Skip to main content
Log in

Can Extrinsic Motivational State Hinder Good Behavior? The Mediating Role of Ambition and Competition in Relationships of Contingent Rewards and Punishments with Work Performance

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing upon the integration of expectancy theory and extrinsic motivation, we attempt to develop and examine a model that reveals different extrinsic motivation-based relationships among contingent rewards and punishments, task performance, job engagement and job creativity. In study 1, we develop a model of contingent incentives, ambition, competition, and work performance using a multiple-case, inductive approach. In study 2, we conduct a one-group pretest-posttest design with 362 matched supervisor-subordinate dyads from Chinese state owned enterprises, the results show that contingent rewards have positive relationships with job engagement and job creativity through ambition and competition. Contingent punishments have positive relationship with job creativity through competition, whereas contingent rewards and punishments have no effect on task performance through ambition or competition. In addition, contingent punishments have no effect on job engagement through competition. On the basis of these findings, the framework suggests formal performance management practices to aid managers and human resource development practitioners in their understanding and enactment of extrinsic motivation. Finally, the implications of the study for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the training courses on contingent motivation, the supervisors were encouraged to recognize, praise, and reward subordinates, contingent on their high work performance. The supervisors also provided instructions, suggestions, and assistance to subordinates contingent on their poor work performance.

  2. Ethical approval: This study and protocol were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of China Business Executives Academy. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

  3. The two stories about contingent incentives came from a semi-structured interview with supervisors and subordinates in study 1.

References

  • Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A., & Tighe, E. M. (1995). The work prefference inentory-assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68(4), 580–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, L. E., Camobreco, J. F., Dionne, S. D., Avolio, B. J., & Lau, A. N. (1997). Effects of rewards and punishments on leader charisma, leader effectiveness and follower reactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(2), 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Dong, I. J. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 72(4), 441–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. National College for School Leadership, 12(4), 5244–5247.

  • Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership : theory, research, and managerial applications: Free press , Collier Macmillan.

  • Benschop, Y., Doorewaard, H., Leenders, J., & Brink, M. V. D. (2013). Discourses of ambition, gender and part-time work. Human Relations, 66(5), 699–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlyne, D. E. (1975). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 31(4).

  • Bozionelos, N., & Wang, L. (2007). An investigation on the attitudes of Chinese workers towards individually based performance-related reward systems. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(2), 284–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breevaart, K., Bakker, A., Hetland, J., Demerouti, E., Olsen, O. K., & Espevik, R. (2014). Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 138–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 363–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, R. K., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. Handbook of parenting: Social conditions and applied parenting, 59-93.

  • Chen, W., & Shi, K. (2014). The structure and measurement of transactional leadership in China. Chinese Journal of Management, 11(10), 1453–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Xie, X., & Chang, S. (2011). Cooperative and competitive orientation among Chinese people: Scale development and validation. Management & Organization Review, 7(2), 353–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. X., Tsui, A. S., & Farh, J. L. (2002). Loyalty to supervisor vs. organizational commitment: Relationships to employee performance in China. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 75(3), 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C., & Jang, S. (2007). The effects of perceived price and brand image on value and purchase intention: Leisure travelers' attitudes toward online hotel booking. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 15(3), 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation: Springer US.

  • Deci, E. L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(1), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 692–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Cognitive evaluation theory.

  • Elchardus, M., & Smits, W. (2008). The vanishing flexible: Ambition, self-realization and flexibility in the career perspectives of young Belgian adults. Work Employment & Society, 22(2), 243–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, C., Zhang, L., & Shi, K. (2014). Can leadership style improve employee’s work engagement and innovative behavior? Entrepreneurial orientation as cross-level moderator. R&D Management, 26(03):62. (In Chinese).

  • Fudge, R. S., & Schlacter, J. L. (1999). Motivating employees to act ethically: An expectancy theory approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(18), 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge, J. J., Tian, Y., & Zhang, X. (2016). The subordinate's side of the story: The practice of contextual components in constructive criticism. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 11, 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Martinage, M. (1989). Immunizing Children against the Negative Effects of Reward. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(3), 212–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52(2), 280–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 944–974.

  • Isaac, R. G., Zerbe, W. J., & Pitt, D. C. (2001). Leadership and motivation: The effective application of expectancy theory. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(2), 212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46(4), 352–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. K., Kim, Y. S., Son, M. H., & Lee, D. J. (2011). Do emotions play a mediating role in the relationship between owner leadership styles and manager customer orientation, and performance in service environment? International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(4), 942–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, N. H., Beauvais, L. L., & Scholl, R. W. (1999). Work motivation: The incorporation of self-concept-based processes. Human Relations, 52(8), 969–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, M. A. R., Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self-efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(1), 59–74.

  • Mead, M. (1976). Cooperation and competition among primitive peoples. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orehek, E., Mauro, R., Kruglanski, A. W., & van der Bles, A. M. (2012). Prioritizing association strength versus value: The influence of self-regulatory modes on means evaluation in single goal and multigoal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 22–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Kemmelmeier, M., & Coon, H. M. (2002). Cultural psychology, a new look: Reply to bond (2002), Fiske (2002), Kitayama (2002), and miller (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 110–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R. G. (1980). Determinants of intrinsic motivation: Locus of control and competence information as components of Deci's cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(2), 211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Bommer, W. H., Podsakoff, N. P., & Mackenzie, S. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Todor, W. D. (1985). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and group processes and productivity. Journal of Management, 11(1), 55–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., Todor, W. D., Grover, R. A., & Huber, V. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact or fiction? Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 34(1), 21–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, J., Li, X., Wang, B., Song, B., Zhang, W., Chen, M., & Qu, Y. (2018). A role theory perspective on how and when goal-focused leadership influences employee voice behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1244.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowold, J., & Rohmann, A. (2009). Transformational and transactional leadership styles, followers’ positive and negative emotions, and performance in German nonprofit orchestras. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20(1), 41–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2010). The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management, 43(4), 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B. (1990). Calculations, values, and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations, 43(4), 313–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A. (2010). Knowledge and appraisal in the cognition-Emotion relationship. Cognition & Emotion, 2(2), 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sools, A. M., Engen, M. L., & Baerveldt, C. (2007). Gendered career-making practices: On doing ambition or how managers discursively position themselves in a multinational corporation. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 80(80), 413–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. I., & Callahan, A. L. (1987). The stigma of bankruptcy: Spoiled organizational image and its management. The Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 405–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2011). Do transformational leaders enhance their followers’ daily work engagement? Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utman, C. H. (1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality & Social Psychology Review An Official Journal of the Society for Personality & Social Psychology Inc, 1(2), 170–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Universitas Negeri Malang, 1964(1964), 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, K., & Fishbach, A. (2018). It’s about time: Earlier rewards increase intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(6), 877–890.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (1984). Case study research. Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbikowski, S. M. (1993). Immunizing children against the negative effects of reward: A further examination of intrinsic motivation training techniques. Creativity Research Journal, 6(3), 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Fishbach, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2007). The dilution model: How additional goals undermine the perceived instrumentality of a shared path. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 389–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (Project 71,602,181).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Jing Ge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study and protocol were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of China Business Executives Academy. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 1 Descriptions of participants in four stories
Table 2 Data collection details for each case
Table 3 Extrinsic motivation of subordinates for contingent incentives
Table 4 The Relationship Between Contingent Incentives and Extrinsic motivation
Table 5 Correlations and Descriptive Statistics
Table 6 Results for task performance, job engagement and job creativity of contingent rewards
Table 7 Results for task performance, job engagement and job creativity of contingent punishments
Table 8 Mediating Effects of ambition and competition on Task performance, Job creativity and Job engagement
Table 9 The results of paired-samples

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, JJ., Zhang, P. & Dong, D. Can Extrinsic Motivational State Hinder Good Behavior? The Mediating Role of Ambition and Competition in Relationships of Contingent Rewards and Punishments with Work Performance. Curr Psychol 41, 2162–2183 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00688-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00688-2

Keywords

Navigation