Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of Japanese patients from the AUGMENT phase III study of lenalidomide + rituximab (R2) vs. rituximab + placebo in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 04 September 2020

Abstract

Patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) typically respond to first-line immunochemotherapy, but relapse is common. Treatment options for relapsed iNHL include chemotherapy ± rituximab and rituximab monotherapy. Lenalidomide plus rituximab (R2) is an immunomodulatory regimen that enhances rituximab-mediated cytotoxicity and improves clinical activity in iNHL. AUGMENT was a double-blind phase III randomized trial of R2 vs. rituximab + placebo (R-placebo) in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma who were not refractory to rituximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Data reported here focus on Japanese patients from AUGMENT and reflect 36 patients (n = 18, each group). PFS was superior in the R2 group, HR = 0.32 (95% CI 0.11–0.96). Median PFS was not reached (95% CI 19.7–NE) in the R2 group vs. 16.5 months (95% CI 11.3–30.6) in the R-placebo group. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more frequent in patients treated with R2 (67%) than with R-placebo (22%), primarily attributable to increased neutropenia (50% vs 17%). R2 resulted in significantly longer median PFS than R-placebo in Japanese patients with R/R iNHL, and the efficacy and the safety profile of R2 were similar to those reported in the global population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swerdlow SH CE, Harris NL, Jafie ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al. World Health Organization classification of tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, ed. Lyon. 2008: IARC Press.

  2. Arcaini L, Merli M, Volpetti S, Rattotti S, Gotti M, Zaja F. Indolent B-cell lymphomas associated with HCV infection: clinical and virological features and role of antiviral therapy. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:638185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sousou T, Friedberg J. Rituximab in indolent lymphomas. Semin Hematol. 2010;47:133–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arcaini L, Rattotti S, Gotti M, Luminari S. Prognostic assessment in patients with indolent B-cell lymphomas. Sci World J. 2012;2012:107892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chihara D, Ito H, Matsuda T, Shibata A, Katsumi A, Nakamura S, et al. Differences in incidence and trends of haematological malignancies in Japan and the United States. Br J Haematol. 2014;164:536–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chihara D, Ito H, Izutsu K, Hattori M, Nishino Y, Ioka A, et al. Advance and stagnation in the treatment of patients with lymphoma and myeloma: Analysis using population-based cancer registry data in Japan from 1993 to 2006. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:1217–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dreyling M, Ghielmini M, Rule S, Salles G, Vitolo U, Ladetto M. Newly diagnosed and relapsed follicular lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v83–v90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Izutsu K. Treatment of follicular lymphoma. J Clin Exp Hematop. 2014;54:31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Izutsu K. JSH practical guidelines for hematological malignancies, 2018: II. Lymphoma-1. Follicular lymphoma (FL). Int J Hematol. 2019; 110:11–19.

  10. Dreyling M, Thieblemont C, Gallamini A, Arcaini L, Campo E, Hermine O, et al. ESMO Consensus conferences: guidelines on malignant lymphoma. part 2: marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:857–77.

  11. Zucca E, Conconi A, Laszlo D, Lopez-Guillermo A, Bouabdallah R, Coiffier B, et al. Addition of rituximab to chlorambucil produces superior event-free survival in the treatment of patients with extranodal marginal-zone B-cell lymphoma: 5-year analysis of the IELSG-19 randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:565–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Igarashi T, Ohtsu T, Fujii H, Sasaki Y, Morishima Y, Ogura M, et al. Re-treatment of relapsed indolent B-cell lymphoma with rituximab. Int J Hematol. 2001;73:213–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gandhi AK, Kang J, Havens CG, Conklin T, Ning Y, Wu L, et al. Immunomodulatory agents lenalidomide and pomalidomide co-stimulate T cells by inducing degradation of T cell repressors Ikaros and Aiolos via modulation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex CRL4 (CRBN.). Br J Haematol. 2014;164:811–21.

  14. Lopez-Girona A, Mendy D, Ito T, Miller K, Gandhi AK, Kang J, et al. Cereblon is a direct protein target for immunomodulatory and antiproliferative activities of lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Leukemia. 2012;26:2326–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramsay AG, Clear AJ, Kelly G, Fatah R, Matthews J, Macdougall F, et al. Follicular lymphoma cells induce T-cell immunologic synapse dysfunction that can be repaired with lenalidomide: implications for the tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. Blood. 2009;114:4713–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fowler NH, Davis RE, Rawal S, Nastoupil L, Hagemeister FB, McLaughlin P, et al. Safety and activity of lenalidomide and rituximab in untreated indolent lymphoma: an open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1311–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu L, Adams M, Carter T, Chen R, Muller G, Stirling D, et al. Lenalidomide enhances natural killer cell and monocyte-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of rituximab-treated CD20+ tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:4650–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chiu H, Trisal P, Bjorklund C, Carrancio S, Torano EG, Guarinos C, et al. Combination lenalidomide-rituximab immunotherapy activates anti-tumour immunity and induces tumour cell death by complementary mechanisms of action in follicular lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2019.

  19. Chaudhry M, Nastoupil L, Samaniego F, Neelapu SS, Hagemeister FB, Fanale MA, et al. Treatment with combination of lenalidomide and rituximab achieves durable responses in a long term follow up of patients with indolent non-hodgkin's lymphoma. Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:215–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiesewetter B, Willenbacher E, Willenbacher W, Egle A, Neumeister P, Voskova D, et al. A phase 2 study of rituximab plus lenalidomide for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Blood. 2017;129:383–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leonard JP, Jung SH, Johnson J, Pitcher BN, Bartlett NL, Blum KA, et al. Randomized trial of lenalidomide alone versus lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma: CALGB 50401 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:3635–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin P, Jung SH, Pitcher B, Bartlett NL, Blum KA, Shea T, et al. A phase II trial of lenalidomide plus rituximab in previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): CALGB 50803 (Alliance). Ann Oncol. 2017;28:2806–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuscano JM, Dutia M, Chee K, Brunson A, Reed-Pease C, Abedi M, et al. Lenalidomide plus rituximab can produce durable clinical responses in patients with relapsed or refractory, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2014;165:375–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Morschhauser F, Fowler NH, Feugier P, Bouabdallah R, Tilly H, Palomba ML, et al. Rituximab plus lenalidomide in advanced untreated follicular lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:934–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leonard JP, Trneny M, Izutsu K, Fowler NH, Hong X, Zhu J, et al. AUGMENT: a phase III study of lenalidomide plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory indolent lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1188–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, Gascoyne RD, Specht L, Horning SJ, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cairo MS, Bishop M. Tumour lysis syndrome: new therapeutic strategies and classification. Br J Haematol. 2004;127:3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors performed and/or designed the research study, analyzed the data, contributed to the development and revision of the manuscript, and approved the final version for submission. The authors thank the patients, their family members, and collaborators from participating institutions and Celgene Corporation. Thank you to following investigators for their participation in data collection at each site: Drs. Kenichi Ishizawa, Yoko Okitsu, Satoshi Ichikawa, Kunihiro Tsukasaki, Takayuki Yoshino, Kiyohiko Hatake, Dai Maruyama, and Masafumi Taniwaki. Medical writing support was provided by Benjamin Levine, PhD of Bio Connections LLC, and funded by Celgene Corporation; the authors were fully responsible for content and editorial decisions for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koji Izutsu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

KI reports grants from Celgene during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Celgene, Eisai, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Mundipharma, Chugai, Astra Zeneca, Abbvie, Bayer, and Zenyaku outside the submitted work; personal fees from Bristol Myers Squib, Dainihon Sumitomo, Nihon Mediphysics, and Kyowa Hakko Kirin outside the submitted work; and grants from Ono, Gilead, Solasia, Symbio, Astellas Amgen, and Daiichi Sankyo outside the submitted work. YM reports research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical and lecture fees from BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer outside the submitted work. NF reports grants from Celgene K.K. during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Eisai and Takeda outside the submitted work; grants from Abbvie, Bayer, Gilead and Solasia Pharma outside the submitted work; and personal fees from Celgene, Chugai, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Mochida, Mundi, Nippon Shinyaku, Ono and Zenyaku outside the submitted work. GY reports personal fees from Celgene, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Takeda, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Mundipharma, and Janssen outside the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Chugai Pharma and Eisai outside the submitted work. HN reports grants from Celgene Corporation during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical K. K, Celgene Corporation, Mundipharma K.K., Bayer Yakuhin, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Esai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, Gilead Sciences, Zenyaku Kogyo, AstraZeneca, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and Roche; grants from Abbvie G.K., Solasia Pharma K.K., HUYA Bioscience International, IQVIA Japan K.K.; and personal fees from Sanofi K.K. outside the submitted work. TO reports employment and stockholder with Celgene K.K. during the conduct of the study. SK reports employment and stockholder with Celgene during the conduct of the study. PF reports employment, stockholder, and received personal fees from Celgene during the conduct of the study. SM reports employment with Celgene K.K. and stockholder of Celgene. KT reports grants and personal fees from Celgene during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Zenyaku, HUYA Bioscience International, Yakult, Daiichi Sanky, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Solasia Pharma, and Verastem outside the submitted work; grants from Janssen and Abbvie outside the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Eisai, Takeda, Mundipharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Chugai Pharma, and Ono Pharmaceutical outside the submitted work. YT, TJ, TI, TKo, and TKi report no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Fig. 1

Duration of response, as assessed by IRC (TIF 131 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 2

Event-free survival, as assessed by IRC (TIF 132 kb)

Supplementary Fig. 3

Time to next anti-lymphoma treatment (TIF 130 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Izutsu, K., Minami, Y., Fukuhara, N. et al. Analysis of Japanese patients from the AUGMENT phase III study of lenalidomide + rituximab (R2) vs. rituximab + placebo in relapsed/refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Hematol 111, 409–416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02802-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-019-02802-y

Keywords

Navigation