Abstract
Objective
Non-uniform attenuation correction using computed tomography (CT) improves the image quality and quantification of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). However, it is not widely used because it requires a SPECT/CT scanner. This study constructs a convolutional neural network (CNN) to generate attenuation-corrected SPECT images directly from non-attenuation-corrected SPECT images.
Methods
We constructed an auto-encoder (AE) using a CNN to correct the attenuation in brain perfusion SPECT images. SPECT image datasets of 270 (44,528 slices including augmentation), 60 (5002 slices), and 30 (2558 slices) cases were used for training, validation, and testing, respectively. The acquired projection data were reconstructed in three patterns: uniform attenuation correction using Chang’s method (Chang-AC), non-uniform attenuation correction using CT (CT-AC), and no attenuation correction (No-AC). The AE learned an end-to-end mapping between the No-AC and CT-AC images. The No-AC images in the test dataset were loaded into the trained AE, which generated images simulating the CT-AC images as output. The generated SPECT images were employed as attenuation-corrected images using the AE (AE-AC). The accuracy of the AE-AC images was evaluated in terms of the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and the structural similarity metric (SSIM). The intensities of the AE-AC and CT-AC images were compared by voxel-by-voxel and region-by-region analysis.
Results
The PSNRs of the AE-AC and Chang-AC images, compared using CT-AC images, were 62.2, and 57.9, and their SSIM values were 0.9995 and 0.9985, respectively. The AE-AC and CT-AC images were visually and statistically in good agreement.
Conclusions
The proposed AE-AC method yields highly accurate attenuation-corrected brain perfusion SPECT images.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ichihara T, Ogawa K, Motomura N, Kubo A, Hashimoto S. Compton scatter compensation using the triple-energy window method for single- and dual-isotope SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:2216–21.
Chang LT. A method for attenuation correction in radionuclide computed tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1978;25:638–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.1978.4329385.
Hutton BF, Hudson HM, Beekman FJ. A clinical perspective of accelerated statistical reconstruction. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:797–808.
Ishii K, Hanaoka K, Okada M, Kumano S, Komeya Y, Tsuchiya N, et al. Impact of CT attenuation correction by SPECT/CT in brain perfusion images. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26:241–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0567-y.
Rahman MA, Zhu Y, Clarkson E, Kupinski MA, Frey EC, Jha AK. Fisher information analysis of list-mode SPECT emission data for joint estimation of activity and attenuation distribution. arXiv: Medical Phys. 2018.
Abe K, Hosono M, Igarashi T, Iimori T, Ishiguro M, Ito T, et al. The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan. Ann Nucl Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01512-4.
Lim B, Son S, Kim H, Nah S, Lee KM. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. arXiv e-prints; 2017.
Umehara K, Ota J, Ishida T. Super-resolution imaging of mammograms based on the super-resolution convolutional neural network. Open J of Med Imaging. 2017;07:180–95. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmi.2017.74018.
Umehara K, Ota J, Ishida T. Application of super-resolution convolutional neural network for enhancing image resolution in chest CT. J Digit Imaging. 2018;31:441–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-0033-z.
Dong C, Loy CC, He K, Tang X. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2016;38:295–307. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2439281.
Park J, Hwang D, Kim KY, Kang SK, Kim YK, Lee JS. Computed tomography super-resolution using deep convolutional neural network. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:145011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aacdd4.
Kaplan S, Zhu YM. Full-dose PET image estimation from low-dose PET image using deep learning: a pilot study. J Digit Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0150-3.
Xu J, Gong E, Pauly J, Zaharchuk G. 200x Low-dose PET reconstruction using deep learning. arXiv e-prints; 2017.
Plenge E, Poot DH, Bernsen M, Kotek G, Houston G, Wielopolski P, et al. Super-resolution methods in MRI: can they improve the trade-off between resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, and acquisition time? Magn Reson Med. 2012;68:1983–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24187.
Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R, Zhao G, Bradshaw T, McMillan AB. A deep learning approach for 18F-FDG PET attenuation correction. EJNMMI Phys. 2018;5:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0225-8.
Liu F, Jang H, Kijowski R, Bradshaw T, McMillan AB. Deep Learning MR Imaging-based Attenuation Correction for PET/MR Imaging. Radiology. 2018;286:676–84. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170700.
Mehranian A, Arabi H, Zaidi H. Vision 20/20: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation correction in PET/MRI: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. Med Phys. 2016;43:1130–55. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4941014.
Shi L, Onofrey JA, Liu H, Liu YH, Liu C. Deep learning-based attenuation map generation for myocardial perfusion SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:2383–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04746-6.
Gondara L. Medical Image Denoising Using Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders. In: 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW); 2016. p. 241–6.
Romer W, Reichel N, Vija HA, Nickel I, Hornegger J, Bautz W, et al. Isotropic reconstruction of SPECT data using OSEM3D: correlation with CT. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:496–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2005.12.004.
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. arXiv e-prints; 2015.
Mao X-J, Shen C, Yang Y. Image restoration using convolutional auto-encoders with symmetric skip connections. ArXiv. 2016;abs/1606.08921.
Kim B, Lee KH, Kim KJ, Mantiuk R, Hahn S, Kim TJ, et al. Prediction of perceptible Artifacts in JPEG 2000–Compressed Chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:328–34. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.2502.
Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13:600–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2003.819861.
Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, Kuhl DE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer’s disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1238–48.
Cohen J. A Coefficient of agreement for nominal Scales. Educ Psychol Measur. 1960;20:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs–threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41:1–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001.
Yuan MK, Tsai DC, Chang SC, Yuan MC, Chang SJ, Chen HW, et al. The risk of cataract associated with repeated head and neck CT studies: a nationwide population-based study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:626–30. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9652.
Reimann AJ, Davison C, Bjarnason T, Thakur Y, Kryzmyk K, Mayo J, et al. Organ-based computed tomographic (CT) radiation dose reduction to the lenses: impact on image quality for CT of the head. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012;36:334–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318251ec61.
Shibutani T, Onoguchi M, Miyamoto N, Yamamoto Y, Kinuya S. Influence of attenuation correction by brain perfusion SPECT/CT using a simulated abnormal bone structure: comparison between Chang and CT methods. J Nucl Med Technol. 2017;45:208–13. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.117.189506.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Takeshi Hara and Hiroshi Fujita from the Graduate School of Medicine Gifu University for technical support in constructing the deep learning network.
We thank Saad Anis, Ph.D., from Edanz Group (https://en-author-services.edanzgroup.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Funding
The authors declare that they received no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The institutional review board at our institution approved this retrospective study (code: 31-042). The requirement of obtaining informed consent of patients was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study, but we provided a means for patients to opt out on our hospital website.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakaguchi, K., Kaida, H., Yoshida, S. et al. Attenuation correction using deep learning for brain perfusion SPECT images. Ann Nucl Med 35, 589–599 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01600-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-021-01600-z