Abstract
Objective
In addition to the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity which is a common problem among all types of parallel hole collimators (PCs), obtained images by high energy PCs (HEPCs) suffer from hole-pattern artifact (HPA) due to further septa thickness. In this study, a new design on the collimator has been proposed to improve the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity and to eliminate the HPA.
Methods
A novel PC, namely high energy extended PC (HEEPC), is proposed and is compared to HEPCs. In the new PC, trapezoidal denticles were added upon the septa in the detector side. The performance of the HEEPCs were evaluated and compared to that of HEPCs using a Monte Carlo-N-particle version5 (MCNP5) simulation. The point spread functions (PSF) of HEPCs and HEEPCs were obtained as well as the various parameters such as resolution, sensitivity, scattering, and penetration ratios, and the HPA of the collimators was assessed. Furthermore, a Picker phantom study was performed to examine the effects of the collimators on the quality of planar images.
Results
It was found that the HEEPCD with an identical resolution to that of HEPCC increased sensitivity by 34.7%, and it improved the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity as well as to eliminate the HPA. In the picker phantom study, the HEEPCD indicated the hot and cold lesions with the higher contrast, lower noise, and higher contrast to noise ratio (CNR).
Conclusion
Since the HEEPCs modify the shaping of PSFs, they are able to improve the trade-off between the resolution and sensitivity; consequently, planar images can be achieved with higher contrast resolutions. Furthermore, because the HEEPCS reduce the HPA and produce images with a higher CNR, compared to HEPCs, the obtained images by HEEPCs have a higher quality, which can help physicians to provide better diagnosis.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig6_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig7_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12149-017-1160-9/MediaObjects/12149_2017_1160_Fig8_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schmidt D, Szikszai A, Linke R, Bautz W, Kuwert T. Impact of 131I SPECT/spiral CT on nodal staging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma at the first radio ablation. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(1):18–23.
Trotter D E G, Bowsher JE, Jaszczak RJ. Absolute quantitation of a spherical I-131 activity distribution using a high-resolution rotating collimator: a phantom study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2001;48(1):65–73.
Avram AM. Radioiodine scintigraphy with SPECT/CT: an important diagnostic tool for thyroid cancer staging and risk stratification. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(5):754–64.
Barwick TD, Dhawan RT, Lewington V. Role of SPECT/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(8):787–98.
Koral KF, Yendiki A, Lin Q, Dewaraja YK. Determining total I-131 activity within a VoI using SPECT, a UHE collimator, OSEM, and a constant conversion factor IEEE. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2004;51(3):611–8.
Kobayashi M, Wakabayashi H, Kayano D, Konishi T, Kojima H, Yoneyama H, et al. Application of a medium-energy collimator for I-131 imaging after ablation treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(6):551–8.
Mah E, Spicer KM. Comparison of medium- and high-energy collimators for 131I-tositumomab dosimetry. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35(3):148–53.
Van Holen R, Staelens S, Vandenberghe S. SPECT imaging of high energy isotopes and isotopes with high energy contaminants with rotating slat collimators. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4257–67.
Formiconi AR, Gunter DL, Vanzi E. A design strategy for suppression of hole-pattern artifacts in high-energy collimators. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2006;53(3):1179–87.
Bussmann N, Sonnenberg F, Engels R, Reinartz R, Schramm N, Friedrich W, et al. Development of a high resolution, 2D detector system for iodine-131-scintigraphy. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;47(3):1085–87.
Han L, Rogers WL, Huh SS, Clinthrone N. Statistical performance evaluation and comparison of a Compton medical imaging system and a collimated Anger camera for higher energy photon imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(24):7029–47.
Formiconi AR. Optimization of high energy collimator design. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 2004;6:3393–97.
Gilland DR, Johnson EL, Turkington TG, Coleman RE, Jaszczak RJ. Evaluation of a pinhole collimator for I-131 SPECT head imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1996;43(4):2230–38.
Formiconi AR, Martino FD, Volterrani D, Passeri A. Study of high-energy multihole collimators. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2002;49(1):25–30.
Jung YJ, Kim KM, Kim JS, Woo SK. Modeling high energy (I-131) pinhole collimator for small animal gamma ray imaging device by Monte Carlo simulation (GATE 6.0). IEEE(NSS/MIC). 2011;2756–59.
Tenney CR, Smith MF, Greer KL, Jaszczak RJ. Uranium pinhole collimators for I-131 SPECT imaging study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46(4):1165–71.
Lee YS, Kim JS, Kim KM, Lim SM, Kim HJ. Determination of energy windows for the triple energy window scatter correction method in I-131 on a Siemens SYMBIA gamma camera: a GATE simulation study. JINST. 2015;10:P01004.
Guy MJ, Flux GD, Flower MA, Ott RJ. A novel high-energy I-131 scatter correction technique which includes correction for gamma camera scatter. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 2000;2:117–21.
Tsui BMW, Zhao XD, Sayeram S, Frey EC. Evaluation of collimator–detector response compensation in tumor SPECT using medium- and high-energy collimators. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 2000;3:117–21.
Lewis DP, Tsui BMW, Tocharoenchay C, Frey EC. Characterization of medium and high energy collimators using ray-tracing and Monte Carlo methods. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 1998;3:2026–30.
Brown F, Sweezy J, Bull J, Goorlay JT, Sood A. MCNP—A general Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code, version 5. 2009; LA-UR-09-00384.
Ljungberg M, Strand SE, King MA. Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine, 3rd edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine, 4th edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.
Kessler RM, Ellis JR, Eden M. Analysis of tomographics can data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:514–22.
Beijst C, Elschout M, Viergever MA, Jong H. A parallel-cone collimator for high energy SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(3):476–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moslemi, V., Ashoor, M. Design and performance evaluation of a new high energy parallel hole collimator for radioiodine planar imaging by gamma cameras: Monte Carlo simulation study. Ann Nucl Med 31, 324–334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1160-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1160-9