Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Political Economy of Air Pollution in Kenya

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Air pollution is a major environmental health risk factor in Nairobi, Kenya. Most research conducted on air pollution in Nairobi has focused on measuring pollution concentrations. Although this research is very important, it is also crucial to understand barriers in the regulatory process that prevents this data from translating into effective action. This article attempts to fill in this gap. It starts by detailing the history of urban planning in Nairobi and its legacy in shaping contemporary urbanization and spatial patterns of air pollution. It then relies on interviews, participant observations, and a close reading of key laws and policies to evaluate current political, institutional, and data-infrastructure gaps in the Kenyan air pollution governance framework that serve as barriers for equitable air pollution mitigation. Finally, it draws on interviews and media analyses to examine the promises and perils of citizen science to improve air quality levels in Kenya. It ends by making policy recommendations to make Nairobi more liveable and breathable in the long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This plan was termed the “Plan of survey at foot of hill and edge of plans” signed by Arthur F Clark, Assistant Surveyor.

  2. This plan was termed as the “Uganda Railway Plan of Staff Quarters, Nyrobi” signed by G. Whitehouse, Chief Engineer.

  3. It must be noted that studies done in the USA have shown that the despite the high costs of the Clean Air Act, the benefits have exceeded costs by a factor of 30:1 (https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview/benefits-and-costs-clean-air-act-1990-2020-second-prospective-study, last accessed April 9, 2021). In addition, these costs are only a fraction of the cost (0.5 billion USD) of the contentious Nairobi expressway project mentioned in the “Conflicts of Interest Preventing Accountability” section which has dubious benefits.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for comments from Jacqueline Klopp, Kim Fortun, Lawrence Susskind, Dorothy Tang, Andrew Binet, and Shin Bin Tan

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priyanka deSouza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

-This paper conducts historically informed analysis of the political economy of air pollution decision-making in Nairobi.

-Political barriers to regulatory action on air pollution are identified.

-Data infrastructure gaps that prevent air pollution data from translating to policy action and increased government accountability are explored.

-The promise and perils of citizen science in Nairobi to improve air quality are discussed

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 10 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

deSouza, P. Political Economy of Air Pollution in Kenya. Urban Forum 33, 393–414 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-022-09464-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-022-09464-w

Keywords

Navigation