Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Genetics and Partitioning for Biomass of Prairie Cordgrass Compared to Switchgrass on Marginal Cropland

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link) has potential as a bioenergy crop in poorly drained cropland in much of temperate North America. Our objectives were (1) describe morphological differences between two prairie cordgrass populations and switchgrass for biomass production and pattern of biomass accumulation in leaf and stem tissue, (2) estimate genetic variation for biomass production and other agronomic traits in a population of prairie cordgrass from South Dakota, and (3) increase knowledge of the impact of insects on biomass production of prairie cordgrass. On poorly drained cropland in South Dakota, a natural population of prairie cordgrass (SD CG) from South Dakota produced 75% more biomass than a natural population from North Dakota, and a selected population of prairie cordgrass produced >2 times the biomass of switchgrass. However, when prairie cordgrass was fed on by larvae of the four-lined borer [(Resapamea stipata (Morr.)], yield of the two species was similar. Prairie cordgrass had a lower frequency of reproductive tillers (RTRs) and larger leaves than switchgrass. SD CG had high genetic variation for disease resistance, moderate genetic variation for biomass yield, and low genetic variation for inflorescences m−2. Seven out of 57 half-sib families from SD CG produced more biomass than “summer” switchgrass during a year with normal precipitation, whereas only one family did so during a drought year. RTR declined rapidly with stand age. The four-lined borer was identified as a serious threat to biomass production of prairie cordgrass in eastern South Dakota.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madakadze IC, Coulman BE, McElroy AR et al (1998) Evaluation of selected warm-season grasses for biomass production in areas with a short growing season. Biores Tech 65:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skinner RH, Zobel RW, Grinten M, Skaradek W (2009) Evaluation of native warm-season grass cultivars for riparian zones. J Soil Water Conserv 64:413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boe A, Springer T, Lee DK, Rayburn AL, Gonzalez-Hernandez J (2013) Underutilized grasses. In: Saha MC, Bhandari HS, Bouton JH (eds) Bioenergy feedstocks: Breeding and genetics. Wiley, Ames, pp 173–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark S (2013) Kingston Germplasm prairie cordgrass release brochure (ID#11934). USDA-NRCS Big Flats Plant Materials Center, Corning

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim S, Rayburn AL, Voigt T et al (2012b) Salinity effects on germination and plant growth of prairie cordgrass and switchgrass. BioEnerg Res 5:225–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boe A, Owens VE, Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Stein J, Lee DK, Koo BC (2009) Morphology and biomass production of prairie cordgrass on marginal lands. GCB Bioenergy 1:240–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weaver JE, Fitzpatrick TJ (1934) The prairie. Ecol Monograph 4:109–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weaver JE, Fitzpatrick TJ (1932) Ecology and relative importance of the dominants of the tall-grass prairie. Bot Gaz 93:113–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mobberley DG (1956) Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Spartina. Iowa St Coll J Sci 30:471–574

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jensen N (2013) Prairie cordgrass. Plant Guide for prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Bosc ex Link). USDA-NRCS Bismarck Plant Materials Center, Bismarck (http:www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_PLANTMATERIALS/publications/nypmcpg11942.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Snee S (2013) Notice of release of Southampton germplasm prairie cordgrass (ID#11919). Cape May Plant Materials Center, Cape May Court House (www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_PLANTMATERIALS/publications/njpmcrn11919.pdf)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boe A, Lee DK (2007) Genetic variation for biomass production in prairie cordgrass and switchgrass. Crop Sci 47:929–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo J, Thapa S, Voigt T, Rayburn AL, Boe A, Lee DK (2015) Phenotypic and biomass yield variations in natural populations of prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link) in the USA. BioEnerg Res 8:1371–1383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Potter L, Bingham MJ, Baker MG, Long S (1995) The potential of two perennial C4 grasses and a perennial C4 sedge as lingo-cellulosic fuel crops in N.W. Europe. Crop establishment and yields in E. England. Ann Bot 76:513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zilverberg CJ, Johnson WC, Boe A et al (2014) Growing Spartina pectinata in previously farmed prairie wetlands for economic and ecological benefits. Wetlands 34:853–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boe A, Owens VE, Gonzalez-Hernandez J, Lee DK (2013) Seed set in prairie cordgrass. Crop Sci 52:403–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Decker GC (1930) The biology of the four-lined borer [Luperina stipata (Morr.)]. Iowa State Coll Agric Mechanic Arts Agric Exp Sta Res Bull No 125

  18. Ainslie CN (1917) A few notes on the life history of Phalonia spartinana. Canadian Entomol 49:93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prasifka JR, Lee DK, Bradshaw JD, Parrish AS, Gray ME (2012) Seed reduction in prairie cordgrass, Spartina pectinata Link., by the floret-feeding caterpillar, Aethes spartinana (Barnes and McDonnough). BioEnerg Res 5:189–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanderson MA (1992) Morphological development in switchgrass and kleingrass. Agron J 84:415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Harper JL (1985) Modules, branches, and the capture of resources. In: Jackson JBC, Buss LW, Cook RE (eds) Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gustafson DM, Boe A, Jin Y (2003) Genetic variation for Puccinia emaculata infection in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:755–759

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen HT, Sleper DA (1983) Theory and application of half-sib matings in forage grass breeding. Theor Appl Gen 64:187–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson JD, McNeilly T, Gray AJ (1991) Population variation in Spartina anglica C.E. Hubbard. II. Reciprocal transplants among three successional populations. New Phytol 117:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Castellanos M, Heredia C, Figueroa ME, Davy AJ (1998) Tiller dynamics of Spartina maritima in successional and non-successional Mediterranean salt marsh. Plant Ecol 137:213–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore KJ, Moser LE (1995) Quantifying developmental morphology of perennial grasses. Crop Sci 35:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Casler MD, Boe A (2003) Cultivar x environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci 43:2226–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Berdahl JD, Frank AB, Krupinsky JM, Carr PM, Hanson JD (2005) Biomass yield, phenology, and survival of diverse switchgrass cultivars and experimental strains in western North Dakota. Agron J 97:549–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim S (2014) Biomass production and quality of prairie cordgrass (Spartina pectinata Link) using urea and kura clover (Trifolium ambiguum Bieb.) as sources of nitrogen. PhD Diss. South Dakota State University, Brookings

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reidenbaugh TG (1983) Tillering and mortality of the salt marsh grass, Spartina alterniflora. Amer J Bot 70:47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gallagher JL, Somers GF, Grant DM, Seliskar DM (1988) Persistent differences in two forms of Spartina alterniflora: A common garden experiment. Ecology 69:1005–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson SR, Knapp AK (1996) Impact of Ischnodemus falicus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) on photosynthesis and production of Spartina pectinata wetlands. Environ Entomol 25:1122–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wheeler AG (1996) Ischnodemus falicus (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae): First record from ornamental grasses, and seasonality on prairie cordgrass in Pennsylvania. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 98:195–198

    Google Scholar 

  34. Prasifka JR, Bradshaw JD, Boe A et al (2010) Symptoms, distribution and abundance of the stem-boring caterpillar, Blastobasis repartella (Dietz) in switchgrass. BioEenerg Res 3:238–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Calles-Torrez V, Johnson PJ, Boe A (2013) Infestation rates and tiller morphology effects by the switchgrass moth on six cultivars of switchgrass. BioEnerg Res 6:808–812

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Boe A, Gagné RA (2011) A new species of gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) infesting switchgrass in the Northern Great Plains. BioEnerg Res 4:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Calles-Torrez V, Johnson PJ, Boe A (2014) The switchgrass gall midge (Chilophaga virgati Gagné) in the Northern Great Plains. BioEnerg Res 7:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Boe A, Beck DL (2008) Yield components of biomass in switchgrass. Crop Sci 48:1306–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Boe A (2007) Variation between two switchgrass cultivars for components of vegetative and seed biomass. Crop Sci 47:636–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jung GA, Shaffer JA, Stout WL, Panciera MT (1990) Warm-season grass diversity in yield, plant morphology, and nitrogen concentration and removal in Northeastern USA. Agron J 82:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Boe A, Casler MD (2005) Hierarchical analysis of switchgrass morphology. Crop Sci 45:2465–2472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Redfearn DD, Moore KJ, Vogel KP et al (1997) Canopy architecture and morphology of switchgrass populations differing for forage yield. Agron J 89:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Casler MD (2012) Switchgrass breeding, genetics, and genomics. In: Monti A (ed) Switchgrass: A valuable biomass crop for energy. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 29–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Cornelius DR, Johnston CO (1941) Differences in plant type and reaction to rust among several collections of Panicum virgatum L. J Amer Soc Agron 33:15–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Davelos AL, Alexander HM, Slade NA (1996) Ecological genetic interactions between a clonal host plant (Spartina pectinata) and associated rust fungi (Puccinia seymouriana and Puccinia sparganioides). Oecol 105:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Casler MD, Brummer EC (2008) Theoretical expected genetic gains for among-and-within-family selection methods in perennial forage crops. Crop Sci 48:890–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zarroughs KM, Nelson CJ, Coutts JH (1983) Relationship between tillering an forage yield of tall fescue. I. Yield. Crop Sci 23:333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kassel PC, Mullen RC, Bailey TB (1985) Seed yield response of three switchgrass cultivars for different management practices. Agron J 77:214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Brejda JT, Brown JR, Wyman GW, Schumacher WK (1994) Management of switchgrass for forage and seed production. J Range Manage 47:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Knapp SJ, Stroup WW, Ross WM (1985) Exact confidence intervals for heritability on a mean progeny basis. Crop Sci 25:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funding from the North Central Regional Sun Grant Center at South Dakota State University through a grant provided by the US Department of Energy Bioenergy Technologies Office under award number DE-FG36-08GO88073. Support for this research was also provided by the South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station through funding provided by USDA-NIFA. We are indebted to Lakshmi Gampala for the collection of morphological data. David Wagner, University of Connecticut, kindly confirmed the identity of the four-lined borer (Resapamea stipata).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Sciences, South Dakota State University, 1110 Rotunda Lane N, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA

    Arvid Boe & Paul J. Johnson

  2. North Central Regional Sun Grant Center, SDSU, Administration Bldg. 200, Box 2201, Brookings, SD, 57007, USA

    Vance Owens

  3. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1102 S. Goodwin, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    DoKyoung Lee & Jia Guo

  4. Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Sciences, South Dakota State University, 2380 Research Park Way, Brookings, SD, 57006, USA

    Jose L. Gonzalez-Hernandez

Authors
  1. Arvid Boe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul J. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vance Owens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. DoKyoung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jia Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jose L. Gonzalez-Hernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose L. Gonzalez-Hernandez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boe, A., Johnson, P.J., Owens, V. et al. Genetics and Partitioning for Biomass of Prairie Cordgrass Compared to Switchgrass on Marginal Cropland. Bioenerg. Res. 10, 864–875 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9849-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9849-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation