Skip to main content
Log in

Lies and imagined intent to lie: Personality, sexism beliefs and false claims of assault

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on the issues surrounding false allegations of assault against men has been largely based on review of official documentation, not on questions asked of the women themselves. This limits what we know about variables that might contribute explanation as to why some women deliberately lie about having been assaulted. In our survey of 255 women (both college students and community members), 18 admitted they had fictitiously claimed to have been assaulted either to official investigators, or to friends and family members. Their stated motives included revenge, fear, and embarrassment. Our participants also rated the extent to which they could imagine a situation in which they would make a(nother) false claim in the future—101 (39.6%) of them rated this item positively to differing degrees. We also examined individual difference variables including the ‘dark triad’ traits and four measures of sexist beliefs. While Machiavellianism and psychopathy had positive relationships with how easily participants could imagine making a false claim, several of the sexism beliefs explained more variance in imagined intent to falsify a claim, particularly among the women who admitted having made one previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available from first author.

Notes

  1. The legal terms of ‘rape’ and ‘sexual assault’ are defined differently, but the precise definitions vary across jurisdictions (Planty et al., 2013). Additionally, these terms are often not specifically defined by researchers, or are used interchangeably. As such, we used the more general description of ‘sexual violence’ in this work to refer to both categories of crimes.

  2. Linear regression on such a small sample (n = 18) produces output that describes only that sample, and it’s unwise to expect these results to generalize to others. While among the larger sub-group (n = 237) the Adjusted R2s were .15 for Block 1, and .19 for Block 2, the smaller group’s Adjusted R2s = .05 and .45. In addition, the expected random relationship among 7 predictors with this sample size = .41 (R = k/N-1).

References

Download references

Code Availability

Not Applicable.

Funding

Internal grant from the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

First author wrote the manuscript and did the majority of the data analyses. Second author created survey file and assisted in data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Bertsch.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bertsch, S., Matthews, K. Lies and imagined intent to lie: Personality, sexism beliefs and false claims of assault. Curr Psychol 42, 9810–9818 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02278-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02278-2

Keywords

Navigation