Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trajectories of Posttraumatic Growth and Associated Characteristics in Women with Breast Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background

Cancer survivors may experience posttraumatic growth (PTG), positive psychological changes resulting from highly stressful events; however, the longitudinal course of PTG is poorly understood.

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to determine trajectories of PTG in breast cancer survivors and associated characteristics.

Methods

Women (N = 653) participating in a longitudinal observational study completed questionnaires within 8 months of breast cancer diagnosis and 6, 12, and 18 months later. Group-based modeling identified PTG trajectories. Chi-square tests and ANOVA detected group differences in demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables.

Results

Six trajectory groups emerged. Three were stable at different levels of PTG, two increased modestly, and one increased substantially over time. Trajectory groups differed by age, race, receipt of chemotherapy, illness intrusiveness, depressive symptoms, active-adaptive coping, and social support.

Conclusions

This first examination of PTG trajectories in US cancer survivors elucidates heterogeneity in longitudinal patterns of PTG. Future research should determine whether other samples exhibit similar trajectories and whether various PTG trajectories predict mental and physical health outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Posttraumatic growth: The positive lessons of loss. In: Neimeyer RA, ed. Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss. Illustratedth ed. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Assoication; 2001: 157-172.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq. 2004; 15(1): 1-18. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996; 9(3): 455-72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stanton AL, Bower JE, Low CA. Posttraumatic growth after cancer. In: Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, eds. Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2006: 138-175.

  5. Danhauer SC, Case LD, Tedeschi R, Russell G, Vishnvesky T, Triplett K. Predictors of posttaumatic growth in women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2013; 22(12): 2673-83. doi:10.1002/pon.3298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O'Connor M, Christensen S, Jensen AB, Moller S, Zachariae R. How traumatic is breast cancer? Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and risk factors for severe PTSS at 3 and 15 months after surgery in a nationwide cohort of Danish women treated for primary breast cancer. Brit J Cancer. 2011; 104(3): 419-26. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6606073.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Costanzo ES, Lutgendorf SK, Mattes ML, et al. Adjusting to life after treatment: distress and quality of life following treatment for breast cancer. Brit J Cancer. 2007; 97(12): 1625-31. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604091.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanson FM, Suman VJ, Rummans TA, et al. Physical, psychological and social well-being of women with breast cancer: the influence of disease phase. Psycho-Oncol. 2000; 9(3): 221-31. doi:10.1037/a0028523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Harirchi I, Ebrahimi M, Khaleghi F, Jarvandi S. Quality of life in patients with breast cancer before and after diagnosis: an eighteen months follow-up study. BMC Cancer. 2008; 8: 330. doi:10.1186/1471-2407-8-330.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Danhauer SC, Crawford SL, Farmer DF, Avis NE. A longitudinal investigation of coping strategies and quality of life among younger women with breast cancer. J Behav Med. 2009; 32(4): 371-9. doi:10.1007/s10865-009-9211-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Knobf MT. Psychosocial responses in breast cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2007; 23(1): 71-83. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2006.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rowland JH, Baker F. Introduction: resilience of cancer survivors across the lifespan. Cancer. 2005; 104(11 Suppl): 2543-8. doi:10.1002/cncr.21487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McDonough MH, Sabiston CM, Wrosch C. Predicting changes in posttraumatic growth and subjective well-being among breast cancer survivors: the role of social support and stress. Psycho-Oncol. 2013; 23(1): 114-20. doi:10.1002/pon.3380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silva S, Crespo C, Canavarro MC. Pathways for psychological adjustment in breast cancer: a longitudinal study on coping strategies and posttraumatic growth. Psychol Health. 2012; 27(11): 1323-41. doi:10.1080/08870446.2012.676644.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scrignaro M, Barni S, Magrin ME. The combined contribution of social support and coping strategies in predicting post-traumatic growth: a longitudinal study on cancer patients. Psycho-Oncol. 2011; 20(8): 823-31. doi:10.1002/pon.1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanyi Z, Szluha K, Nemes L, Kovács S, Bugán A. Health-related quality of life, fatigue, and posttraumatic growth of cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: a longitudinal study. Appl Res Qual Life. 2013; 8(31): 1-14. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9261-7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Manne S, Ostroff J, Winkel G, Fox K, Grana G, Goldstein L. Posttraumatic growth after breast cancer: patient, partner, and couple perspectives. Psychosom Med. 2004; 66(3): 442-54. doi:10.1097/?01.psy.0000127689.38525.7d.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milam JE. Posttraumatic growth among HIV/AIDS patients. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2004; 34(11): 2353-76. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01981.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang AW, Chang CS, Chen ST, Chen DR, Hsu WY. Identification of posttraumatic growth trajectories in the first year after breast cancer surgery. Psychooncology. 2014. doi:10.1002/pon.3577.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Linley PA, Joseph S. Positive change following trauma and adversity: a review. J Trauma Stress. 2004; 17(1): 11-21. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000014671.27856.7e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aspinwall LG, MacNamara A. Taking positive changes seriously. Cancer. 2005; 104(11 Suppl): 2549-56. doi:10.1002/cncr.21244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Avis NE, Levine B, Naughton MJ, Case LD, Naftalis E, Van Zee KJ. Age-related longitudinal changes in depressive symptoms following breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2013; 139(1): 199-206. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2513-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Avis NE, Levine B, Naughton MJ, Case DL, Naftalis E, Van Zee KJ. Explaining age-related differences in depression following breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. Breast Cancer Res Tr. 2012; 136(2): 581-91. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2277-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996; 67(3): 588-97. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beck A. BDI, Beck Depression Inventory: Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med. 1997; 4(1): 92-100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989; 56(2): 267-83. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Devins GM, Edworthy SM, Seland TP, Klein GM. Differences in illness intrusiveness across rheumatoid arthritis, end-stage renal disease, and multiple sclerosis. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993; 181(6): 377-81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Devins GM, Binik YM, Hutchinson TA, Hollomby DJ, Barre PE, Guttmann RD. The emotional impact of end-stage renal disease: Importance of patients’ perception of intrusiveness and control. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1983; 13(4): 327-43. doi:10.2190/5DCP-25BV-U1G9-9G7C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Devins GM. Illness intrusiveness and the psychosocial impact of lifestyle disruptions in chronic life-threatening disease. Adv Renal Replace Th. 1994; 1(3): 251-63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Devins GM. Using the illness intrusiveness ratings scale to understand health-related quality of life in chronic disease. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68(6): 591-602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991; 32(6): 705-14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. House JS, Kahn RL, McLeod JD, Williams D. Measures and concepts of social support. In: Cohen S, Syme SL, eds. Social Support and Health. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press; 1985:83–108.

  34. Jones BL, Nagin DS. Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociol Method Res. 2007; 35(4): 542-71. doi:10.1177/0049124106292364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nagin DS. Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press; 2005.

  36. Jones BL, Nagin DS, Roeder K. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Method Res. 2001; 29(3): 374-93. doi:10.1177/0049124101029003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Andruff H, Carraro N, Thompson A, Gaudreau P, Louvet B. Latent class growth modelling: a tutorial. TQMP. 2009; 5(1): 11-24.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haviland A, Rosenbaum PR, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE. Combining group-based trajectory modeling and propensity score matching for causal inferences in non-experimental longitudinal data. Dev Psychol. 2008; 44(2): 422-36. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Calhoun LG, Cann A, Tedeschi RG. The posttraumatic growth model: Sociocultural considerations. In: Weiss T, Berger R, eds. Posttraumatic growth and culturally competent practice: Lessons learned from around the globe. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010: 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sohl SJ, Levine B, Case LD, Danhauer SC, Avis NE. Trajectories of illness intrusiveness domains following a diagnosis of breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2014; 33(3): 232-41. doi:10.1037/a0032388.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Helgeson VS, Snyder P, Seltman H. Psychological and physical adjustment to breast cancer over 4 years: identifying distinct trajectories of change. Health Psychol. 2004; 23(1): 3-15. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.1.3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Henselmans I, Helgeson VS, Seltman H, De-Vries J, Sanderman R, Ranchor AV. Identification and prediction of distress trajectories in the first year after a breast cancer diagnosis. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(2): 160-8. doi:10.1037/a0017806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lam WW, Bonanno GA, Mancini AD, et al. Trajectories of psychological distress among Chinese women diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2010; 19(10): 1044-51. doi:10.1002/pon.1658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Weiss T, Berger R. Posttraumatic growth around the globe: Research findings and practice implications. In: Posttraumatic growth and culturally compentent practice: Lessons learned from around the globe. Hoboken, NJ: US: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2010: 189-195.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by grants from the National Cancer Institute (R03CA150593-01A1, R25 CA122061, P30 CA012197), the National Institutes of Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women’s Health (BIRCWH) Scholar Program (2K12HD043483-11), and the Department of Defense (Grant # DAMD17-01-1-0447). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Defense.

Authors’ Statement of Conflict of Interest and Adherence to Ethical Standards

Suzanne C. Danhauer, Greg Russell, L. Douglas Case, Stephanie J. Sohl, Richard G. Tedeschi, Elizabeth L. Addington, Kelli Triplett, Kimberly J. Van Zee, Elizabeth Z. Naftalis, Beverly Levine, and Nancy E. Avis declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures, including the informed consent process, were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1063, USA

    Suzanne C. Danhauer Ph.D, Stephanie J. Sohl PhD, Elizabeth L. Addington BA, Kelli Triplett PhD, Beverly Levine PhD & Nancy E. Avis PhD

  2. Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157-1063, USA

    Greg Russell MS & L. Douglas Case PhD

  3. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA

    Stephanie J. Sohl PhD

  4. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, USA

    Richard G. Tedeschi PhD, Elizabeth L. Addington BA & Kelli Triplett PhD

  5. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA

    Kimberly J. Van Zee MD

  6. Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Elizabeth Z. Naftalis MD

Authors
  1. Suzanne C. Danhauer Ph.D
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg Russell MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Douglas Case PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stephanie J. Sohl PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard G. Tedeschi PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Elizabeth L. Addington BA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kelli Triplett PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kimberly J. Van Zee MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Elizabeth Z. Naftalis MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Beverly Levine PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nancy E. Avis PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzanne C. Danhauer Ph.D.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danhauer, S.C., Russell, G., Case, L.D. et al. Trajectories of Posttraumatic Growth and Associated Characteristics in Women with Breast Cancer. ann. behav. med. 49, 650–659 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9696-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9696-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation