Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detectability of residual invasive bladder cancer in delayed 18F-FDG PET imaging with oral hydration using 500 mL of water and voiding-refilling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

2-Fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) imaging is not considered useful for assessing bladder cancer due to the physiological uptake of 18F-FDG in the bladder. Despite reports of the detection of bladder cancer by washing out 18F-FDG from the bladder, such methods are invasive and impractical in the routine practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the utility of oral hydration with 500 mL of water and voiding-refilling, a minimally invasive method that we introduced to enable detection of residual invasive bladder cancer on delayed 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Methods

From January 2015 to December 2017, 267 consecutive patients with bladder cancer underwent 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography scans. Among these patients, 25 (19 men and 6 women; mean age, 72.0 ± 11.3 years) were newly diagnosed as having muscle-invasive bladder cancer by transurethral resection of bladder tumor and T3b or T4 by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All patients were orally hydrated with only 500 mL of water and were then instructed to void frequently for 60 min before early 18F-FDG PET imaging. After the scans, they were instructed to hold their urine for 60 min. Then, delayed imaging was performed. Two radiologists evaluated the early and delayed 18F-FDG PET images to determine whether residual invasive bladder cancer could be detected. The maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of the bladder urine and residual tumor site were also measured on early and delayed images. The maximum diameter of the primary bladder tumor was measured on MRI.

Results

The sensitivity for detecting residual invasive bladder cancer on early and delayed imaging were 24.0 and 92.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The SUVmax of the bladder urine on the early and delayed imaging were 34.7 ± 29.7 and 16.0 ± 10.7 (mean ± SD), respectively. The SUVmax of the residual tumor site on the early and delayed imaging were range 15.65–30.83 and 10.06–45.70, respectively.

Conclusion

Delayed 18F-FDG PET imaging with oral hydration using only 500 mL of water and voiding-refilling is useful for detecting residual invasive bladder cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2009;374(9685):239–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60491-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, et al. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2014;65(4):778–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Azuma H, Yamamoto K, Inamoto T, Ibuki N, Kotake Y, Sakamoto T, et al. Total cystectomy versus bladder preservation therapy for locally invasive bladder cancer: effect of combined therapy using balloon-occluded arterial infusion of anticancer agent and hemodialysis with concurrent radiation. Am J Clin Oncol. 2009;32(6):592–606. https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0b013e318199fb42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith ZL, Christodouleas JP, Keefe SM, Malkowicz SB, Guzzo TJ. Bladder preservation in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): a review of the literature and a practical approach to therapy. BJU Int. 2013;112(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11762.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang J, Gerst S, Lefkowitz RA, Bach A. Imaging of bladder cancer. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45(1):183–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2006.10.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kosuda S, Kison PV, Greenough R, Grossman HB, Wahl RL. Preliminary assessment of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with bladder cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24(6):615–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mertens LS, Bruin NM, Vegt E, de Blok WM, Fioole-Bruining A, van Rhijn BW, et al. Catheter-assisted 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging of primary bladder cancer: a prospective study. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(11):1195–201. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283567473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anjos DA, Etchebehere EC, Ramos CD, Santos AO, Albertotti C, Camargo EE. 18F-FDG PET/CT delayed images after diuretic for restaging invasive bladder cancer. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(5):764–70. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.036350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Harkirat S, Anand S, Jacob M. Forced diuresis and dual-phase F-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT scan for restaging of urinary bladder cancers. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010;20(1):13–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.59746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nayak B, Dogra PN, Naswa N, Kumar R. Diuretic 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection and locoregional staging of urinary bladder cancer: prospective evaluation of a novel technique. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(3):386–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2294-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yildirim-Poyraz N, Ozdemir E, Uzun B, Turkolmez S. Dual phase 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography with forced diuresis in diagnostic imaging evaluation of bladder cancer. Rev Espanola Med Nucl Image Mol. 2013;32(4):214–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.remn.2012.10.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Z, Cheng J, Pan L, Hu S, Xu J, Zhang Y, et al. Is whole-body fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT plus additional pelvic images (oral hydration-voiding-refilling) useful for detecting recurrent bladder cancer? Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(7):571–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-012-0614-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kubota K, Itoh M, Ozaki K, Ono S, Tashiro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28(6):696–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Bruins HM, et al. Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):462–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Higashiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Higashiyama, A., Komori, T., Juri, H. et al. Detectability of residual invasive bladder cancer in delayed 18F-FDG PET imaging with oral hydration using 500 mL of water and voiding-refilling. Ann Nucl Med 32, 561–567 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-018-1280-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-018-1280-x

Keywords

Navigation