Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

What’s in a Name? The Negative Implications of Gender Neutrality in the Intimate Partner Violence Prevention and Intervention Literature

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research and interventions for intimate partner violence in current use largely consist of practices aimed at getting victims to leave their abusers, rather than helping perpetrators stop their violence. In the context of parenthood, the focus on programs targeting women experiencing violence has resulted in an emphasis on mothers’ responsibility for mitigating the adverse effects of witnessing violence on children. This has led to insufficient understanding of violent men’s identities as fathers. This narrative review employed content analysis to analyze the discursive constructions of men and women as parents in a selection of peer reviewed articles about the prevention of intimate partner violence during childbearing years that were published between January 2000 and January 2015 (N = 37). A quantitative word count was conducted in order to determine the frequency with which these articles referred to men and women in their parental roles when employing prevention and intervention strategies. Women were consistently identified as mothers in all areas of the literature, while the prevalence of men’s identities as fathers was confined only to the specific, specialized area of the literature that is aimed at men alone. The implications of these findings for future research and practice in the area of prevention and intervention of intimate partner violence specifically in the context of parenthood are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, B. A., Marshak, H. H., & Hebbeler, D. L. (2002). Identifying intimate partner violence at entry to prenatal care: Clustering routine clinical information. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 47, 353–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Artz, S., Jackson, M. A., Rossiter, K. R., Nijdam-Jones, A., Géczy, I., & Porteous, S. (2014). A comprehensive review of the literature on the impact of exposure to intimate partner violence for children and youth. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 5(4), 493–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berns, N. (2001). Degendering the problem and gendering the blame: Political discourse on women and violence. Gender and Society, 15(2), 262–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coates, L., & Wade, A. (2007). Language and violence: Analysis of four discursive operations. Journal of Family Violence, 22(7), 511–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Condon, J. T., Boyce, P., & Corkindale, C. J. (2004). The first-time fathers study: A prospective study of the mental health and wellbeing of men during the transition to parenthood. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38(1–2), 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Devaney, J. (2009). Children’s exposure to domestic violence: Holding men to account. The Political Quarterly, 80(4), 569–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Douglas, H., & Walsh, T. (2010). Mothers, domestic violence, and child protection. Violence Against Women, 16(5), 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Easteal, P., Holland, K., & Judd, K. (2015). Enduring themes and silences in media portrayals of violence against women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 48, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edin, K., Hogberg, U., Dahlgren, L., & Lalos, A. (2009). The pregnancy put the screws on discourses of professionals working with men inclined to violence. Men and Masculinities, 11(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Featherstone, B., & Fraser, C. (2012). Working with fathers around domestic violence: Contemporary debates. Child Abuse Review, 21(4), 255–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Featherstone, B., & Peckover, S. (2007). Letting them get away with it: Fathers, domestic violence and child welfare. Critical Social Policy, 27(2), 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hester, M. (2011). The three planet model: Towards an understanding of contradictions in approaches to women and children’s safety in contexts of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 837–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Holt, S. (2003). Child protection social work and men’s abuse of women: An Irish study. Child and Family Social Work, 8(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Humphreys, C., & Absler, D. (2011). History repeating: Child protection responses to domestic violence. Child and Family Social Work, 16(4), 464–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kataoka, Y., Yaju, Y., Eto, H., & Horiuchi, S. (2010). Self-administered questionnaire versus interview as a screening method for intimate partner violence in the prenatal setting in Japan: A randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10(1), 84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krane, J., & Davies, L. (2007). Mothering under difficult circumstances challenges to working with battered women. Affilia, 22(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403–407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lamb, S., & Keon, S. (1995). Blaming the perpetrator: Language that distorts reality in newspaper articles on men battering women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(2), 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lapierre, S. (2008). Mothering in the context of domestic violence: The pervasiveness of a deficit model of mothering. Child and Family Social Work, 13(4), 454–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lapierre, S. (2009). More responsibilities, less control: Understanding the challenges and difficulties involved in mothering in the context of domestic violence. British Journal of Social Work.

  21. Lapierre, S., & Côté, I. (2011). “I made her realise that I could be there for her, that I could support her”: Child protection practices with women in domestic violence cases. Child Care in Practice, 17(4), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mulkeen, M. (2012). Gendered processes in child protection: ‘‘Mother-blaming’ and the erosion of men’s accountability. Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 12(1), 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nettleton, P. H. (2011). Domestic violence in men’s and women’s magazines: Women are guilty of choosing the wrong men, men are not guilty of hitting women. Women’s Studies in Communication, 34(2), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Perel, G., & Peled, E. (2008). The fathering of violent men constriction and yearning. Violence Against Women, 14(4), 457–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips, D., & Henderson, D. (1999). “Patient was hit in the face by a fist…”: A discourse analysis of male violence against women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 69(1), 116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Powell, A., & Murray, S. (2008). Children and domestic violence: Constructing a policy problem in Australia and New Zealand. Social and Legal Studies, 17(4), 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rådestad, I., Rubertsson, C., Ebeling, M., & Hildingsson, I. (2004). What factors in early pregnancy indicate that the mother will be hit by her partner during the year after childbirth? A nationwide Swedish survey. Birth: Issues in Perinatal Care, 31(2), 84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salmon, D., Murphy, S., Baird, K., & Price, S. (2006). An evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational programme promoting the introduction of routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence. Midwifery, 22(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thapar-Björkert, S., & Morgan, K. J. (2010). “But sometimes I think… they put themselves in the situation”: Exploring blame and responsibility in interpersonal Violence. Violence Against Women, 16(1), 32–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tower, M. (2007). Intimate partner violence and the health care response: A postmodern critique. Health Care for Women International, 28(5), 438–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Veteläinen, A., Grönholm, H., & Holma, J. (2013). Discussions of fatherhood in male batterer treatment group. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Child and Youth Care, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada

    Teila Sinnott & Sibylle Artz

Authors
  1. Teila Sinnott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sibylle Artz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teila Sinnott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinnott, T., Artz, S. What’s in a Name? The Negative Implications of Gender Neutrality in the Intimate Partner Violence Prevention and Intervention Literature. Gend. Issues 33, 271–284 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9166-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-016-9166-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation