Skip to main content
Log in

The role of HFTs in order flow toxicity and stock price variance, and predicting changes in HFTs’ liquidity provisions

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines relations between high frequency trading, order flow toxicity, stock price volatility during normal and high order flow toxicity periods, and the predictability of changes in high frequency traders’ liquidity supply and demand. By employing volume-synchronized probability of informed trading (VPIN), a flow toxicity metric, we find a negative relation between high frequency trading and order flow toxicity. Our results also show that VPIN can be a good predictor of high frequency traders’ liquidity supply and demand changes. Finally, we find that high frequency traders’ impact on stock price variance is not uniform and change with order flow toxicity levels and stock volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The NASDAQ high frequency dataset includes 120 stocks.

  2. Cartea and Penalva (2012), Jarrow and Protter (2012) and Biais et al. (2015) develop theoretical models to describe the impact of HFTs.

  3. Brogaard (2010), Kearns et al. (2010), Menkveld (2013), Kirilenko et al. (2012), Brogaard et al. (2014) and Carrion (2013) empirically examine HFTs from different perspectives.

  4. Participation definitions are similar to those of Brogaard (2010).

  5. We winsorize “price” at 0.01 and 99.9 percentiles to eliminate the impact of any outliers as in Hendershott et al. (2011).

  6. We discuss the findings of Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, but do not report the results. The findings are available upon request.

  7. Exceptions are: after 1 window, which is significant at 10 % level, and after 5 window, which is statistically insignificant.

  8. Our approach is similar to that of Andersen and Bondarenko (2014a–b).

References

  • Abad D, Yague J (2012) From PIN to VPIN: an introduction to order flow toxicity. The Spanish Review of Financial Economics 10:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn TS, Hwang I, Kim MI (2010) The impact of performance measure discriminability on ratee incentives. Account Rev 85(2):389–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen TG, Bondarenko O (2014a) VPIN and the flash crash. J Financ Mark 17:1–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen TG, Bondarenko O (2014b) Assessing measures of order flow toxicity and early warning signals for market turbulence. Review of Finance, Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Ané T, Geman H (2000) Order flow, transaction clock, and normality of asset returns. J Financ 55(5):2259–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethel EW, Leinweber D, Rubel O, Wu K (2012) Federal market information technology in the post-flash crash era: roles for supercomputing. Journal of Trading 7(2):9–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biais B, Foucault T, Moinas S (2015) Equilibrium high-frequency trading. J Financ Econ 116(2):292–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume L, Easley D, O’Hara M (1994) Market statistics and technical analysis: the role of volume. J Financ 49(1):153–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brogaard J (2010) High frequency trading and its impact on market quality. Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management Working Paper

  • Brogaard J, Hendershott T, Riordan R (2014) High-frequency trading and price discovery. Rev Financ Stud 27(8):2267–2306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrion A (2013) Very fast money: high-frequency trading on the NASDAQ. J Financ Mark 16(4):680–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartea Á, Penalva J (2012) Where is the value in high frequency trading?. The. Quarterly Journal of Finance 2(03):1250014

  • Clark PK (1973) A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica journal of the econometric. Society:135–155

  • Easley D, O’Hara M (1992) Time and the process of security price adjustment. J Financ 47(2):577–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, Engle RF, O’Hara M, Wu L (2008) Time-varying arrival rates of informed and uninformed trades. J Financ Econ 6(2):171–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, López de Prado M, O’Hara M (2011) The microstructure of the ‘flash crash’: flow toxicity, liquidity crashes and the probability of informed trading. The Journal of Portfolio Management 37(2):118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley D, de Prado MML, O’Hara M (2012) Flow toxicity and liquidity in a high-frequency world. Rev Financ Stud 25(5):1457–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott T, Jones CM, Menkveld AJ (2011) Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? J Financ 66(1):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott T, Riordan R, Trading A, the Market for Liquidity (2013) Journal of. Financial and Quantitative Analysis 48(4):1001–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow RA, Protter P (2012) A dysfunctional role of high frequency trading in electronic markets. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 15(03):1250022

  • Jones CM, Kaul G, Lipson ML (1994) Transactions, volume, and volatility. Rev Financ Stud 7(4):631–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, M., Kulesza, A., and Nevmyvaka, Y. (2010). Empirical limitations on high frequency trading profitability. Available at SSRN 1678758.

  • Kirilenko, A., Kyle, A., Samadi, M., and Tuzun, T. (2012). The Flash Crash: The impact of high frequency trading on an electronic market. Available at SSRN 1686004.

  • Menkveld AJ (2013) High frequency trading and the new-market makers. J Financ Mark 16(4):712–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menkveld, A. J., and Yueshen, B. Z., (2013), Anatomy of the Flash Crash (April 10, 2013) Available from SSRN: http:/ssrn.com/abstract=2243520

  • Newey, W. K., and West, K. D., (1987), A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55(3):703–708

  • Paternoster R, Brame R, Mazerolle P, Piquero A (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36:859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei WC, Gerace D, Frino A (2013) Informed trading, flow toxicity and the impact on intraday trading factors. Australian accounting business and finance. Journal 7:3–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu K, Bethel W, Gu M, Leinweber D, Rübel O (2013) (2013). A big data approach to analyzing market volatility. Algorithmic Finance 2:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F. (2010). High-frequency trading, stock volatility, and price discovery. Available at SSRN 1691679.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Van Ness.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Ness, B.F., Van Ness, R.A. & Yildiz, S. The role of HFTs in order flow toxicity and stock price variance, and predicting changes in HFTs’ liquidity provisions. J Econ Finan 41, 739–762 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9374-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9374-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation