Abstract
Investor sentiment rather than aggregate stock wealth predicts changes in non-durable consumer spending across different economic cycles above and beyond housing wealth, labor income, and other macro-economic factors. A statistically and economically significant positive contemporaneous relationship exists between investor sentiment and current nondurable spending, whereas sentiment negatively predicts later spending. Consumers adjust their spending patterns along with sentiment about the stock market, then reverse sentiment-based consumption smoothing when biased market expectations do not come to fruition. Investors’ biased beliefs about stock returns affect consumers purchasing decisions and, thus, the overall .
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our lag order tests indicate that a one month lagged error correction term is best for our monthly data, see Table 5.
References
Arif S, Lee CMC (2014) Aggregate investment and investor sentiment. Rev Financ Stud 27(11):3241–3279
Bagchi S (2011) Can overconfidence explain the consumption hump? J Econ Financ 35(1):41–70
Baker M, Wurgler J (2006) Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. J Financ 61(4):1645–1680
Baker M, Wurgler J (2007) Investor sentiment in the stock market. J Econ Perspect 21(2):129–151. Spring
Beeler J, Campbell JY (2012) The long-run risks model and aggregate asset prices: an empirical assessment. Crit Finance Rev 1(1):141–182
Case KE, Quigley JM, Shiller RJ (2005) Comparing wealth: The stock market versus the housing market. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics: Advances in Macroeconomics, 5 (1): Article 1
Case KE, Quigley JM, Shiller RJ (2013) Critical finance review. Critical Finance Review 2 (1)
Choi JJ (2006) Extrapolative expectations and the equity premium. Working Paper, Yale University
Da Z, Engelberg J, Gao P (2011) In search of attention. The Journal of Finance, 66 (5)
Davidson JEH, Hendry DF, Srba F, Yeo S (1978) Econometric modelling of the aggregate time-series relationship between consumers’ expenditure and income in the United Kingdom. Econ J 88(352):661–692
Dumas B, Kurshev A, Uppal R (2009) Equilibrium portfolio strategies in the presence of sentiment risk and excess volatility. J Financ 64(2):579–629
Esqueda OA, Luo Y, Jackson DO (2013) The linkage between the u.s. “fear index” and adr premiums under non-frictionless stock markets. J Econ Financ 39(3):541–556
Hamilton JD (1994) Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Han B (2008) Investor sentiment and option prices. Rev Financ Stud 21(1):387–414
Hirshleifer D, Li J, Jianfeng Y (2015) Asset pricing in production economies with extrapolative expectations. Working Paper, UC Irvine Merage School of Business
Huang D, Jiang F, Jun T, Zhou G (2014) Investor sentiment aligned: a powerful predictor of stock returns. Forthcoming, Review of Financial Studies
Keloharju M, Knpfer S, Linnainmaa J (2012) Do investors buy what they know? product market choices and investment decisions. Rev Financ Stud 25(10):2921–2958
Lansing KJ (2006) Lock-in of extrapolative expectations in an asset pricing model. Macroecon Dyn 10(03):317–348
Lemmon M, Portniaguina E (2006) Consumer confidence and asset prices: Some empirical evidence. Rev Financ Stud 19(4):1499–1529
Lettau M, Ludvigson S (2001) Consumption, aggregate wealth, and expected stock returns. J Financ 56(3):815–849
Ludvigson S, Steindel C (1999) How important is the stock market effect on consumption? Economic Policy Review, (July):29–51
Shapiro MD, Slemrod J (2001) Consumer response to tax rebates. Working paper, NBER
Shapiro MD, Slemrod JB (2009) Did the 2008 tax rebates stimulate spending? Technical Report 14753. Working paper, NBER
Shiller R (2013) Reflections on finance and the good society. Working paper, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 1894
Xuefeng L, Xu H (2003) The weak effect of wealth in chinese stock markets. Nankai Econ Stud 3:1–13
Acknowledgments
We are thankful for helpful comments from: David Hirshleifer, Zheng Sun, Kerry Vandell, Nzinga Broussard, Stephanie Fortune and seminar participants at the PhD Project FDSA conference, the University of Maryland, the University of Western Ontario, the University of Miami, Syracuse University and the College of Charleston.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A: Definitions of variables
Variables with an asterisk are per capita.
Main variables
- *Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE). :
-
Nondurable, durable, and service expenditures from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Data is annualized, seasonally adjusted, and inflation adjusted.
- Investor Stock Sentiment (sent, sent_o). :
-
From Baker and Wurgler (2006) and Baker and Wurgler (2007), sent is an index of stock market sentiment indicators, standardized to be approximately mean zero with unit standard deviation. Sent_o has been orthogonalized to macroeconomic business cycle variables. See Baker and Wurgler (2007) for details. In order to take the natural log of sentiment, sent and sent_o are transformed to a mean of 100 and an annual standard deviation of 20. Hence, sentiment is assumed to be approximately as volatile as the stock market.
- *Disposable Income. :
-
Total after-tax personal income, from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Data is annualized, seasonally adjusted, and inflation adjusted.
- *Federal Housing Finance Agency Home Price Index (FHFA). :
-
A quarterly U.S. home price index based on actual sales transactions and appraisal transactions. Monthly data is constructed from quarterly data with cubic spline interpolation. Data is inflation adjusted.
- *S&P 500 Stock Index (SP500). :
-
The Standard and Poor’s 500 U.S. equity index.
- *Deposits :
-
Total customer deposits in U.S. chartered banks, from the Federal Reserve. Data is inflation adjusted.
Control and robustness test variables
- Unemployment rate :
-
The unemployment rate as a percentage of the active labor force. Data is seasonally adjusted.
- *Industrial production :
-
Index of industrial production from the Federal Reserve. Data is seasonally adjusted and inflation adjusted.
- *Consumer credit :
-
Total outstanding debt from consumer credit, from the Federal Reserve. Consumer credit excludes loans secured by real estate. Data is seasonally adjusted and inflation adjusted
- Income/Debt :
-
The ratio of disposable income to total consumer credit.
- *GDP :
-
Chained GDP, seasonally adjusted and inflation adjusted with the chained method.
- *Saved income :
-
Disposable income less total personal consumption expenditures. Data is seasonally adjusted and inflation adjusted
- Consumer confidence (Conf) :
-
The Conference Board’s monthly index of consumer outlook.
- UM Consumer sentiment (Cons sent) :
-
The University of Michigan index of consumer outlook.
- CBOE Volatility Index. :
-
The Chicago Board of Options Exchange provides two indices to capture the implied volatility of index-options. The VIX since January 1990 is implied volatility on the S&P 500 index and the VXO since June 1986 is implied volatility on the S&P 100.
- Interaction of sentiment and SP500 :
-
The product of sentiment and the SP500 level.
- Interaction of sentiment and SP500 squared :
-
The square of the product of sentiment and the SP500 level.
- High and low sentiment indicators :
-
The high sent_o indicator variable has a value of one if sentiment is more than one standard deviation above its mean, and zero otherwise. The low sent_o indicator variable has a value of one if sentiment is less than one standard deviation below its mean, and zero otherwise. interactions.
Appendix B: Index option implied volatility as a measure of risk expectations
In models with a stochastic discount factor (SDF), stock market risk can be defined as the negative of covariance between the SDF and stock returns:
where m is the SDF and r is the stock return. ρ m,r is the correlation between the SDF and returns; σ m and σ r is SDF volatility and return volatility respectively. C o v(m,r) is not realized risk, it is the expectation of what realized risk will be. So σ r is not realized stock market volatility, it is expected volatility, which is reflected in stock index option prices as implied volatility.
If σ r goes up, then all else equal, risk also goes up. SDF volatility or the correlation between returns and the SDF would have to also change in order for implied stock volatility and expected risk to move in opposite directions. A sufficient condition for implied volatility to be a same sign proxy for risk is:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ZarBabal, K., Evans, J. Does wall street affect main street? examining potential spillovers from investor stock market sentiment to personal consumption expenditures. J Econ Finan 42, 293–314 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-017-9394-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-017-9394-x