Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Treg) are a suppressive T cell population which play a crucial role in the establishment of tolerance after stem cell transplantation (SCT) by controlling the effector T cell responses that drive acute and chronic GVHD. The BM compartment is enriched in a highly suppressive, activated/memory autophagy-dependent Treg population, which contributes to the HSC engraftment and the control of GVHD. G-CSF administration releases Treg from the BM through disruption of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis and further improves Treg survival following SCT through the induction of autophagy. However, AMD3100 is more efficacious in mobilizing these Treg highlighting the potential for optimized mobilization regimes to produce more tolerogenic grafts. Notably, the disruption of adhesive interaction between integrins and their ligands contributes to HSC mobilization and may be relevant for BM Treg. Importantly, the Tregs in the BM niche contribute to maintenance of the HSC niche and appear required for optimal control of GVHD post-transplant. Although poorly studied, the BM Treg appear phenotypically and functionally unique to Treg in the periphery. Understanding the requirements for maintaining the enrichment, function and survival of BM Treg needs to be further investigated to improve therapeutic strategies and promote tolerance after SCT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is the preferred therapy for the majority of malignancies of bone marrow origin. Following transplantation, donor haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are relied upon to successfully reconstitute the recipient’s haematopoietic and immune systems. The curative property of SCT lies in the graft versus leukaemia (GVL) effect which is required for ablation of residual cancer burden. This process is absolutely dependent on donor T cells contained within the graft; however, these T cells are also the primary mediators of graft versus host disease (GVHD), a life-threatening complication of SCT. Establishing transplant protocols which maximize GVL but minimize GVHD for optimal transplant outcomes has been a long-term goal in the field.
In the last two decades, there has been a significant shift in the stem cell sources used for SCT such that the majority of SCT is now undertaken using G-CSF mobilized blood (G-PBSC) products. The use of G-PBSC in place of steady-state bone marrow (BM) has been readily adopted in part due to the ease of harvest, but also due to favourable HSC numbers and the association with accelerated engraftment and decreased graft failure rates post-transplant [1]. Notably, while G-PBSC grafts contain 10–50-fold more T cells than standard BM grafts [2, 3], the incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) is not increased, and patients receiving either graft source have similar overall survival rates [1]. However, it is now clear that the use of G-PBSC grafts is associated with a significant increase in the incidence and severity of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (Fig. 1) [1]. Thus, HSC mobilization with G-CSF exerts immunomodulatory effects on the graft that significantly impact on transplant outcomes [4,5,6,7]. Recent investigations into the immunomodulatory effects of G-CSF have identified G-CSF-mediated alterations in the number and function of CD4+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) as an important mechanism contributing to the attenuation of aGVHD observed following SCT [8,9,10]. Treg represent a heterogeneous immunosuppressive T cell population that regulates immune responses and are critical for the induction and maintenance of tolerance after SCT [11]. Indeed the inverse correlation between Treg numbers contained within the donor graft and incidence of GVHD has been demonstrated both clinically and in preclinical models [10, 12,13,14]. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms underlying the propensity of G-CSF administration to enhance Treg number and function within G-PBSC grafts, and strategies to promote their engraftment at this BM site to improve transplant outcomes.
Treg are critical for the control of alloreactive T cells after SCT
Donor T cells are central mediators of GVHD and aGVHD is absolutely dependent on the presence and function of donor T cells in the graft. Following SCT, tissue injury and inflammation characterized by proinflammatory cytokine release is initiated by the conditioning regimen [15, 16]. These cytokines, together with LPS released from damaged gut tissue, result in the activation of host antigen-presenting cells (APC). Activated host APC then prime naïve donor T cells and promote the differentiation and expansion of effector CD4+ (Th) and CD8+ (Tc) T cells which through cytokine production and cytolytic effector function mediate target tissue destruction [17]. During chronic GVHD both T cells contained in the graft and thymically derived auto- and alloreactive T cells contribute to pathology [18]. It is now clear that, in both acute and chronic forms, GVHD is characterized by an imbalance of T effector and Treg which results in uncontrolled T effector expansion and cytokine production. In this regard, both preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that donor graft Treg number inversely correlates with aGVHD [10, 12, 13] and overall survival after SCT [19]. Moreover, a failure of Treg reconstitution after SCT contributes to both acute and chronic GVHD-associated pathology [17, 20,21,22,23]. As such, therapeutic strategies designed to increase the number of functional Treg within the graft and promote Treg survival following transplant represent areas of intense focus.
The BM is a niche for highly functional memory Treg (Figs. 2 and 3)
Studies in both mouse and man have demonstrated that within the BM, the CD4 T cell compartment contains a substantially increased proportion of Treg compared to that of other peripheral sites including PB, spleen and lymph nodes (LN). Thus, within the BM, Treg represent 20–60% of the CD4 T cell compartment [24, 25], in contrast to the 7–15% typically found in the spleen [26]. Although the majority of studies have focused on Treg form and function in the periphery (PB in humans and spleen and LN in mice), the limited number of studies which have investigated BM Treg suggest that in addition to their enrichment, Treg at this site exhibit features distinct from Treg in the periphery. In this regard, comparison of the subset composition of Treg in the BM, thymus and spleen of mice shows ~50% of BM Treg express the co-inhibitory molecule TIGIT in contrast to ~10 or 30% in thymus or spleen, respectively. Treg can be broadly subdivided into two subpopulations: thymic-derived Treg (tTreg) and Treg induced in the periphery (pTreg) from FoxP3neg conventional CD4 T cells in response to immunosuppressive cytokines and antigen-specific activation. These Treg subsets are reported to have distinct but complementary roles in attenuating inflammation [27, 28]. To date, however, whether BM Treg represent pTreg or iTreg has not been elucidated. However, TIGIT expression marks a highly suppressive activated/memory Treg population which is required for the control of autoimmune disease and contributes to anti-tumour immune responses [29]. In further support of their activated/memory status, TIGIT+ Treg express low levels of CD62L and high levels of CD44 and CXCR4 which is upregulated on Treg upon activation [24]. Indeed, the expression of CD44 on Treg is also strongly associated with superior suppressor function [30]. Thus, the BM appears to represent a niche for highly suppressive activated/memory Treg.
G-CSF mobilizes Treg into the periphery via disruption of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis (Fig. 4)
Through their enhanced CXCR4 expression, activated Tregs preferentially home to and are retained in the BM where stromal cells produce high levels of SDF-1 [24, 31]. HSC are also known to be tethered in the BM via the CXCR4/SDF-1 interactions [32], and the dominant mechanism by which G-CSF mobilizes HSC from the BM is through the disruption of this chemo-attractive interaction [33]. As for HSC, studies in both mice and humans suggest that G-CSF administration increases the number of graft Treg through the disruption of this axis, which promotes the egress of Treg from BM into the periphery [24, 34,35,36]. Mechanistically this was confirmed by administration of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, which resulted in the rapid mobilization of Treg into the PB. Notably, in both mice and primates, AMD3100 has been shown to mobilize Treg more efficiently than G-CSF [35, 37] highlighting the potential to further increase graft-associated Treg numbers by optimizing mobilization regimes. Indeed, a synergism between G-CSF and AMD3100 in HSC mobilization is established [38]; however, the combined effects of G-CSF and AMD3100 administration on Treg mobilization remain to be elucidated. Furthermore, in addition to the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis, several other adhesive interactions are known to contribute to the firm retention of HSC in the BM. In this regard, HSC expression of the integrins α4β1 (VLA4), α4β7, α9β1 and αLβ2 (LFA1) contributes to HSC retention through interactions with their cognate ligands VCAM-1, fibronectin, osteopontin and ICAM-1 in the BM microenvironment. Blocking these interactions using antibodies or small molecule inhibitors has proven effective at mobilizing HSC and in some cases, to enhance G-CSF-mediated HSC mobilization [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. While the integrin expression profile of Treg residing in the BM remains largely undefined, it is important to note that integrins expressed by Treg contribute to both their function [47,48,49,50] and tissue tropism [48, 51,52,53]. Clearly, further investigations into the mechanisms by which Treg are recruited and retained within the BM are warranted and will be required to allow mobilization strategies optimal for harnessing Treg in SCT grafts.
Memory Treg are autophagy-dependant and G-CSF elicits autophagy in Treg
TIGIT+ and TIGITneg Treg exhibit distinct survival requirements. In this regard, in TIGITneg Treg the Bcl2 anti-apoptotic pathway is more active, whereas TIGIT+ Treg are critically reliant on autophagy for their survival [35]. Autophagy is a highly conserved process used to degrade and recycle damaged or unused intracellular components and is considered an adaptive response to stress which promotes survival [54]. Indeed disarming autophagy in the FoxP3+ Treg specifically, results in a profound loss of activated/memory Treg in vivo [55], particularly within the BM [35], consistent with their enrichment at this site. Functionally, the loss of these Treg resulted in dysregulated effector T cell activation and expansion, and the development of multiorgan inflammation. Of note, mRNA transcriptome analysis of Treg isolated from splenic grafts from G-CSF-treated donor mice demonstrates an upregulation of genes associated with Treg survival, including genes associated with the autophagic pathway [34]. Furthermore, in vitro exposure to G-CSF has been shown to rapidly upregulate the autophagic pathway in Treg [35]. Thus, G-CSF mobilization results in grafts containing increased number of Treg poised for survival. In support of this notion, in a murine aGVHD model, Treg reconstitution was shown to be significantly improved in mice receiving allografts from G-CSF pre-treated donors [34]. Thus, G-CSF exerts additional beneficial effects on Treg beyond their mobilization, suggesting strategies to optimize Treg mobilization should be built around combination strategies where G-CSF is retained. In this regard, that AMD3100 was shown to mobilize Treg with increased efficacy than G-CSF leads to the speculation that a combined strategy of G-CSF plus AMD3100 mobilization would generate more tolerogenic grafts due to Treg content. However, in a recent preclinical study, grafts mobilized with combined G-CSF plus AMD3100 in fact elicited increased GVHD severity, although the mechanism was unclear [56].
BM Treg contribute locally to the maintenance of the HSC niche and immune tolerance
Increasing evidence suggests that the Treg that reside within the BM are active and functionally relevant at this site. In elegant in vivo imaging studies, Fujisakie et al. demonstrated that Treg co-localize with HSC in the endosteal niche and are crucial for establishing an immune privileged environment [57]. In this study using non-irradiated recipients, transplanted purified syngeneic and allogeneic HSC were engrafted and were maintained in the niche in similar numbers. However, Treg depletion resulted in a dramatic loss of allogeneic donor HSC, which was associated with increased proinflammatory cytokine expression by BM resident CD4 and CD8 T cells. Mechanistically, IL-10 production by Treg was shown to be critical for Treg-mediated protection of allogenic HSC within the niche. In line with this, the infusion of Treg into patients prior to SCT improves lymphoid reconstitution and GVHD control after transplantation. Furthermore, as ascertained from studies of the FoxP3-deficient scurfy mice, BM Treg protect B lymphopoiesis integrity through the inhibition of cytokine production by effector T cells during inflammation [58]. Moreover, the BM is a recently recognized target of GVHD, which is characterized by donor T cell destruction of the BM HSC niche associated with delayed immune reconstitution and disrupted B cell lymphopoiesis [59, 60]. The observation that changes in the resident BM Treg population are associated with pathology further supports the importance of these cells in the regulation of disease. Studies report increased Treg in the BM of patients with metastatic prostate cancer compared to healthy donors. These BM Treg were functional, highly proliferative and found to suppress osteoclast differentiation, in turn contributing to the osteoblastic bone lesions observed in patients with prostate cancer. Several studies support this finding, most notably Luo et al. demonstrated in vitro that Treg inhibit osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption through IL-10 and TGF-β secretion and that production of these cytokines was enhanced in the presence of estrogen [61]. In line with the suppressive role of Treg in BM, patients with acute myeloid leukaemia present with higher Treg numbers in the PBMC and in the BM. This is associated with poor prognosis and may contribute to the suppression of immune responses via IL-10 production in these patients [62]. In contrast to this, in the inflammatory setting observed after allogeneic SCT, GVHD is associated with a defect in Treg homeostasis and these findings lead to the question of the role of BM resident Treg in controlling GVHD locally. In this regard, the reconstitution of the BM Treg compartment following SCT appears important for the control of GVHD. Thus, in models of both acute and chronic GVHD, recipients of grafts from donor mice which harbour a Treg-specific autophagy deficiency resulted in reduced Treg engraftment, which was most striking in the BM. This reduction of BM Treg was associated with an expansion of CD8 effector T cells in the BM, exacerbated GVHD and reduced survival [35]. However, the impact of BM Treg deficiency on the HSC niche was not investigated. Thus, more than just a reservoir for Treg, the BM appears to be a site where Treg actively contribute to immune homeostasis and peripheral tolerance.
BM environment contributes to Treg maintenance (Fig. 3)
The cytokine requirements for BM Treg also appear to differ from those in the periphery. While FoxP3 represents the definitive marker of Treg, the ability to functionally characterize Treg based on FoxP3 expression is limited by its intracellular localization, which requires fixation and permeabilization to visualize. To circumvent this, cell surface markers are routinely used to define and separate Treg from conventional T cells, thus the phenotype of high-level CD25 (IL-2Rα) expression in parallel with low-level CD127 (IL-7R) expression is widely used to identify Treg [63, 64]. IL-2 is widely recognized as being required for the proliferation, survival and function of Treg [65,66,67,68]. However, it is increasingly recognized that a significant proportion of CD4+FoxP3+ Treg is CD25neg, and this is particularly true for BM Treg [69]. In line with this, TIGIT+ Treg exhibit significantly diminished levels of CD25 as compared to the TIGITneg Treg subset [35]. Furthermore, all Treg within the BM, irrespective of TIGIT expression, exhibit elevated levels of CD127, which has been reported to be upregulated on activated Treg [70]. As IL-7R signalling on Treg has also been shown to be required for the development, function and survival of Treg [71,72,73], together these findings suggest that BM Treg, in contrast to Treg in the periphery, may be more dependent on IL-7 than IL-2. Notably, IL-7 is also critical for memory CD8 T cell maintenance [74, 75], their recruitment to and residency within the BM, and is required for their homeostatic proliferation [76, 77]. Within the BM, CD8 T cells are found in close proximity to stromal cells which produce large amounts of IL-7. Thus, common mechanisms may contribute to the maintenance of Treg and CD8 T cell populations in the BM, although overall, the influence of the BM environment on Treg homeostasis remains poorly defined. However, a study in prostate cancer demonstrated that RANK expressing BM resident dendritic cells promote the expansion of BM Treg in this pathogenic environment [25]. Moreover, the expression of the anti-inflammatory protein glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper (GILZ) by BM mesenchymal stem cells (BMSC) was reported to contribute to Treg maintenance at this site [78]. GILZ, the expression of which is ubiquitously induced by glucocorticoids, has been reported to elicit immunosuppressive effects on T cells through the disruption of NFκB signalling and downstream proinflammatory cytokine production [79]. In transgenic mice in which GILZ overexpression is restricted to BMSC, the frequency of Treg was significantly increased within the BM in parallel with an increase in CD8 but not CD4 T cells. Mechanistically, BMSC overexpression of GILZ promoted increased IL-10, and diminished IL-6 and IL-12 production [78]. Thus, through their generation of a distinct cytokine milieu within the BM, BMSC and stromal cells appear to promote a Treg-supportive environment.
That failed Treg reconstitution following SCT has been demonstrated to be causative a lesion in GVHD has led the field to develop Treg restorative approaches. Based on the high-level expression of CD25 on peripheral Treg one approach currently being trialled in the clinic is the administration of low-dose IL-2 to preferentially expand Treg over T effector cells. Encouragingly, approximately 50% of patients show Treg expansion in the PB and improved disease status as long as therapy is continued [80, 81]. Whether low-dose IL-2 is effective in promoting the BM Treg compartment is unknown; however, given the perceived distinction between the cytokine requirements of Treg in the periphery and BM, one could speculate that IL-2 alone may not be optimal. Thus, deepening our understanding of the BM Treg requirements in both steady state and after SCT, should help direct further Treg restorative protocols.
To summarize, Treg are a suppressive T cell subset which play a crucial role in the establishment of tolerance after SCT. Recent findings highlight the enrichment of an activated/memory Treg population in the BM which are highly suppressive and functional at this site. Treg are attracted to, and maintained in, the BM through the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis, and the disruption of this pathway mobilizes Treg into the periphery. In contrast to its efficacy in HSC mobilization, AMD3100 is superior to G-CSF in its ability to mobilize Treg. Given that HSC mobilization involves the disturbance of adhesive interactions beyond the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis, it will be important to determine if these interactions contribute to Treg retention in the BM, to allow the development of mobilizing regimes optimal for generating SCT grafts enriched in these cells. Importantly, strategies that promote autophagy to enhance Treg survival appear ideal. In addition to enhancing Treg numbers in the graft, collectively the literature suggests that promoting Treg engraftment in the BM after SCT will be beneficial for GVHD control. Clearly, further studies of the survival requirements of the BM Treg are required, and may lead to new therapeutic strategies to promote tolerance after SCT.
References
Anasetti C, Logan BR, Lee SJ, et al. Peripheral-blood stem cells versus bone marrow from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(16):1487–96.
Bensinger WI, Weaver CH, Appelbaum FR, et al. Transplantation of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cells mobilized by recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Blood. 1995;85(6):1655–8.
Pavletic ZS, Joshi SS, Pirruccello SJ, et al. Lymphocyte reconstitution after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21(1):33–41.
Yang JZ, Zhang JQ, Sun LX. Mechanisms for T cell tolerance induced with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Mol Immunol. 2016;70:56–62.
Arpinati M, Green CL, Heimfeld S, Heuser JE, Anasetti C. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor mobilizes T helper 2-inducing dendritic cells. Blood. 2000;95(8):2484–90.
Morris ES, MacDonald KP, Rowe V, et al. Donor treatment with pegylated G-CSF augments the generation of IL-10-producing regulatory T cells and promotes transplantation tolerance. Blood. 2004;103(9):3573–81.
Pan L, Delmonte J Jr, Jalonen CK, Ferrara JL. Pretreatment of donor mice with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor polarizes donor T lymphocytes toward type-2 cytokine production and reduces severity of experimental graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 1995;86(12):4422–9.
Wolf D, Wolf AM, Fong D, et al. Regulatory T-cells in the graft and the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Transplantation. 2007;83(8):1107–13.
Vasu S, Geyer S, Bingman A, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized allografts contain activated immune cell subsets associated with risk of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(4):658–68.
Rezvani K, Mielke S, Ahmadzadeh M, et al. High donor FOXP3-positive regulatory T-cell (Treg) content is associated with a low risk of GVHD following HLA-matched allogeneic SCT. Blood. 2006;108(4):1291–7.
Beres AJ, Drobyski WR. The role of regulatory T cells in the biology of graft versus host disease. Front Immunol. 2013;4:163.
Robb RJ, Lineburg KE, Kuns RD, et al. Identification and expansion of highly suppressive CD8(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells after experimental allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2012;119(24):5898–908.
Zhang P, Tey SK, Koyama M, et al. Induced regulatory T cells promote tolerance when stabilized by rapamycin and IL-2 in vivo. J Immunol. 2013;191(10):5291–303.
Edinger M, Hoffmann P, Ermann J, et al. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells preserve graft-versus-tumor activity while inhibiting graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation. Nat Med. 2003;9(9):1144–50.
Hill GR, Crawford JM, Cooke KR, Brinson YS, Pan L, Ferrara JL. Total body irradiation and acute graft-versus-host disease: the role of gastrointestinal damage and inflammatory cytokines. Blood. 1997;90(8):3204–13.
Hill GR, Ferrara JL. The primacy of the gastrointestinal tract as a target organ of acute graft-versus-host disease: rationale for the use of cytokine shields in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2000;95(9):2754–9.
Antin JH, Ferrara JL. Cytokine dysregulation and acute graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 1992;80(12):2964–8.
Sakoda Y, Hashimoto D, Asakura S, et al. Donor-derived thymic-dependent T cells cause chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2007;109(4):1756–64.
Danby RD, Zhang W, Medd P, et al. High proportions of regulatory T cells in PBSC grafts predict improved survival after allogeneic haematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(1):110–8.
Chen X, Vodanovic-Jankovic S, Johnson B, Keller M, Komorowski R, Drobyski WR. Absence of regulatory T-cell control of TH1 and TH17 cells is responsible for the autoimmune-mediated pathology in chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2007;110(10):3804–13.
Zorn E, Kim HT, Lee SJ, et al. Reduced frequency of FOXP3+CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2005;106(8):2903–11.
Rieger K, Loddenkemper C, Maul J, et al. Mucosal FOXP3+ regulatory T cells are numerically deficient in acute and chronic GvHD. Blood. 2006;107(4):1717–23.
Matsuoka K, Kim HT, McDonough S, et al. Altered regulatory T cell homeostasis in patients with CD4+ lymphopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(5):1479–93.
Zou L, Barnett B, Safah H, et al. Bone marrow is a reservoir for CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells that traffic through CXCL12/CXCR4 signals. Cancer Res. 2004;64(22):8451–5.
Zhao E, Wang L, Dai J, et al. Regulatory T cells in the bone marrow microenvironment in patients with prostate cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2012;1(2):152–61.
Sakaguchi S. Naturally arising Foxp3-expressing CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells in immunological tolerance to self and non-self. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(4):345–52.
Haribhai D, Lin W, Edwards B, et al. A central role for induced regulatory T cells in tolerance induction in experimental colitis. J Immunol. 2009;182(6):3461–8.
Haribhai D, Williams JB, Jia S, et al. A requisite role for induced regulatory T cells in tolerance based on expanding antigen receptor diversity. Immunity. 2011;35(1):109–22.
Joller N, Lozano E, Burkett PR, et al. Treg cells expressing the coinhibitory molecule TIGIT selectively inhibit proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cell responses. Immunity. 2014;40(4):569–81.
Firan M, Dhillon S, Estess P, Siegelman MH. Suppressor activity and potency among regulatory T cells is discriminated by functionally active CD44. Blood. 2006;107(2):619–27.
Sugiyama T, Kohara H, Noda M, Nagasawa T. Maintenance of the hematopoietic stem cell pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine signaling in bone marrow stromal cell niches. Immunity. 2006;25(6):977–88.
Zou YR, Kottmann AH, Kuroda M, Taniuchi I, Littman DR. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature. 1998;393(6685):595–9.
Greenbaum AM, Link DC. Mechanisms of G-CSF-mediated hematopoietic stem and progenitor mobilization. Leukemia. 2011;25(2):211–7.
MacDonald KP, Le Texier L, Zhang P, et al. Modification of T cell responses by stem cell mobilization requires direct signaling of the T cell by G-CSF and IL-10. J Immunol. 2014;192(7):3180–9.
Le Texier L, Lineburg KE, Cao B, et al. Autophagy-dependent regulatory T cells are critical for the control of graft-versus-host disease. JCI Insight. 2016;1(15):e86850.
Ukena SN, Velaga S, Goudeva L, et al. Human regulatory T cells of G-CSF mobilized allogeneic stem cell donors qualify for clinical application. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51644.
Kean LS, Sen S, Onabajo O, et al. Significant mobilization of both conventional and regulatory T cells with AMD3100. Blood. 2011;118(25):6580–90.
Bonig H, Chudziak D, Priestley G, Papayannopoulou T. Insights into the biology of mobilized hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells through innovative treatment schedules of the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. Exp Hematol. 2009;37(3):402.e401–415.e401.
Cao B, Zhang Z, Grassinger J, et al. Therapeutic targeting and rapid mobilization of endosteal HSC using a small molecule integrin antagonist. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11007.
