security-failures/story?id=31434881. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Fletcher C (2011) Aviation security: a case for risk-based passenger screening. Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, California
Ford J, Faghri A, Yuan D, Gayen S (2020) An Economic Study of the US Post-9/11 Aviation Security. Open J Bus Manag 08(05):1923–1945. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2020.85118
General Data Protection Regulation, Official Journal of the European Union (2018) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679 Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Hasisi B, Margalioth Y, Orgad L (2012) Ethnic profiling in airport screening: lessons from Israel, 1968–2010. Am Law Econ Rev 14(2):517–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahs009
How 9/11 changed air travel: more security, less privacy (2021) AP NEWS. https://apnews.com/article/how-sept-11-changed-flying-1ce4dc4282fb47a34c0b61ae09a024f4. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
IATA (2018) 20-year passenger forecast | Airlines. https://www.airlines.iata.org/data/20-year-passenger-forecast. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
IATA (2021) Optimism for travel restart as borders reopen | Airlines. https://www.airlines.iata.org/news/optimism-for-travel-restart-as-borders-reopen. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
IATA (2022) Air passenger numbers to recover in 2024 [Press release]. https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2022-releases/2022-03-01-01/
International Civil Aviation Orgainzation (2014) Cabin crew safety training manual. Link: http://www.aviationchief.com/uploads/9/2/0/9/92098238/icao_doc_10002_-_cabin_crew_safety_training_manual_1.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Janssen S, Sharpanskykh A, Curran R (2019) AbSRiM: an agent-based security risk management approach for airport operations. Risk Anal 39(7):1582–1596. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13278
Jones (2003). Travel industry and privacy groups object to a U.S. Screening Plan for Airline Passengers. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/06/business/travel-industry-privacy-groups-object-us-screening-plan-for-airline-passengers.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Knol A, Sharpanskykh A, Janssen S (2019) Analyzing airport security checkpoint performance using cognitive agent models. J Air Transp Manag 75:39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.11.003
Kyriazanos DM, Segou OE, Zalonis A, Thomopoulos SCA (2016) FlySec: a risk-based airport security management system based on security as a service concept. Signal Processing, Sensor/Information Fusion, and Target Recognition XXV. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2224031
Lazar Babu VL, Batta R, Lin L (2006) Passenger grouping under constant threat probability in an airport security system. Eur J Oper Res 168(2):633–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.007
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Federative Republic of Brazil (2018) [Translation taken from https://iapp.org/resources/article/brazilian-data-protection-law-lgpd-english-translation/]. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
McLay LA, Jacobson SH, Kobza JE (2006) A multilevel passenger screening problem for aviation security. Nav Res Logist 53(3):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20131
McLay LA, Jacobson SH, Nikolaev AG (2009) A sequential stochastic passenger screening problem for aviation security. IIE Trans 41(6):575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170802510416
Michalski Marcin Jurgilewicz, Kubiak Mariusz, Grądzka Anna (2020) The Implementation of Selective Passenger Screening Systems Based on Data Analysis and Behavioral Profiling in the Smart Aviation Security Management – Conditions, Consequences and Controversies. J Secur Sustain Issues 9(4) https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2020.9.4(2)
Milestones in International Civil Aviation (2014) https://www.icao.int/about-icao/History/Pages/Milestones-in-International-Civil-Aviation.aspx. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Ministry of Civil Aviation, India (2018) Digi Yatra. Reimagining Air Travel in India,. https://www.civilaviation.gov.in/sites/default/files/Digi%20Yatra%20Policy%2009%20Aug%2018.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
New Federal Act on Data Protection, the Swiss Confederation (2022) fedlex.admin.ch/eli/oc/2022/491/de [Translated using Google Translate]
New Jersey Disclosure and Accountability Transparency Act, NJ, A505 (2022) https://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bill-search/2022/A505. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Nicas J (2015) Homeland Security Chief Orders Changes at TSA After Failed Tests. WSJ. https://www.wsj.com/articles/homeland-security-chief-orders-changes-at-tsa-after-failed-tests-1433217024?mod=article_inline. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Nie X, Batta R, Drury CG, Lin L (2009) Passenger grouping with risk levels in an airport security system. Eur J Oper Res 194(2):574–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.027
Nikolaev AG, Lee AJ, Jacobson SH (2012) Optimal Aviation Security Screening Strategies With Dynamic Passenger Risk Updates. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 13(1):203–212. https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2011.2167230
Ohio Personal Privacy Act, OH, HB376 (2021b) https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/legislation-documents?id=GA134-HB-376. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Personal Data Privacy Act, MI, SB1182 (2022) https://legiscan.com/MI/bill/SB1182/2021. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Personal Data Protection Act, Republic of Singapore (2012) https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/PDPA2012?Timeline=Off
Personal Information Privacy Law, People’s Republic of China (2021) [Translation taken from https://digichina.stanford.edu/work/translation-personal-information-protection-law-of-the-peoples-republic-of-china-effective-nov-1-2021/]. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Polls on war on terrorism (2003) Pollingreport. https://web.archive.org/web/20030208051602/https://www.pollingreport.com/terror2.htm. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Poole W (2007) Airport Security: Time for a New Model. In The Economic Costs and Consequences of Terrorism. Edward Elgar Publishing
Poole RW, Passantino G (2003) A risk-based airport security policy (No. Policy Study 308). Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, CA. https://web.archive.org/web/20180514080116id_/https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/359408528b992e7d0804df1b590dd424.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Privacy Act, Commonwealth of Australia (1988) https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2022C00321. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Privacy Act, New Zealand (2020) https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0031/latest/LMS23223.html
Ravich TM (2005) Airline passenger profiling systems after 9/11: personal privacy versus national security. J Transp Res Forum. https://doi.org/10.5399/osu/jtrf.44.2.856
Rochow-Leuschner (2004) CAPPS II and the Fourth Amendment: Does It Fly. J Air Law Commerce 69(1):139
Schiaffino S, Amandi A (2009) Intelligent User Profiling. Artif Intell Int Perspect 193–216 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03226-4_11
Secure Flight: Additional Actions Needed to Determine Program Effectiveness and Strengthen Privacy Oversight Mechanisms (2015) United States Government Accountability Office. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-14-796t.pdf
Solove DJ (2002) Digital dossiers and the dissipation of fourth amendment privacy. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.313301
Stewart MG, Mueller J (2011) Cost-benefit analysis of advanced imaging technology full body scanners for airline passenger security screening. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manag 8(1) https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1837
Stewart MG, Mueller J (2015) Responsible policy analysis in aviation security with an evaluation of PreCheck. J Air Transp Manag 48:13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.06.007
Taipale KK (2003–2004) Data mining and domestic security: connecting the dots to make sense of data. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 5:1–83
Transportation Security Administration (2003a) TSA Selects Lockheed Martin Management and Data Systems to Build TSA Passenger Pre-Screening System [Press release]. https://web.archive.org/web/2003a1023132934/www.tsa.gov/public/display?content=248. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Transportation Security Administration (2003b) New Notice Outlines Changes to CAPPS II System [Press release]. https://web.archive.org/web/20050520082925/; http://www.tsa.gov/public/display?content=634. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
TSA: TSA Weekly (2009) https://web.archive.org/web/20090923203333/http://www.tsa.gov/weekly/051809.shtm. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
USATODAY.com - Travel - News - Lawmakers question progress in airline security since Sept. 11. (2002) https://web.archive.org/web/20030625161631/http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/2002/2002-07-23-security-hearing.htm. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Wald ML (2001) Long Before Verdict, Lockerbie Changed Airport Security. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/31/world/long-before-verdict-lockerbie-changed-airport-security.html
Wald ML, Schwartz J (2004 19). Expansion Sank Terror Screening Program, Officials Say. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/19/politics/expansion-sank-terror-screening-program-officials-say.html. Accessed 18 Nov 2022
Zhao S, Li S, Ramos J, Luo Z, Jiang Z, Dey AK, Pan G (2019) User profiling from their use of smartphone applications: A survey. Pervasive Mobile Comput 59:101052https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.101052
Zhao Z, Zhao Y, Li X, Li Z (2020) Agent-based modeling and analysis of airport passenger differentiated security strategy. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computer modeling and simulation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408066.3408091
Zheng YJ, Sheng WG, Sun XM, Chen SY (2017) Airline Passenger Profiling Based on Fuzzy Deep Machine Learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(12):2911–2923. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2016.2609437
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: Ajay Sudharshan Satish, Akul Mangal, Prathamesh Churi; Methodology: [Ajay Sudharshan Satish, Akul Mangal, Prathamesh Churi; Formal analysis and investigation: Ajay Sudharshan Satish, Akul Mangal; Writing—original draft preparation: Ajay Sudharshan Satish, Akul Mangal; Writing—review and editing: Ajay Sudharshan Satish, Akul Mangal, Prathamesh Churi; Supervision: Prathamesh Churi.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Competing interest
The authors of this research study declare that there is NO competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Satish, A.S., Mangal, A. & Churi, P. A systematic review of passenger profiling in airport security system: Taking a potential case study of CAPPS II. J Transp Secur 16, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-023-00260-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-023-00260-6