Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Foreign direct investment in the Dominican Republic: consequences and recommendations for sustainable growth

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 21 June 2016

Abstract

This research, using a production function methodology, examines the effects of international trade and foreign direct investment (FDI) liberalization policies on the economy of the Dominican Republic during the 1990s. Most of the FDI was in the free trade zone (FTZ) sector. The results have important ramifications on current policies to promote sustainable economic growth. The econometric results indicate evidence of unbalanced growth characterized by regional and technological dualism: (a) an efficient FTZ sector, highly dependent on FDI, and operating under increasing returns to scale, and (b) a relatively inefficient primary/secondary sector operating under decreasing returns to scale. These growth strategies fail to establish economic linkages between different economic sectors; also they focus on the development of the FTZ sector whose contribution to GDP averages only about 3 %. Policies to promote sustainable growth necessitate strategies to develop and diversify the primary/service sectors. Importantly, recently revised agreements on international trade will lessen the competitiveness of the FTZ sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. EPZs are geographical areas of the country, subject to special customs and tax controls established by law, in which companies manufacturing products or providing services for foreign markets receive certain tax incentives necessary for promoting development). Policy makers have identified some key pre-conditions for a successful EPZ. They include (i) general economic health, (ii) political stability, (iii) regional integration (trade agreements), (iv) infrastructure in the free trade zone, (v) tax regime and tax benefits, (vi) infrastructure of the port and of the airport, (vii) economic freedom, (viii) labor market and pay, and (ix) government support and investment. (www.tno.nl/en/news/)

  2. The ILO (2003) has provided an extensive database for countries with different structures of Free Trade Zones (FTZ), EPZ and industrial parks.

  3. Martin and Sunley (1996) provide an extensive critic of Krugman’s work

  4. The input-provision, derived demand, or backward linkage effects, that is, every non-primary economic activity, will induce attempts to supply through domestic production the inputs needed in that activity. The output-utilization or forward linkage effects, that is, every activity that does not by its nature cater exclusively to final demands; will induce attempts to utilize its outputs as inputs in some new activities. (see Meier and Rauch (1995), p.346)

  5. A new Foreign Investment Law, approved in November 1995, opened up key sectors, including the baking sector, to foreign investment, extended to foreign participants the guarantees granted to domestic investors, and eliminated all restrictions on profit remittances and capital repatriation. (see IMF, 2001, p 6)

  6. Industrial Tax Free Zones in the Dominican Republic (www.rvhb.com/faq).

  7. See Moroney (1967), Arrow et al. (1961) and Intrilligator (1978).

  8. This results in the long run average total cost curve (LRATC) being either constantly rising (decreasing return to scale), horizontal (constant returns to scale), or constantly falling (increasing returns to scale).

  9. See Staci Warden, CAER II Discussion paper No. 77 (www.cid.harvard.edu)

  10. Hornbeck (2005) The Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA), CRS Report for Congress. Also see http://dr1.com/trade/articles/67/1/DR-CAFTA-Agreement. As a result if the DR-CAFTA having entered into force with respect to the DR in March 2007, about 80 percent of US industrial and consumer goods can enter the DR duty free immediately, with the remaining tariffs, which currently range up to 20 %, phased-out within 10 years. Nearly all textile and apparel goods that meet the agreement’s rules of origin are to enter duty-free and quota-free immediately, providing new opportunities for US and regional manufacturers of fibber, yarn, fabric and apparel. The agreement’s tariff treatment for textile and apparel goods is retroactive to 1 January 2004. In July 2006, the government eliminated an exchange surcharge that had levied a 13 % tax on all imports.

References

  • “Equity and Development” World Development Report 2005: World Bank. Washington, D. C

  • “The Inequality Predicament: Report on the World Social Situation 2005”. Sales No. E. 05. IV. 5. United Nations 2005

  • “The Shift Towards Services”, World Investment Report 2004, United Nations, New York

  • Arrow K, Chenery H, Minhas S, Solow R (1961) Capital labor substitution and economic efficiency”. Rev Econ Stat 43:225–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanyam VN, Salisu M, Sapsford D (1999) Foreign direct investment as an engine of growth. J Int Trade Econ Dev: Int Comparat Rev 8(1):27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrell R, Pain N (1996) An econometric analysis of U.S. foreign direct investment. Rev Econ Stat 78(2):200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen L, Jorgenson D, Lau L (1973) Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. Rev Econ Stat 55(February):28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demery DD, Demery L (1973) Cross-section evidence for balanced and unbalanced growth. Rev Econ Stat 55(4):459–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D, Kraay A (2004) Trade, growth, and poverty. Econ J 114:F22–F49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dominican Republic: Selected Issues, 1999, IMF Staff Country Report No. 99/117, Oct

  • Dominican Republic: Statistical Appendix 2003, IMF Country Report No. 03/285, September

  • Fan CC, Scott AJ (2003) Industrial agglomeration and development: a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Econ Geogr 79(3):295–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillat C, Woertz J (2011) Good or bad? the influence of FDI on productivity growth. an industry-level analysis. J Int Trade Econ Dev: Int Comparat Rev 20(3):293–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG (1967) Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. Monthly Review Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regressions in economics. J Econ 2:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald J, Flamm K (1985) The global factory: foreign assembly in international trade. The Brookings Institute, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GH (1996) Economic integration, intraindustry trade, and frontier regions. Eur Econ Rev 40:941–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GH (1998) Regional adjustment to trade liberalisation. Reg Sci Urban Econ 28:419–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson GH (2001) Scale economies and the geographic concentration of industry. Econ Geogr 1:225–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (1958) The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbeck JF (2005) The Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA), CRS Report for Congress

  • Industrial Development Report 2004, United Nations Industrial Development Organization

  • ILO Database on Export Processing Zones (2003) ILO Office-Geneva

  • Intrilligator M (1978) Econometric models, techniques, and applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky R (1993) Export processing zones in the Dominican Republic: transforming manufacturers into commodities. World Dev 21:1851–1865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim YH (1992) The translog production function and variable returns to scale. Rev Econ Stat 74:546–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1981) Trade, accumulation, and uneven development. J Dev Econ 8:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1993) On the relationship between trade theory and location theory. Rev Int Econ 1:102–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, Elizondo RL (1996) Trade policy and the third world Metropolis. J Dev Econ 49:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwack JM, Qian Y (1998) Balanced or unbalanced development: special economic zones as catalysts for transition. J Comp Econ 26:117–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR (1995) The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade”. J Econ Perspect 9:169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen JR, Venables AJ (1998) Multinational firms and the new trade theory. J Int Econ 46:183–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin R, Sunley P (1996) Paul Krugman’s geographical economic and its implications for regional development theory: a critical assessment. Econ Geogr 72(93):259–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier GM, Rauch JE (1995) Leading issues in economic development. Press, Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroney JR (1967) Cobb-Douglas production functions and returns to scale in U.S. manufacturing industry. Western Econ J 6(1):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1957) Economic theory and under-developed regions. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachum L (2000) Economic geography and the location of TNCs; Financial and Professional Services FDI to the United States. J Int Bus Stud 31(3):367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naguib RI (2012) The effects of privatisation and foreign direct investment on economic growth in Argentina. J Int Trade Econ Dev: Int Comparat Rev 21(1):51–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nurkse R (1953) Problems in capital formation in underdeveloped countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ocampo JA, Vos R (2008) Uneven Economic Development, TWN (United Nations)

  • Pantzalis C (2001) Does location matter” An empirical analysis of geographic scope and MNC market valuation. J Int Bus Stud 32(1):123–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham THH (2012) Temporal causality and the dynamics of foreign direct onvestment and trade in Vietnam. J Int Trade Econ Dev: Int Comparat Rev 21(1):83–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch R (1959) Commercial policy in the underdevelopment countries. Am Econ Rev 49(May):251–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharran H (2001) Productivity, returns to scale and the elasticity of factor substitution in the USA apparel industry. Int J Prod Econ 73:285–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramcharran H (2011) The pharmaceutical industry of Puerto Rico: ramifications of global competition. J Policy Model 33:395–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch JE (1997) Erratum to “balance and unbalance growth”. J Dev Econ 54:493–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds LT (1998) Harnessing women’s work: restructuring agricultural and industrial labor forces in the Dominican Republic. Econ Geogr 74(2):149–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revankar NS (1971) A class of variable elasticity of substitution production function. Econometrica 39(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1993) Two strategies for economic development: using ideas and producing ideas; in proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1992 (Washington D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and development, 63–91

  • Rosenstein-Roden PN (1943) Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. Econ J 53(210–211):202–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Paulino, Thirlwall AP (2004) The impact of trade liberalisation on exports and the balance of payments of development countries. Econ J 114:F50–F72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shatz HJ, Venables AJ (2000) The geography of international investment. In: Clark GL, Gertler MS (eds) The Oxford handbook of economic goegraphy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 125–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy DS (1967) Statistical evidence of balanced and unbalanced growth. Rev Econ Stat 49(3):288–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Dominican Republic Growth with Equity 1995, World Bank Report No. 13619-DO, May 15

  • Vinod HD (1972) Non-homogenous production functions and applications to the applications to telecommunications. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 3(2):531–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein I (1974) The modern world-system. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Warden S (www.cid.harvard.edu) Assessing export platforms; the case of the Dominican Republic, CAER II Discussion Paper #77

  • Willmore L (1995) Export processing zones in the Dominican Republic: A comment on Kaplinsky. World Dev 23:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yotopoulos PA, Lau JL (1975) The balance-unbalanced growth controversy revisited. Rev Econ Stat 75(4):516–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young PM (2001) The Dominican Republic stabilization, reform, and growth, occasional paper 206. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harri Ramcharran.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9365-7.

Appendix

Appendix

  1. 1.

    The Free Trade Zone Law provides 100 % exemption on all taxes, duties, and charges affecting the productive and trade operations at Free Trade Zones (FTZs). These incentives are provided to specific beneficiaries for up to 20 years, depending on the location of the zone. This legislation is managed jointly by the Foreign Trade Zone National Council and the Dominican Customs Service. Investors operating in the Dominican Republic’s FTZs experience far fewer problems in dealing with the government than do investors working outside the zones. For example, materials coming into or being shipped out of the zones are reported to move quickly, without the kinds of bureaucratic difficulties mentioned above. (Source: 2001 Country Report on Economic Policy and Trade Practices, US Department of State, February, 2002)

  2. 2.

    The Export Incentive Law provides for tax and duty free treatment of inputs from overseas that are to be processed and re-exported as final products. The Dominican Export Promotion Centre and the Customs Service manage this legislation. In practice, use of the export incentive law to import raw materials for process and re-export is cumbersome and delays in clearing customs can take anywhere from 20 to 60 days. This customs clearance process has made completion of production contracts with specific deadlines difficult. As a result, non-free trade zone exporters rarely take advantage of the Export Incentive Law. Most prefer to import raw materials using the normal customs’ procedures which, although more costly, are more rapid and predictable. (Source: 2001 Country Report on Economic Policy and Trade Practices, US Department of State, February, 2002)

Table 3 Free trade zone activity
Table 4 Sources of growth, 1974–93 (real annual growth rates)
Table 5 Dominican Republic: GDP by sectors at constant prices (in millions of Pesos at 1970 prices)
Table 6 Sect oral contribution to GDP (%)
Table 7 Dominican Republic: GDP growth rate by sectors at constant prices
Table 8 Dominican Republic: export performance ($mil.)
Table 9 Dominican Republic exports by commodity groups (%)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramcharran, H. Foreign direct investment in the Dominican Republic: consequences and recommendations for sustainable growth. J Econ Finan 41, 610–629 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9361-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-016-9361-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation