Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding misperceptions of colorectal cancer risk and cancer screening based on the health belief model: a systematic review of qualitative literature

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk perception, knowledge, and awareness are important predictors of colorectal cancer (CRC) behavior and screening. Misperception appears to be the cause of negative CRC behaviors and refusal to be screened. Here, we systematically reviewed qualitative studies to identify common CRC misperceptions in the general population. The PubMed, Web Of Science, and Scopus databases were searched to answer the research question. Original qualitative articles in English that addressed CRC risk and/or screening were included, whereas review articles and studies on health care provider misperceptions were excluded. The appropriate Health Belief Model (HBM) domains in the included studies were identified with thematic analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) checklist. The review included 15 qualitative studies. There were two major HBM domains for misperception of CRC risk: high perceived severity (CRC is fatal and incurable) and low perceived susceptibility (older man’s disease, asymptomatic, sexual behavior). A high perceived barrier was that screening was considered embarrassing, painful, and inappropriate, leading to screening refusal, while a high perceived severity resulted in the belief that CRC is fatal but that screening is ineffective. Identifying the most common misperceptions enables the strategic planning of HBM-based interventions, and more engaging risk communication could improve CRC prevention and control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the team for their continuous commitment and efforts in the completion of the manuscript. We also thank the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, for his endless support and motivation.

Funding

The authors received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M. and A.M.; methodology, R.H. and A.M.; analysis, All; writing—original draft preparation, N.M.; writing—review and editing, R.H., A.M. and N.M.; visualization, A.M.; supervision, A.M and R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Azmawati Mohammed Nawi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

All authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 66.3 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masdor, N.A., Nawi, A.M. & Hod, R. Understanding misperceptions of colorectal cancer risk and cancer screening based on the health belief model: a systematic review of qualitative literature. Curr Psychol 43, 13729–13741 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05373-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05373-8

Keywords

Navigation