Abstract
The current paper investigates Psychoanalytic, Cognitive, Behaviorist, and Socio-cultural theories and critiques how they have (or might have) contributed to the study of radicalization. The paper asserts two arguments that lack emphasis in the current radicalization research: 1) radicalization refers to a process, and does not always refer to violent behavior; 2) radicalization research needs to pay tribute to socio-cultural, political, and historical context while designing research and discussing findings. These two points are essential to extend the concept of radicalization and to be sensitive to different research contexts and populations. Currently, the conceptualization of radicalization appears to be generalized to violent action among minority groups (mainly Muslims) in limited contexts (mostly Western countries). The article claims that Psychology can better contribute to this diverse field of interest with its well-established theoretical contributions to the understanding of human beings and its compassion to seek differences amongst people across different contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam-Troian, J., Tecmen, A., & Kaya, A. (2021). Youth extremism as a response to global threats?. European Psychologist, 26(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000415.
Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D., & Sanford, N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Harper and Row.
Bal, M., & Van Den Bos, K. (2017). From system acceptance to embracing alternative systems and system rejection: Tipping points in processes of radicalization. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(3), 241.
Becker, J. C., Tausch, N., & Wagner, U. (2011). Emotional consequences of collective action participation: Differentiating self-directed and outgroup-directed emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(12), 1587–1598.
Bjørgo, T., & Horgan, J. (Eds.). (2009). Leaving terrorism behind. Individual and collective disengagement. Abingdon, U.K. Routledge.
Borum, R. (2011). Radicalization into violent extremism I: A review of social science theories. Journal of strategic security, 4(4), 7–36.
Briggs, R., Fieschi, C., & Lownsbrough, H. (2006). Bringing it Home. Community-based approaches to counter-terrorism.
Browning, C. S. (2018). Brexit, existential anxiety and ontological (in)security. European Security, 27(3), 336–355.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (p. 619–647). American Psychological Association. https://doi-org.ezproxy.gc.cuny.edu/10.1037/10176-018
Cahan, E. D., & White, S. H. (1992). Proposals for a second psychology. American Psychologist, 47(2), 224.
Cohen, S. J. (2019). The unconscious in terror: An overview of psychoanalytic contributions to the psychology of terrorism and violent radicalization. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 16(4), 216–228
Cole, M. (1995). Socio-cultural-historical psychology: Some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of cultural-genetic methodology. Socio-cultural studies of mind, 187–214.
Craib, I. (1989). Psychoanalysis and social theory. Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Daiute, C. (2014). Narrative inquiry: A dynamic approach. Sage Publications.
d’Andrade, R. G. (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
da Silva, R., Fernández-Navarro, P., Gonçalves, M. M., Rosa, C., & Silva, J. (2019). Tracking narrative change in the context of extremism and terrorism: Adapting the Innovative Moments Coding System. Aggression and violent behavior.
Della Porta, D., & LaFree, G. (2012). Guest editorial: Processes of radicalization and deradicalization. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 6(1), 4–10.
Doosje, B., Loseman, A., & Van Den Bos, K. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 586–604.
Eberle, J. (2019). Narrative, desire, ontological security, transgression: fantasy as a factor in international politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, 22(1), 243–268.
Ejdus, F. (2017). ‘Not a heap of stones’: material environments and ontological security in international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 30(1), 23–43.
Ercan, H. (2010). Dynamics of Mobilization and Radicalization of the Kurdish Movement in the 1970s in Turkey (Doctoral dissertation, Koç University).
Ferguson, N., & Binks, E. (2015). Understanding radicalization and engagement in terrorism through religious conversion motifs. Journal of Strategic Security, 8(1–2), 16–26.
Ferguson, N., & McAuley, J. W. (2019). Radicalization or Reaction: Understanding Engagement in Violent Extremism in Northern Ireland. Political Psychology.
Ferguson, N., & McAuley, J. W. (2019). Staying Engaged in Terrorism: Narrative Accounts of Sustaining Participation in Violent Extremism. Frontiers in Psychology.
Fernbach, P. M., Rogers, T., Fox, C. R., & Sloman, S. A. (2013). Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding. Psychological science, 24(6), 939–946.
Fraihi, T. (2008). Escalating radicalization: The debate within Muslim and immigrant communities. Jihadi terrorism and the radicalization challenge in Europe. Ashgate.
Githens-Mazer, J. (2008). Islamic Radicalization among North Africans in Britain. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(4), 550–570.
Gøtzsche-Astrup, O. (2018). The time for causal designs: Review and evaluation of empirical support for mechanisms of political radicalization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 90–99.
Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological motives and political orientation: the left, the right, and the rigid— comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin. 129:376–82.
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild (No. 1995). MIT press.
Horgan, J. G. (2009). Walking away from terrorism: Accounts of disengagement from radical and extremist movements. Routledge.
Jensen, M., LaFree, G., James, P. A., Atwell-Seate, A., Pisoiu, A., Stevenson, J., & Tinsley, H. (2016). Empirical Assessment of Domestic Radicalization (EADR), final report to the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. College Park, MD: Start.
Johnson, Q. (2019). "Extremism as a Response to Globalization: Case Study: Nigeria," Occam's Razor: Vol. 9 , Article 6.
Jordan, C. H., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2005). Types of high self-esteem and prejudice: How implicit self-esteem relates to ethnic discrimination among high explicit self-esteem individuals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(5), 693–702.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 339.
Kay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J. (2014). A functional basis for structure-seeking: Exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 486.
Kaya, A. (2020). “The State of the art on radicalization,” European Institute Working Paper 11, Istanbul Bilgi University, Retrieved from https://eu.bilgi.edu.tr/media/files/Kaya_Working_Paper_2020.pdf
Kinnvall, C. (2018). Ontological Insecurities and Postcolonial Imaginaries: The Emotional Appeal of Populism. Humanity & Society, 42(4), 523–543.
Klandermans, P. G. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Blackwell.
Kristeva, J. (1991) Strangers to ourselves. Havester.
Kristeva, J. (2018). Cet incroyable besoin de croire. Bayard Culture.
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The three pillars of radicalization: Needs, narratives, and networks. Oxford University Press.
Kruglanski, A. W., Gelfand, M. J., Bélanger, J. J., Sheveland, A., Hetiarachchi, M., & Gunaratna, R. (2014). The psychology of radicalization and deradicalization: How significance quest impacts violent extremism. Political Psychology, 35, 69–93.
Kunda, Z. (1999). Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. MIT Press.
Leuprecht, C., Hataley, T., Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2010). Containing the narrative: Strategy and tactics in countering the storyline of global jihad. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 5(1), 42–57.
Lifton, E. J. (2007). A clinical psychology perspective on radical Islamic youth. In T. Abbas (Ed.), Islamic Political Radicalism: A European Perspective. (pp. 25–41). Edinburgh University Press.
Lifton, R. J. (1961). Thought, Reform and the Psychology of Totalism. Norton.
Martin, J., & Sugarman, J. (2000). Between the modern and the postmodern: The possibility of self and progressive understanding in psychology. American Psychologist, 55(4), 397.
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2008). Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and political violence, 20(3), 415–433.
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2014). Toward a profile of lone wolf terrorists: What moves an individual from radical opinion to radical action. Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(1), 69–85.
McCauley, C., & Moskalenko, S. (2017). Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist, 72(3), 205.
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2011). The psychology of lone-wolf terrorism. Counselling psychology quarterly, 24(2), 115–126.
Neumann, P. R. (2013). Options and strategies for countering online radicalization in the United States. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36(6), 431–459.
Norenzayan, A., & Hansen, I. G. (2006). Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(2), 174–187.
Post, J. M. (1998). Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psychological forces. In W. Reich (Ed.), Origins of Terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind. (pp. 24–40). John Hopkins University Press.
Pyszczynski, T. A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychology Bulletin., 130, 435–468.
Pyszczynski, T. A., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror. American Psychology. Association.
Ranstorp, M. (2016). The root causes of violent extremism. RAN Issue paper, 4.
Ravn, S., Coolsaet, R., & Sauer, T. (2019). Rethinking radicalization: addressing the lack of a contextual perspective in the dominant narratives on radicalization. In Radicalisation: a marginal phenomenon or a mirror to society? (pp. 21–46). Leuven University Press.
Rogers, M. B., Loewenthal, K. M., Lewis, C. A., Amlôt, R., Cinnirella, M., & Ansari, H. (2007). The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(3), 253–262
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford University Press.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind: Investigations into the nature of belief systems and personality systems.
Sedgwick, M. (2010). The concept of radicalization as a source of confusion. Terrorism and political violence, 22(4), 479–494.
Silke, A. (1998). Cheshire-cat logic: The recurring theme of terrorist abnormality in psychological research. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4, 51–69.
Silke, A. (2003). Terrorists, Victims and Society: Psychological perspectives on terrorism and its consequences. Wiley.
Strenger, C. (2015). Freud’s legacy in the global era. Routledge.
Strickland, B. R. (2000). Misassumptions, misadventures, and the misuse of psychology. American Psychologist, 55(3), 331
Taylor, K. (2004). Brainwashing: The Science of Thought Control. Oxford University Press.
Van den Bos, K. (2009). Making sense of life: The existential self trying to deal with personal uncertainty. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 197–217.
Van den Bos, K. (2018). Why People Radicalize. Oxford Univ. Press.
Van den Bos, K. (2020). Unfairness and radicalization. Annual review of psychology, 71, 563–588.
Van den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: the influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355–366.
Van Prooijen, J. W., & Krouwel, A. P. (2017). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(3), 292–300.
Van Stekelenburg, J. (2017). Radicalization and violent emotions. P.S.: Political Science & Politics, 50(4), 936–939.
Voutyras, S. (2016). This radicalisation which is not one: contentious politics against the backdrop of the Greek crisis. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 24(2), 223–239.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Wicker, A. W. (1969). Attitudes versus actions: The relationship of verbal and overt behavioral responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social issues, 25(4), 41–78.
Wilner, A. S., & Dubouloz, C. J. (2010). Homegrown terrorism and transformative learning: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding radicalization. Global Change, Peace & Security, 22(1), 33–51.
Acknowledgements
This review was prepared in the scope of the ongoing EU-funded research for the “PRIME Youth” project conducted under the supervision of the Principal Investigator, Prof. Dr Ayhan Kaya, and funded by the European Research Council with Agreement Number 785934. Thanks are also due to Ayhan Kaya, Ayşe Tecmen, and Catarina Kinnvall for their critical and constructive reading of the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author has received research grants from European Research Council. The paper does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benevento, A. The Necessity to Recognize Processes of Radicalization from a Socio-cultural Perspective. Integr. psych. behav. 57, 1418–1434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09620-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-021-09620-0