Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Linked Geoscience Data in practice: where W3C standards meet domain knowledge, data visualization and OGC standards

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geoscience community is now facing both the challenge and the opportunity caused by the vast amount of datasets that can be made available on the Web. An efficient “data environment” on the Web has the potential to enable geoscientists to conduct their research in ways that never existed before. Standards developed by the Open Geospatial Consortium have already been used widely to build data services among different subjects in geosciences. In recent years, the Linked Open Data approach initiated by the World Wide Web Consortium has received increasing attention. In this paper, the author presents a pilot study that uses a domain specific knowledge base and data visualization techniques to leverage the functionality of geoscience data services in the Web of Data. The study focuses on the topic of the geologic time scale. Detailed works such as semantic modeling and encoding, multilingual vocabularies, exploratory data visualization, web map service and processing, and the query of linked data are introduced through real-world datasets. This study faces a broad perspective of the Linked Geoscience Data and leverages the functionalities of existing standards into a new level for geoscience applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berg-Cross G, Cruz I, Dean M, Finin T, Gahegan M, Hitzler P, Hua H, Janowicz K, Li N, Murphy P, Nordgren B, Obrst L, Schildhauer M, Sheth A, Sinha K, Thessen A, Wiegand N, Zaslavsky I (2012) Semantics and Ontologies for EarthCube. In: Janowicz K, Kessler C, Kauppinen T, Kolas D, Scheider S (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on GIScience in the Big Data Age 2012, Columbus, pp 11–16

  • Berners-Lee T (2006). Linked Data http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html. Accessed 19 Dec 2016

  • Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila OT (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am 284(5):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein A, Hendler J, Noy N (2016) A new look at the semantic web. Commun ACM 59(9):35–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizer C, Lehmann J, Kobilarov G, Auer S, Becker C, Cyganiak R, Hellmann S (2009) DBpedia-A crystallization point for the web of data. Web Semant 7(3):154–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blower JD, Riechert M (2016) Coverages, JSON-LD and RDF data cubes. In: Janowicz K, Lieberman J, Taylor K, Mckenzie G, Gao S, Cox S, Parsons E (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on spatial data on the web (SDW 2016), Montreal, pp 9–16

  • CODATA (2016). Coordinating Data Standards amongst Scientific Unions http://www.codata.org/task-groups/coordinating-data-standards. Accessed 24 March 2017

  • Cox SJD (2016) Time ontology extended for non-Gregorian calendar applications. Semant Web 7(2):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox SJD, Richard SM (2005) A formal model for the geologic time scale and global stratotype section and point, compatible with geospatial information transfer standards. Geosphere 1(3):119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox SJD, Richard SM (2015) A geologic timescale ontology and service. Earth Sci Inf 8(1):5–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DDI Alliance (2016). Why use DDI? http://www.ddialliance.org/training/why-use-ddi. Accessed 19 Dec 2016

  • Greiner A, Issac A, Iglesias C, Laufer C, Gueret C, Lee D, Schepers D, Stephan EG, Kauz E, Atemezing GA, Beeman H, Bittencourt II, Almeida JP, Dekkers M, Winstanley P, Archer P, Albertoni R, Purohit S, Cordova Y. (eds.) (2017). Data on the Web Best Practices https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/. Accessed 16 March 2017

  • Gruber TR (1995) Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. Int J Hum Comput Stud 43(5):907–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2015) ISO 19109:2015 geographic information -- rules for application schema. International Organization for standardization, Geneva, 91 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz K, Schade S, Bröring A, Keßler C, Maué P, Stasch C (2010) Semantic enablement for spatial data infrastructures. Trans GIS 14(2):111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz K, Bröring A, Stasch C, Schade S, Everding T, Llaves A (2013) A restful proxy and data model for linked sensor data. Int J Digital Earth 6(3):233–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz K, van Harmelen F, Hendler JA, Hitzler P (2015) Why the data train needs semantic rails. AI Mag 36(1):5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Kmoch A (2014) A SMART groundwater portal: an OGC web services orchestration framework for hydrology to improve data access and visualisation in New Zealand. Comput Geosci 69:78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krisnadhi AA, Hu Y, Janowicz K, Hitzler P, Arko R, Carbotte S, Chandler C, Cheatham M, Fils D, Finin T, Ji P, Jones M, Karima N, Mickle A, Narock T, O’Brien M, Raymond L, Shepherd A, Schildhauer M, Wiebe P (2015) The GeoLink modular oceanography ontology. In: Arenas M, Corcho O, Simperl E, Strohmaier M, d'Aquin M, Srinivas K, Groth P, Dumontier M, Heflin J, Thirunarayan K, Staab S (eds) Proceedings of ISWC2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 9367. Springer, Berlin, pp 301–309

  • Lacasta J, Nogueras-Iso J, Béjar R, Muro-Medrano PR, Zarazaga-Soria FJ (2007) A web ontology service to facilitate interoperability within a spatial data infrastructure: applicability to discovery. Data Knowl Eng 63(3):947–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laxton J, Serrano JJ, Tellez-Arenas A (2010) Geological applications using geospatial standards–an example from OneGeology-Europe and GeoSciML. Int J Digital Earth 3(S1):31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter AM (2015) Linked Ocean data. In: Narock T, Fox P (eds) The semantic web in Earth and space science: current Status and future Directions. IOS Press, Berlin, pp 11–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter AM, Lowry RK, Clements DO (2013) Putting meaning into NETMAR - the open service network for marine environmental data. Int J Digital Earth 7(10):811–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loudon TV, Laxton JL (2007) Steps toward grid-based geological survey: suggestions for a systems framework of models, ontologies, and workflows. Geosphere 3(5):319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz M, Sprado J, Klien E, Schubert C, Christ I (2009) Overcoming semantic heterogeneity in spatial data infrastructures. Comput Geosci 35(4):739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Fox P (2013) Recent progress on geologic time ontologies and considerations for future works. Earth Sci Inf 6(1):31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Fox P (2014) A jigsaw puzzle layer cake of spatial data. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 95(19):161–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Wu C, Carranza EJM, Schetselaar EM, van der Meer FD, Liu G, Wang X, Zhang X (2010) Development of a controlled vocabulary for semantic interoperability of mineral exploration geodata for mining projects. Comput Geosci 36(12):1512–1522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Carranza EJM, Wu C, van der Meer FD, Liu G (2011) A SKOS-based multilingual thesaurus of geological time scale for interoperability of online geological maps. Comput Geosci 37(10):1602–1615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Carranza EJM, Wu C, van der Meer FD (2012) Ontology-aided annotation, visualization and generalization of geological time scale information from online geological map services. Comput Geosci 40(3):107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Fox P, Tilmes C, Jacobs K, Waple A (2014) Capturing and presenting provenance of global change information. Nat Clim Chang 4(6):409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Chen Y, Wang H, Zheng JG, Fu L, West P, Erickson JS, Fox P (2015) Data visualization in the semantic web. In: Narock T, Fox P (eds) The semantic web in Earth and space science: current Status and future Directions. IOS Press, Berlin, pp 149–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X, Erickson JS, Zednik S, West P, Fox P (2016) Semantic specification of data types for a world of open data. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 5(3). doi:10.3390/ijgi5030038

  • McKee L (2016). OGC’s future and mine as an OGC member http://www.opengeospatial.org/blog/2407. Accessed 23 March 2017

  • Narock T, Fox P (eds) (2015) The semantic web in Earth and space science: current Status and future Directions. IOS Press, Berlin, 210 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran R, Rushing J, Li X, Kamath C, Conover H, Graves S (2006) Bird's-eye view of data mining in geosciences. In: Sinha AK (ed) Geoinformatics: data to knowledge, Geological Society of America special papers, 397. The Geological Society of America, Boulder, pp 235–247

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin R, Pan MJ (2005) Knowledge representation in the semantic web for Earth and environmental terminology (SWEET). Comput Geosci 31:1119–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma F, Albrecht J (2005) Modeling with the semantic web in the geosciences. IEEE Intell Syst 20(2):86–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard SM, Matti J, Soller DR (2003) Geoscience terminology development for the national geologic map database. In: Soller DR (ed) Digital mapping techniques '03—Workshop Proceedings, Millersville, pp 157–167

  • Riechert, M., Blower, J., Griffiths, G., 2016. Exposing coverage data to the semantic web within the MELODIES project: challenges and solutions. In EGU general assembly conference abstracts (Vol. 18, 16923).

  • Schade S, Granell C, Díaz L (2010) Augmenting SDI with linked data. In: Janowicz K, Pehle T, Hart G, Maue P (eds) Proceedings of the Workshop on linked spatiotemporal data 2010, Zurich, 12 pp

  • Stadler C, Lehmann J, Höffner K, Auer S (2012) LinkedGeoData: a core for a web of spatial open data. Semant Web 3(4):333–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandy J, Barnaghi P, van den Brink L (eds.) (2017) Spatial Data on the Web Best Practices https://www.w3.org/TR/sdw-bp. Accessed 07 Jan 2017

  • Taylor K, Parsons E (2015) Where is everywhere: bringing location to the web. IEEE Internet Comput 19(2):83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathi A, Babaie HA (2008) Developing a modular hydrogeology ontology by extending the SWEET upper-level ontologies. Comput Geosci 34(9):1022–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usery EL, Varanka D (2012) Design and development of linked data from the national map. Semant Web 3(4):371–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaccari L, Shvaiko P, Marchese M (2009) A geo-service semantic integration in spatial data infrastructures. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4:24–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemann S (2017) Formalization and web-based implementation of spatial data fusion. Comput Geosci 99:107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemann S, Bernard L (2016) Spatial data fusion in spatial data infrastructures using linked data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 30(4):613–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Raskin R, Goodchild M, Gahegan M (2010) Geospatial cyberinfrastructure: past, present and future. Comput Environ Urban Syst 34(4):264–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You J (2015) Geoscientists aim to magnify specialized web searching. Science 347(6217):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue P, Di L, Yang W, Yu G, Zhao P (2007) Semantics-based automatic composition of geospatial web service chains. Comput Geosci 33(5):649–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Di L, Yu G, Yue P, Wei Y, Yang W (2009) Semantic web-based geospatial knowledge transformation. Comput Geosci 35(4):798–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao P, Foerster T, Yue P (2012) The geoprocessing web. Comput Geosci 47:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng JG, Fu L, Ma X, Fox P (2015) SEM+: tool for discovering concept mapping in Earth science related domain. Earth Sci Inf 8(1):95–102

  • Zhong J, Aydin A, McGuinness DL (2009) Ontology of fractures. J Struct Geol 31:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through the NSF Idaho EPSCoR Program (award number IIA-1301792) and by the 2012 Funding Friday grants from the Federation of Earth Science Information Partners (ESIP). The author thanks Patrick West, Linyun Fu and Jin Guang Zheng for discussing technical issues in the development of the proof-of-concept website, and four anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, 875 Perimeter Drive MS 1010, Moscow, ID, 83844-1010, USA

    Xiaogang Ma

Authors
  1. Xiaogang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaogang Ma.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Hassan Babaie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, X. Linked Geoscience Data in practice: where W3C standards meet domain knowledge, data visualization and OGC standards. Earth Sci Inform 10, 429–441 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0304-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-017-0304-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation