Abstract
To date, characteristics of the internet “troll” have largely been explored in general community samples, which may lack representation of the sample of interest. In this brief report, we aimed to evidence the role of gender and the personality traits of sadism, psychopathy, extraversion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness in a sample of individuals who self-report having perpetrating trolling behaviours. Participants (N = 163; 50.3% women; Mage = 27.35, SD = 8.78) were recruited via social media advertisements and completed an anonymous online questionnaire. The variables explained 55.5% of variance in trolling. We found self-reported trolls were more likely to be men and have higher psychopathy, higher sadism, and lower agreeableness. Findings of this representative sample have implications for understanding, managing, and preventing this antisocial online behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Internet trolling (“trolling”) is an antisocial online behaviour characterised by posting inflammatory, provocative comments with the intention of upsetting others (Buckels et al., 2014). As experiencing trolling can have significant psychological impact (Coles & West, 2016), management and prevention of this online behaviour is critical. Understanding individual differences associated with trolling, such as gender and personality traits, can inform development of appropriate interventions (March, 2019).
Although women engage in other antisocial online behaviour more than men (e.g., intimate partner cyberstalking; March et al., 2022), men are more likely to perpetrate trolling (Buckels et al., 2014). Possibly, this is due to their more antisocial use of social media (Howard et al., 2019), their higher dominance and competitiveness (March & Steele, 2020), and viewing trolling as having a functional purpose (Brubaker et al., 2021). People with higher subclinical psychopathy and sadism also perpetrate more trolling, likely due to their lower empathy and a deceitful interpersonal style (i.e., psychopathy; March & Steele, 2020), and their enjoyment of hurting others (i.e., sadism; March, 2019). People with lower agreeableness, lower conscientiousness (Buckels et al., 2014), and higher extraversion (Zezulka & Seigfried-Spellar, 2016) also perpetrate more trolling – although extraversion results are mixed. Here, trolling may be a product of increased antagonism (i.e., low agreeableness), increased impulsivity (i.e., low conscientiousness), assertiveness and a need to establish social status (i.e., higher extraversion; Zezulka & Seigfried-Spellar, 2016).
In the current study, we aimed to replicate these findings in a representative sample of self-reported “trolls”. As previous studies have largely assessed tendencies to troll (Zezulka & Seigfrield-Spellar, 2016) and agreement with trolling behaviours (March, 2019) in community samples, the validity of results may be questionable. Although someone might agree with trolling behaviours (e.g., the GAIT; Buckels et al., 2014), this agreement may not translate to actual behaviour. We predicted that men would be more likely than women to troll, and that people with higher sadism, higher psychopathy, lower agreeableness, lower conscientiousness, and higher extraversion, would perpetrate more trolling.
Method
After receiving institution ethical approval, participants were recruited to complete a voluntary, anonymous online questionnaire via social media (e.g., Facebook, Reddit, and Instagram) advertisements. After providing informed consent, participants (N = 663) were presented with an operational definition (see supplementary material) of trolling, followed by the inclusion question, “do you troll other people/groups online?” Only those who answered yes (N = 266; 40.12%) could commence the questionnaire. The questionnaire took approximately 20–30 min to complete and included an attention check. We also included an open-ended question to screen for inattention and assessed start/finish times for outliers.
The final sample (N = 163; 50.3% women) completed all measures (See Table 1) and satisfied attention checks. Participants were aged 18–62 years (Mage = 27.36, SD = 8.78), predominantly heterosexual (75.5%) and Australian (63.8%). An a priori power calculation indicated a minimum sample size of 153 (effect size = 0.15, alpha = 0.05, 95% power) required for statistical power. The study was a correlational, cross-sectional design, and based on research recommendations we controlled for socially desirable responding (see March, 2019).
Results
Assumptions of linearity, homoscedasticity, normality, and multicollinearity were screened and met. Table 2 presents total and gendered descriptive and bivariate correlations. To test the hypothesis, a 2-Step Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis was run (see Table 3). The total model explained 55.5% of variance in trolling, R²=0.56, F(7,149) = 26.59, p < .001, with a large effect size of ƒ²=1.27.
Discussion
In this brief report, we aimed to evidence the utility of gender and personality to predict trolling in a sample of self-reported trolls. Corroborating past findings of general population samples (Buckels et al., 2014; Craker & March, 2016; Sest & March, 2017), men were more likely than women to troll, and trolling was predicted by lower empathy and a deceitful interpersonal style (i.e., higher psychopathy), enjoyment harming others (i.e., higher sadism), and antagonism (i.e., lower agreeableness).
Results also demonstrate some key differences in general population samples and representative samples. Conscientiousness did not predict trolling, a finding contrary to the hypothesis and to general population samples (Buckels et al., 2014). However, as trolling is deliberate (Sest & March, 2017), and can even include strategic coordination (Etudo et al., 2019), it follows that trolls may not display low conscientiousness. Further, extraversion did not predict trolling, a finding also contrary to previous research – though extraversion findings have been mixed (see Buckels et al., 2014; Gylfason et al., 2021; and Zezulka & Seigfried-Spellar, 2016), possibly due to the different measures employed to assess extraversion. Still, extraversion shares an inverse relationship with forms of deception (McArthur et al., 2022), and as deception is a key characteristic of trolling (Hardaker, 2010), the nonsignificant extraversion finding is logical. However, it is worth noting that extraversion was a significant predictor until sadism and psychopathy were entered, indicating either (1) sadism and psychopathy capture the variance explained by extraversion, or (2) the strength of sadism and psychopathy rendered extraversion nonsignificant.
We conclude that general population samples may somewhat, but not entirely, capture the psychological profile of trolls. Interventions seeking to target trolling behaviours should consider the deliberate and strategic nature of trolling; the troll may not be a reactionary, impulsive aggressor (i.e., low conscientiousness). Although the modest sample size of the current study somewhat limits generalisability, there was adequate statistical power and a large effect size (ƒ² = 1.27) was large. Future research exploring trolling could seek to apply theoretical frameworks to understand this antisocial use of social media, such as Uses and Gratifications theory (see Geary et al., 2021). Further, as trolls are often diverse in their purpose and goals (Sanfilippo et al., 2017), future research could focus on examining the individual differences of trolls who vary by goals, strategies, and platform.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and analysed during the current study are available in the figshare repository, https://figshare.com/s/d54cd377d52df93ab37d.
References
Brubaker, P. J., Montez, D., & Church, S. H. (2021). The power of shadenfreude: Predicting behaviors and perceptions of trolling among Reddit users. Social Media + Society, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021382
Buckels, E. E., Trapnell, P. D., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
Coles, B., & West, M. (2016). Trolling the trolls: Online forum users constructions of the nature and properties of trolling. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.070
Craker, N., & March, E. (2016). The dark side of Facebook®: The Dark Tetrad, negative social potency, and trolling behaviours. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.043
Etudo, U., Yoon, V. Y., & Yaraghi, N. (2019, January). From Facebook to the streets: Russian troll ads and Black Lives Matter protests. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Geary, C., March E., & Grieve, R. (2021) Insta-identity: Dark personality traits as predictors of authentic self-presentation on Instagram. Telematics and Informatics 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101669
Gylfason, H. F., Sveinsdottir, A. H., Vésteinsdóttir, V., & Sigurvinsdottir, R. (2021). Haters gonna hate, trolls gonna troll: The personality profile of a Facebook troll. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5722), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115722
Hardaker, C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.011
Howard, K., Zolnierek, K. H., Critz, K., Dailey, S., & Ceballos, N. (2019). An examination of psychosocial factors associated with malicious online trolling behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.020
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory: Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
March, E. (2019). Psychopathy, sadism, empathy, and the motivation to cause harm: New evidence confirms malevolent nature of the internet troll. Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.001
March, E., & Steele, G. (2020). High esteem and hurting others online: Trait sadism moderates the relationship between self-esteem and internet trolling. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking, 23, 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0652
March, E., Szymczak, P., Di Rago, M., & Jonason, P. K. (2022). Passive, invasive, and duplicitous: Three forms of intimate partner cyberstalking. Personality and Individual Differences, 189, 111502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111502
McArthur, J., Jarvis, R., Bourgeois, C., & Ternes, M. (2022). Lying motivations: Exploring personality correlates of lying and motivations to lie. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000328
O’Meara, A., Davies, J., & Hammond, S. (2011). The psychometric properties and utility of the short sadistic impulse scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 523–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022400
Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125.
Sanfilippo, P., Yang, S., & Fichman, P. (2017). Managing online trolling: From deviant to social and political trolls Proceedings of the 50th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
Sest, N., & March, E. (2017). Constructing the cyber-troll: Psychopathy, sadism, and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.038
Zezulka, L. A., & Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2016). Differentiating cyberbullies and internet trolls by personality characteristics and self-esteem. Journal of Digital Forensics Security and Law: Special Issue on Cyberharassment, 11(3), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.15394/jdfsl.2016.1415
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. All research was conducted in accordance with ethical standards and the project was approved by the [blinded] Human Research Ethics Committee. Participants provided informed consent to participate.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
March, E., McDonald, L. & Forsyth, L. Personality and internet trolling: a validation study of a Representative Sample. Curr Psychol 43, 4815–4818 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04586-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04586-1