Abstract
Researchers interested in the study of implicit (and, to a lesser degree, explicit) memory have frequently used word stem completion (WSC) to measure repetition priming in both healthy and clinical populations. In this task, participants are asked to complete each of several stems (e.g., ele__) with the first word that comes to mind (e.g., elephant). A key problem, however, is that the baseline completion rates of the stems corresponding to the target words must be known in advance, if the researcher want to maximize the possibility to detect sizable priming effects. Norms have indeed been developed in a variety of languages (including English, French, Spanish, German, and Swedish), but not in Italian. Here, we report a set of preliminary norms on the spontaneous completion rates of 97 word stems from a group of 115 Italian undergraduate psychology students. They were obtained as part of a pilot study for an experiment investigating the status of implicit memory in the word-stem completion task in schizophrenic patients (Marques et al. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(3), 314–321, 2016). In addition, we examined the within-items correlations between the completion rates and five basic properties of the target words (frequency, length, familiarity, imageability, and concreteness). Replicating previous research, we found that spontaneous completion rates were positively associated to word frequency, familiarity, imageability and concreteness, but negatively associated to word length – although in all cases the consistency of the relation across stems was moderate-to-low. The present database can be helpful for Italian researchers to select appropriate words and stems to include in experiments using the WSC.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This occurred because some participants were unable to complete the stems with a meaningful word in the allotted time. The most difficult stems to complete were vac (42 missing values), tab (15 missing values), abr (14 missing values) and vis (13 missing values). For all other stems, missing values varied between 0 and 9.
For several stems, the inspection of the variance inflation factors and tolerance values revealed strong collinearity between two predictors: in these cases, the variable having the lowest correlation with completion rates was removed from analysis (indicated by ‘NA’ in Table 1).
References
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L. S. (2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(3), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195471.
Barnhardt, T. M. (2005). Number of solutions effects in stem decision: Support for the distinction between identification and production processes in priming. Memory, 13(7), 725–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210444000368.
Bergmann, H. C., Müller, B. C. N., & Danek, A. (2010). Normdaten zur ergänzung deutscher wortanfänge (normative data for the completion of German word stems). Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 21(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1024/1016-264X/a000003.
Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2005). Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell'Italiano Scritto (Corpus and Frequency Lexicon of the Written Italian). http://linguistica.sns.it/CoLFIS/Home.htm
Craik, F. M., Moscovitch, M., & McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 864–875. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.864.
Gabrieli, J. E., Vaidya, C. J., Stone, M., Francis, W. S., Thompson-Schill, S. L., Fleischman, D. A., Tinklenberg, J. R., Jesavage, J. A., & Wilson, R. S. (1999). Convergent behavioral and neuropsychological evidence for a distinction between identification and production forms of repetition priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.479.
Geraci, L. (2006). A test of the frontal lobe functioning hypothesis of age deficits in production priming. Neuropsychology, 20(5), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.20.5.539.
Geraci, L., & Hamilton, M. (2009). Examining the response competition hypothesis of age effects in implicit memory. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16(6), 683–707.
Geraci, L., Hamilton, M., & Guillory, J. J. (2015). Age effects in implicit memory: The role of response competition induced by relative word frequency. Experimental Aging Research, 41(5), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2015.1085745.
Graf, P., & Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23(5), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90346-3.
Graf, P., & Williams, D. (1987). Completion norms for 40 three-letter word stems. Behavior Research Methods, 19(5), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205611.
Graf, P., Squire, L. R., & Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10(1), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.164.
Kučera, M., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
LaVoie, D. J., Olbinski, B., & Palmer, S. (2015). Degree of handedness and priming: Further evidence for a distinction between production and identification priming mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 151.
Marques, V. S., Spataro, P., Cestari, V., Sciarretta, A., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2016). Testing the identification/production hypothesis of implicit memory in schizophrenia: The role of response competition. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(3), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617715001198.
Martin, S., Dressaire, D., Guerdoux, E., Trouillet, R., Brouillet, D., Brouillet, T., & Maury, P. (2009). Norme francophone de complétion de trigrammes chez des participants âgés de 30 à 93 ans (French word-stem completion norms by participants from 30 to 93 years old). European Review of Applied Psychology / Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 59(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2008.09.001.
Migo, E. M., Roper, A., Montaldi, D., & Mayes, A. R. (2010). British English norms for the spontaneous completion of three-letter word stems. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 470–473. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.470.
Olofsson, U., & Nyberg, L. (1992). Swedish norms for completion of word stems and unique word fragments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 33(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1992.tb00890.x.
Prull, M. W. (2004). Exploring the identification-production hypothesis of repetition priming in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.1.108.
Prull, M. W. (2010). Age-related influences on repetition priming in the verb generation task: Examining the role of response competition. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 17(4), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580903469846.
Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., Stadler, M. L., & Riegler, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(6), 1251–1269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.6.1251.
Shaw, R. J. (1997). Unprimed stem completion is only moderately predicted by word frequency and length. Behavior Research Methods, 29(3), 401–424. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200594.
Soler, M. J., Dasí, C., & Ruiz, J. C. (2015). Priming in word stem completion tasks: Comparison with previous results in word fragment completion tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1172.
Soler, M. J., Dasí, C., Ruiz, J. C., & Cervera, T. (2017). Spanish norms for completion of restricted length word stems. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1920–1929. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0834-x.
Spataro, P., Cestari, V., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2011). The relationship between divided attention and implicit memory: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.007.
Spataro, P., Saraulli, D., Mulligan, N. W., Cestari, V., Costanzi, M., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2018). Not all identification tasks are born equal: Testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision. Psychological Research, 82(4), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0852-z.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. Oxford: Bureau of Publications, Teachers Co.
Vaidya, C. J., Gabrieli, J. E., Keane, M. M., Monti, L. A., Gutiérrez-Rivas, H., & Zarella, M. M. (1997). Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(6), 1324–1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1324.
Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesic syndrome: Consolidation or retrieval? Nature, 228(5272), 628–630. https://doi.org/10.1038/228628a0.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
This research was conducted at Sapienza University. The authors report that they have no financial interests or benefits arising from direct application of this research.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLS 193 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spataro, P., Marques, V.R.S. & Rossi-Arnaud, C. Italian norms for the spontaneous completion of three-letter word stems: A preliminary study. Curr Psychol 40, 2221–2228 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0160-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-0160-4