Bonig H, Watts KL, Chang KH, Kiem HP, Papayannopoulou T. Concurrent blockade of alpha4-integrin and CXCR4 in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization. Stem Cells. 2009;27(4):836–7.
Craddock CF, Nakamoto B, Elices M, Papayannopoulou T. The role of CS1 moiety of fibronectin in VLA mediated haemopoietic progenitor trafficking. Br J Haematol. 1997;97(1):15–21.
Craddock CF, Nakamoto B, Andrews RG, Priestley GV, Papayannopoulou T. Antibodies to VLA4 integrin mobilize long-term repopulating cells and augment cytokine-induced mobilization in primates and mice. Blood. 1997;90(12):4779–88.
Papayannopoulou T, Craddock C, Nakamoto B, Priestley GV, Wolf NS. The VLA4/VCAM-1 adhesion pathway defines contrasting mechanisms of lodgement of transplanted murine hemopoietic progenitors between bone marrow and spleen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(21):9647–51.
Papayannopoulou T, Priestley GV, Nakamoto B. Anti-VLA4/VCAM-1-induced mobilization requires cooperative signaling through the kit/mkit ligand pathway. Blood. 1998;91(7):2231–9.
Ramirez P, Rettig MP, Uy GL, et al. BIO5192, a small molecule inhibitor of VLA-4, mobilizes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 2009;114(7):1340–3.
Velders GA, Pruijt JF, Verzaal P, et al. Enhancement of G-CSF-induced stem cell mobilization by antibodies against the beta 2 integrins LFA-1 and Mac-1. Blood. 2002;100(1):327–33.
Stassen M, Fondel S, Bopp T, et al. Human CD25+ regulatory T cells: two subsets defined by the integrins alpha 4 beta 7 or alpha 4 beta 1 confer distinct suppressive properties upon CD4+ T helper cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34(5):1303–11.
Glatigny S, Duhen R, Arbelaez C, Kumari S, Bettelli E. Integrin alpha L controls the homing of regulatory T cells during CNS autoimmunity in the absence of integrin alpha 4. Sci Rep. 2015;5:7834.
Siewert C, Lauer U, Cording S, et al. Experience-driven development: effector/memory-like alphaE + Foxp3+ regulatory T cells originate from both naive T cells and naturally occurring naive-like regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180(1):146–55.
Zhao D, Zhang C, Yi T, et al. In vivo-activated CD103+CD4+ regulatory T cells ameliorate ongoing chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2008;112(5):2129–38.
Fischer A, Zundler S, Atreya R, et al. Differential effects of alpha4beta7 and GPR15 on homing of effector and regulatory T cells from patients with UC to the inflamed gut in vivo. Gut. 2015.
Ermann J, Hoffmann P, Edinger M, et al. Only the CD62L+ subpopulation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells protects from lethal acute GVHD. Blood. 2005;105(5):2220–6.
Braun A, Dewert N, Brunnert F, et al. Integrin alphaE(CD103) is involved in regulatory T-cell function in allergic contact hypersensitivity. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135(12):2982–91.
Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469(7330):323–35.
Wei J, Long L, Yang K, et al. Autophagy enforces functional integrity of regulatory T cells by coupling environmental cues and metabolic homeostasis. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(3):277–85.
Arbez J, Saas P, Lamarthee B, et al. Impact of donor hematopoietic cells mobilized with G-CSF and plerixafor on murine acute graft-versus-host-disease. Cytotherapy. 2015;17(7):948–55.
Fujisaki J, Wu J, Carlson AL, et al. In vivo imaging of Treg cells providing immune privilege to the haematopoietic stem-cell niche. Nature. 2011;474(7350):216–9.
Kim S, Park K, Choi J, et al. Foxp3+ regulatory T cells ensure B lymphopoiesis by inhibiting the granulopoietic activity of effector T cells in mouse bone marrow. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(1):167–79.
Shono Y, Shiratori S, Kosugi-Kanaya M, et al. Bone marrow graft-versus-host disease: evaluation of its clinical impact on disrupted hematopoiesis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(4):495–500.
Shono Y, Ueha S, Wang Y, et al. Bone marrow graft-versus-host disease: early destruction of hematopoietic niche after MHC-mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2010;115(26):5401–11.
Luo CY, Wang L, Sun C, Li DJ. Estrogen enhances the functions of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells that suppress osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption in vitro. Cell Mol Immunol. 2011;8(1):50–8.
Tian T, Yu S, Liu L, et al. The profile of T helper subsets in bone marrow microenvironment is distinct for different stages of acute myeloid leukemia patients and chemotherapy partly ameliorates these variations. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131761.
Seddiki N, Santner-Nanan B, Martinson J, et al. Expression of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-7 receptors discriminates between human regulatory and activated T cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203(7):1693–700.
Liu W, Putnam AL, Xu-Yu Z, et al. CD127 expression inversely correlates with FoxP3 and suppressive function of human CD4+ T reg cells. J Exp Med. 2006;203(7):1701–11.
Malek TR, Bayer AL. Tolerance, not immunity, crucially depends on IL-2. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(9):665–74.
Malek TR, Yu A, Vincek V, Scibelli P, Kong L. CD4 regulatory T cells prevent lethal autoimmunity in IL-2Rbeta-deficient mice. Implications for the nonredundant function of IL-2. Immunity. 2002;17(2):167–78.
Levings MK, Sangregorio R, Roncarolo MG. Human cd25(+)cd4(+) t regulatory cells suppress naive and memory T cell proliferation and can be expanded in vitro without loss of function. J Exp Med. 2001;193(11):1295–302.
Thornton AM, Shevach EM. Suppressor effector function of CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells is antigen nonspecific. J Immunol. 2000;164(1):183–90.
Wan YY, Flavell RA. Identifying Foxp3-expressing suppressor T cells with a bicistronic reporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(14):5126–31.
Simonetta F, Chiali A, Cordier C, et al. Increased CD127 expression on activated FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40(9):2528–38.
Mazzucchelli R, Hixon JA, Spolski R, et al. Development of regulatory T cells requires IL-7Ralpha stimulation by IL-7 or TSLP. Blood. 2008;112(8):3283–92.
Simonetta F, Gestermann N, Martinet KZ, et al. Interleukin-7 influences FOXP3+CD4+ regulatory T cells peripheral homeostasis. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36596.
Schmaler M, Broggi MA, Lagarde N, et al. IL-7R signaling in regulatory T cells maintains peripheral and allograft tolerance in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(43):13330–5.
Goldrath AW, Sivakumar PV, Glaccum M, et al. Cytokine requirements for acute and Basal homeostatic proliferation of naive and memory CD8+ T cells. J Exp Med. 2002;195(12):1515–22.
Schluns KS, Williams K, Ma A, Zheng XX, Lefrancois L. Cutting edge: requirement for IL-15 in the generation of primary and memory antigen-specific CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2002;168(10):4827–31.
Becker TC, Coley SM, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R. Bone marrow is a preferred site for homeostatic proliferation of memory CD8 T cells. J Immunol. 2005;174(3):1269–73.
Mazo IB, Honczarenko M, Leung H, et al. Bone marrow is a major reservoir and site of recruitment for central memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2005;22(2):259–70.
Yang N, Baban B, Isales CM, Shi XM. Crosstalk between bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and regulatory T cells through a glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper/developmental endothelial locus-1-dependent mechanism. FASEB J. 2015;29(9):3954–63.
Ayroldi E, Migliorati G, Bruscoli S, et al. Modulation of T-cell activation by the glucocorticoid-induced leucine zipper factor via inhibition of nuclear factor kappaB. Blood. 2001;98(3):743–53.
Koreth J, Kim HT, Jones KT, et al. Efficacy, durability, and response predictors of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for chronic graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2016;128(1):130–7.
Matsuoka K, Koreth J, Kim HT, et al. Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy restores regulatory T cell homeostasis in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(179):179ra143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Le Texier, L., Lineburg, K.E. & MacDonald, K.P.A. Harnessing bone marrow resident regulatory T cells to improve allogeneic stem cell transplant outcomes. Int J Hematol 105, 153–161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-016-2161-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-016-2161-5