Skip to main content
Log in

Improvement in automated quantitation of myocardial perfusion abnormality by using iterative reconstruction image in combination with resolution recovery, attenuation and scatter corrections for the detection of coronary artery disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

An iterative reconstruction method in combination with resolution recovery, attenuation and scatter corrections (IR-RASC) can improve image quality. It, however, is undetermined whether this technique can improve the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) when automated quantitative analysis is used. This study evaluated diagnostic values of IR-RASC in combination with automated quantitative analysis in stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in the CAD detection.

Methods

This study enrolled consecutive 64 patients (mean age 66.2 ± 17.3 years, 39 males) who had undergone both 99mTc-labeled tetrofosmin stress MPI and coronary angiography within 3 months. Stress MPI abnormalities quantified as summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS) and summed difference score (SDS) by Heart Risk View-S (HRV-S) and Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS) softwares using IR-RASC images were compared with those by using conventional filtered back-projection method (FBP) images and angiographic findings.

Results

Based on expert visual assessment, SSS and SRS by HRV-S/QPS softwares with IR-RASC were significantly lower than those by HRV-S/QPS softwares with FBP at mid- and basal left ventricular segments. Receiver-operating characteristics analysis showed that areas under the curve assessed by HRV-S (0.687) and QPS (0.678) with IR-RASC were nearly identical to those (0.717–0.724) by expert assessment with FBP, and were significantly (P < 0.05) greater than those by HRV-S (0.505) and QPS (0.522) with FBP. When HRV-S was used, the specificity and diagnostic accuracy of IR-RASC in the CAD detection were significantly greater than those of FBP: 90.3 versus 51.6%, P < 0.0001 and 79.7 versus 54.7%, P = 0.0027, respectively. Likewise, when QPS was used, the specificity and diagnostic accuracy of IR-RASC in the CAD detection were significantly greater than those of FBP: 80.6 versus 41.9%, P < 0.0001, and 78.1 versus 51.6%, P = 0.0018, respectively. There, however, were no significant differences in sensitivity between IR-RASC and FBP images.

Conclusions

IR-RASC can improve diagnostic accuracy of the CAD detection using an automated scoring system compared to FBP, by reducing false positivity due to artefactual appearance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akalin EN, Yaylali O, Kirac FS, Yuksel D, Kilic M. The role of myocardial perfusion gated SPECT study in women with coronary artery disease: a correlative study. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther. 2012;21:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen GB, Wu H, He XJ, Huang JX, Yu D, Xu WY, et al. Adenosine stress thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging for detecting coronary artery disease at an early stage. J Xray Sci Technol. 2013;21:317–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Shaw LJ, Kiat H, Cohen I, Cabico JA, et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:535–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nishimura T, Nakajima K, Kusuoka H, Yamashina A, Nishimura S. Prognostic study of risk stratification among Japanese patients with ischemic heart disease using gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: J-ACCESS study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:319–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, Mancini GB, Hayes SW, Hartigan PM, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008;117:1283–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Slomka PJ, Nishina H, Berman DS, Akincioglu C, Abidov A, Friedman JD, et al. Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:66–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nanasato M, Morita S, Yoshida R, Niimi T, Sugimoto M, Tsukamoto K, et al. Detection of coronary artery disease using automated quantitation of myocardial perfusion on single-photon emission computed tomography images from patients with angina pectoris without prior myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2012;76:2280–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakajima K, Matsuo S, Okuda K, Wakabayashi H, Tsukamoto K, Nishimura T. Estimation of cardiac event risk by gated myocardial perfusion imaging and quantitative scoring methods based on a multi-center J-ACCESS database. Circ J. 2011;75:2417–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwasaki T, Kurisu S, Abe N, Tamura M, Watanabe N, Ikenaga H, et al. Validation of automated quantification of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography using Heart Score View in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Int Heart J. 2014;55:350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakata T, Hashimoto A, Matsuki T, Yoshinaga K, Tsukamoto K, Tamaki N. Prognostic value of automated SPECT scoring system for coronary artery disease in stress myocardial perfusion and fatty acid metabolism imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29:253–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shepp LA, Vardi Y. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;1:113–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Narayanan MV, King MA, Pretorius PH, Dahlberg ST, Spencer F, Simon E, et al. Human-observer receiver-operating-characteristic evaluation of attenuation, scatter, and resolution compensation strategies for (99 m)Tc myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1725–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Okuda K, Nakajima K, Yamada M, Wakabayashi H, Ichikawa H, Arai H, et al. Optimization of iterative reconstruction parameters with attenuation correction, scatter correction and resolution recovery in myocardial perfusion SPECT/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2014;28:60–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:539–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakajima K, Kumita S, Ishida Y, Momose M, Hashimoto J, Morita K, et al. Creation and characterization of Japanese standards for myocardial perfusion SPECT: database from the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Working Group. Ann Nucl Med. 2007;21:505–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sampson UK, Dorbala S, Limaye A, Kwong R, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:1052–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 2. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:G47–G84.

  19. Yoshinaga K, Matsuki T, Hashimoto A, Tsukamoto K, Nakata T, Tamaki N. Validation of automated quantitation of myocardial perfusion and fatty acid metabolism abnormalities on SPECT images. Circ J. 2011;75:2187–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zoccarato O, Scabbio C, De Ponti E, Matheoud R, Leva L, Morzenti S, et al. Comparative analysis of iterative reconstruction algorithms with resolution recovery for cardiac SPECT studies. A multi-center phantom study. J Nucl Cardiol. 2014;21:135–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Golub RJ, Ahlberg AW, McClellan JR, Herman SD, Travin MI, Mather JF, et al. Interpretive reproducibility of stress Tc-99 m sestamibi tomographic myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:257–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakatani T, Shimoo S, Takamatsu K, Kyodo A, Tsuji Y, Mera K, et al. Usefulness of the novel risk estimation software, Heart Risk View, for the prediction of cardiac events in patients with normal myocardial perfusion SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2016;. doi:10.1007/s12149-016-1117-4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahisa Onoguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chono, T., Onoguchi, M., Shibutani, T. et al. Improvement in automated quantitation of myocardial perfusion abnormality by using iterative reconstruction image in combination with resolution recovery, attenuation and scatter corrections for the detection of coronary artery disease. Ann Nucl Med 31, 181–189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-016-1146-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-016-1146-z

Keywords

Navigation