Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dosimetric assessment of a single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm for computed tomography images in radiation therapy

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm for radiation therapy treatment using phantom cases with metal inserts, assess improvements in computed tomography (CT) number accuracy, and investigate its effects on treatment planning dosimetry. A standard electron density phantom was scanned with and without metal inserts. The numbers of tissue-equivalent materials on both uncorrected and SEMAR-corrected CT images were compared. Treatment planning accuracy was evaluated by comparing dose distributions computed using true density images (without metal inserts), uncorrected images (with metal inserts), and SEMAR-corrected images (with metal inserts) using three-dimensional gamma analysis. The numbers of the true density and uncorrected and SEMAR-corrected CT images in a muscle plug with unilateral inserts were 25.9 HU, − 281.8 HU, and 26.1 HU, respectively. A similar tendency was obtained for other tissue-equivalent materials, and the numbers on CT images were improved with the SEMAR algorithm. In cases involving 1 portal irradiation, 10-MV X-ray, and the Acuros XB algorithm, the pass ratio between the true density and uncorrected images was 89.89%, while that between the true density and SEMAR-corrected images was 95.03%. Improvements in dose distribution were evident using the SEMAR algorithm. Similar trends were found for different irradiation methods and dose calculation algorithms. The SEMAR algorithm can significantly reduce metal artifacts on CT images used for radiation treatment planning. This aspect influenced dosimetry in the region of the artifact and dose distribution was significantly improved with use of the SEMAR-corrected images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mutic S, Palta JR, Butker EK, Das IJ, Huq MS, Loo LND, et al. Quality assurance for computed-tomography simulators and the computedtomography-simulation process: report of the AAPM radiation therapy committee task group no. 66. Med Phys. 2003;30:2762–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyoshi K, Satou T, Okada A. Effect of hybrid iterative reconstruction on CT image quality using metal artifact reduction. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2018;74:797–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katsura M, Sato J, Akahane M, Tajima T, Furuta T, Mori H, et al. Single-energy metal artifact reduction technique for reducing metallic coil artifacts on post-interventional cerebral CT and CT angiography. Neuroradiology. 2018;60:1141–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Niehues SM, Vahldiek JL, Troltzsch D, Hamm B, Shnayien S. Impact of single-energy metal artifact reduction on CT image quality in patients with dental hardware. Comput Biol Med. 2018;103:161–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bal M, Spies L. Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. Med Phys. 2006;33:2852–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalender WA, Hebel R, Ebersberger J. Reduction of CT artifacts caused by metallic implants. Radiology. 1987;164:576–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watzke O, Kalender WA. A pragmatic approach to metal artifact reduction in CT: merging of metal artifact reduced images. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:849–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yazdia M, Gingras L, Beaulieu L. An adaptive approach to metal artifact reduction in helical computed tomography for radiation therapy treatment planning: experimental and clinical studies. Int J Radiat Oncol. 2005;62:1224–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ragusi M, van der Meer RW, Joemai RMS, van Schaik J, van Rijswijk CSP. Evaluation of CT angiography image quality acquired with single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients after complex endovascular aortic repair. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41:323–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ragusi MAAD, der Meer RW, Joemai RMS, van Schaik J, van Rijswijk CSP. Evaluation of CT angiography image quality acquired with single-energy metal artifact reduction (SEMAR) algorithm in patients after complex endovascular aortic repair. Cardiovasc Inter Rad. 2018;41:323–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Teixeira PAG, Meyer JB, Baumann C, Raymond A, Sirveaux F, Coudane H, et al. Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43:1237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Funama Y, Taguchi K, Utsunomiya D, Oda S, Hirata K, Yuki H, et al. A newly-developed metal artifact reduction algorithm improves the visibility of oral cavity lesions on 320-MDCT volume scans. Phys Med. 2015;31:66–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang YB, Xu D, Zamyatin AA. Metal artifact reduction algorithm for single energy and dual energy CT scans. In: IEEE Nuclear science conference record. 2012;3426–29.

  14. Kidoh M, Utsunomiya D, Ikeda O, Tamura Y, Oda S, Funama Y, et al. Reduction of metallic coil artefacts in computed tomography body imaging: effects of a new single-energy metal artefact reduction algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1378–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miki K, Mori S, Hasegawa A, Naganawa K, Koto M. Single-energy metal artefact reduction with CT for carbon-ion radiation therapy treatment planning. Br J Radiol. 2016;89:20150988.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shiraishi Y, Yamada Y, Tanaka T, Eriguchi T, Nishimura S, Yoshida K, et al. Single-energy metal artifact reduction in postimplant computed tomography for I-125 prostate brachytherapy: impact on seed identification. Brachytherapy. 2016;15:768–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Axente M, Paidi A, Von Eyben R, Zeng C, Bani-Hashemi A, Krauss A, et al. Clinical evaluation of the iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm for CT simulation in radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2015;42:1170–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Han T, Mourtada F, Kisling K, Mikell J, Followill D, Howell R. Experimental validation of deterministic Acuros XB algorithm for IMRT and VMAT dose calculations with the Radiological Physics Center’s head and neck phantom. Med Phys. 2012;39:2193–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Han T, Mikell J, Salehpour M, Mourtada F. Dosimetric comparison of acuros XB Deterministic radiation transport method with Monte Carlo and model-based convolution methods in heterogeneous media. Med Phys. 2011;38:2651–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Padmanaban S, Warren S, Walsh A, Partridge M, Hawkins MA. Comparison of Acuros (AXB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) for dose calculation in treatment of oesophageal cancer: effects on modelling tumour control probability. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kroon PS, Hol S, Essers M. Dosimetric accuracy and clinical quality of Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation algorithm for stereotactic and conventional lung volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Radiat Oncol. 2013;8:149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ong CCH, Ang KW, Soh RCX, Tin KM, Yap JHH, Lee JCL, et al. Dosimetric comparison of peripheral NSCLC SBRT using Acuros XB and AAA calculation algorithms. Med Dosim. 2017;42:216–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagata K, Pethel TD. A comparison of two dose calculation algorithms-anisotropic analytical algorithm and Acuros XB-for radiation therapy planning of canine intranasal tumors. Vet Radiol Ultrasoun. 2017;58:479–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lloyd SAM, Ansbacher W. Evaluation of an analytic linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for high-density inhomogeneities. Med Phys. 2013;40:011707. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4769419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Radiology, Department of Medical Technology, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Hiroo Murazaki, Junichi Fukunaga, Taka-aki Hirose, Naomi Funatsu, Ryoji Matsumoto, Kyohei Hidaka, Shuji Nagamine, Daiki Nakanishi & Toyoyuki Kato

Authors
  1. Hiroo Murazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Junichi Fukunaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taka-aki Hirose
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Naomi Funatsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ryoji Matsumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kyohei Hidaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shuji Nagamine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daiki Nakanishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Toyoyuki Kato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroo Murazaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article contains no studies with human participants or animals.

Informed consent

Informed consent for this study was not required because it involved no research involving human participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murazaki, H., Fukunaga, J., Hirose, Ta. et al. Dosimetric assessment of a single-energy metal artifact reduction algorithm for computed tomography images in radiation therapy. Radiol Phys Technol 12, 268–276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-019-00517-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-019-00517-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation