Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

U.S. Small Business Administration loans and U.S. state-level employment

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) lending programs and state-level employment from the early 1990s to 2013 using quarterly panel data for U.S. states with fixed effects. The results show a positive statistical relationship between the growth in SBA lending per capita and the change in the state’s civilian employment rates. Despite these statistically significant relationships, the coefficient sizes are small. An analysis of high and low personal income states shows no meaningful differences in the relationship between SBA lending and employment across these groups. These findings support the idea that SBA lending programs may help with the public policy goal of assisting small businesses and may contribute to the finance–growth nexus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) loan program performance is available on their website: https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/aboutsbaarticle/WDS_Table1_UPB_Report.pdf

  2. See the SBA Weekly Lending reports, which are made available on their website: https://www.sba.gov/about-sba/sba-newsroom/weekly-lending-report.

  3. This terminology could be credited to Jayaratne and Strahan (1996).

  4. The empirical analysis experimented with a time trend dummy, but this was subsequently dropped, as it was not statistically significant and did not add to the overall explanatory power of the models.

  5. See Davidson and MacKinnon (2004, pp 214–15).

  6. In contrast, Armstrong et al. (2014), Craig et al. (2007), and Craig et al. (2008) did not consider recessions in their analysis that was confined to a period between 1991 and 2001. However, Brown and Earle (2017) offer a dummy variable for the high unemployment period in their study that covered the period from 1992 until 2009, so this would have acted in a similar manner as the NBER variable.

  7. PLP is a designation given to certain banks by the SBA that allows them to authorize guaranteeing loans on behalf of the U.S. SBA without the SBA’s prior review.

  8. Other variables, such as education, were considered, but the change in state-level college educated population as a percentage of the entire population was not significant.

References

  • Acs Z, Audretsch D (1990) Innovation and small firms. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson TW, Hsiao C (1981) Estimation of dynamic models with error components. J Am Stat Assoc 76(375):598–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong C, Craig B, Jackson WE, Thomason JB (2014) The moderating influence of financial market development on the relationship between loan guarantees for SMEs and local employment rates. J Small Bus Manag 52(1):126–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Debreu G (1954) Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica 22(3):265–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett RJ (2013) Entrepreneurship, small business and public policy. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin M, Mester LJ (1999) Deposits and relationship lending. Rev Financ Stud 12(3):579–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Black S, Strahan P (2002) Entrepreneurship and bank credit availability. J Financ 57(6):2807–2833

    Google Scholar 

  • Brash R, Gallagher M (2008) A performance analysis of SBA’s loan and investment programs. The Urban Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JD, Earle JS (2017) Finance and growth at the firm level: evidence from SBA loans. J Financ 72(3):1039–1080

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce D, Deskins JA, Hill BC, Rork JC (2009) (Small) business activity and state economic growth: does size matter? Reg Stud 43(2):229–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow GC (1960) Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28(3):591–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig B, Thomason JB (2003) Federal home loan bank lending to community banks: are targeted subsidies desirable? J Financ Serv Res 23(1):5–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig B, Jackson WE, Thomason JB (2007) Small firm finance, credit rationing, and the impact of SBA-guaranteed lending on local economic growth. J Small Bus Manag 45(1):116–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig B, Jackson WE, Thomason JB (2008) Credit market failures intervention: do government-sponsored small business credit programs enrich poorer areas? Small Bus Econ 30(4):345–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig B, Jackson WE, Thomason JB (2009) The economic impact of the Small Business Administration’s intervention in the small firm credit market: a review of the research literature. J Small Bus Manag 47(1):221–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson R, MacKinnon J (2004) Econometric theory and methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilger R (2018) Small business administrative and job creation. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenach J (2011) The impact of state employment policies on job growth: a 50-state review. US Chamber of Commerce. https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/legacy/reports/201103WFI_StateBook.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019

  • Giles DE (2017) On the inconsistency of instrumental variables estimators for the coefficients of certain dummy variables. J Quant Econ 15(1):15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith RW (1969) Financial structure and development. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiso L, Sapienza P, Zingales L (2004) Does local financial development matter? Q J Econ 119(3):929–969

    Google Scholar 

  • Haltiwanger J, Jarmin R, Miranda J (2013) Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Rev Econ Stat 95(2):347–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Headd B (2010) An analysis of small business and jobs. US Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy

  • Jayaratne J, Strahan P (1996) The finance–growth nexus: evidence from bank branch deregulation. Q J Econ 111(3):639–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Judson R, Owen A (1999) Estimating dynamic panel data models: a practical guide for macroeconomists. Econ Lett 65(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane E (1977) Good intentions and unintended evil: the case against selective credit allocations. J Money Credit Bank 9(1):55–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane E (2010) The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Kauffman Foundation

  • King RG, Levine R (1993a) Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. Q J Econ 108:717–738

    Google Scholar 

  • King RG, Levine R (1993b) Finance, entrepreneurship, and growth: theory and evidence. J Monet Econ 32:513–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff BA, Phillips BD (1988) The effect of firm formation and growth on job creation in the United States. J Bus Ventur 3(4):261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobe K (2012) How did the financial crisis affect small business lending in the United States? Small Business Administration Office of Advocacy, research issue no. 10-M-0258

  • Kuratko DF, Hodges RM (1998) Entrepreneurship: a contemporary approach. Dryden Press, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP, Krull JL, Lockwood CM (2000) Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci 1(4):173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell S (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49(6):1417–1426

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajan RG, Zingales L (1998) Financial dependence and growth. Am Econ Rev 88(3):559–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J (1952) The rate of interest and other essays. MacMillan, London, pp 67–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1911) Theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw ES (1973) Financial deepening in economic development. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J, Weiss A (1981) Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am Econ Rev 71(3):393–410

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul E. Orzechowski.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 4 Distribution of SBA loans by U.S. states
Table 5 Distribution of SBA loans and GDP share by U.S. states

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orzechowski, P.E. U.S. Small Business Administration loans and U.S. state-level employment. J Econ Finan 44, 486–505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-09495-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-019-09495-3

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation