Skip to main content
Log in

How Can Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Both Be Changed? Testing Two Interventions to Promote Consumption of Green Vegetables

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Although correlational studies have demonstrated that implicit and explicit attitudes are both important in predicting eating behavior, few studies targeting food choice have attempted to change both types of attitudes.

Purpose

We tested the impact of (a) an evaluative learning intervention that uses the self to change attitudes (i.e., a Self-Referencing task) and (b) a persuasive communication in modifying implicit and explicit attitudes towards green vegetables and promoting readiness to change. The study targeted individuals who explicitly reported they did not like or only moderately liked green vegetables.

Methods

Participants (N = 273) were randomly allocated to a 2 (self-referencing: present vs. absent) × 2 (persuasive message: present vs. absent) factorial design. The outcomes were implicit and explicit attitudes as well as readiness to increase consumption of green vegetables.

Results

Implicit attitudes increased after repeatedly pairing green vegetable stimuli with the self in the self-referencing task but did not change in response to the persuasive communication. The persuasive message increased explicit attitudes and readiness to change, but did not alter implicit attitudes. A three-way interaction with pre-existing explicit attitudes was also observed. In the absence of a persuasive message, the self-referencing task increased on readiness to change among participants with more negative pre-existing explicit attitudes.

Conclusions

This study is the first to demonstrate that a self-referencing task is effective in changing both implicit attitudes and readiness to change eating behavior. Findings indicate that distinct intervention strategies are needed to change implicit and explicit attitudes towards green vegetables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1991; 50:179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health. 1998; 13: 623–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004; 8: 220–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenwald A, McGhee D, Schwartz J. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998; 74: 1464–1480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nosek BA. Implicit–explicit relations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007; 16: 65-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor NJ, Lawton RJ. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2011; 5: 97–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prestwich A, Hurling R, Baker S. Implicit shopping: Attitudinal determinants of the purchasing of healthy and unhealthy foods. Psychol Health. 2011; 26: 875–885.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollands G, Prestwich A, Marteau T. Using aversive images to enhance healthy food choices and implicit attitudes: An experimental test of evaluative conditioning. Health Psychol. 2011; 30:195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Karpinski A, & Steinman R B. The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91:16-32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karpinski A, & Hilton, J L. Attitudes and the Implicit Association Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 81: 774-778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friese M, Hofmann W, Wänke M. When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. Brit J Soc Psychol. 2008; 47: 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perugini M. Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. Brit J Soc Psychol. 2005; 44: 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Richetin J, Perugini M, Prestwich A, O’Gorman R. The IAT as a predictor of food choice: The case of fruits versus snacks. Int J Psychol. 2007; 42: 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Conner M, Perugini M, O’Gorman R, Ayres K, Prestwich A. Relations between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behavior: Evidence of moderation by individual difference variables. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2007; 33:1727–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maison D, Greenwald A, Bruin R. The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Pol Psychol Bull. 2001; 32: 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gawronski B, Bodenhausen G. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychol Bull. 2006; 132: 692–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hofmann W, De Houwer J, Perugini M, Baeyens F, Crombez G. Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136: 390–421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Houben K, Havermans R, Wiers R. Learning to dislike alcohol: Conditioning negative implicit attitudes toward alcohol and its effect on drinking behavior. Psychopharmacology. 2010; 211: 79–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lebens H, Roefs A, Martijn C, Houben K, Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Making implicit measures of associations with snack foods more negative through evaluative conditioning. Eat Behav. 2011; 12: 249–253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamaguchi S, Greenwald A, Krendl A, et al. Apparent universality of positive implicit self-esteem. Psychol Sci. 2007; 18: 498–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prestwich A, Perugini M, Hurling R, Richetin J. Using the self to change implicit attitudes. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hughes S, De Houwer J, Perugini M. Expanding the boundaries of evaluative learning research: How intersecting regularities shape our likes and dislikes. J Exp Psychol Gen. In press.

  23. Perugini M, Zogmaister C, Richetin J, Prestwich A, Hurling R. Changing implicit attitudes by contrasting the self with others. Soc Cognition. 2013; 31: 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rydell R, McConnell A. Understanding implicit and explicit attitude change: A systems of reasoning analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006; 91: 995–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson T, Lindsey S, Schooler T. A model of dual attitudes. Psychol Rev. 2000; 107: 101–126.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krosnick J, Petty R. Attitude strength: An overview. In: Petty R, Krosnick J, eds. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 1995: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin B. H., Wendt M, Guthrie J. F. Impact on energy, sodium and dietary fibre intakes of vegetables prepared at home and away from home in the USA. Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16, 1937-1943.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Di Noia J. Defining Powerhouse Fruits and Vegetables: A Nutrient Density Approach. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014; 11: E95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Higdon JV, Delage B, Williams DE, Dashwood RH. Cruciferous vegetables and Human Cancer Risk: Epidemiologic Evidence and Mechanistic Basis. Pharmacol Res. 2007; 55: 224–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Harris P, Brearley I, Sheeran P, et al. Combining self-affirmation with implementation intentions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Psychol. 2014; 33: 729–736.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Mattavelli MSc.

Ethics declarations

Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Authors Mattavelli, Avishai, Perugini, Richetin, and Sheeran declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mattavelli, S., Avishai, A., Perugini, M. et al. How Can Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Both Be Changed? Testing Two Interventions to Promote Consumption of Green Vegetables. ann. behav. med. 51, 511–518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9874-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9874-9

Keywords

Navigation