Skip to main content
Log in

The role of worry and attentional control in mental imagery

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Models of Generalized Anxiety Disorder postulate that attentional biases for threat-related information and avoidance are key maintenance factors of worry. Such models suggest that worry is primarily a verbal-linguistic, as opposed to an imagery-based process; however, findings regarding the role of imagery, worry, and attentional control (AC) have been inconsistent. The current study aimed to investigate the impact of worry and AC during mental imagery. The sample was comprised of (N = 93) college-age students who self-reported current levels of worry and AC. Participants engaged in either worry or relaxation prior to an imagery task, during which they were asked to rate valence and arousal of each image. Heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) were recorded throughout the task. Results suggest that overall, individuals reported more difficulties engaging in mental imagery following the worry manipulation. Moreover, individuals with high worry found it more difficult to engage in mental imagery, particularly after engaging in relaxation. Additionally, results revealed no differences in physiological arousal between groups. Results provide support for the avoidance function of worry such that individuals high in worry found it more difficult to engage in mental imagery. Furthermore, results may suggest that those high in worry find it more beneficial to maintain negative affect as demonstrated by findings that individuals with anxiety found it more difficult to engage in mental imagery following relaxation. This study provides important information regarding the mechanisms of worry and AC by documenting the role of avoidance and mental imagery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Supplemental analyses using ANCOVA assessed PSWQ-A and ACS as continuous variables for all dependent variables. Results reveal a similar main effect of manipulation, F(1, 93) = 10.41, p = 0.002 and PSWQ-A by manipulation interaction, F(1, 93) = 6.16, p = 0.015. The main effect of PSWQ-A is marginally significant, p = 0.061.

  2. After examining ACS as a continuous variable, this effect is marginally significant, p = 0.054.

  3. A main effect of image is still observed on arousal rating, F(1, 85) = 7.93, p = 0.006; however, there is no longer a significant 4-way interaction, p = 0.074.

References

Download references

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaitlyn M. Nagel.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethics Approval

The Institutional Review Board at Oklahoma State University approved the present study and the study was in line with the ethical standards as described in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Consent for Publication

Informed consent regarding publication of data was obtained from all participants in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagel, K.M., Grant, D.M., Kraft, J.D. et al. The role of worry and attentional control in mental imagery. Curr Psychol 42, 10862–10870 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02384-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02384-1

Keywords

Navigation