Abstract
Loss and gain frames have been extensively employed to promote vaccination. However, previous studies have yet to reach a consensus on which frame is more effective. Besides, with the emotional turn in framing research, more efforts are necessitated to comprehend how affective and cognitive responses work together in framing effect. This study employed a single-factor (message framing: loss vs. gain) between-subjects online experiment to unravel the process-oriented psychological mechanism of how loss-versus-gain framing affects HPV vaccination among Chinese female college students. Results demonstrated that the direct effect of message framing on HPV vaccination intention was not significant. Additionally, neither discrete emotions nor cognitive elaboration mediated framing’s effect on vaccination intention. Nevertheless, the serial mediation process with hope and cognitive elaboration as sequential mediators was significant, such that the gain-framed message activated greater hope than the loss-framed one, and hope was associated with intenser cognitive elaboration and HPV vaccination intention. Our study substantiates the importance of hope in fulfilling the framing effect and highlights the importance of simultaneously considering affective and cognitive responses in framing research. Theoretical and practical implications were further discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x
Bassett-Gunter, R. L., Ginis, M., K. A., & Latimer-Cheung, A. E. (2013). Do you want the good news or the bad news? Gain- versus loss-framed messages following health risk information: The effects on leisure time physical activity beliefs and cognitions. Health Psychology, 32(12), 1188–1198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030126
Bilandzic, H., Kalch, A., & Soentgen, J. (2017). Effects of goal framing and emotions on perceived threat and willingness to sacrifice for climate change. Science Communication, 39(4), 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017718553
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
Borah, P. (2022). Message framing and COVID-19 vaccination intention: Moderating roles of partisan media use and pre-attitudes about vaccination. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02851-3
Brooks, J. J., & Walter, N. (2020). Cognitive functional model of the Effects of Discrete negative emotions. The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0291
Chen, L., & Chen, M. (2023). Danger control and fear control during public health emergencies: Considering the roles of fear and hope in the EPPM across different levels of trust. Risk Analysis, 43(5), 928–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13985
Chen, L., & Yang, X. (2018). Using EPPM to evaluate the effectiveness of fear appeal messages across different media outlets to increase the intention of breast self-examination among chinese women. Health communication, 34(11), 1369–1376. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1493416
Chen, L., Yang, X., Fu, L., Liu, X., & Yuan, C. (2019). Using the extended parallel process model to examine the nature and impact of breast cancer prevention information on mobile-based social media: Content analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(6), e13987. https://doi.org/10.2196/13987
Chen, L., Ling, Q., Cao, T., & Han, K. (2020). Mislabeled, fragmented, and conspiracy-driven: A content analysis of the social media discourse about the HPV vaccine in China. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(6), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1817113
Chen, L., Yang, X., & Huang, X. (2021). Promoting HPV vaccination on social media: Interactive effects of threat, efficacy and social cues. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(11), 4442–4456. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1975449
China, C. D. C. (2022). https://en.chinacdc.cn/about/overview/
Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2008). Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00393.x
Covey, J. (2014). The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology, 33(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029305
Cox, D., & Cox, A. D. (2001). Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing, 65(3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.3.91.18336
Credamo (2022). https://www.credamo.com/#/functions
Das, E., Vonkeman, C., & Hartmann, T. (2012). Mood as a resource in dealing with health recommendations: How mood affects information processing and acceptance of quit-smoking messages. Psychology & Health, 27(1), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.569888
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-5978(03)00022-0
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Shiv, B. (2001). Nonconscious and contaminative effects of hypothetical questions on subsequent decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 224–238.
CCTV. (2022, January 11). Free HPV vaccination is being piloted in many places across the country, and the HPV vaccination rate among school-aged girls in China is less than 1%. https://tv.cctv.com/2022/01/11/VIDEPPycsSuYRJN5Fa78zuTu220111.shtml
Fu, C. J., Pan, X. F., Zhao, Z. M., Saheb-Kashaf, M., Chen, F., Wen, Y., Yang, C. X., & Zhong, X. N. (2014). Knowledge, perceptions and acceptability of HPV vaccination among medical students in Chongqing, China. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention: APJCP, 15(15), 6187–6193. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.15.6187
Ge, Y., Zhong, S., Ren, M., Ge, Y., Mao, Y., & Cao, P. (2019). Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection of 65,613 women in East China. Bmc Public Health, 19(1), https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6487-9
George, C., Roberts, R., Brennen, D., Deveaux, L., & Read, S. E. (2020). Knowledge and awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV vaccines among Caribbean youth: The case of the Bahamas. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 16(3), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1661205
Gerend, M. A., & Shepherd, J. E. (2007). Using message framing to promote acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. Health Psychology, 26(6), 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.6.745
Gerend, M. A., Shepherd, J. E., & Monday, K. A. (2008). Behavioral frequency moderates the effects of message framing on HPV vaccine acceptability. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9024-0
Hayes, A. F. (2018). Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification, inference, and interpretation. Communication Monographs, 85(1), 4–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
Hong, Y., & Hashimoto, M. (2023). I will get myself vaccinated for others: The interplay of message frame, reference point, and perceived risk on intention for COVID-19 vaccine. Health Communication, 38(4), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1978668
Kim, S., & Kim, Y. C. (2021). Attention to news media, emotional responses, and policy preferences about public health crisis: The case of fine dust pollution in south korea. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(24), 13325. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413325
Kim, H., Han, J. Y., So, J., & Seo, Y. (2020). An investigation of cognitive processing of fear appeal messages promoting HPV vaccination: Predictors and outcomes of magnitude and valence of cognitive responses. Journal of Health Communication, 25(11), 885–894. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2020.1842566
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York Oxford Univ. Press.
Lee, M. J., & Cho, J. (2017). Promoting HPV vaccination online: Message design and media choice. Health Promotion Practice, 18(5), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839916688229
Liu, S., Yang, J. Z., & Chu, H. (2019). Now or future? Analyzing the effects of message frame and format in motivating chinese females to get HPV vaccines for their children. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.09.005
Liu, S., Yang, J. Z., & Chu, H. (2021). When we increase fear, do we dampen hope? Using narrative persuasion to promote human papillomavirus vaccination in China. Journal of Health Psychology, 26(11), 1999–2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105319894626
Lu, H. (2016). The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication, 38(2), 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015619173
Lu, H., & Yuan, S. (2021). What motivates information sharing about disaster victims on social media? Exploring the role of compassion, sadness, expectancy violation, and enjoyment. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 63, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102431
Lu, L., Liu, J., Yuan, Y. C., Burns, K. S., Lu, E., & Li, D. (2021). Source trust and COVID-19 information sharing: The mediating roles of emotions and beliefs about sharing. Health Education & Behavior, 48(2), 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120984760
Lu, L., Liu, J., Kim, S. J., Tao, R., Shah, D. V., & McLeod, D. M. (2023). The effects of vaccine efficacy information on vaccination intentions through perceived response efficacy and hope. Journal of Health Communication, 28(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2186545
Luo, C., Zhang, Z., & Jin, J. (2023). Recommending breast Cancer screening to my Mum: Examining the interplay of threat, efficacy, and virality on recommendation intention in the chinese context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 907. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20020907
Maness, S. B., Reitzel, L. R., Watkins, K. L., & McNeill, L. H. (2016). HPV awareness, knowledge and vaccination attitudes among church-going african-american women. American Journal of Health Behavior, 40(6), 771–778. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.40.6.9
Mehrabian, A., & Russell, J. A. (1974). An approach to environmental psychology. The MIT Press.
Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_18
Ming, J., Jianqiu, Z., Bilal, M., Akram, U., & Fan, M. (2021). How social presence influences impulse buying behavior in live streaming commerce? The role of S-O-R theory. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 17(4), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijwis-02-2021-0012
Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive-functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication theory, 9(3), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650202250881
Nabi, R. L. (2007). Emotion and persuasion: A social cognitive perspective. In D. R. Roskos-Ewoldsen, & J. Monahan (Eds.), Social cognition and communication: Theories and methods (pp. 377–398). Erlbaum.
Nabi, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2019). Uplifting fear appeals: Considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health communication, 34(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1422847
Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018776019
Nabi, R. L., Walter, N., Oshidary, N., Endacott, C. G., Love-Nichols, J., Lew, Z. J., & Aune, A. (2020). Can emotions capture the elusive gain-loss framing effect? A meta-analysis. Communication Research, 47(8), 1107–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219861256
Nan, X. (2012a). Communicating to young adults about HPV Vaccination: Consideration of message framing, motivation, and gender. Health Communication, 27(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.567447
Nan, X. (2012b). Relative persuasiveness of Gain- Versus loss-framed human papillomavirus vaccination messages for the Present- and future-minded. Human Communication Research, 38(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01419.x
Nan, X., & Madden, K. (2014). The role of cultural worldviews and message framing in shaping public opinions toward the human papillomavirus vaccination mandate. Human Communication Research, 40(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12016
Nan, X., Madden, K., Richards, A., Holt, C., Wang, M. Q., & Tracy, K. (2016). Message framing, perceived susceptibility, and intentions to vaccinate children against HPV among african american parents. Health Communication, 31(7), 798–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2015.1005280
O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of health communication, 12(7), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
O’Keefe, D. J., & Nan, X. (2012). The relative persuasiveness of gain-and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health communication, 27(8), 776–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.640974
Park, S. Y. (2012). The effects of message framing and risk perceptions for HPV vaccine campaigns: Focus on the role of regulatory fit. Health marketing quarterly, 29(4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2012.732847
Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2012). The elaboration likelihood model. In Van P. A. M. Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (1 vol., pp. 224–245). Sage.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Communication and Persuasion, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1
Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39(4), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111418108
Raghunathan, R., & Trope, Y. (2002). Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: Mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.510
Richards, A. S., Qin, Y., Daily, K., & Nan, X. (2021). African american parents’ perceived vaccine efficacy moderates the effect of message framing on psychological reactance to HPV vaccine advocacy. Journal of Health Communication, 26(8), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2021.1966688
Rothman, A. J., & Updegraff, J. A. (2009). Specifying when and how gainand loss-framed messages motivate healthy behavior: An integrated approach. In G. Keren (Ed.), Perspectives on framing (pp. 257–278). Psychology Press.
Rothman, A. J., Martino, S. C., Bedell, B. T., Detweiler, J. B., & Salovey, P. (1999). The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(11), 1355–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299259003
Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The state of Framing Research. In K. Kenski, & K. H. Jamieson (Eds.), Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.47
Shin, S., Park, S., & Ki, E. J. (2021). The mediation effects of fear on the relationship between gain/loss message frames and cognitive/conative responses. Journal of Intelligent Communication, 1(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.54963/jic.v1i1.32
So, J. (2013). A further extension of the extended parallel process model (E-EPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health communication, 28(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.708633
So, J., Kuang, K., & Cho, H. (2016). Reexamining fear appeal models from cognitive appraisal theory and functional emotion theory perspectives. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 120–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1044257
Storbeck, J., & Clore, G. L. (2007). On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 21(6), 1212–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701438020
Su, Y., Hong, X., & Sun, C. (2022). Red media, blue media, and misperceptions: Examining a moderated serial mediation model of partisan media use and COVID-19 misperceptions. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03772-x
Turner, M. M., Rimal, R. N., Morrison, D., & Kim, H. (2006). The role of anxiety in seeking and retaining risk information: Testing the risk perception attitude Framework in two studies. Human Communication Research, 32(2), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00006.x
van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Jin, Y. (2020). Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication, 35(5), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295
Wagner, B. C., & Petty, R. E. (2011). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Thoughtful and non-thoughtful social influence. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 96–116). Blackwell.
Wang, K., Wong, E. L. Y., Cheung, A. W. L., Chung, V. C. H., Wong, C. H. L., Dong, D., & Yeoh, E. K. (2022). Impact of information framing and vaccination characteristics on parental COVID-19 vaccine acceptance for children: A discrete choice experiment. European Journal of Pediatrics, 181(11), 3839–3849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04586-6
Wansink, B., & Pope, L. (2015). When do gain-framed health messages work better than fear appeals? Nutrition Reviews, 73(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuu010
Wen, N., & Shen, F. (2016). Communicating to young chinese about human papillomavirus vaccination: Examining the impact of message framing and temporal distance. Asian Journal of Communication, 26(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2016.1162821
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328
Witte, K. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In P. Anderson (Ed.), Handbook of communication and emotion (pp. 423–450). Academic Press.
Wu, M. (2022). What drives people to share misinformation on Social Media during the COVID-19 pandemic: A stimulus-organism-response perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811752
Xiao, X., & Borah, P. (2021). Do norms matter? Examining norm-based messages in HPV vaccination promotion. Health communication, 36(12), 1476–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1770506
Xiao, X., & Su, Y. (2020). Still a “female problem”: A framing analysis of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in chinese online news. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2020.1714683
Xiao, X., & Su, Y. (2022). Stumble on information or misinformation? Examining the interplay of incidental news exposure, narcissism, and new media literacy in misinformation engagement. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2021-0791
Xiao, X., Lee, D. K. L., Wong, R. M., & Borah, P. (2021). The impact of theory in HPV vaccination promotion research: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(7), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171211012524
Xie, L., Ren, J., Min, S., Zhu, X., Xu, D., Qiao, K., Chen, X., Liu, M., Xiao, Z., & Tan, Y. (2023). Knowledge, attitude, and perception regarding HPV-related diseases and vaccination among the general public in Guizhou Province of China. Vaccine, 41(5), 1119–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.027
Xu, X., Yang, M., Zhao, Y. C., & Zhu, Q. (2021). Effects of message framing and evidence type on health information behavior: The case of promoting HPV vaccination. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 73(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-02-2020-0055
Yan, C. (2015). Persuading people to eat less junk food: A cognitive resource match between attitudinal ambivalence and health message framing. Health Communication, 30(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.842525
Ye, W., Li, Q., & Yu, S. (2021). Persuasive Effects of Message Framing and Narrative Format on promoting COVID-19 vaccination: A study on Chinese College Students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189485
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
This study receives no external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
Materials availability
Data are available upon reasonable request.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Institutional review board statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the School of Journalism and Communication at Tsinghua University (Protocol ID: TSJC 202301310010).
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, C., He, Y., Xu, Y. et al. How does loss-versus-gain message framing affect HPV vaccination intention? Mediating roles of discrete emotions and cognitive elaboration. Curr Psychol 43, 9443–9456 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05131-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05131-w