Skip to main content
Log in

The Buffett critique: volatility and long-dated options

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In his 2008 letter to shareholders, Warren Buffett, Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, criticizes the ability of the Black-Scholes model to accurately price long-dated options. Buffet discusses how the model leads to over-pricing of put options with long maturities using examples of Berkshire’s investments in derivatives contracts. We confirm that traditional implied volatility estimates do indeed overstate long-term volatility. As an alternative, we propose a maturity-matching technique for estimating long-term volatility using historical holding period returns. We focus on three large asset classes, large cap stocks, long-term bonds, and treasury bills, to demonstrate how volatility evolves over different holding periods. We apply this rolling-period simulation method to estimate volatility for annual maturities ranging from 1 to 30-years within the Black-Scholes model. This method generates superior long-dated option values, and effectively answers Buffett’s critique. This is of particular importance for firms with significant investment holdings, as the issuance and valuation of these derivatives can have a substantial effect on firm capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A 2005 report by ComplianceWeek found that 80% of companies used the Black-Scholes option pricing framework to determine the value of their option holdings; the remainder generally used a binomial (lattice-form) model.

  2. $1 billion put contract × 1% likelihood × 50% anticipated loss = $5 million.

  3. Cornell (2010) states that the values are reasonable estimates based on the Buffett letter.

  4. Cornell (2010) notes that raising the risk free rate to 5.8% lowers the put value to $0.45 million, but we argue that in an era of low interest levels, this adjustment is unreasonable. Dividends are likewise deemed appropriate, matching both the current and long-term S&P yields.

  5. See Sears, Steven “Here come the Super Options.” Barrons, September, 7, 2012. http://online.barrons.com/news/articles/SB50001424053111904294104577631491840049660

    Last Accessed 7/17/2014.

  6. See SEC Release No. 34-68164: http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/cboe/2012/34-68164.pdf

  7. The small discrepancies result from fluctuations in the market between Buffett’s contract initiation date and our assumed date.

References

  • Bachelier L (1900) Théorie de la spéculation. Annales Ecole Normale Supérieure 3(17):21–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz J (2009) On justifications for the Ad Hoc Black-Scholes method of option pricing. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econom 14(1):1558–3708

    Google Scholar 

  • Black F, Scholes M (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J Polit Econ 81:637–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt MW, Wu T (2002) Cross-sectional tests of deterministic volatility functions. J Empir Financ 9:525–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffett, W. (2009), “Chairman’s Letter”. In Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s 2008 Annual Report, 3-21. Retrieved February 16, 2013 from http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2008ar/2008ar.pdf.

  • Campa JM, Chang PHK (1995) Testing the expectations hypothesis on the term structure of volatilities in foreign exchange options. J Financ 50:529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin-Dufresne P, Goldstein RS, Yang F (2012) On the relative pricing of long-maturity index options and collateralized debt obligations. J Financ 67(6):1983–2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley PL, Hubbard CM, Walz DT (1998) Retirement savings: choosing a withdrawal rate that is sustainable. AAII J 20(2):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell B (2010) Warren Buffett, Black-Scholes and the valuation of long-dated options. J Portf Manag 36(4):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coval JD, Jurek JW, Stafford E (2009) Economic catastrophe bonds. Am Econ Rev 99(3):628–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox J, Ross S, Rubinstein M (1979) Option pricing: a simplified approach. J Financ Econ 7:229–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M (2001) Mathematics of financial markets. In: Engquist B, Schmid W (eds) Mathematics unlimited—2001 and beyond. New York, Springer, pp 361–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Deelstra G, Rayée G (2013) Local volatility pricing models for long-dated FX derivatives. Appl Math Financ 20(4):380–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan JC, Fulop A (2009) Estimating the structural credit risk model when equity prices are contaminated by trading noises. J Econ 150(2):288–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffie D, Lando D (2001) Term structures of credit spreads with incomplete accounting information. Econometrica 69(3):633–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas B, Fleming F, Whaley R (1998) Implied volatility functions: empirical tests. J Financ 53:2059–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupire B (1994) Pricing with a smile. Risk 7:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, DW, Kocagil, AE, Stein, RM (2004) “Moody’s KMV RISKCALCTM v3.1 Model”. Whitepaper. Retrieved March 19, 2013 from http://www.moodys.com/sites/products/ProductAttachments/RiskCalc%203.1%20Whitepaper.pdf.

  • Eom YH, Helwege J, Huang JZ (2004) Structural models of corporate bond pricing: an empirical analysis. Rev Financ Stud 17:499–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figlewski S (2004) Forecasting volatility. Working paper, NYU Stern School of Business

  • Garman M, Kolhagen SW (1983) Foreign currency option values. J Int Money Financ 2:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta NJ, Pavlik R, Synn W (2012) Adding “value” to sustainable post-retirement portfolios. Finan Serv Rev 21(1):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug EG (1998) The complete guide to option pricing formulas. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow RA, Turnbull SM (1995) Pricing derivatives on financial securities subject to credit risk. J Financ 50:53–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanblanc M, Le Cam Y (2007) Reduced form modelling for credit risk”. working paper. Universite d’Evry Val d’Essonne and French Treasury, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim IJ, Jang BG, Kim KT (2013) A simple iterative method for the valuation of american options. Quant Financ 13(6):885–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lando D (2005) Credit risk modeling - theory and applications. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton RC (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Financ 29:449–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan J (2002) The jump-risk premia implicit in options: evidence from an integrated time-series study. J Financ Econ 63(1):3–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poterba J, Summers L (1986) The persistence of volatility and stock market fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 76:1142–1151

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein M (1994) Implied binomial trees. J Financ 49:771–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1965), “Rational theory of warrant pricing”. Ind Manag Rev 6(2):13–39

  • Sprenkle C (1964) Warrant prices as indicator of expectation. Yale Econ Essays 1:412–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker TB (2005) Estimating default with discrete duration and structural models. In: Working paper. Indiana University, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neeraj J. Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, N.J., Kurt, M. & White, R. The Buffett critique: volatility and long-dated options. J Econ Finan 40, 524–537 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-015-9319-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-015-9319-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation