Abstract
Past research has demonstrated mixed findings on attentional biases toward food and body words among non-clinical restrained eaters (Brooks, S., Prince, A., Stahl, D., Campbell, I. C., & Treasure, J. (2011). A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive bias to food stimuli in people with disordered eating behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 37–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.006; Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. (2004). Attentional biases in eating disorders: A meta-analytic review of Stroop performance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1001−1022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.004; Francis, J. A., Stewart, S. H., & Hounsell, S. (1997). Dietary restraint and the selective processing of forbidden and nonforbidden food words. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(6), 633–646. doi:10.1023/A:1021804207132). Addressing previous methodological issues, this study examined college female restrained eaters’ attentional bias to food words. We used 120 college females – 20 were classified as restrained eaters by the Restrained Eating subscale of Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E., Bergers, G. P., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T). Using a computer-based program called MouseTracker for a Stroop test (Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.226), attentional bias indicators of both process (i.e., what happens while attention is captured and directed; Area under the Curve and Maximum Deviation) and outcome (i.e., the end results of attention captured by certain stimuli; Reaction Time and Percentage of Errors) were measured to forbidden (i.e., unhealthy) and unforbidden (i.e., healthy) food words over animal words (i.e., used as control condition). Word stimuli were matched on frequency and syllables between conditions (Francis, J. A., Stewart, S. H., & Hounsell, S. (1997). Dietary restraint and the selective processing of forbidden and nonforbidden food words. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(6), 633–646. doi:10.1023/A:1021804207132). No evidence of attentional bias to food words was found among non-clinical restrained eaters. Based on the results in the current study, non-clinical restrained eaters with no accompanying overeating may not show attentional bias to food words. Future studies could compare clinical and non-clinical restrained eaters with and without overeating symptoms on attentional bias to food versus body stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., p. 329). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Black, C. M. D., Wilson, G. T., Labouvie, E., & Heffernan, K. (1997). Selective processing of eating disorder relevant stimuli: Does the Stroop test provide an objective measure of bulimia nervosa? International Journal of Eating Disorders, 22(3), 329–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199711)22:3,329::AID=EAT13>3.0.CO;2-T.
Brooks, S., Prince, A., Stahl, D., Campbell, I. C., & Treasure, J. (2011). A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive bias to food stimuli in people with disordered eating behavior. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1), 37–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.006.
Cooper, M. J., & Fairburn, C. G. (1992). Selective processing of eating, weight and shape related words in patients with eating disorders and dieters. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 363–365.
D’Agostino, R. B., & Cureton, E. E. (1975). The 27 percent rule revisited. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 35, 47–50.
Dobson, K. S., & Dozois, D. J. (2004). Attentional biases in eating disorders: A meta-analytic review of Stroop performance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8), 1001–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2003.09.004.
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., & Davies, B. A. (2005). Identifying dieters who will develop an eating disorder: A prospective, population-based study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(12), 2249–2255. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi/ajp.162.12.2249.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Francis, J. A., Stewart, S. H., & Hounsell, S. (1997). Dietary restraint and the selective processing of forbidden and nonforbidden food words. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21(6), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021804207132.
Freeman, J. B., & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 226–241. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.226.
Green, M. W., & Rogers, P. J. (1993). Selective attention to food and body shape words in dieters and restrained non-dieters. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 14(4), 515–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199312)14:4<515::AID-EAT2260140417>3.0.CO;2-E.
Hollitt, S., Kemps, E., Tiggemann, M., Smeets, E., & Mills, J. S. (2010). Components of attentional bias among restrained eaters. Appetite, 54(2), 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.005.
Johansson, L., Ghaderi, A., & Andersson, G. (2004). Stroop interference for food- and body-related words: A meta-analysis. Eating Behaviors, 6(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.11.001.
Lee, M., & Shafran, R. (2004). Information processing biases in eating disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 24(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2003.10.004
Markis, T. A. (2015). Attentional Bias to body-related stimuli in younger and middle-aged females: The role of eating disorders and thin ideal priming. (Doctoral dissertation). Ohio:Cleveland State University.
McCarthy, M. (1990). The thin ideal, depression, and eating disorders in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29(3), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(90)90003-2.
McLaren, L., Gauvin, L., & White, D. (2001). The role of perfectionism and excessive commitment to exercise in explaining dietary restraint: Replication and extension. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29(3), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.1023.
Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Warsh, S. (1978). Internal and external components of emotionality in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(5), 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.5.497.
Rand, C. S. W., & Kuldau, J. M. (1990). Restrained eating (weight concerns) in the general population and among students. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 10(6), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(199111)10:6<699::AID-EAT2260100608>3.0.CO;2-0.
Stice, E., Marti, C. N., & Durant, S. (2011). Risk factors for onset of eating disorders: Evidence of multiple risk pathways from an 8-year prospective study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(10), 622–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.009.
Urland, G. R., & Ito, T. A. (2005). Have your cake and hate it, too: Ambivalent food attitudes are associated with dietary restraint. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(4), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2704_8.
Van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E., Bergers, G. P., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch eating behavior questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T.
Williams, J. M. G., Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology. Psychological Bulletin, 120(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.3.
Williamson, D. A., Muller, S. L., Reas, D. L., & Thaw, J. M. (1999). Cognitive bias in eating disorders: Implications for theory and treatment. Behavior Modification, 23(4), 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445599234003.
Yamamoto, N., Incera, S., & McLennan, C. T. (2016). A reverse Stroop task with mouse tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(670), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00670.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. The study was approved by Illinois State University IRB and conducted in accord with ethical principles.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This study is based partly on Brandon Hodge’s master’s thesis. He is now at the Institute for Human Resources, Pontiac, IL.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodge, B., Han, S. & McBride, D.M. No evidence of attentional bias to food words among non-clinical female restrained eaters. Curr Psychol 41, 4466–4473 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00933-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00933-8