Abstract
Cultural norms embody the communalism and familism that characterize social structures and traditions of care among certain identity groups, notably, Hispanics. In turn, they affect remitting behavior as they do family dynamics thereby extending care transnationally. Using the 2006 Latino National Survey, the largest instrument that captures socioeconomic variables and political perspectives among Hispanics residing in the USA, we constructed a Hispanic identity index that is used to capture the role of cultural norms in remittance behavior. This index is used as an explanatory variable in a logit model for the probability and frequency of remitting money. We find that both the probability and frequency of remitting increase with higher levels of self-defined familism as reflected by the Hispanic index. This effect is stronger among males, renters, foreign-born non-US citizens, and migrants with fewer years of residence in the USA. Incorporating variables such as our Hispanic identity index may shed light on a relatively unexplored area in the field of economics that explains remitting behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
According to the US Census, Hispanics or Latinos are those people, of any race, who classified themselves in one of the specific Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino categories listed on the Census 2010 questionnaire or who indicated that they are of “another Hispanic, Latino, or Spanish origin.” We acknowledge the difficulties with this identity definition, but nonetheless, we use the category to refer to persons of Spanish or Hispanic cultural background.
It may generate contradictory feelings of excessive burden and sacrifice due to financial or time commitments to support or care for family that may undermine one’s own well-being.
A town of approximately 30,000 residents (one third is of Hispanic background).
The 2006 LNS is one of the largest, most representative data sets of Hispanics. It is a telephone-based survey that sampled 11 million Hispanic households residing in areas with 87.5 % of the Hispanic population in the USA. For a more detailed description of the data, please access the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, LNS 2006 Description and LNS, Executive Summary (http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/).
While familism has been strongly associated with Hispanic cultures, Schwartz (2007) found familism evidence in similar forms across many ethnic groups.
The term refers to a situation characterized by any of the following: a. Economies rely excessively on the influx of foreign exchange from the work of migrants abroad; b. Individuals of working age decide not to join the labor force in recipient countries due to rents received from relatives abroad; and c. Remittances may originate on “illegal” activities (“laundering”).
Respondents self-identify as Latino/as or Hispanic.
We and the LNS use Hispanics and Latino/as interchangeably.
Description of the data is found at the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, LNS 2006 Description and LNS, Executive Summary (http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/).
STATA randomly chose Iowa as the baseline state. However, compared to AZ, CO, NM, and TX, Iowa has a small, but increasing, percentage of Hispanics (under 6 % according to the Pew Hispanic Center).
References
Acosta, P., Calderón, C., Fajnzylber, P., & López, H. (2008). What is the impact of international remittances on poverty and inequality in Latin America? World Development, 36, 89–114.
Allen, V. C., Jr., Lachance, C., Rios-Ellis, B., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2011). Issues in the assessment of “race” among Latinos: implications for research and policy. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 33, 41–424.
Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Pozo, S. (2006). Remittances as insurance: evidence from Mexican immigrants. Journal of Population Economics, 19(2), 227–254.
Anzoategui, D., Demirguc-Kunt A., & Martínez Pería, M. S. (2011). Remittances and financial inclusion. Evidence from El Salvador. Policy research working paper 5839, The World Bank Development Research Group. Also at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2011/10/06/000158349_20111006135759/Rendered/PDF/WPS5839.pdf.
Aranda, M. P., Ray, L. A., Snih, S. A., Ottenbacher, K. J., & Markides, K. S. (2011). The protective effect of neighbourhood composition on increasing frailty among older Mexican Americans: a barrio advantage? Journal of Aging & Health, 23, 1189–1217.
Baker, S. S. (2002). Understanding mainland Puerto Rican poverty. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bengtson, V. L., & Mangen, D. J. (1988). Family intergenerational solidarity revisited: suggestions for future management. In D. J. Mangen & K. Y. McChesney (Eds.), Measurement of intergenerational relations (pp. 222–238). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Bermúdez, J. M., Kirkpatrick, D., Hecker, L., & Torres-Robles, C. (2010). Describing Latinos families and their help-seeking attitudes: challenging the family therapy literature. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 32, 155–172.
Bettin, G., Lucchetti, R., & Zazzaro, A. (2009). Income, consumption and remittances: evidence from immigrants to Australia. EconPapers. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1498325. no. 34, Money and Finance Research group, University Politecnica Marche. Also at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1498325.
Beyene, Y., Becker, G., & Mayen, N. (2002). Perception of aging and sense of well-being among Latino elderly. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 17, 155–172.
Blue, S. A. (2004). State policy, economics crisis, gender and family ties: determinants of family remittances to Cuba. Economic Geography, 80(1), 63–82.
Bollard, A., McKenzie, D., & Morten, M. (2010). The remitting patterns of African migrants in the OECD. Journal of African Economies, 19(5), 605–634.
Boswell, C. (2008). Combining economics and sociology in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 549–566.
Boswell, C., & Mueser, P. R. (2008). Introduction: economics and interdisciplinary approaches in migration research. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 519–529.
Brewer, L. (2001). Gender socialization and the cultural construction of elder caregivers. Journal of Aging Studies, 15, 217–235.
Burr, J. A., & Mutchler, J. E. (2003). English language skills, ethnic concentration, and household composition: older Mexican immigrants. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 58B, S83–S92.
Calderón-Tena, C. O., & Knight, G. P. (2011). The socialization of prosocial behavioural tendencies among Mexican American adolescents: the role of familism values. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(1), 98–106.
Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The age of migration. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Cohen, J. H. (2010). Oaxacan migration and remittances as they relate to Mexican migration patterns. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 149–161.
Cruz-Saco, M. A. (2010). Intergenerational solidarity. In M. A. Cruz-Saco & S. Zelenev (Eds.), Intergenerational solidarity. Strengthening economic and social ties (pp. 9–34). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Cruz-Saco, M. A., & López-Anuarbe, M. (2013). Familism and social inclusion: Hispanics in New London, Connecticut. Social Inclusion, 1(2), 113–125.
Dennis, J., Basañez, T., & Farahmand, A. (2009). Intergenerational conflicts among Latinos in early adulthood: separating values conflicts with parents from acculturation conflicts. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 32, 118–135.
Desmond, M., & López Turley, R. N. (2009). The role of familism in explaining the Hispanic-white college application gap. Social Problems, 56(2), 311–334.
Donato, K. M., Gabaccia, D., Holdaway, J., Manalansan, M., & Pessar, P. R. (2006). A glass half full? Gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 3–26.
Donato, K. M., Hiskey, J., Durand, J., & Massey, D. S. (2010). Migration in the Americas: Mexico and Latin America in comparative context. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 630(1), 6–17.
Economist Intelligence Unit. (2008). Building a future back home. leveraging migrant worker remittances for development in Asia. The Economist, sponsored by Western Union (pp 1–30).
Ellis, M., & Almgren, G. (2009). Local contexts of immigrant and second-generation integration in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 1059–1076.
Epstein, G. S. (2008). Herd and network effects in migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 567–583.
Ermisch, J. F. (2003). An economic analysis of the family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Fajnzylber, P. & López, J. H. (2007). Close to home. The development impact of remittances in Latin America, The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, (pp 1–73).
García-Fuentes, P. A. & Kennedy, P. L. (2009). Remittances and economic growth in Latin America and the Caribbean: the impact of human capital development. Presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.
Göbel, K. (2013). Remittances, expenditure patterns, and gender: parametric and semiparametric evidence from Ecuador. IZA Journal of Migration, 2(1), 1–19.
González, H. M., Vega, W. A., & Tarraf, W. (2010). The health care quality perceptions among foreign-born Latinos and the importance of speaking the same language. Journal of the American Board of Medicine, 23, 745–752.
Haug, S. (2008). Migration networks and migration decision-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 585–605.
Hilton, J. M., Gonzalez, C. A., Saleh, M., Maitoza, R., & Anngela-Cole, L. (2012). Perceptions of successful aging among older Latinos in cross-cultural context. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 27, 183–199.
Hoddinott, J. (1994). A model of migration and remittances applied to Western Kenya. Oxford Economic Papers, 46(3), 459–476.
Holst, E., Schafer, A., & Schrooten, M. (2012). Remittance and gender: theoretical consideration and empirical evidence. Feminist Economics, 18(2), 201–229.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (1994). Gendered transitions. Mexican experiences of immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
INSTRAW. (2007). Feminization of migration. 2007. Working Paper 1. http://www.google.com.pe/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wunrn.com%2Fnews%2F2009%2F05_09%2F05_18_09%2F051809_feminization_files%2FFeminization%2520of%2520Migration-INSTRAW.pdf&ei=GI-1U_T-FKK8igKnzYBA&usg=AFQjCNGvTNvA-T-0NTkuZLbKjZ-srSrQIA&sig2=7QEqxDq7lxzsHdBWPuZw9w&bvm=bv.70138588,d.cGE. Accessed Jul 2014.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2010). The role of migrant care workers in ageing societies: report on research findings in the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States. Geneva: IOM.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2011). Gender, migration and remittances. http://www.iom.int/jahia/webdav/site/myjahiasite/shared/shared/mainsite/published_docs/brochures_and_info_sheets/Gender-migration-remittances-infosheet.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2013). World migration report 2013. Migrant wellbeing and development. Geneva: IOM. Also at http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpublications.iom.int%2Fbookstore%2Ffree%2FWMR2013_EN.pdf&ei=yJNAU-nyCbKqsQSawIHQBg&usg=AFQjCNH6eiYGG5I2_pcqLKEt_ujyyIHWeg&sig2=aWODAFWkGq7dj5l7gFColA&bvm=bv.64125504,d.cWc. Accessed on Apr 5 2014.
Karakaplan, M. U., Naufal, G.S., Vega-Silva, C. (2011). Gender, migration, remittances and household expenditures in Nicaragua. http://econweb.tamu.edu/karakaplan/Karakaplan%20-%20Migration.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
Ketkar, S., & Ratha, D. (2009). New paths to funding. Finance and Development, 46, 43–45.
Lindley, A. (2009). The early-morning phonecall: remittances from a refugee diaspora perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(8), 1315–1372.
López-Anuarbe, M. (2013). Intergenerational transfers in long term care. Review of Economics of the Household, 11(2), 235–258.
Lozano-Ascencio, F. (2005). “Remittance behavior among Latin American immigrants in the United States.” (pp. 18–23). Tours: International Population Conference.
Maimbo, S. M. & Ratha, D. (eds). (2005). Remittances. Development impact and future prospects, Washington DC International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank pp (1–378).
Mangen, D. J., Bengtson, V. L., & Landry, P. H., Jr. (Eds.). (1988). Measurement of intergenerational relations. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Mundaca, G. (2009). Remittances, financial markets development and economic growth: the case of Latin America and Caribbean. Review of Development Economics, 13, 288–303.
Naufal, G. (2008). Why remit? The case of Nicaragua. Institute for the study of labor (IZA). Discussion Paper no, 3276, 1–44.
Oboler, S. (1995). Ethnic labels, Latino lives. Identity and the politics of (re) presentation in the United States. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Orozco, M. (2012). Future trends in remittances to Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American dialogue report, http://www.thedialogue.org/PublicationFiles/IAD8642_Remittance_0424enFINAL.pdf. Accessed Jan 2014.
Orozco, M., Lowell, B. L., & Schneider, J. (2006). Gender specific determinants of remittances: differences in structure and motivation. Mimeo: Georgetown University.
Osaki, K. (1999). Economic interactions of migrants and their households of origin: are women more reliable supporters? Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 8(4), 447–471.
Pessar, P. (2006). A glass half full? Gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 3–26.
Pfeiffer, L., Richter, S., Fletcher, P., & Taylor, E. (2008). Gender in economic research on international migration and its impacts: a critical review. In Andrew R. Morrison, Maurice Schiff and Mirja Sjöblom, (eds) The international migration of women (pp. 11–49). The World Bank: Palgrave Macmillan.
Portes, A., Fernández-Kelly, P., & Haller, W. (2009). The adaptation of the immigrant second generation in America: a theoretical overview and recent evidence. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 1077–1104.
Quinn, M. (2005). Remittances, savings, and relative rates of return. The Journal of Developing Areas, 38(2), 1–23.
Radina, E. M., & Barber, C. E. (2004). Utilization of formal support services among Hispanic Americans caring for aging parents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 43, 5–23.
Radu, D. (2008). Social interactions in economic models of migration: a review and appraisal. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 531–548.
Ramírez, M. D. & Sharma, H. (2008). Remittances and growth in Latin America: a panel unit root and panel cointegration analysis. Yale Economics Department Working Paper No. 51.
Ramírez, C., García Domínguez M., & Míguez Morais, J. (2005). Crossing Borders: remittances, Gender and Development. UN-INSTRAW Working Paper.
Rapoport, H., & Docquier, F. (2006). The economics of migrant’s remittances. In S. C. Kolm & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (pp. 1135–1198). New York: Elsevier Science.
Realo, A., Allik, J., & Greenfield, B. (2008). Radius of trust: social capital in relation to familism and institutional collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(4), 447–462.
Rivera, F., Guarnaccia, P., Mulvaney-Day, N., Lin, J. Y., Torres, M., & Alegría, M. (2008). Family cohesion and its relationship to psychological distress among Latino groups. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 30, 357–378.
Ruiz, M. E., & Ransford, H. E. (2012). Latino elders reframing familismo: implications for health and caregiving support. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 19, 50–57.
Sabogal, F., Marin, G., Otero-Sabogal, R., & Marin, B. V. (1987). Latino familism and acculturation: what changes and what doesn’t? Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 397–412.
Sana, M. (2008). Growth of migrant remittances from the United States to Mexico, 1990–2004. Social Forces, 86, 995–1025.
Schwartz, S. J. (2007). The applicability of familism to diverse ethnic groups: a preliminary study. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(2), 101–118.
Stark, O., & Lucas, R. (1988). Migration, remittances, and the family. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 36(3), 465–481.
Taylor, G., Wangaruro, J., & Papadopoulos, I. (2012). It is my turn to give: migrants’ perceptions of gift exchange and the maintenance of transnational identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(7), 1085–1100.
United Nations. (2009). International migration report 2006: a global assessment. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
United Nations Development Program. (2009). Human development report. Overcoming barriers: human mobility and development, at http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2009/chapters/UN.
United States 2010 Census at http://www.census.gov/2010census/
World Bank. (2006). Global economic prospects. Economic implications of remittances and migration (pp. 1–157). World Bank: Washington DC.
World Bank. (2011). Migration and remittances factbook, 2011, at http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTDECPROSPECTS/0,,contentMDK:21352016~pagePK:64165401~piPK:64165026~theSitePK:476883,00.html.
World Bank. (2013). Migration and remittances data, at http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTDECPROSPECTS/0,,contentMDK:22759429~pagePK:64165401~piPK:64165026~theSitePK:476883,00.htm.
World Bank. (2014), Migration and remittances Brief 20.
Yang, D. (2006). Why do migrants return to poor countries? Evidence from Philippine migrants’ responses to exchange rate shocks. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 715–735.
Yang, D. (2008). International migration, remittances, and household investment: evidence from Philippine migrants’ exchange rate shocks. Economic Journal, 118(528), 591–630.
Yang, D. (2011). Migrant remittances. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(3), 1–24.
Acknowledgments
We thank Prof. Evelyn Hu-Dehart (Brown University) and Prof. Ron Flores (Connecticut College) who provided us with access to the LNS 2006 survey. We also thank travel and research grants from Connecticut College that allowed us to present earlier versions of this paper at conferences that, in turn, provided opportunities to receive useful feedback. Finally, we thank comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Hispanic index frequency distribution and correlation coefficient matrix
Hispanic index = Hispanic identity + distinct culture + speak Spanish
Key Variables:
Hispanic identity (LAIDENT)
[In general,] how strongly or not do you think of yourself as Hispanic or Latino?
0 = Not at all
1 = Not very strongly
2 = Somewhat strongly
3 = Very strongly
Distinct Culture (DISTINCT)
[In general,] how important is it for you and your family to maintain your distinct cultures?
0 = Not at all
1 = Not very important
2 = Somewhat important
3 = Very important
Speak Spanish at home (KEEPSPAN)
[In general], how important do you think it is for you or your family to maintain the ability to speak Spanish at home?
0 = Not at all important
1 = Not very important
2 = Somewhat important
3 = Very important
Keep Spanish | Latino identity | Distinct culture | ||||
Freq. | Percent | Freq. | Percent | Freq. | Percent | |
Not at all important (0) | 58 | 1.02 | 179 | 3.14 | ||
Not very important (1) | 109 | 1.91 | 331 | 5.8 | 157 | 2.75 |
Somewhat important (2) | 668 | 11.71 | 1416 | 24.83 | 968 | 16.97 |
Very important (3) | 4868 | 85.36 | 3777 | 66.23 | 4578 | 80.27 |
Total | 5703 | 100 | 5703 | 100 | 5703 | 100 |
Index | Freq. | Percent |
1 | 3 | 0.05 |
2 | 8 | 0.14 |
3 | 21 | 0.37 |
4 | 52 | 0.91 |
5 | 136 | 2.38 |
6 | 357 | 6.26 |
7 | 720 | 12.62 |
8 | 1436 | 25.18 |
9 | 2970 | 52.08 |
Total | 5703 | 100.00 |
Correlation coefficient matrix
Keep Spanish | Hispanic identity | Distinct culture | |
Keep Spanish | 1 | ||
Hispanic identity | 0.176 | 1 | |
Distinct culture | 0.239 | 0.162 | 1 |
Appendix 2: A utility maximization analytical framework
A utility maximization model is used to determine a migrant’s optimal level of remittances (R*). Controlling for personal characteristics (vector Z), their utility or satisfaction level (U M) not only depends on his or her own consumption (X) and leisure levels (N) but also on the utility level of their family abroad (U F).
-
(1)
U M = U M [X M, N, U F, Z]
Likewise, the family’s utility function (U F) depends on their own consumption levels, which increase when they receive remittances from their migrant relative. Remittances are endogenously determined and depend on the Hispanic migrant’s socioeconomic and personal characteristics, such as age, gender, income level, marital status, and familism (F H). We theoretically and empirically construct a Hispanic identity index that links and relates familism to cultural identity, specifically, identifying as a Hispanic, Latino/a, or from their country of origin in the USA (H), believing it is important to maintain a Hispanic culture in the USA (C), and believing that it is important to speak Spanish at home (S)
-
(2)
F H = F H(H, C, S)
When solving to find an optimal level of remittances, R*, we find that a migrant’s optimal level of remittances, R*, depends on the relative importance that familism plays in her utility, δU M/δF H, the share size of her family utility compared to her own utility (γ), her propensity to remit (φ), her income level (M), and relative importance of her propensity to remit, which is directly impacted by how U F can positively affect U M. Likewise, her R* is negatively impacted by the migrant’s propensity to consume (α), the cost of her consumption basket (p, a proxy for inflation), and the cost of remittances (1 + c).
-
(3)
R*(F H, U F, α, γ, φ, p, c) = M[δU M/δF H]U F(γφ)/(αp + γφ)(1 + c)
Appendix 3: Remittance amount histogram
(Natural log of the values of sent remittances).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Anuarbe, M., Cruz-Saco, M.A. & Park, Y. More than Altruism: Cultural Norms and Remittances Among Hispanics in the USA. Int. Migration & Integration 17, 539–567 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-015-0423-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-015-0423-3