Skip to main content
Log in

Electrochemical Magnetic Bead-Based Immunosensor for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus in Dairy Products

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid and quantitative detection of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus at the strain level is important for quality control of probiotic products. In this study, an electrochemical magnetic bead-based immunosensor (EMBI) was developed for the specific quantification of probiotic L. rhamnosus strain GG (LGG) in dairy products. Magnetic beads coupled with a specific antibody against the pilus subunit SpaA of LGG (Ab-SpaA) were prepared to selectively capture LGG from the background, which were then detected using horseradish peroxidase-labeled Ab-SpaA. The resultant sandwich-type immunocomplexes were separated by magnetic force and detected by measuring current signals using a magnetic glassy carbon electrode (MGCE) and the hydroquinone (HQ)/H2O2 system. Under optimal experimental conditions, the developed EMBI showed a linear relationship between the peak current and the logarithmic value of LGG concentration ranging from 2.56 × 103 to 2.56 × 107 CFU mL−1 with a detection limit of 22 CFU mL−1. EMBI detection is LGG specific, and no cross-reaction was observed for tested strains of other lactic acid bacterial species. The EMBI was successfully applied for LGG determination in commercial milk, yogurt, milk beverage products, and spiked dairy samples, with a recovery rate in the range of 91.74–108.67%. The entire detection process could be completed within 3 h. The proposed biosensor shows low-cost, rapid response, and high sensitivity and specificity and could be a promising technique for quality detection and functional evaluation of probiotic products containing LGG.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achilleos C, Berthier F (2013) Quantitative PCR for the specific quantification of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus paracasei and its interest for Lactococcus lactis in cheese samples. Food Microbiol 36:286–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alves RC, Pimentel FB, Nouws HP, Marques RC, Gonzálezgarcía MB, Oliveira MB, Deleruematos C (2015) Detection of Ara h 1 (a major peanut allergen) in food using an electrochemical gold nanoparticle-coated screen-printed immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 64:19–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Chatterjee M, Ganguly S, Chandra PK (2007) Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in persistent diarrhea in Indian children: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Gastroenterol 41:756–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt K, Alatossava T (2003) Specific identification of certain probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains with PCR primers based on phage-related sequences. Int J Food Microbiol 84:189–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunthof CJ, Bloemen K, Breeuwer P, Rombouts FM, Abee T (2001) Flow cytometric assessment of viability of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2326–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Conzuelo F, Gamella M, Campuzano S, Reviejo AJ, Pingarrón JM (2012) Disposable amperometric magneto-immunosensor for direct detection of tetracyclines antibiotics residues in milk. Anal Chim Acta 737:29–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis C (2014) Enumeration of probiotic strains: review of culture-dependent and alternative techniques to quantify viable bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 103:9–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Debmandal M, Mandal S, Pal NK (2012) Detection of intestinal colonization of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus by stool culture in modified selective media. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doron S, Snydman DR, Gorbach SL (2005) Lactobacillus GG: bacteriology and clinical applications. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 34:483–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drouault S, Corthier G, Ehrlich SD, Renault P (1999) Survival, physiology, and lysis of Lactococcus lactis in the digestive tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4881

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duez H et al (2010) A colony immunoblotting method for quantitative detection of a Bifidobacterium animalis probiotic strain in human faeces. J Appl Microbiol 88:1019–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem A, Pividori MI, Lermo A, Bonanni A, Valle MD, Alegret S (2006) Genomagnetic assay based on label-free electrochemical detection using magneto-composite electrodes. Sens Actuators B 114:591–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2002) Guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food

  • Guandalini S, Pensabene L, Zikri MA, Dias JA, Casali LG, Hoekstra H, Kolacek S, Massar K, Micetic–Turk D, Papadopoulou A, de Sousa JS, Sandhu B, Szajewska H, Weizman Z (2000) Lactobacillus GG administered in oral rehydration solution to children with acute diarrhea: a multicenter European trial. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 30:54–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guo S, Dong S (2009) ChemInform abstract: biomolecule-nanoparticle hybrids for electrochemical biosensors. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 28:96–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Han E, Li X, Cai JR, Cui HY, Zhang XA (2014) Development of highly sensitive amperometric biosensor for glucose using carbon nanosphere/sodium alginate composite matrix for enzyme immobilization. Analytical sciences the international journal of the Japan society for Anal Chem 30:897–902

  • Hervás M, López MA, Escarpa A (2009) Electrochemical immunoassay using magnetic beads for the determination of zearalenone in baby food: an anticipated analytical tool for food safety. Anal Chim Acta 653:167–172

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hojsak I, Abdović S, Szajewska H, Milosević M, Krznarić Z, Kolacek S (2010) Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of nosocomial gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections. Pediatrics 125:1171–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MI, Sadekuzzaman M, Ha SD (2017) Probiotics as potential alternative biocontrol agents in the agriculture and food industries: a review. Food Res Int 100:63–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CH, Chang MT, Huang L, Chu WS (2015) Simultaneous discrimination of species and strains in Lactobacillus rhamnosus using species-specific PCR combined with multiplex mini-sequencing technology. Mol Cell Probes 29:531–533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huys G, Vancanneyt M, D'Haene K, Vankerckhoven V, Goossens H, Swings J (2006) Accuracy of species identity of commercial bacterial cultures intended for probiotic or nutritional use. Res Microbiol 157:803–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalliomäki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Kero P, Koskinen P, Isolauri E (2001) Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 357:1076–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lebeer S, Claes I, Tytgat HLP, Verhoeven TLA, Marien E, von Ossowski I, Reunanen J, Palva A, de Vos WM, de Keersmaecker SCJ, Vanderleyden J (2012) Functional analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG pili in relation to adhesion and immunomodulatory interactions with intestinal epithelial cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:185–193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Park EJ, Min NK, Pak JJ (2009) Carbon nanotube based electrochemical immunosensors for high-sensitive detection of E. coli. Sensors:1176–1179

  • Lena MD, Quero GM, Santovito E, Verran J, Angelis MD, Fusco V (2015) A selective medium for isolation and accurate enumeration of Lactobacillus casei-group members in probiotic milks and dairy products. Int Dairy J 47:27–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • M Č, Metelka R, Holubová L, Horák D, Dvořáková V, Bílková Z, Korecká L (2015) Magnetic beads-based electrochemical immunosensor for monitoring allergenic food proteins. Anal Biochem 484:4–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ranadheera CS, Naumovski N, Ajlouni S (2018) Non-bovine milk products as emerging probiotic carriers: recent developments and innovations. Curr Opin Food Sci 22:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruizvaldepeñas MV, Campuzano S, Torrenterodríguez RM, Reviejo AJ, Pingarrón JM (2016) Electrochemical magnetic beads-based immunosensing platform for the determination of α-lactalbumin in milk. Food Chem 213:595–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakai T, Oishi K, Asahara T, Takada T, Yuki N, Matsumoto K, Nomoto K, Kushiro A (2010) M-RTLV agar, a novel selective medium to distinguish Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei from Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Int J Food Microbiol 139:154–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salam F, Tothill IE (2009) Detection of Salmonella typhimurium using an electrochemical immunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2630–2636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen ZQ, Wang JF, Qiu ZG, Jin M, Wang XW, Chen ZL, Li JW, Cao FH (2011) QCM immunosensor detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on beacon immunomagnetic nanoparticles and catalytic growth of colloidal gold. Biosens Bioelectron 26:3376–3381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smita S, Pawas G, Rameshwar S, Knutj H (2009) Application of molecular identification tools for Lactobacillus, with a focus on discrimination between closely related species: a review. LWT- Food Sci Technol 42:448–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y et al (2016a) A novel label-free electrochemical immunosensor based on functionalized nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for carcinoembryonic antigen detection. Biosens Bioelectron 90:31–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZQ, Wei YF, Rao SQ, Gao L, Yin YQ, Xue F, Fang WM, Gu RX, Jiao XA (2016b) Immunomagnetic separation combined with colony immunoblotting for selective enrichment and detection of piliated Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. J Appl Microbiol 121:1406–1415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZQ, Xue Y, Rao SQ, Zhang M, Gao L, Yin YQ, Chen DW, Zhou XH, Jiao XA (2017) Isolation of probiotic piliated Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains from human faecal microbiota using SpaA antiserum-based colony immunoblotting. J Microbiol Biotechnol 27:1971–1982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ye L, Zhao G, Dou W (2018) An electrochemical immunoassay for Escherichia coli O157:H7 using double functionalized Au@Pt/SiO2 nanocomposites and immune magnetic nanoparticles. Talanta 182:354–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yun Z, Hang Y, Yu J, Wei H (2016) Rapid and sensitive detection of HIV-1 p24 antigen by immunomagnetic separation coupled with catalytic fluorescent immunoassay. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:6115–6121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Shen J, Ma H, Jiang Y, Huang C, Han E, Yao B, He Y (2016a) Optimized dendrimer-encapsulated gold nanoparticles and enhanced carbon nanotube nanoprobes for amplified electrochemical immunoassay of E. coli in dairy product based on enzymatically induced deposition of polyaniline. Biosens Bioelectron 80:666–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Zhang F, Zhang H, Shen J, Han E, Dong X (2015) Functionalized gold nanorod-based labels for amplified electrochemical immunoassay of E. coli as indicator bacteria relevant to the quality of dairy product. Talanta 132:600–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Ge S, Wang S, Yan M, Yu J, Song X, Liu W (2012) Magnetic beads-based electrochemiluminescence immunosensor for determination of cancer markers using quantum dot functionalized PtRu alloys as labels. Analyst 137:2176–2182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhang B, Ye X, Yan Y, Huang L, Jiang Z, Tan S, Cai X (2016b) Electrochemical immunosensor for interferon-γ based on disposable ITO detector and HRP-antibody-conjugated nano gold as signal tag. Mater Sci Eng C 59:577–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CH, Long YM, Qi BP, Pang DW, Zhang ZL (2013) A magnetic bead-based bienzymatic electrochemical immunosensor for determination of H9N2 avian influenza virus. Electrochem Commun 31:129–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31371806 and 31601535), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant number BK20160459), the Priority Academic Program Development of the Department of Education of Jiangsu Province (grant number 15KJA550004 and 16KJB550008), and a grant from Yangzhou University Science and Technology Innovation Team (2016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Author Yu Xue declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Dong-lei Jiang declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Qin Hu declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Sheng-qi Rao declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Lu Gao declares that she has no conflict of interest. Author Zhen-quan Yang declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, Y., Jiang, Dl., Hu, Q. et al. Electrochemical Magnetic Bead-Based Immunosensor for Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus in Dairy Products. Food Anal. Methods 12, 1197–1207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-019-01457-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-019-01457-z

Keywords

Navigation