Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is a punisher always trustworthy? In-group punishment reduces trust

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Third-party punishment (TPP) helps maintain social justice; the social preference model highlights desires to punish individuals who violate fairness and group norms. Third-party punishment affects bystanders’ trust in punishers, but the effects of group factors are currently unknown. The current study assessed how the group condition between the punished and bystanders influences how third-party punishment affects bystander trust, using third-party punishment and trust game paradigms. A pre-experiment (N = 63) showed that third-party punishment affected trust between participants and the punisher. Study 1 (N = 164) showed that TPP improved trust between participants and an out-group punisher, whereas trust decreased under an in-group condition. Study 2 (N = 128) showed that increased trust was the result of increased perceived integrity of an out-group punisher by bystanders. Decreased in-group trust was the result of decreased benevolence consciousness. Third-party punishment only enhanced bystanders’ trust for an out-group punisher, while the in-group condition revealed the opposite result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China [grant numbers 18ZDA165], and the Open research Fund of Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Education Technology and Application [jykf21022].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Binghai Sun, Lingling Jin, Zirong Ren, and Guoan Yue designed this study. Lingling Jin and Zirong Ren collected and analyzed data. Guoan Yue, Zirong Ren and wrote the English version of the manuscript. Zirong Ren participated in drafting the paper and revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data; took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; agreed to submit to the current journal; gave final approval of the version to the published; and agree to the accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guoan Yue or Zirong Ren.

Ethics declarations

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, B., Jin, L., Yue, G. et al. Is a punisher always trustworthy? In-group punishment reduces trust. Curr Psychol 42, 22965–22975 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03395-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03395-2

Keywords

Navigation