Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of a pre-reconstruction process in a filtered back projection reconstruction on an image quality of a low tube voltage computed tomography

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effect of pre-reconstruction process for low tube voltage computed tomography (CT) on image quality of filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. Small and large quality assurance water phantoms (19 and 33 cm diameter) were scanned on a third-generation dual-source CT with 70 kVp and 120 kVp at various dose levels. Image quality was assessed in terms of the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF). NPSs and TTFs in the small phantom were comparable between 70 and 120 kVp protocols. In the large phantom, the curves of the NPS changed and the TTF decreased even at the high-dose levels for 70 kVp protocol compared to 120 kVp protocol. Our results indicated that the pre-reconstruction process is performed in low tube voltage CT for large objects even for the FBP reconstruction and has an effect on the image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shimonobo T, Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, et al. Low-tube-voltage selection for non-contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of the radiation dose in pediatric and adult phantoms. Phys Med. 2016;32(1):197–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nakaura T, Awai K, Maruyama N, et al. Abdominal dynamic CT in patients with renal dysfunction: contrast agent dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube current-time product settings at 256-detector row CT. Radiology. 2011;261(2):467–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimoyama S, Nishii T, Watanabe Y, et al. Advantages of 70-kV CT angiography for the visualization of the adamkiewicz artery: comparison with 120-kV imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:2399–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Meinel FG, Canstein C, Schoepf UJ, et al. Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1643–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karmazyn B, Liang Y, Klahr P, et al. Effect of tube voltage on CT noise levels in different phantom sizes. AJR. 2013;200:1001–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Solomon J, Wilson J, Samei E. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: noise, resolution, and detectability. Med Phys. 2015;42(8):4941–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu H, Li X, Li L, et al. Adaptive noise reduction toward low-dose computed tomography. Proc SPIE. 2003;5030:759–66.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kachelriess M, Watzke O, Kalender WA, et al. Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. Med Phys. 2001;28:475–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimes J, Duan X, Yu L, et al. The influence of focal spot blooming on high-contrast spatial resolution in CT imaging. Med Phys. 2015;42(10):6011–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richard S, Husarik DB, Yadava G, et al. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys. 2012;39(7):4115–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen B, Christianson O, Wilson JM, et al. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods. Med Phys. 2014;41(7): 071909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Solomon J, Lyu P, Marin D, et al. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep-learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm. Med Phys. 2020;47(9):3961–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Samei E, Bakalyar D, Boedeker KL, et al. Performance evaluation of computed tomography systems: summary of AAPM task group 233. Med Phys. 2019;46(11):e735–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stierstorfer K, Rauscher A, Boese J, et al. Weighted FBP – a simple approximate 3D FBP algorithm for multislice spiral CT with good dose usage for arbitrary pitch. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:2209–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Euler A, Solomon J, Farjat AE, et al. High-pitch wide-coverage fast kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT: Impact of pitch on noise, spatial resolution, and iodine quantification in a phantom study. AJR. 2019;212:64–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Urikura A, Yoshida T, Nakaya Y, et al. Deep learning-based reconstruction in ultra-high-resolution computed tomography: can image noise caused by high definition detector and the miniaturization of matrix element size be improved? Phys Med. 2021;81:121–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mr. Steven Gardner for his advice on preparing our manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiological Technology, Yamaguchi University Hospital, Yamaguchi, 755-8505, Japan

    Masaki Takemitsu, Shohei Kudomi, Kazuki Takegami & Takuya Uehara

Authors
  1. Masaki Takemitsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shohei Kudomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuki Takegami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Takuya Uehara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaki Takemitsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study did not involve human subjects as such ethical approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takemitsu, M., Kudomi, S., Takegami, K. et al. The effect of a pre-reconstruction process in a filtered back projection reconstruction on an image quality of a low tube voltage computed tomography. Radiol Phys Technol 17, 306–314 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00764-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00764-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation