Skip to main content
Log in

Multiculturalism, social distance, and xenophobia among non-WEIRD individuals toward Syrian refugees: positive and negative emotions as moderators

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Türkiye, the country hosting the most refugees in the world, hosted millions of refugees due to the Syrian civil war, the Taliban coup, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Among these communities, Syrian refugees are the majority in number and have been mainly influencing Türkiye’s agenda for the last decade. This unexpected and sudden contact elevated intergroup tension and conflict between host and Syrian refugee communities. We aimed to examine the association between multiculturalism, positive and negative emotions, perceived outgroup threat, social distance, and xenophobia toward refugees among non-WEIRD participants in the prejudice-intense intergroup context through two correlational studies (Ntotal = 898) to shed light on possible remedies for these conflicts. Study 1 revealed that multiculturalism negatively predicted social distance toward Syrian refugees. This association was mediated by positive and negative emotions. Study 2, which focused on xenophobia as an outcome, found that multiculturalism negatively predicted xenophobia, and positive and negative emotions had a mediator role on the association between these variables. We also found that participants with higher social distancing towards Syrian refugees had lower and poorer intergroup contact quality and perceived more outgroup threat than those with lower social distancing. The findings indicated that greater multiculturalism and positive emotions were associated with low social distance and xenophobia in the prejudice-intense context. We discussed the findings in terms of the potential benefits of multiculturalism and the positive emotions for attitudes towards refugees in prejudice-intense relationships between hosts and refugees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data, measurements and appendices are available at https://osf.io/n2ka5/?view_only=6372f51083064d46a55ce3adb10dda2b

Code availability

Analytical R codes are available from the corresponding author, upon request.

Notes

  1. Here, we would like to remind that there are different conceptualizations of multiculturalism. For instance, some different researchers conceptualize this concept from a critical perspective in a different framework (see, Meer & Modood, 2012; Modood, 2013). In this study, we conceptualize multiculturalism as the equal living of different cultural groups in a society that attaches importance to diversity.

  2. This wage shows that the participants have a household income equal to the average minimum wage for Türkiye.

  3. To capture a narrative consistent with Study 2, we also conducted three independent samples t tests to see whether there were significant differences between social distance groups on the variables we focused on. However, since these analyzes were not within the scope of the research question of Study 1, we presented the results in Appendix II.

  4. We focused on students because they were the most heterogeneous social group we could reach across the country.

  5. Approximately 28% of the participants (N = 102) showed a mean of 1, which is the lowest mean, on the 7-point Likert-type social distance measurement in Study 1. Approximately 41% of the participants (N = 147) have a social distance of less than a mean of 3 towards Syrian refugees (see also, Appendix III).

  6. All intergroup comparisons are presented in Appendix IV for a broader perspective. We did not present the relevant analysis result here, as it was out of the scope of the current study.

  7. Separate analyzes for the group with low and high social distancing also point to the same pattern (see Appendix V).

  8. Some comparisons violated the assumptions of normality or homogeneity of variances. Accordingly, the Mann-Whitney U tests we conducted pointed to a similar pattern (see Appendix VI) with the results of the independent sample t tests.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Bilal Ul-Haque Farooqui, Lucas Austin Mcleod and Sara Teresa Pergola for helping us.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sami Çoksan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The research protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee under the 113/1 and 116/22 approval number.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The first research of the current study depends on the last author’s master thesis’ dataset.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 130 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uygur, M.R., Eser, H.B., Çoksan, S. et al. Multiculturalism, social distance, and xenophobia among non-WEIRD individuals toward Syrian refugees: positive and negative emotions as moderators. Curr Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06001-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06001-9

Keywords

Navigation