Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between being bullied and bystander intervention in adolescent school bullying: the moderating mediation of moral disengagement and only child status

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have examined that bullying bystander intervention refers to a positive, pro-social bystander behavior that prevents the sustained development of bullying incidents in the face of school bullying. Limited research has investigated the different roles of bystanders and the factors that influence their behavior. This study attempts to explore the association between being bullied and intervention by bystanders in adolescent school bullying, the role of moral disengagement, and the status of only children in this context. For this purpose, 2113 middle school students completed the Being Bullied Behavior Scale, Bystander Intervention Scale, and Moral Disengagement Scale. The study findings indicate that (1) being bullied positively anticipates the intervention by bystanders in school bullying; (2) further, moral disengagement plays an essential role in mediating the effects of bullying on bystander intervention, and being bullied "masks" the related positive influence on the bystander intervention through the negative mediation of moral disengagement; and (3) finally, the status of being an only child moderates the first half of this mediating effect. Based on this, this study implies that being bullied is more effective at predicting moral disengagement for only children. Consequently, the influence of being bullied on bystander intervention in school bullying is revealed in this study, which exhibits significant practical implications for improving the ecological environment of school bullying.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Agnew, R. A. (2010). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, K. R., & Bussey, K. (2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: A review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Z., Chu, J., Wang, F., & Liu, X. (2023). Adolescents’ outsider behaviors in school bullying: The roles of school climate, school connectedness and moral disengagement. Psychological Development and Education, 39(4), 580–589.

  • Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: Role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1981). Family size and the quality of children. Demography, 18(4), 421–442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 3(2), 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caravita, S. S., Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2012). Main and moderated effects of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending. Aggressive Behavior, 38(6), 456–468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoos, S. L., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2011). Friendship as protection from peer victimization for girls with and without ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(7), 1035–1045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. C. O., & Wong, D. S. (2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies: Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, B., Wang, Y., Liang, J., & Tong, L. (2016). And baby makes four: Biological and psychological changes and influential factors of the firstborn’s adjustment to transition to siblinghood. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(6), 863–873.

  • Chen, S., & Li, M. (2014). Subjective well-being and mental health of undergraduate students. Journal of Chongqing University (social Science Ed.), 20(3), 178–183.

  • Ding, F., & Lu, Z. (2016). Association between empathy and pro-social behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(8), 1159–1174.

  • Dong, H. (2018). Characteristics of primary school’s peer victimization and the role of family. Journal of Educational Development, 36(11), 28–34.

  • Dong, Y., Chen, D., & Fu, M. (2018). The impact of sibling relationships on the psychological development of children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of School Health, 39(7), 1110–1114.

  • Dorit, O. S., Tali, H., & Sigal, E. (2017). Bystanders’ behavior in cyberbullying episodes: Active and passive patterns in the context of personal-socio-emotional factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(1), 23–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, Y., Mao, Y., & Yang, C. (2018). Preventing bullying in schools through social emotional learning: The mediation role of social emotional competences. Educational Science Research, 29(12), 38–46.

  • Dunn, J. (1988). Siblings’ influences on childhood development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 29(2), 119–127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J., Brown, J. R., & Maguire, M. (1995). The development of children’s moral sensibility: Individual differences and emotion understanding. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 649–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falla, D., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Runions, K., & Romera, E. M. (2022). Why do victims become perpetrators of peer bullying? Moral disengagement in the cycle of violence. Youth & Society, 54(3), 397–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M. E., Solmeyer, A. R., & McHale, S. M. (2012). The third rail of family systems: Sibling relationships, mental and behavioral health, and preventive intervention in childhood and adolescence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 15(1), 43–57.

  • Feng, X. (2020). The only-child problems in the “post only-child era.” Zhejiang Academic Journal, 58(5), 64–73.

  • Gao, L., & Jing, X. (2019). Research on the intervention of middle school students’ moral disengagement. Theory and Practice of Education, 39(7), 46–50.

  • Gao, L., Hua, S., Li, P., Yang, J., & Wang, X. (2021). The effect of sibling relationship on adolescents’ pro-social behavior: The roles of moral disengagement and empathy. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 19(2), 216–222.

  • Gao, L., & Zhang, S. (2017). The developmental characteristics of teenagers’ moral disengagement based on situation. Theory and Practice of Education, 37(19), 42–45.

  • Gu, Y., Wang, L., & Qin, J. (2012). Bronfenbrenner’s concept of human development: From cradle to maturity. Psychological Exploration, 32(2), 104–109.

  • Guo, Z., Zhao, Y., Yao, X., & Kou, Y. (2020). The influences of life goals on adolescents' immoral behaviors: The mediating role of moral disengagement. Youth Studies, 43(6), 34–42+92.

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, S. (2022). Don’t be the audience in the theater of bullying——a study on bystander groups in school bullying from an international perspective. Studies in Foreign Education, 49(4), 3–18.

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, W. (2019). The influence of sibling relationship on children and adolescents’ social development. Children’s Study, 32(2), 44–48.

  • Huang, X., Chu, X., Liu, Q., Zhou, Z., & Fan, C. (2019). Bystander behavior in cyberbullying. Advances in Psychological Science, 27(7), 1248–1257.

  • Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2016). Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 43(3), 281–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. N., Demaray, M. K., Fredrick, S. S., & Summers, K. H. (2016). Associations among middle school students’ bullying roles and social skills. Journal of School Violence, 15(3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., Liu, R. D., Ding, Y., Jiang, R., Fu, X., & Hong, W. (2022). Why the victims of bullying are more likely to avoid involvement when witnessing bullying situations: The role of bullying sensitivity and moral disengagement. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(5–6), NP3062–NP3083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, X., & Liu, H. (2018). Role differences of bystanders in school bullying and their coping strategies. Journal of Henan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Ed.), 45(3), 151–156.

  • Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools: The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 159–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killer, B., Bussey, K., Hawes, D. J., & Hunt, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between moral disengagement and bullying roles in youth. Aggressive Behavior, 45(4), 450–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? (pp. 1–67). Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Zong, L., & Liu, J. (2013). The relationship between externalizing behavior problem and collective moral emotion and responsibility: The moderate effects of class climate. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45(9), 1015–1025.

  • Li, X., Liu, A., & Han, Y. (2023). Intrinsic guiltlessness: A meta-analysis of moral disengagement and bullying in campus among children and adolescents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31(3), 723–728.

  • Li, Y. (2021). An analysis of the differences in the sense of happiness between individuals and non-only children——Empirical analysis based on CGSS (2015 and 2017) data. The World of Survey and Research, 34(6), 12–19.

  • Liao, Y., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., & Peng, C. (2022). The reciprocal relationship between peer victimization and internalizing problems in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54(7), 828–849.

  • Lihnou, K., & Antonopoulou, E. (2016). Pupils’ participant roles in bullying situations and their relation to perceptions of empathy and self-efficacy. Preschool and Primary Education, 4(2), 291–304.

  • Lin, S. (2022). Moral disengagement and normalization of bullying: The mechanistic analysis of the behavioral changes of victim-bullying teenagers. Educational Science Research, 33(2), 46–53.

  • Liu, S. (2017). Analysis of factors influencing school bullying behavior and investigation of intervention measures. Moral Education China, 12(12), 21–24.

  • McHale, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Whiteman, S. D. (2012). Sibling relationships and influences in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 913–930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. (2008). Moral disengagement in processes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., Detert, J. R., KlebeTreviño, L., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology, 65(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obermann, M. L. (2011). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 133–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (2005). A useful evaluation design and effects of the Olweus Bullying Prevention Program. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(4), 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, L. J., Allan, A., & Cross, D. (2017). Adolescent perceptions of bystanders’ responses to cyberbullying. New Media and Society, 19(3), 366–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence: Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Poskiparta, E., Ahtola, A., & Haataja, A. (2013). The implementation and effectiveness of the KiVa antibullying program in Finland. European Psychologist, 18(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, H. L., White, S. J., Chang, V. Y., & Juvonen, J. (2015). “Why me?”: Characterological self-blame and continued victimization in the first year of middle school. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(3), 446–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sentse, M., Dijkstra, J. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cillessen, A. H. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 229–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seta, J. J., Haire, A., & Seta, C. E. (2008). Choices and affective reactions to negative life events: An averaging/summation analysis. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(5), 425–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z., & Du, Y. (2010). The moral status of a generation of only children and its social impact. Guizhou Social Sciences, 31(9), 62–65.

  • Sijtsema, J. J., Rambaran, J. A., & Ojanen, T. J. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, deselection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8(2–3), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberg, J. L., Copeland, W., Linker, J., Moore, A. A., Roberson-Nay, R., & York, T. P. (2016). Psychiatric outcomes of bullying victimization: A study of discordant monozygotic twins. Psychological Medicine, 46(9), 1875–1883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. B., Nail, P. R., Swindle, T., Bihm, E. M., & Joshi, K. (2017). Defensive egotism and self-esteem: A cross-cultural examination of the dynamics of bullying in middle school. Self and Identity, 16(3), 270–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J., & Oh, I. (2018). Factors influencing bystanders’ behavioral reactions in cyberbullying situations. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spadafora, N., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2020). Should I defend, or should I go? An adaptive, qualitative examination of the personal costs and benefits associated with bullying intervention. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 35(1), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, C. M., & Youngblade, L. (1999). Marital conflict and parental hostility: Links with children’s sibling and peer relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(4), 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y., Li, L., Wang, Z., Zeng, Q., Zhang, L., & Zhang, H. (2022). On the relationship between bystanders' moral sensitivity and moral disengagement in school bullying. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Ed.), 22(3), 7–12.

