Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Self-Sexualization in Relation to Sexual Harassment and Body Shame

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While many researchers have identified harmful consequences of the sexualization of women, still little is known about voluntary self-sexualization and its potential effects on women who engage in the practice. Although the idea that self-sexualization is self-fulfilling remains contentious, women who self-sexualize are naturally expected to receive sexualized attention, including unwanted attention. This study starts with the question of whether self-sexualizing women, including those who use self-sexualization as a source of power, experience sexually objectifying encounters, measured by nonphysical sexual harassment, and its negative consequence, measured by body shame. Furthermore, we investigate how age moderates the relationship. An online questionnaire was created and a total of 308 women completed the questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was conducted to test the hypothesized causal relationships from self-sexualization (self-empowering sexualization and non-power self-sexualization) to nonphysical sexual harassment, which can lead to body shame. The results showed that the effects of self-sexualization were dependent on the intent for self-sexualization as well as the self-sexualizer’s age. While self-sexualization without intent to gain power led to increased sexual harassment incidents and body shame, mature women’s self-sexualization as a source of power did not lead to increased sexual harassment experiences nor increased body shame. However, unlike the mature women’s self-empowering sexualization, the young women’s self-sexualization, with or without intent to gain power, led to more sexual harassment experiences. The findings of this study indicate the need to uncover the various intentions for self-sexualization as well as their different effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari, A., & Husain, A. (2021). Street harassment and coping among Indian college women. Demography India, 50(1), 152–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. NewYork, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrend, T. S., Sharek, D. J., Meade, A. W., & Wiebe, E. N. (2011). The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 800–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. L., Karabenick, S. A., & Lerner, R. M. (1976). Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12(5), 409–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(76)90073-1.

  • Bogart, K., Simmons, S., Stein, N., & Tomaszewski, E. P. (1992). Breaking the silence: Sexual and gender-based harassment in elementary, secondary, and postsecondary education. Sex Equity and Sexuality in Education, 191–221.

  • Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondestam, F., & Lundqvist, M. (2020). Sexual harassment in higher education–a systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 10(4), 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, C. G. (1993). Street harassment and the informal ghettoization of women. Harvard Law Review, 106, 517–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandon, D. M., Long, J. H., Loraas, T. M., Mueller-Phillips, J., & Vansant, B. (2014). Online instrument delivery and participant recruitment services: Emerging opportunities for behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. R. (2006). Sex, power, and dominance: The evolutionary psychology of sexual harassment. Managerial and Decision Economics, 27(2-3), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, N. T., Bluestein, B. M., Nappa, A. C., Woods, K. C., & Depatie, M. M. (2013). Exploring gender differences in body image, eating pathology, and sexual harassment. Body Image, 10(3), 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.

  • Bularzik, M. (1978). Sexual harassment at the workplace: Historical notes. Radical America, 12, 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, B. (2014, October 29). The story behind that ’10 hours of walking in NYC’ viral street harassment video. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/wp/2014/10/29/the-story-behind-that-10-hours-of-walking-in-nyc-viral-street-harassment-video/

  • Cash, T. F., & Kilcullen, R. N. (1985). The aye of the beholder: Susceptibility to sexism and beautyism in the evaluation of managerial applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(4), 591–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. (2017). Development and validation of a self-sexualization scale (Publication No. 9671). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota at Twin Cities]. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy.

  • Choi, D. (2021). Internalization of sexualized female ideals and body shame. Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 1–14.

  • Choi, D., & DeLong, M. (2019). Defining female self sexualization for the twenty-first century. Sexuality & Culture, 23(4), 1350–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colarelli, S. M., & Haaland, S. (2002). Perceptions of sexual harassment: An evolutionary perspective. Psychology Evolution & Gender, 4(3), 243–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crofts, T., Lee, M., McGovern, A., & Milivojevic, S. (2015). Conceptualising Sexting. Sexting and Young People (pp. 9–21). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, S., & Bridges, S. K. (2010). The drive for muscularity in men: Media influences and objectification theory. Body Image, 7(1), 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. M., Gervais, S. J., & Sherd, L. W. (2015). The ripple effects of stranger harassment on objectification of self and others. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(1), 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. (1994). The harm that has no name: Street harassment, embodiment, and african american women. UCLA Women’s Law Journal, 4, 133–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, M., Carrier, A., Casini, A., & Demoulin, S. (2021). The drawback of sexual empowerment: Perceiving women as emancipated but still as sexual objects. Sex Roles, 84(9), 626643.

    Google Scholar 

  • DelGreco, M., & Christensen, J. (2020). Effects of street harassment on anxiety, depression, and sleep quality of college women. Sex Roles, 82(7–8), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DelGreco, M., Hubbard, E., A. S., & Denes, A. (2021). Communicating by catcalling: Power dynamics and communicative motivations in street harassment. Violence Against Women, 27(9), 1402–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eom, E., Restaino, S., Perkins, A. M., Neveln, N., & Harrington, J. W. (2015). Sexual harassment in middle and high school children and effects on physical and mental health. Clinical Pediatrics, 54(5), 430–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erchull, M. J., & Liss, M. (2013). Exploring the concept of perceived female sexual empowerment: Development and validation of the sex is power scale. Gender Issues, 30(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, K. (2010). Context effects on women’s perceptions of stranger harassment. Sexuality & Culture, 14, 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, K., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Everyday stranger harassment and women’s objectification. Social Justice Research, 21(3), 338–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineran, S., & Bennett, L. (1999). Gender and power issues of peer sexual harassment among teenagers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(6), 626–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F. (1993). Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1070–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foulis, D., & McCabe, M. P. (1997). Sexual harassment: Factors affecting attitudes and perceptions. Sex Roles, 37, 773–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02936339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, C. B. (1995). Passing by: Gender and public harassment. Univ of California Press.

  • Gervasio, A. H., & Ruckdeschel, K. (1992). College Students’ judgments of verbal sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 190–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, A. J. (2008, May 14). Catcalling: Creepy or a compliment? Retrieved November 25, 2022, from http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/05/14/lw.catcalls/index.html

  • Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: Impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. Jossey-Bass.

  • Hakim, C. (2011). Erotic capital: The power of attraction in the boardroom and the bedroom. NewYork, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamermesh, D. S., & Biddle, J. E. (1993). Beauty and the labor market. The American Economic Review, 84, 1174–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S., Linardon, J., Kim, C., & Mitchison, D. (2021). Understanding the relationship between sexual harassment and eating disorder psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 54(5), 673–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Appearance-related commentary, body image, and self-esteem: Does the distress associated with the commentary matter? Body Image, 3(3), 255–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hlavka, H. R. (2014). Normalizing sexual violence: Young women account for harassment and abuse. Gender & Society, 28(3), 337–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. C., & Johnson, D. M. (2017). Applying objectification theory to the relationship between sexual victimization and eating disorder psychopathology. The Counseling Psychologist, 45(8), 1091–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Mezulis, A. H. (2020). Gender differences in depression: Biological, affective, cognitive, and sociocultural factors. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 28(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T., Zheng, P., & Chen, H. (2016). Features of objectified body consciousness and sociocultural perspectives as predictors of eating and body image disturbances among young women and men in China. Journal of Gender Studies, 25(5), 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearl, H. (2010). Stop street harassment: Making public places safe and welcoming for women. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-GLIO Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Millsap, R. (2014). Using the Bollen–Stine bootstrapping method for evaluating approximate fit indices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.947352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer’s physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaRocca, M. A., & Kromrey, J. D. (1999). The perception of sexual harassment in higher education: Impact of gender and attractiveness. Sex Roles, 40(11), 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, A. (2006). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S. M., Grabe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2007). Gender, pubertal development, and peer sexual harassment predict objectified body consciousness in early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(4), 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., & Ramsey, L. R. (2011). Empowering or oppressing? Development and exploration of the enjoyment of sexualization scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 5568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, L. S. (2015). Street harassment: Current and promising avenues for researchers and activists. Sociology Compass, 9(3), 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunde, C., & Joleby, M. (2022). Being under pressure to sext: Adolescents’ experiences, reactions, and counter-strategies. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12797.

  • Manago, A. M., Ward, L. M., Lemm, K. M., Reed, L., & Seabrook, R. (2015). Facebook involvement, objectified body consciousness, body shame, and sexual assertiveness in college women and men. Sex Roles, 72(1–2), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S. J., & Bigler, R. S. (2010). Development of the internalized sexualization scale (ISS) for pre- and early adolescent girls. Philadelphia, PA: Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(2), 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNair, B. (2002). Striptease culture. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and wellbeing: The impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58(7–8), 458–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moscatelli, S., Golfieri, F., Tomasetto, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2021). Women and# MeToo in Italy: Internalized sexualization is associated with tolerance of sexual harassment and negative views of the# MeToo movement. Current Psychology, 40(12), 6199–6211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murnen, S. K., & Don, B. (2012). Body image and gender roles. Encyclopedia of Body Image and Human Appearance, 1, 128–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustapic, J., Marcinko, D., & Vargek, P. (2017). Body shame and disordered eating in adolescents. Current Psychology, 36(3), 447–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowatzki, J., & Morry, M. M. (2009). Women’s intentions regarding, and acceptance of, self-sexualizing behavior. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(1), 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(4), 249–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donohue, W., Downs, K., & Yeater, E. A. (1998). Sexual harassment: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3(2), 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2009). A longitudinal investigation of peer sexual harassment victimization in adolescence. Journal of adolescence, 32(5), 1173–1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.01.011.

  • Pina, A., Gannon, T. A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, B. A. (2002). Sexual harassment and masculinity: The power and meaning of “girl watching. Gender & Society, 16(3), 386–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RAINN (2022). Victims of sexual violence: Statistics Rain.org. https://www.rainn.org/statistics/victims-sexual-violence

  • Ramsey, L. R., Marotta, J. A., & Hoyt, T. (2017). Sexualized, objectified, but not satisfied: Enjoying sexualization relates to lower relationship satisfaction through perceived partner-objectification. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(2), 258–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingen, P. H., & Kernan, J. B. (1993). Social perception and interpersonal influence: Some consequences of the physical attractiveness stereotype in a personal selling setting. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. H. (2005). Reinforcing hegemonic masculinities through sexual harassment: Issues of identity, power and popularity in secondary schools. Gender and Education, 17(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, S. M., & Schroeder, R. D. (2020). Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me”: Verbal sexual harassment among middle school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(17–18), 3462–3486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romito, P., Cedolin, C., Bastiani, F., Beltramini, L., & Saurel-Cubizolles, M. J. (2017). Sexual harassment and menstrual disorders among italian university women: A cross-sectional observational study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 45(5), 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romito, P., Cedolin, C., Bastiani, F., & Saurel-Cubizolles, M. J. (2019). Disordered eating behaviors and sexual harassment in italian male and female university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(14), 2960–2974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roszell, P., Kennedy, D., & Grabb, E. (1989). Physical attractiveness and income attainment among Canadians. The Journal of Psychology, 123(6), 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. T. (1996). Bystander stress: The effect of organizational tolerance of sexual harassment on victims’ coworkers (Publication No. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/23259). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

  • Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(2), 213–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, L. (2019). Responding to sexual objectification: The role of emotions in influencing willingness to undertake different types of action. Sex Roles, 80(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. A., Sabat, I. E., Martinez, L. R., Weaver, K., & Xu, S. (2015). A convenient solution: Using MTurk to sample from hard-to-reach populations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, J., & Kurek, A. (2019). Looking hot in selfies: Narcissistic beginnings, aggressive outcomes? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(6), 500506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sue, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in everyday life: Race, gender, and sexual orientation. Hobken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H., Lord, T., & McHugh, M. (2010). Creeps and Casanovas: Experiences, explanations and effects of street harassment. Victims of Sexual Assault and Abuse: Resources and Responses for Individuals and Families, 1, 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terhoeven, V., Nikendei, C., Barnighausen, T., Bountogo, M., Friederich, H. C., Ouermi, L., & Harling, G. (2020). Eating disorders, body image and media exposure among adolescent girls in rural Burkina Faso. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 25(1), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiggemann, M., & Barbato, I. (2018). You look great!”: The effect of viewing appearance-related Instagram comments on women’s body image. Body Image, 27, 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuerkheimer, D. (1997). Street harassment as sexual subordination: The phenomenology of gender-specific harm. Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal, 12, 167–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. https://www.eeoc.gov/

  • Wang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, J., Zeng, P., & Lei, L. (2020). Body talk on social networking sites, body surveillance, and body shame among young adults: The roles of self-compassion and gender. Sex Roles, 82, 731–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M., Seabrook, R. C., Manago, A., & Reed, L. (2016). Contributions of diverse media to self-sexualization among undergraduate women and men. Sex Roles, 74(1), 1223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M., Seabrook, R. C., Grower, P., Giaccardi, S., & Lippman, J. R. (2018). Sexual object or sexual subject? Media use, self-sexualization, and sexual agency among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (2018). The legacy of an attribution approach to motivation and emotion: A nocrisis zone. Motivation Science, 4(1), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of STEM Education and Professional Studies, Darden College of Education and Professional Studies, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA

    Dooyoung Choi

  2. Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Hawaii, Manoa Honolulu, HI, USA

    Ju-Young M. Kang

  3. Sejong Cyber University, Seoul, South Korea

    Jien Kim

  4. Department of Clothing & Textiles, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea

    Ha Kyung Lee

Authors
  1. Dooyoung Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ju-Young M. Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jien Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ha Kyung Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.C. and H.L. contributed to the study conceptualization and design, data collection, and data analysis. D.C. wrote the manuscript with support from H.L., J.K., and J.L.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ha Kyung Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethics Approval

The study was carried out after permission to use human subjects in the research was received from the Old Dominion University review board [1893233-1].

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, D., Kang, JY.M., Kim, J. et al. Self-Sexualization in Relation to Sexual Harassment and Body Shame. Sexuality & Culture 27, 1894–1914 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10096-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10096-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation