Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of Basic Empathy Scale: Exploring a Korean Version

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Basic Empathy Scale was designed to measure the multidimensional aspects of empathetic feelings, such as cognitive and affective empathy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES). The Korean version of BES was administered to a sample of early adolescents aged 12–14 (N = 1524). The result of confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor solution with method effects associated with negatively worded items to be the most adequate model. Empathy was positively correlated with the measure of attachment, negatively correlated with the measure of bullying problems, and exhibited satisfactory internal consistency. BES proved to be a reliable assessment tool for empathy in a Korean adolescent sample. Moreover, in line with the previous research, girls were found to score significantly higher in both cognitive and affective empathy than boys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–146. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, J. H., & Lee, D. H. (2013). The effects of neuroticism and attachment security on social skills: mediating roles of attention control and empathy. Korea Journal of Counseling, 14(4), 2085–2105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M. S., & Hwang, K. R. (2010). An investigation on validation of balanced emotional empathy scale. Korean Journal of Counseling, 11(2), 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Morris, A. S., McDaniel, B., & Spinrad, T. L. (2009). Moral cognitions and prosocial responding in adolescence. In Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 229–265). Hoboke, NJ: Wiley.

  • Felix, E. D., Sharkey, J. D., Green, J. G., Furlong, M. J., & Tanigawa, D. (2011). Getting precise and pragmatic about the assessment of bullying: the development of the California bullying victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 37(3), 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents' bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (2008). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 440–455). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006a). Examining the role between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006b). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, H. N., & Cho, O. K. (2011). The role of empathy and self-esteem between parents’ parenting behavior and attitudes on bullying. Educational Theory and Practice, 21(1), 87–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J. H. (2007). The effect of parents' parenting behavior on adolescents’ personality and empathy ability. Master’s thesis, Kyungnam University.

  • Kang, J. H., & Lee, E. H. (2009). Affectionate and self-regulating parenting behavior and adolescents’ abilities to empathize: the mediating role of the big-five personality. Studies on Korean Youth, 20(4), 71–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, E. K. (2009). The effect of abused experience on school adjustment mediated by locus of control and empathic ability. The Korean Journal of Development Psychology, 22(1), 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J., & Lee, S. J. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the empathy quotient scale. Psychiatry Investigation, 7(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. M. (2008). Positive psychology: scientific exploration of happiness. Seoul: Hakjisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y. (2014). The roles of empathy, social self-efficacy, and perceived norms on defending behaviors to bullying among middle school students. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. Y., & Yoo, S. M. (2011). The influence of empathy, self-esteem, and personal values on prosocial behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Brain Education, 7, 33–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A. (2000). Manual for the balanced emotional empathy scale (BEES). Monterey: Albert Mehrabian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Christensen, K. J. (2011). Empathy and self-regulation as mediators between parenting and adolescents' prosocial behavior toward strangers, friends, and family. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(3), 545–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. E. (2012). The relationship between middle school students’ depression and internet addiction: The mediatining effect of school membership. Master’s thesis. Keimyung University. Korea.

  • Song, K. H., & Lee, S. Y. (2010). The relationship among theory of mind, proactive bullying and defending behaviors in adolescents: mediation effects of moral disengagement and moral emotions. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23(3), 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. M. (1980). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA.

  • Suh, K. Y. (2008). The relationships between empathy level, aggressive behaviors, and prosocial behaviors in adolescence: The mediating effect of conflict resolution styles. Master’s thesis, Kyungnam University.

  • Yeo, J. Y. (2012). Validation of the Korean version of the empathy quotient-short form. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 13(11), 5356–5363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, S., Ritchey, K., Furlong, M., Shochet, I., & Boman, P. (2010). Examination of the latent structure of the psychological sense of school membership scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(3), 225–237. doi:10.1177/0734282910379968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea. The funding source did not have any involvement in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukkyung You.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, S., Lee, J. & Lee, Y. Validation of Basic Empathy Scale: Exploring a Korean Version. Curr Psychol 37, 726–730 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9554-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9554-8

Keywords

Navigation