  • Swearer, S. M., & Hymel, S. (2015). Understanding the psychology of bullying: Moving toward a social-ecological diathesis–stress model. American Psychologist, 70(4), 344–353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R., Tenenbaum, L., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., Jungert, T., & Vanegas, G. (2012). Bystander Motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene? Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13(3), 247–252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2018). The differences in moral expectation and moral disengagement between children and parents. Youth Studies, 41(5), 27–34+95.

  • Wang, X., Lei, L., Liu, D., & Hu, H. (2016). Moderating effects of moral reasoning and gender on the relation between moral disengagement and cyberbullying in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 244–249.

  • Wang, X., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2019). Childhood maltreatment, moral disengagement, and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: Fathers’ and mothers’ moral disengagement as moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 95, 48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Dou, B. (2021). Bystanders in campus bullying and intervention strategies of school social work. Chinese Youth Social Science, 40(6), 71–77.

  • Wang, Y., Xiong, Y., Ren, P., Yang, L., & Miao, W. (2023). Effects of bully-victimization on proactive and reactive aggression in early adolescence: The role of moral disengagement and gender. Psychological Development and Education, 39(3), 410–418.

  • Wang, Z., & Bai, B. (2020). The impact of family social class on high school teenagers’ self-esteem: A moderated mediation model. Educational Research and Experiment, 38(6), 88–92.

  • Wen, Z., & Ye, B. (2014). Different methods for testing moderated mediation models: Competitors or backups? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(5), 714–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., Wang, P., Du, S., & Kang, X. (2019). China’s changing family structure and adolescent development. Social Sciences in China, 40(4), 64–79.

  • Yang, S., & Xin, X. (2022). Bystander effects in school bullying from a micro ecological perspective. Educational Review, 38(9), 54–62.

  • Yeh, H. C., & Lempers, J. D. (2004). Perceived sibling relationships and adolescent development. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 33(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, Z., Xu, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). Reliability and validity of bystander intervention in bullying among Chinese junior school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(1), 7–10.

  • Zhang, H., Ma, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, C. (2021). Trajectory of friendship quality and loneliness in junior high school students: A multivariate growth model analysis. Psychological Development and Education, 37(2), 230–239.

  • Zhang, L., Hong, X., Fan, H., Chen, Y., Zhao, M., Zhu, T., & Liu, S. (2022). Attachment style and defending behaviors in bullying among middle school students: Chain mediation roles of social support and bullying coping efficacy. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 20(2), 212–218.

  • Zhang, Q., Meng, F., & Liu, D. (2020a). How to achieve comprehensive management of school bullying: An exploration from Norway, the birthplace of modern school bullying research. Educational Research, 41(11), 70–82.

  • Zhang, Y., Li, S., & Yu, G. (2020b). Alexithymia and aggression among adolescents: The mediating role of boredom proneness. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 383–386+399.

  • Zhao, F., & Yu, G. (2017). Sibling relationship and its relation with children and adolescents’ social development. Advances in Psychological Science, 25(5), 825–836.

  • Zheng, Q., Ye, B., Yao, Y., Chen, J., Fu, H., & Lei, X. (2017). Normative beliefs about aggression on cyberbullying: A chain mediating model. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25(4), 727–730.

  • Zhou, H., & Long, L. (2004). Statistical remedies for common method biases. Advances in Psychological Science, 12(6), 942–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, X., Zhou, Z., Chu, X., Lei, Y., & Fan, C. (2019). The trajectory from traditional bullying victimization to cyberbullying: A moderated mediation analysis. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27(3), 492–496.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted within the Doctoral Research Foundation Project of Xinjiang Normal University. The authors sincerely thank all students, teachers, and school administrators for participating and cooperating and MJEditor (www.mjeditor.com) for providing English editing services while preparing this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The Ministry of Education of Humanities and Social Science project (19YJA880086), the Doctoral Research Foundation Project of Xinjiang Normal University (XJNUBS202008), and the Doctoral Students' Independent Innovation Project for 2021, College of Educational Sciences, Xinjiang Normal University (XJNUJKYA2101).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Dongrong Wang, Yuhong Zhang, Huidong Tian, Haoxiang Sun, Kui Wang, Meng Su, and Yixin Wei. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Dongrong Wang and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Scientific Research of Xinjiang Normal University (Ürümqi, China). The procedures for human participants involved in this study are consistent with the ethical standards of the authors' institution. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants followed the institutional and/or national research committee's ethical standards, the 1964 Helsinki Declaration, and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

All authors agreed and authorized the final version of this manuscript.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants and their parents and/or guardians in the study.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Tian, H. et al. The relationship between being bullied and bystander intervention in adolescent school bullying: the moderating mediation of moral disengagement and only child status. Curr Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05734-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05734-x

Keywords

Navigation