Abstract
The paper presents Victor von Weizsäcker’s theory of Gestaltkreis (i.e. ‘circle of form’), which offers an original theoretical contribution. It is rich of fruitful stimuli for understanding the relationship of the living organism with its environment, recognizing a dynamic unity between perception and the movement. The paper first provides some biographical, scientific and clinical professional life elements of Viktor von Weizsäcker, then it presents the dynamic theory of Gestaltkreis with its principles and key elements, and finally discusses the epistemological and methodological implications. Von Weizsäcker’s Gestaltkreis theory - systematically published in 1939 - represents the effort of a theoretical synthesis of the experiments conducted in the field of neurology, of studies of perception and voluntary movement. It is based on the complementary and simultaneous unity of perception and movement, and it establishes a substantial contribution against the mechanism of physiology, by overcoming the notion of automatic reflex. Such a theory consolidates von Weizsäcker’s systematic commitment to his epistemological, methodological and ethical project for the ‘introduction of the subject in the biological sciences’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
De Luca Picione, R. (2023-in press). Viktor von Weizsäcker’s notion of pathic: affective liminality, modalization of experience and illness. Integrative psychological and behavioral science
De Luca Picione, R. (2020). The semiotic paradigm in psychology. A mature weltanschauung for the definition of semiotic mind. Integrative psychological and behavioral science, 54(3), 639–650.
De Luca Picione, R. (2021a). The dynamic nature of the human psyche and its three tenets: Normativity, liminality and resistance—semiotic advances in direction of modal articulation sensemaking. Human Arenas, 4(2), 279–293.
De Luca Picione, R. (2021b). Metapsychology of borders: Structures, operations and semiotic dynamics. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, 23(4), 436–467.
De Luca Picione, R. (2021c). Models of semiotic borders in psychology and their implications: From rigidity of separation to topological dynamics of connectivity. Theory & Psychology, 31(5), 729–745.
De Luca Picione, R. & Lozzi, U. (2021). Uncertainty as a constitutive condition of human experience: Paradoxes and complexity of sensemaking in the face of the crisis and uncertainty. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education: Subject Action & Society, 1(2), 14–53.
De Luca Picione, R., Marsico, G., Tateo, L., & Valsiner, J. (2022). Generalized semiotic functions of Borders’ model: Contributions from cultural psychology, semiotics and psychoanalysis towards the understanding of borders in human experience. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education: Subject Action & Society, 2(2), 81–111.
Greco, M. (2008). On the art of life: A vitalist reading of medical humanities. The Sociological Review, 56(2_suppl), 23–45.
Henkelmann, T. (1990). V. von Weizsäcker, Filosofia della medicina. Milano: Guerini.
Masullo, P. A. (1992). Patosofia. L’antropologia relazionale di Viktor von Weisäcker. Milano: Guerini.
Puumeister, O., Kõvamees, E., & Kull, K. (2022). Semiosis is always at the border, which operates it. International Journal of Psychoanalysis and Education: Subject Action & Society, 2(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.32111/SAS.2022.2.2.8.
Rasini, V. (2002). Teorie della realtà organica. Helmuth Plessner e Viktor von Weizsäcker. Milano: SIGEM.
Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.
Spinsanti, S. (1988). Guarire tutto l’uomo: La medicina antropologica di Viktor von Weizsäcker. Ed. Paoline.
Stenner, P. (2018). Liminality and experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial. Springer.
Stenner, P. & De Luca Picione, R. (2023). A Theoretically Informed Critical Review of Research Applying the Concept of Liminality to Understand Experiences with Cancer: Implications for a New Oncological Agenda in Health Psychology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(11), 5982. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20115982
Tateo, L., & Marsico, G. (2021). Signs as borders and borders as signs. Theory & Psychology, 31(5), 708–728.
Tedesco, S. (2014). Funktionskreis e Gestaltkreis: La metafora del circolo nella biologia teoretica. Aisthesis. Pratiche linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico, 7(2), 177–185.
Tolone, O. (2016). Alle origini dell’antropologia medica: il pensiero di Viktor von Weizsäcker. Roma: Carocci editore.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundation of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
von Uexkull, J. (1926). Theoretical Biology. London: Kegan Paul.
von Weizsäcker, V. (1933). Der Gestaltkreis, dargestellt als psychophysiologische Analyse des optischen Drehversuches. Pflüger’s Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere, 231(1), 630–661.
von Weizsäcker, V. (1939). Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen. Stuttgart: Thieme.
von Weizsäcker, V. (1956). Pathosophie. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.D.L.P. is the unique author of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
De Luca Picione, R. Viktor von Weizsäcker’s Gestaltkreis Theory. The Dynamic and Subjective Relationship of Perception and Movement. Integr. psych. behav. 58, 35–45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09787-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09787-8