Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design and performance evaluation of a new high energy parallel hole collimator for radioiodine planar imaging by gamma cameras: Monte Carlo simulation study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In addition to the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity which is a common problem among all types of parallel hole collimators (PCs), obtained images by high energy PCs (HEPCs) suffer from hole-pattern artifact (HPA) due to further septa thickness. In this study, a new design on the collimator has been proposed to improve the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity and to eliminate the HPA.

Methods

A novel PC, namely high energy extended PC (HEEPC), is proposed and is compared to HEPCs. In the new PC, trapezoidal denticles were added upon the septa in the detector side. The performance of the HEEPCs were evaluated and compared to that of HEPCs using a Monte Carlo-N-particle version5 (MCNP5) simulation. The point spread functions (PSF) of HEPCs and HEEPCs were obtained as well as the various parameters such as resolution, sensitivity, scattering, and penetration ratios, and the HPA of the collimators was assessed. Furthermore, a Picker phantom study was performed to examine the effects of the collimators on the quality of planar images.

Results

It was found that the HEEPCD with an identical resolution to that of HEPCC increased sensitivity by 34.7%, and it improved the trade-off between resolution and sensitivity as well as to eliminate the HPA. In the picker phantom study, the HEEPCD indicated the hot and cold lesions with the higher contrast, lower noise, and higher contrast to noise ratio (CNR).

Conclusion

Since the HEEPCs modify the shaping of PSFs, they are able to improve the trade-off between the resolution and sensitivity; consequently, planar images can be achieved with higher contrast resolutions. Furthermore, because the HEEPCS reduce the HPA and produce images with a higher CNR, compared to HEPCs, the obtained images by HEEPCs have a higher quality, which can help physicians to provide better diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schmidt D, Szikszai A, Linke R, Bautz W, Kuwert T. Impact of 131I SPECT/spiral CT on nodal staging of differentiated thyroid carcinoma at the first radio ablation. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(1):18–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trotter D E G, Bowsher JE, Jaszczak RJ. Absolute quantitation of a spherical I-131 activity distribution using a high-resolution rotating collimator: a phantom study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2001;48(1):65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avram AM. Radioiodine scintigraphy with SPECT/CT: an important diagnostic tool for thyroid cancer staging and risk stratification. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(5):754–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barwick TD, Dhawan RT, Lewington V. Role of SPECT/CT in differentiated thyroid cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33(8):787–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koral KF, Yendiki A, Lin Q, Dewaraja YK. Determining total I-131 activity within a VoI using SPECT, a UHE collimator, OSEM, and a constant conversion factor IEEE. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2004;51(3):611–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kobayashi M, Wakabayashi H, Kayano D, Konishi T, Kojima H, Yoneyama H, et al. Application of a medium-energy collimator for I-131 imaging after ablation treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28(6):551–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mah E, Spicer KM. Comparison of medium- and high-energy collimators for 131I-tositumomab dosimetry. J Nucl Med Technol. 2007;35(3):148–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Holen R, Staelens S, Vandenberghe S. SPECT imaging of high energy isotopes and isotopes with high energy contaminants with rotating slat collimators. Med Phys. 2009;36(9):4257–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Formiconi AR, Gunter DL, Vanzi E. A design strategy for suppression of hole-pattern artifacts in high-energy collimators. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2006;53(3):1179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bussmann N, Sonnenberg F, Engels R, Reinartz R, Schramm N, Friedrich W, et al. Development of a high resolution, 2D detector system for iodine-131-scintigraphy. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;47(3):1085–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Han L, Rogers WL, Huh SS, Clinthrone N. Statistical performance evaluation and comparison of a Compton medical imaging system and a collimated Anger camera for higher energy photon imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(24):7029–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Formiconi AR. Optimization of high energy collimator design. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 2004;6:3393–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gilland DR, Johnson EL, Turkington TG, Coleman RE, Jaszczak RJ. Evaluation of a pinhole collimator for I-131 SPECT head imaging. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1996;43(4):2230–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Formiconi AR, Martino FD, Volterrani D, Passeri A. Study of high-energy multihole collimators. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2002;49(1):25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung YJ, Kim KM, Kim JS, Woo SK. Modeling high energy (I-131) pinhole collimator for small animal gamma ray imaging device by Monte Carlo simulation (GATE 6.0). IEEE(NSS/MIC). 2011;2756–59.

  16. Tenney CR, Smith MF, Greer KL, Jaszczak RJ. Uranium pinhole collimators for I-131 SPECT imaging study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46(4):1165–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee YS, Kim JS, Kim KM, Lim SM, Kim HJ. Determination of energy windows for the triple energy window scatter correction method in I-131 on a Siemens SYMBIA gamma camera: a GATE simulation study. JINST. 2015;10:P01004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guy MJ, Flux GD, Flower MA, Ott RJ. A novel high-energy I-131 scatter correction technique which includes correction for gamma camera scatter. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 2000;2:117–21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsui BMW, Zhao XD, Sayeram S, Frey EC. Evaluation of collimator–detector response compensation in tumor SPECT using medium- and high-energy collimators. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 2000;3:117–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis DP, Tsui BMW, Tocharoenchay C, Frey EC. Characterization of medium and high energy collimators using ray-tracing and Monte Carlo methods. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp. 1998;3:2026–30.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brown F, Sweezy J, Bull J, Goorlay JT, Sood A. MCNP—A general Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code, version 5. 2009; LA-UR-09-00384.

  22. Ljungberg M, Strand SE, King MA. Monte Carlo calculations in nuclear medicine, 3rd edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cherry SR, Sorenson JA, Phelps ME. Physics in nuclear medicine, 4th edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kessler RM, Ellis JR, Eden M. Analysis of tomographics can data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:514–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beijst C, Elschout M, Viergever MA, Jong H. A parallel-cone collimator for high energy SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(3):476–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vahid Moslemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moslemi, V., Ashoor, M. Design and performance evaluation of a new high energy parallel hole collimator for radioiodine planar imaging by gamma cameras: Monte Carlo simulation study. Ann Nucl Med 31, 324–334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1160-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1160-9

Keywords

Navigation