Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attenuation correction using deep learning for brain perfusion SPECT images

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Non-uniform attenuation correction using computed tomography (CT) improves the image quality and quantification of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). However, it is not widely used because it requires a SPECT/CT scanner. This study constructs a convolutional neural network (CNN) to generate attenuation-corrected SPECT images directly from non-attenuation-corrected SPECT images.

Methods

We constructed an auto-encoder (AE) using a CNN to correct the attenuation in brain perfusion SPECT images. SPECT image datasets of 270 (44,528 slices including augmentation), 60 (5002 slices), and 30 (2558 slices) cases were used for training, validation, and testing, respectively. The acquired projection data were reconstructed in three patterns: uniform attenuation correction using Chang’s method (Chang-AC), non-uniform attenuation correction using CT (CT-AC), and no attenuation correction (No-AC). The AE learned an end-to-end mapping between the No-AC and CT-AC images. The No-AC images in the test dataset were loaded into the trained AE, which generated images simulating the CT-AC images as output. The generated SPECT images were employed as attenuation-corrected images using the AE (AE-AC). The accuracy of the AE-AC images was evaluated in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the structural similarity metric (SSIM). The intensities of the AE-AC and CT-AC images were compared by voxel-by-voxel and region-by-region analysis.

Results

The PSNRs of the AE-AC and Chang-AC images, compared using CT-AC images, were 62.2, and 57.9, and their SSIM values were 0.9995 and 0.9985, respectively. The AE-AC and CT-AC images were visually and statistically in good agreement.

Conclusions

The proposed AE-AC method yields highly accurate attenuation-corrected brain perfusion SPECT images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ichihara T, Ogawa K, Motomura N, Kubo A, Hashimoto S. Compton scatter compensation using the triple-energy window method for single- and dual-isotope SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:2216–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang LT. A method for attenuation correction in radionuclide computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1978;25:638–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.1978.4329385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutton BF, Hudson HM, Beekman FJ. A clinical perspective of accelerated statistical reconstruction. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:797–808.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ishii K, Hanaoka K, Okada M, Kumano S, Komeya Y, Tsuchiya N, et al. Impact of CT attenuation correction by SPECT/CT in brain perfusion images. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:241–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0567-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahman MA, Zhu Y, Clarkson E, Kupinski MA, Frey EC, Jha AK. Fisher information analysis of list-mode SPECT emission data for joint estimation of activity and attenuation distribution. arXiv: Medical Phys. 2018.

  6. Abe K, Hosono M, Igarashi T, Iimori T, Ishiguro M, Ito T, et al. The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan. Ann Nucl Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01512-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim B, Son S, Kim H, Nah S, Lee KM. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. arXiv e-prints; 2017.

  8. Umehara K, Ota J, Ishida T. Super-resolution imaging of mammograms based on the super-resolution convolutional neural network. Open J of Med Imaging. 2017;07:180–95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmi.2017.74018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Umehara K, Ota J, Ishida T. Application of super-resolution convolutional neural network for enhancing image resolution in chest CT. J Digit Imaging. 2018;31:441–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-0033-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dong C, Loy CC, He K, Tang X. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016;38:295–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2439281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park J, Hwang D, Kim KY, Kang SK, Kim YK, Lee JS. Computed tomography super-resolution using deep convolutional neural network. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:145011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aacdd4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan S, Zhu YM. Full-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET image using deep learning: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0150-3.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Xu J, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G. 200x Low-dose PET reconstruction using deep learning. arXiv e-prints; 2017.

  14. Plenge E, Poot DH, Bernsen M, Kotek G, Houston G, Wielopolski P, et al. Super-resolution methods in MRI: can they improve the trade-off between resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and acquisition time? Magn Reson Med. 2012;68:1983–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R, Zhao G, Bradshaw T, McMillan AB. A deep learning approach for 18F-FDG PET attenuation correction. EJNMMI Phys. 2018;5:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0225-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R, Bradshaw T, McMillan AB. Deep Learning MR Imaging-based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Imaging. Radiology. 2018;286:676–84. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mehranian A, Arabi H, Zaidi H. Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. Med Phys. 2016;43:1130–55. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4941014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi L, Onofrey JA, Liu H, Liu YH, Liu C. Deep learning-based attenuation map generation for myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2383–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04746-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gondara L. Medical Image Denoising Using Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW); 2016. p. 241–6.

  20. Romer W, Reichel N, Vija HA, Nickel I, Hornegger J, Bautz W, et al. Isotropic reconstruction of SPECT data using OSEM3D: correlation with CT. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv e-prints; 2015.

  22. Mao X-J, Shen C, Yang Y. Image restoration using convolutional auto-encoders with symmetric skip connections. ArXiv. 2016;abs/1606.08921.

  23. Kim B, Lee KH, Kim KJ, Mantiuk R, Hahn S, Kim TJ, et al. Prediction of perceptible Artifacts in JPEG 2000–Compressed Chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:328–34. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13:600–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2003.819861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen J. A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Measur. 1960;20:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs–threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41:1–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan MK, Tsai DC, Chang SC, Yuan MC, Chang SJ, Chen HW, et al. The risk of cataract associated with repeated head and neck CT studies: a nationwide population-based study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:626–30. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9652.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Reimann AJ, Davison C, Bjarnason T, Thakur Y, Kryzmyk K, Mayo J, et al. Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: impact on image quality for CT of the head. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:334–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318251ec61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shibutani T, Onoguchi M, Miyamoto N, Yamamoto Y, Kinuya S. Influence of attenuation correction by brain perfusion SPECT/CT using a simulated abnormal bone structure: comparison between Chang and CT methods. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017;45:208–13. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.117.189506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Takeshi Hara and Hiroshi Fujita from the Graduate School of Medicine Gifu University for technical support in constructing the deep learning network.

We thank Saad Anis, Ph.D., from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that they received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenta Sakaguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The institutional review board at our institution approved this retrospective study (code: 31-042). The requirement of obtaining informed consent of patients was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study, but we provided a means for patients to opt out on our hospital website.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakaguchi, K., Kaida, H., Yoshida, S. et al. Attenuation correction using deep learning for brain perfusion SPECT images. Ann Nucl Med 35, 589–599 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01600-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01600-z

Keywords

Navigation