Skip to main content
Log in

Determining Switchgrass Breakeven Prices in a Landscape Design System

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precision agriculture technologies allow producers to identify areas of fields that are underperforming and unprofitable. If these less productive parts of the field could be converted to a bioenergy crop through subfield management strategies (landscape design), there may be potential gains to farmer revenue, biomass availability, and reduced adverse environmental impacts. Switchgrass is considered as a potential energy crop due its ability to thrive in marginal conditions. Previous studies have examined switchgrass production and breakeven costs, but have not looked at how production costs may change when produced in a landscape design situation. Adapting costs to the partial field situation, this paper determines the switchgrass breakeven prices ($ ton−1) which equate producers’ net revenues in a base case (all corn) and landscape design case. That breakeven price is the price at which the farmer would be indifferent between the base and landscape design cases. We examine the case of a general, 100-acre field in Iowa, with 15 acres converted to switchgrass production, as well as 11 actual fields in Central Iowa where unprofitable subfields are assumed to be converted to switchgrass production, and the remaining portion of the field remains in corn. We find an average switchgrass breakeven price of $173 ton−1 when land costs are included, and an average of $114 ton−1 when no land costs are considered. A stochastic analysis to obtain a distribution of switchgrass breakeven prices under uncertainty is performed, producing distributions of switchgrass breakeven prices of $65–$266 ton−1 and $108– $432 ton−1 with and without land costs, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2017) Climate Change: Basic Information. United States Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/climate-change-basic-information. Accessed 5 Jan 2017

  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2010) Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor

  3. Csefalvay E, Akien G, Qi L, Horvath I (2015) Definition and application of ethanol equivalent: sustainability performance metrics for biomass conversion to carbon-based fuels and chemicals. Catal Today 239:50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.02.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abodeely J, David M, Joshua K, Kenneth B (2013) A model integration framework for assessing integrated landscape management strategies. Environmental Software Systems 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_12

  5. Liebig A, Schmer R, Vogel P, Mitchell R (2008) Soil carbon storage by switchgrass grown for bioenergy. Bio Energy Res 1(3-4):215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-008-9019-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanal S, Anex RP, Anderson CJ, Herzmann DE, Jha MK (2013) Implications of biofuel policy-driven land cover change for rainfall erosivity and soil erosion in the United States. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 5(6):713–722.

  7. Follett R, Kenneth V, Varvel G, Robert M, John K (2012) Soil carbon sequestration by switchgrass and no-till maize grown for bioenergy. Bio Energy Res 5(4):866–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-012-9198-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhong J, Yu ET, English B, Larson J (2015) Economics and economic trade-offs of switchgrass supply chain for biofuel in Tennessee. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the southern agricultural economics, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Knoxville

  9. Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M (2004) Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 8(4):365–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kitchen R, Sudduth A, Myers B, Massey E, Sadler J, Lerch N, Hummel JW, Palm L (2005) Development of a conservation-oriented precision agriculture system: crop production assessment and plan implementation. Soil and Water Conservation 60(6):421–430

  11. Delgado JA, Bausch WC (2005) Potential use of precision conservation techniques to reduce nitrate leaching in irrigated crops. Soil and Water Conservation Society 60(6):379–387

  12. McConnell M, Burger LW (2011) Precision conservation: a geospatial decsison support tool for optimizing conservation and profitability in agricultural landscapes. Soil Water Conserv Soc 66(6):347–354. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.6.347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonner I, Cafferty K, Tomer M, Muth D, James D, Porter S (2014) Opportunities for energy crop production based on subfield scale distribution of profitability. Energies 7(10):6509–6526. https://doi.org/10.3390/en7106509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonner I, McNunn G, Muth D, Tyner W, Leirer J, Dakins M (2016) Development of integrated bioenergy production systems using precision conservation and multicriteria decision analysis techniques. Soil Water Conserv 71(3):182–193. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.3.182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brandes E, McNunn G, Bonner I, Muth D, Babcock B, Sharma B, Heaton A (2016) Subfield profitability analysis reveals an economic case for cropland diversification. Environ Res Lett 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014009

  16. AgSolver [Computer Software] (2016) Ames, Iowa. Available at http://www.Agsolver.com. Accessed 5 April 2017

  17. Klein R, Wilson R, Groskopf J, Jansen J (2015) 2016 Nebraska crop budgets. University of Nebraska Extension Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources

  18. Plastina A (2016) Estimated costs of crop production in Iowa – 2016. Ag Decision Maker. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach

  19. Edwards W (2016) Comparison of drying systems. Ag Decision Maker. Iowa State University Extension

  20. Smith A (n.d.) Grain hauling cost calculator. The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

  21. (2015) Machinery cost calculator. Ag Decision Maker. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach

  22. Hoque M, Artz G, Hart C (2015) Estimated cost of establishment and production of ‘liberty’ switchgrass. Ag Decision Maker. Iowa State University Extension

  23. Vogel K, Bredja J, Walters D, Buxton D (2002) Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA. Agron J 94(3):413–420. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Burras L, Charles B, John S, Martin B, Tyler J, Velvet G, Mike B, Julie M (2002) On-farm switchgrass yield in the lower Chariton River watershed of Iowa. Switchgrass Production in Iowa. Iowa State University

  25. Fike JH, Parrish DJ, Wolf DD, Balasko JA, Green JT Jr, Rasnake M, Reynolds JH (2006) Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems. Biomass Bioenergy 30(3):198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Busby D, Randall L, Saleem S, Angelina M, Francis E, Seonhuyk H, Brian B, Charles T (2007) Yield and production costs for three potential dedicated energy crops in Mississippi and Oklahoma environments. Selected paper prepared for presentation at the southern agricultural economics association, Department of Agricultural Economics, Mobile

  27. Perrin R, Kenneth V, Marty S, Rob M (2008) Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass. Faculty Publications, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Agronomy and Horticulture Department

  28. Lemus R, Brummer C, Burras L, Moore K, Barker M, Molstad N (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilization on biomass yield and quality in large fields of established switchgrass in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(12):1187-1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.016

  29. Mooney D, Roland R, Burton E, Donald T, James L (2008) Switchgrass production in marginal environments: a comparative economic. American Agricultural Economics, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  30. University of Tennessee Extension (2009) Guideline Switchgrass Establishment and Annual Production Budgets over Three Year Planning Horizon. The University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture

  31. Jacobsen M, Helsen Z (2014) NEWBio switchgrass budget for biomass production. Penn State Extension

  32. Griffith A, Francis E, Daren R (2010) Cost of producing switchgrass for biomass feedstock. Oklahoma State University, Department Of Plant and Soil Sciences

  33. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2017a) Prices received for corn by month—United States. United States Department of Agriculture

  34. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2017b) Quick stats—Central Iowa corn yields. United States Department of Agriculture

Download references

Funding

Funding for this project was provided by the US Department of Energy under project 20.079 Landscape Design for Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, through a subcontract with Antares Group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sabrinna Soldavini.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 938 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soldavini, S., Tyner, W.E. Determining Switchgrass Breakeven Prices in a Landscape Design System. Bioenerg. Res. 11, 191–208 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9888-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9888-6

Keywords

Navigation