Abstract
The current study aimed to examine the emerging role of early adaptive schemas within heterosexual romantic relationships. In accordance with schema theory, it was hypothesised that endorsing greater early adaptive schemas would predict higher levels of relationship quality. A total of 941 heterosexual adults (age, M = 32.44 years), who identified as being in a current romantic relationship (relationship duration, M = 7.92 years), completed questionnaires online. Early adaptive schemas were measured using the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire. Relationship quality was measured by relationship and sexual satisfaction. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses revealed that, after controlling for potential confounding variables, higher levels of the early adaptive schemas of Emotional Fulfilment and Self-Care predicted greater relationship and sexual satisfaction. The current findings suggest that specific early adaptive schemas may be beneficial for bolstering romantic relationship quality in heterosexual relationships. This preliminary evidence may inform the development of a more holistic schema-based couple therapy intervention. Specifically, one which incorporates the enhancement of early adaptive schemas to promote sexual and relationship wellbeing in couples. Future research is required to elucidate the explanatory mechanisms and to examine whether integrating early adaptive schemas into schema therapy does indeed have a positive effect on therapy outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Meaningful close connections are fundamental to human life and form the basis of human experience. Stable and fulfilling relationships provide humans with opportunities to satisfy fundamental needs (Sagkal & Ozdemir, 2019; Vollmann et al., 2019), which promote positive outcomes, including improved physical and mental health (Adamczyk et al., 2021; Waldinger et al., 2015), life satisfaction (Dyrdal et al., 2011), quality of life, and subjective wellbeing (Gomez-Lopez et al., 2019).
Despite the well-documented benefits, creating and maintaining romantic relationships can be challenging. Numerous studies have reported that relationship dissatisfaction and dissolution are associated with greater levels of loneliness (de Jong Gierveld & Broese van Groenou, 2016), poorer psychological wellbeing (Mirsu-Paun & Oliver, 2017), and a wide array of long-term health risks (Sbarra et al., 2019), including greater morbidity and mortality (Floud et al., 2014; Kojima et al., 2020; Robles et al., 2014). Understanding why some couples are happier than others remains a prominent focus of academic investigation (e.g., Fentz & Trillingsgaard, 2017).
Romantic relationship quality may be broadly defined as the subjective, global evaluation of the positive and negative aspects of one’s relationship (Farooqi, 2014; Morry et al., 2010). This encompasses components such as relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction (e.g., Fletcher et al., 2016). Relationship satisfaction refers to the subjective evaluation of the level of warmth, support, and emotional connection within one’s relationship (Fincham et al., 2018). Sexual satisfaction refers to how pleasurable, satisfying, and valuable one perceives physical intimacy with their spouse (Lawrance & Byers, 1995). Whilst relationship and sexual satisfaction are positively correlated (McNulty et al., 2016), longitudinal evidence suggests both represent unique constructs that may have differing determinants (Fallis et al., 2016). Furthermore, relationship and sexual satisfaction have been associated with greater levels of relationship maintenance (Ogolsky et al., 2017), in which individuals engage in prosocial behaviours designed to ensure the continuance of meaningful relationships by strengthening relationships, preventing breakdown, or through the process of rupture and repair (Fallis et al., 2016; Gottman & Gottman, 2008). This suggests that examining both sub-components of relationship quality may be pertinent when evaluating couples functioning.
A vast body of research has identified key factors that enhance these components of relationship quality, including communication and conflict resolution skills (see Ogolsky et al., 2017 for a review). More recently, studies have begun to explore the connection between early life experiences and relationship quality in adulthood (e.g., Pizzirani et al., 2021; Sommantico et al., 2018). Longitudinal evidence suggests that warm and nurturing family environments in childhood (Grossmann et al., 2006) and adolescence (Waldinger & Schulz, 2016) significantly predict secure attachment bonds with romantic partners later in life. Secure bonds are characterised by greater intimacy, loving behaviour, comfort with seeking and providing care, and relationship satisfaction (see Mikulincer & Shaver, 2016 for a comprehensive review). In contrast, adverse childhood experiences, which are associated with cold and neglectful family environments, predict interpersonal difficulties (Mosley-Johnson et al., 2019; Poole et al., 2018) and poor relational outcomes later in life (Doyle & Cicchetti, 2017; Obsuth et al., 2014). Considering the associations between early life and downstream relational outcomes, elucidating the explanatory mechanisms may be pertinent to ensure the efficacy of couples-based therapy interventions. Schema theory (Young, 1990; Young et al., 2003) offers a comprehensive framework to understand the relationships between early life experiences and relationship outcomes.
Schema Theory
Young and colleagues (Young, 1990; Young et al., 2003) proposed that schemas develop through the internalisation of core emotional needs being adaptively met or thwarted during early childhood and adolescence. Core emotional needs are postulated to be universal human needs, such as the need to form a secure attachment to others (Young et al., 2003). When core emotional needs are met in a consistent and loving manner by warm and responsive caregivers, early adaptive schemas develop (Louis et al., 2018). In contrast, early maladaptive schemas develop when core emotional needs are toxically frustrated, such as being raised within abusive, rejecting, or cold family environments (Arntz & Jacob, 2017). Despite the presence of both early adaptive and maladaptive schemas, research to date has focused largely on early maladaptive schemas.
Early Maladaptive Schemas
Early maladaptive schemas are defined as enduring dysfunctional cognitive patterns that encompass memories, cognitions, emotions, and bodily sensations (Young, 1990; Young et al., 2003). These self-defeating themes are assimilated into an individual’s sense of identity and accepted as truths regarding the self, others, and the world (Young et al., 2003). When activated, early maladaptive schemas bias how information is filtered, processed, interpreted, and organised (Arntz & Jacob, 2017). Consequently, early maladaptive schemas may become continuously reinforced, elaborated, and strengthened throughout life (Arntz & Jacob, 2017). Young et al. (2003) defined 18 distinct early maladaptive schemas. These schemas have been empirically grouped into five higher-order schema domains, each corresponding theoretically to a core emotional need (see Supplemental Material).
Early Maladaptive Schemas and Relationships
Numerous correlational studies have found that early maladaptive schemas are associated with lower relationship quality in heterosexual romantic relationships (Eftekhari et al., 2018; Esmaili et al., 2016; Mohammadi & Soleymani, 2017), including lower couples satisfaction (Dumitrescu & Rusu, 2012) and reduced sexual satisfaction (Hashemian et al., 2015; Kebritchi & Mohammadkhani, 2016). A recent metanalysis by Janovsky et al. (2020) examined the influence of specific schemas on interpersonal functioning using 42 cross-sectional and six longitudinal studies (N = 14,932). Findings revealed a moderate association between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems, with schemas involving themes of rejection found to have the strongest influence (i.e., emotional deprivation schema). Taken together, it is evident that the presence of early maladaptive schemas is an important consideration when assessing couples’ overall functioning and relationship quality. Despite this, there has been no research examining the theoretical counterpart of early maladaptive schemas, that is, early adaptive schemas.
Early Adaptive Schemas
Early adaptive schemas are defined as a “broad, pervasive theme or pattern, comprised of memories, emotions, cognitions, and neurobiological reactions regarding oneself and one’s relationship with others, developed during childhood or adolescence, elaborated throughout one’s lifetime and leading to healthy functioning and adaptive behavioural dispositions” (Lockwood & Perris, 2012, p. 54). Early adaptive schemas develop through repeated interactions with a reliable and responsive caregiver who meets an individual’s core emotional needs in an adequate and predictable manner. As a result, individuals hold positive beliefs towards themselves (e.g., see themselves as inherently acceptable, lovable, worthwhile) and positive expectations about others as being loving, caring, and responsive.
Early adaptive schemas were initially theorised as the positive counterpart of early maladaptive schemas, although empirical evidence indicates that these represent additional schemas, with predictive ability over and above early maladaptive schemas (Louis et al., 2018). Louis et al. (2018) identified 14 unique early adaptive schemas using the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire (YPSQ). This novel instrument was developed using a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis, which revealed early adaptive schemas predicted greater positive qualities including, gratitude, humor, agreeableness, and life satisfaction (Louis et al., 2018).
The research to date suggests individuals could have developed both positive and negative schemas, which would likely be activated by different scenarios throughout the lifespan. Moreover, as early adaptive schemas represent distinct dimensions, it is likely that traditional schema therapy which aims to weaken early maladaptive schemas, would not inherently strengthen early adaptive schemas (Louis et al., 2018). Failing to enhance early adaptive schemas in therapeutic settings may reduce the potential for improved clinical outcomes for both individuals and couples experiencing distress.
This approach highlights the importance of clinicians placing an equal focus on the promotion of positive functioning alongside traditional goals to reduce dysfunction or psychopathology (Wood & Tarrier, 2010). The benefits of this are widespread, with research linking the positive characteristics, such as positive affect, psychological flexibility, optimism, and gratitude with reduced psychopathology (Chakhssi et al., 2018; Wood et al., 2010). Enhancing positive functioning may also buffer against future psychopathology and relapse (Trompetter et al., 2017). These findings support the notion that wellbeing is not merely the absence of mental disorder, but also the presence of psychological resources (e.g., Galderisi et al., 2015), encouraging exploration of the role of early adaptive schemas.
Rationale
To date, research has not examined the relationship between early adaptive schemas and relationship quality within the context of romantic relationships. The present research aims to fill this gap by exploring the association between early adaptive schemas and relationship and sexual satisfaction, using data from individuals in committed relationships.
This research focused solely on early adaptive schemas for two reasons. Firstly, there is a large body of research that has examined early maladaptive schemas, however, no research examining the role of early adaptive schemas within relationships. Secondly, as an ethical consideration, authors decided not to include an early maladaptive schemas questionnaire to minimise participant fatigue. This decision aimed to reduce the likelihood of attrition and response bias due to fatigue.
The scope of the current study was limited to individuals who identified as being in a committed heterosexual relationship. This limited scope aimed to reduce extraneous variables confounding the data, as previous research has found differences between heterosexual and homosexual relationships (e.g., Landolt et al., 2004; Ryan et al., 2009). Moreover, couples in homosexual relationships may have different combinations of schemas due to unique challenges faced by homosexual individuals. For instance, individuals in same-sex relationships may face parent and peer rejection due to their sexual orientation (Starks & Parsons, 2013). They may also experience stigma within society (Herek, 2004; Steffens, 2005), contributing to minority stress (Meyer, 1995) and rejection sensitivity (Pachankis et al., 2008). Consequently, it is argued that heterosexual and homosexual populations should be examined separately to ensure generalisability of the findings.
Understanding the relationship between early adaptive schemas and their associated outcomes is essential for clinicians. Such findings may strengthen practitioners’ knowledge regarding the role of positive functioning within schema therapy. Research in this area may also promote the development and integration of a wider variety of effective intervention techniques, including strategies to enhance positive functioning within romantic relationships.
Hypotheses
The goal of the present study was to extend previous research by considering the associations between early adaptive schemas and relationship quality within the context of romantic relationships. It was hypothesised that higher scores on early adaptive schemas would predict significantly greater relationship satisfaction (H1) and sexual satisfaction (H2). It is reasonable to assume that schemas within the Connection and Acceptance domain would have the strongest association with relationship quality due to their conceptual and theoretical overlap with emotional intimacy. However, given the paucity of research, no specific predictions were made regarding which early adaptive schemas would emerge as the strongest predictor of each component of relationship quality.
Methods
Participants
Data were collected from December 2021 to April 2022. A total of 1474 participants who completed all survey items were screened, of which 941 participants met the following criteria: (1) informed consent was provided, (2) 18 years of age or older, (3) currently in a romantic relationship, and (4) heterosexual sexual orientation. The final dataset included responses from 579 females (61.5%) and 362 males, ranging from 18 to 74 years (M = 32.44, SD = 9.98). The average relationship duration was 7.92 years (SD = 8.02) and ranged from 1 to 50 years. Approximately half identified as either partnered (53.8%) or married (42.9%), and 3.3% identified as other (e.g., dating, engaged). Most participants reported having no children (n = 680, 72.3%). A total of 341 (36.2%) self-reported having a mental or physical health concern for either themselves and/or their romantic partner. Nearly two-thirds were from predominately Western cultures, such as America (40.2%) Australia (19.2%), Canada (11.8%), United Kingdom (12.1%), and New Zealand (3.3%). The remaining participants identified as either European (9%) or other (e.g., Africa, Asia, South America; 4.4%). Two-thirds of participants had attained a university degree (66.8%) with the remaining having received a certificate or diploma (14.2%), or a school education (19%).
Design
The current study utilised a cross-sectional, correlational, web-based design where participants completed an online survey. Hierarchical multiple regressions were used to test the relationship between early adaptive schemas and romantic relationship quality. The 14 early adaptive schemas were entered as the predictor variables and the relationship quality variables of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction were entered separately as outcome variables. Consistent with previous relationship research, the following covariates were controlled for across each analysis: age, gender, relationship duration, presence of perceived stressors, and dependants within the home (e.g., Erol & Orth, 2014; Hilpert et al., 2016; Yoo et al., 2014).
Measures
Demographic Questions
Demographic information included age, biological sex, sexual orientation, romantic relationship status, relationship duration, presence of perceived physical or mental health stressors for the individual or their romantic partner, and whether dependants were living within the home.
Early Adaptive Schemas
The 56-item Young Positive Schema Questionnaire (YPSQ; Louis et al., 2018) provided a measure of 14 early adaptive schemas. Items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale, (1) completely untrue of me to (6) describes me perfectly. Example items include “I know I can depend on the people closest to me to always be there for me” (Emotional Fulfilment) or “I can be a good person and, at the same time, consider my own needs to be as important as those of others” (Self-Care). Scores were summed for each schema, with higher scores indicating greater presence of each schema. A total early adaptive schema score was obtained by summing the 14 early adaptive schema scores. In accordance with the standards outlined by Nunnally and Bernstein (1994), the YPSQ demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, both when developed (Louis et al., 2018) and within the current study (a = 0.67–0.91).
Relationship Satisfaction
A global measure of relationship satisfaction was measured using the 16-item Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-16; Funk & Rogge, 2007). The CSI-16 was developed using item response theory and has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties (Graham et al., 2011). Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97 was observed within the current sample. One item rated overall relational happiness on a 7-point Likert scale from (0) extremely unhappy to (6) perfect. Six items rated how participants felt about their relationship on a 6-point Bipolar scale, using polarised adjectives, such as (0) miserable (5) enjoyable. Nine items were rated on a 6-point Likert scale, ranging between (0) not at all true to (5) completely true. Scores were summed, with higher scores indicating greater relationship satisfaction. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 81. The CSI-16 has been used to differentiate between distressed and non-distressed relationships, with total scores lower than 51.5 indicating distress (Funk & Rogge, 2007).
Sexual Satisfaction
The Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction (GMSEX; Lawrance & Byers, 1995) is a 5-item measure of sexual satisfaction. Items were rated on a 7-point Bipolar scale (1) to (7): “good-bad, pleasant-unpleasant, positive–negative, satisfying-unsatisfying, valuable-worthless”. Scores ranged from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating greater sexual satisfaction. The GMSEX is frequently used and has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties (Mark et al., 2014). Internal consistency of 0.94 was observed in the current sample, with test–retest reliabilities of 0.84 observed at two-week follow-up (Lawrance & Byers, 1995), 0.78 at three-month follow-up, and 0.61 at 18-month follow-up (Byers & MacNeil, 2006).
Procedure
Ethical approval was granted by a university human research ethics committee. Participants were recruited via social networking websites prior to being screened for eligibility. Volunteers who followed the survey link were informed of the research purpose and invited to complete the relevant. Upon completion of the questionnaire, participants were provided an opportunity to enter a prize draw to win one of four $50 gift vouchers. Participants provided an email address via an external survey to maintain confidentiality.
Data Analysis
The assumption of linearity and normality were met, as visual inspection of standardised residuals revealed probability plots followed diagonal lines and histograms approximately followed normal bell curves (Field, 2018). Durbin-Watson statistic scores were approximately two, indicating independence of residuals (Field, 2018). No issues were observed with collinearity (i.e., VIF < 10, Tolerance > 0.2). Multivariate outliers that exceeded critical χ2 value (α = 0.01) were examined removed and excluded from hypotheses testing (n = 48, 5%; Tabachnick et al., 2019). Cook’s distance was below one for all cases (Cook & Weisberg, 1982) and no leverage values greater than 0.2 were observed, indicating no highly influential points (Field, 2018). Casewise diagnostics revealed 95% of all cases fell within ± 2 SDs. Cases outside ± 3 SDs were removed after being assessed and deemed to be outside of the normal distribution (n = 17; 1.79%).
The assumption of homogeneity was violated, as identified by a visual inspection of the scatterplot data of ZRED against ZRESID, which revealed decreased funnelling (Field, 2018). Heteroscedasticity remained when examining subsamples restricted by age range, relationship duration, country of residence, and subsamples with and without the presence of stressors, and children. This suggests that the heterogeneity of the sample did not solely influence heteroscedasticity, which was not surprising given the complexity of romantic relationships in combination with the large sample size. Large sample sizes have been found to exacerbate problems produced by heteroscedasticity (Hayes, 1996; Long & Ervin, 2000). To account for this violation, heteroscedasticity-consistent standard error (HCSE) estimator of ordinary least squares (OLS) parameter estimates were examined (Hayes & Cai, 2007; Long & Ervin, 2000).
The HCSE method was deemed more appropriate than weighted least squares, given that it has good statistical power and does not require prior knowledge of the form of heteroscedasticity (MacKinnon & White, 1985). No statistical differences emerged between OLS regressions and those using HCSE estimators, specifically HC3 model created by Hayes and Cai (2007). Thus, the OLS results were retained for ease of interpretation. Lastly, the final sample (n = 876) was deemed acceptable in accordance with Faul et al.’s (2007) empirical estimates required for 0.80 power (α = 0.05).
Results
Preliminary Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS program (Version 28.0). Mean scores, standard deviations, and zero-order correlations between study variables are presented in Table 1. As anticipated, having greater levels of early adaptive schemas was significantly positively associated with greater levels of relationship and sexual satisfaction.
Main Analyses
Relationship Satisfaction
Hierarchical multiple regression was used to test whether greater early adaptive schemas scores significantly predicted greater relationship satisfaction. Results are presented in Table 2. The first block included age and sex, which significantly accounted for 4% variability in relationship satisfaction, R2 = 0.04, F (2, 873) = 18.88, p < 0.001. The second block included the addition of relationship duration, presence of stressors for either individual or their romantic partner, and dependants living within the home, which accounted for an additional 2% of variance of relationship satisfaction, ΔR2 = 0.02, ΔF (3, 870) = 6.48, p < 0.001. In the final model, the addition of 14 early adaptive schemas significantly accounted for an additional 28% of the variance of relationship satisfaction, ΔR2 = 0.28, ΔF (14, 856) = 25.38, p < 0.001. In combination, all 19 variables explained 34% of the variance of relationship satisfaction, R2 = 0.34, F (19, 856) = 22.94, p < 0.001. By Cohen’s (1988) conventions, a combined effect of this magnitude can be considered “large” (f2 = 0.51).
Emotional Fulfilment, Social Belonging, Self-Compassion, and Self-Care were the only early adaptive schemas that significantly contributed to the observed variance in relationship satisfaction scores. Emotional Fulfilment emerged as the strongest predictor which explained 11% of significant unique variance (sr2 = 0.11), followed by Self-Care, Self-Compassion, and Social Belonging which accounted for approximately 1% of significant unique variance each. Unexpectedly, the impact of Social Belonging and Self-Compassion were in the negative direction. This was an opposite finding than expected which indicates the possible presence of suppression in the model. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution. The remaining early adaptive schemas did not significantly contribute to variance in relationship satisfaction scores. Overall, these findings suggest the early adaptive schemas of Emotional Fulfilment and Self-Care predict greater relationship satisfaction.
Sexual Satisfaction
Hierarchical multiple regression was used to test whether greater early adaptive schemas scores significantly predicted greater sexual satisfaction. Results are presented in Table 3. The first block included age and sex, which significantly accounted for 5% variability in sexual satisfaction, R2 = 0.05, F (2, 873) = 22.68, p < 0.001. In the second block, the addition of relationship duration, presence of stressors (for either individual or their romantic partner), and dependants living within the home was non-significant, ΔR2 = 0.004, ΔF (3, 870) = 1.13, p = 0.337. In the final model, the addition of 14 early adaptive schemas significantly accounted for an additional 15% of the variance of sexual satisfaction, ΔR2 = 0.15, ΔF (14, 856) = 11.15, p < 0.001. In combination, all 19 variables explained 20% of the variance of sexual satisfaction, R2 = 0.20, F (19, 856) = 11.20, p < 0.001. By Cohen (1988) conventions, a combined effect of this magnitude can be considered “medium” (f2 = 0.25).
The only significant predictors were Emotional Fulfilment, Self-Compassion, and Self-Care. Emotional Fulfilment was the strongest predictor and accounted for 4% of significant unique variance (sr2 = 0.04). Both Self-Compassion (sr2 = 0.01) and Self-Care (sr2 = 0.01) accounted for 1% each of significant unique variance. Unexpectedly, the impact of Self-Compassion was in the negative direction. This indicates the presence of suppression in the model and should be interpreted with caution. The remaining early adaptive schemas did not significantly contribute to variance in sexual satisfaction scores. Overall, findings suggest Emotional Fulfilment and Self-Care predict greater sexual satisfaction.
Discussion
This study is the first to examine the role of early adaptive schemas in understanding adult sexuality and relationships. By elucidating the role of early adaptive schemas, this study provides an important contribution to our understanding of schema theory. Findings partially supported hypotheses that higher early adaptive schemas scores would predict greater relationship quality, as measured by greater relationship (H1) and sexual satisfaction (H2). Those who endorsed higher levels of early adaptive schemas overall (total presence of early adaptive schemas) reported greater levels of relationship and sexual satisfaction in their romantic relationships. Interestingly, when examined at the individual schema level, only two of the fourteen early adaptive schemas predicted greater relationship and sexual satisfaction. These included Emotional Fulfilment and Self-Care. Emotional Fulfilment emerged as the strongest predictor which explained a substantial amount of variance in both relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction. In contrast, Self-Care accounted for a small portion of greater relationship quality. Unexpectedly, and in the opposite direction than anticipated, Social Belonging and Self-Compassion predicted lower relationship quality, although findings only explained 1% of the variance. Findings demonstrated that early maladaptive schemas are uniquely associated with romantic relationship quality.
Emotional Fulfilment
Emotional Fulfilment emerged as the strongest and most meaningful early adaptive schema to predict relationship quality, with greater Emotional Fulfilment found to increase both relationship and sexual satisfaction. That is, endorsing beliefs that one is loved, cared for, and valued by one’s spouses increased overall relational happiness and security in addition to positive evaluations regarding sexual connection.
Consistent with notions outlined in schema theory (Arntz & Jacob, 2017; Young et al., 2003) and elaborated by Lockwood and Perris (2012), individuals who endorsed higher Emotional Fulfilment likely had their core emotional needs for security and safety adaptively met in loving, nurturing family environments. These early experiences may have been internalised and manifested as beliefs that one is loved, cared for, and valued by others. In the context of romantic relationships, individuals likely believe they are inherently loveable and desirable regardless of their human flaws. They may depend on their spouse and trust that their core emotional needs for nurturance, empathy, and safety will be met. Collectively, this suggests that individuals who endorse greater levels of Emotional Fulfilment would be comfortable seeking support from their spouse. Seeking support may in turn facilitate more secure and satisfying attachment bonds.
It is plausible to assume when measuring relationship outcomes, that similar positive associations would exist between early adaptive schemas as those observed within securely attached adults. For instance, attachment security is integral to relationship functioning and has been associated with high levels of interpersonal trust and, in turn, high relationship quality, at the level of the individual and the dyad (Givertz et al., 2013). This finding has been further supported by Hadden et al.’s (2014) meta-analysis (N = 1449) which found a moderate effect size between secure attachments and greater levels of relationship satisfaction. Developing a secure attachment with a spouse appears to provide an emotional regulatory system (Simpson & Rholes, 2017), as individuals seek proximity and comfort from their spouse when experiencing distress, and in turn, receive support to facilitate coping and alleviate distress (Pietromonaco & Beck, 2015).
Interestingly, self-report, observational, and experimental data using both individual and dyadic data, demonstrate that attachment security positively influences perceptual, physiological, and behavioral responses within relationships (see Mikulincer & Shaver, 2012 for review). For instance, secure individuals appear to perceive partner behaviour in a more positive light, regardless of whether their partner’s actions were actually positive (Overall et al., 2015). Taken together, these findings suggest Emotional Fulfilment, as an early adaptive schema, may enhance a sense of closeness, safety, and security with one’s spouse, which is indicative of a secure attachment as outlined within attachment theory (Bowlby, 1979; Cassidy & Shaver, 2016). Considering that gratifying and meaningful relationships meet basic innate human needs, it is understandable that Emotional Fulfilment emerged as the most important early adaptive schema within the current sample. Collectively, findings suggest clinicians ought to evaluate and strive to strengthen this early adaptive schema in couples’ therapy.
Other Early Adaptive Schemas
The following findings should be interpreted with caution as only an additional 1% of the variance was explained by each of the remaining significant early adaptive schemas.
Self-Care
The current study revealed that Self-Care predicted greater relationship quality. That is, considering one’s own needs as equally important to those of others and investing time in caring for oneself contributed to more rewarding and enjoyable relational and sexual experiences with one’s spouse. These findings align with the tenets of schema theory. That is, individuals who had had their core needs adaptively met in childhood are more likely to function as healthy adults. In relation to the schema of Self-Care, these individuals have realistic expectations regarding their own needs and the needs of others. By implementing healthy boundaries, such individuals may fulfil their obligations across roles (e.g., partner, parent, work) whilst equally caring for their wellbeing.
The findings from the current study are consistent with the theory that the more realistic expectations and self-care one has, the more one may be able to self-regulate and manage the demands of an intimate relationship (Yarnell & Neff, 2013). This may enable individuals to meet their own emotional needs, be attuned, and responsive to their partner (Neff & Beretvas, 2013). It is also possible that such individuals are able to ask for support from their partner, after accurately considering their own coping resources. Whilst Emotional Fulfilment appeared to be the strongest predicting factor of relationship quality, Self-Care also provides a positive standalone contribution to relationship functioning. This suggests that therapies and practices intending to increase relationship quality should consider empowering individuals to learn and adopt healthy self-care behaviours.
Self-Compassion and Social Belonging
Two unexpected findings emerged within the current study. Firstly, findings revealed individuals endorsing greater levels of the early adaptive schema of Self-Compassion predicted lower levels of relationship and sexual satisfaction. That is, individuals who believed they should be forgiven easily and should not suffer for their failures or mistakes were less likely to report being satisfied with their emotional and sexual relationship. Secondly, findings revealed Social Belonging also significantly reduced relationship satisfaction, although no association was observed between Social Belonging and sexual satisfaction. This suggests that perceiving that you are accepted, included, and connected with others reduced positive perceptions of happiness and emotional intimacy within the romantic relationship.
These unexpected findings should be interpreted with caution. Several early adaptive schemas were observed to have moderate to strong positive correlations (r range = 0.21 to 0.64; although no multicollinearity was evidenced). Thus, it is possible that these small negative findings may indicate suppression within the model. It is also important to consider that intimate relationships do not exist in a vacuum. As such, it is equally possible uncontrolled factors may have influenced the observed relationships. For example, it is plausible that differences may emerge from idiosyncratic combinations of early adaptive schemas and early maladaptive schemas. In accordance with schema theory (Young, 1990; Young et al., 2003), both likely interact and influence global perceptions about ones’ spouse and intimate relationship. Differences in personality, temperament, and coping behaviours may further complicate findings (see Young et al., 2003 for additional information). Future research may consider measuring these variables concurrently to increase our understanding of schema theory and relationship dynamics in adult romantic relationships.
Self-Compassion
The observed relationship between greater Self-Compassion and lower relationship quality was unexpected and in contrast to previous research. For instance, self-compassion has been associated with more acceptance of one’s romantic partner, greater relationship satisfaction, and healthier romantic relationships (Neff & Beretvas, 2013). The difference in findings observed between previous research and the current study may be explained by the way in which self-compassion was measured. Previous research has measured self-compassion using the 26-item Self-Compassion Scale (Neff, 2003), which has multiple factors (self-kindness versus self-judgement; common humanity versus isolation; mindfulness versus over-identification). In contrast, the current study used three items. Considering the depth of self-compassion as a construct, and the small number of items used in the YPSQ, the early adaptive schema of Self-Compassion does not appear to capture self-compassion as conceptualised within the wider positive psychological literature. Moreover, it could be argued the YPSQ may measure self-forgiveness; at least at face-value. Self-forgiveness has been associated with self-excusing or self-justification, in which one does not accept responsibility for their transgressions. The acceptance of responsibility has been hypothesised as the key differentiating factor between pseudo versus genuine self-forgiveness (Wohl & McLaughlin, 2014), which is important in relationship contexts. Given that the YPSQ does not consider the acceptance of responsibility, it is difficult to ascertain the latent variable being assessed. Future research should further examine the relationship between the early adaptive schema of Self-Compassion and other more comprehensive measures to elucidate the underlying construct and limit confusion when drawing conclusions.
Social Belonging
To explain the unexpected association between greater Social Belonging and lower relationship satisfaction, it may be that those individuals with positive beliefs about their ability to fit in and be accepted have larger strong social convoys. Having a larger social convoy may mean individuals obtain support from others, rather than from within the romantic relationship (Davis & Affi, 2014). A study by Julien and Markman (1991) found discussing relationship issues with others was associated with reduced marital quality. Consistent with this notion, further research has revealed females in relationships were more justified and less willing to compromise on issues relating to their relationship when they had greater connections and support from others, such as friends, family, and acquaintances (Klein & Milardo, 2000). As individuals have their needs met elsewhere, it may cause tension or devaluing of the relationship, possibly reducing relationship satisfaction (see Interdependence Theory; Arriaga, 2013). In line with this, Kislev (2020) found individuals who were high in social satisfaction from friends reported lower desire to seek a romantic relationship and considered friendship as more important. Whilst this was observed in singles, it provides evidence that some of the assumed responsibilities of the relationship can be transferred to ones’ networks of friends (Bellotti, 2008; Fileborn et al., 2015). Taken together, endorsing greater levels of social belonging may reduce relationship satisfaction, however, future research is needed to understand these complex associations.
Non-Significant Early Adaptive Schemas
Surprisingly, the remaining 11 early adaptive schemas did not predict greater relationship quality within the current sample. The YPSQ is a new measure that has not yet been validated in couples. Participants may have interpreted items differently than anticipated. Moreover, items were not specific to one’s romantic relationship. To illustrate, the YPSQ assessed participants early adaptive schemas in the context of social networks (i.e., “I usually fit in with others”) or parental relations (i.e., “I have been able to establish a life of my own and am not overly involved with my parents and their problems”). Findings may have differed if participants were asked to reflect on their spouse specifically, in contrast to their broader social context. It is also possible that the associations between these 11 early adaptive schemas and relationship quality may be indirect in nature. For instance, the effect on relationship quality may be mediated through other factors such as, wellbeing, communication, or conflict resolution skills. Additional research is required to further understand the complex association between early adaptive schemas and relationship quality.
Early Adaptive Schemas as a Positive Psychology Construct
Taking a broad perspective, a key finding from the present study was that early adaptive schemas uniquely influenced relationship quality. This is important as Louis et al. (2018) found early adaptive schemas had unique predictive validity for wellbeing, over and above early maladaptive schemas. Taken together, these findings indicate both early adaptive and early maladaptive schemas may need to be considered concurrently to adequately capture couple functioning. This postulation is consistent with the wider positive clinical psychology literature (Johnson & Wood, 2015), which acknowledges both positive and negative constructs should be targeted as each interacts to influence mental health and functioning (Wood & Tarrier, 2010). By including early adaptive schemas into traditional schema therapy for couples, clinicians may expand the focus of therapy from reducing distress to also include supporting couples flourishing. This balanced approach facilitates a more holistic approach to assessment and treatment by placing equal value on couples’ strengths and weaknesses. Overall, the present findings provide a step towards enhancing our understanding of early adaptive schemas in intimate relationships.
The findings that only some early adaptive schemas are important for relationship quality is consistent with the patterns observed within the early maladaptive schema literature. For instance, Esmaili et al. (2016) found only three early maladaptive schemas significantly predicted marital satisfaction scores. Similarly, Hashemian et al. (2015) found four early maladaptive schemas significantly predicted lower sexual satisfaction scores. Across these two studies, early maladaptive schemas collectively explained 26% and 17% of the variance in relationship and sexual satisfaction scores, respectively. This previous research aligns closely with the current findings, in which early adaptive schemas accounted for 28% of relationship satisfaction and 15% of sexual satisfaction scores.
Taken together, findings indicate that specific early adaptive schemas may be more important within intimate relationships than others. In addition, early adaptive schemas appear to have a similar impact on relationship quality as early maladaptive schemas, although in the positive direction. That is, endorsing early adaptive schemas appears to increase relationship quality as much as endorsing early maladaptive schemas appears to reduce relationship and sexual satisfaction. This strengthens the argument that an equal emphasis should be placed on both adaptive and maladaptive schemas in therapeutic settings.
Clinical Implications
Collectively, the present findings indicate that early adaptive schemas are important factors that have a unique contribution on relationship and sexual satisfaction. The implications for relationship theory and practice are potentially quite large. Understanding relationship functioning through a schema lens offers clinicians a road map to support couples to meet basic emotional needs, create secure bonds, and experience satisfying and meaningful connections.
In relation to schema therapy for couples (i.e., Atkinson & Perris, 2020; Simeone-DiFrancesco et al., 2015), the addition of early adaptive schemas may provide clinicians with strengths that may be used therapeutically to facilitate flourishing within the couple. A central goal of traditional schema therapy for couples is to foster consistent patterns of secure connection to facilitate bonding between spouses (Atkinson & Perris, 2020). Currently, this is achieved by helping individuals to challenge unhelpful schemas and adopt healthier coping styles. This process may be more effective if early adaptive schemas were included within the therapeutic process. For instance, targeting both early adaptive and early maladaptive schemas concurrently may bolster psychological and coping resources, through promoting more functional perspectives, increased psychological flexibility, and healthier coping behaviours within the dyad (Arntz & Jacob, 2017; Atkinson & Perris, 2020).
Couples may be more equipped to manage relational difficulties in an emotionally conducive manner, thereby, providing greater opportunities for corrective emotional experiences. These experiences may empower couples to meet each other’s core relational needs in a caring, functional, and mutually responsive manner (Atkinson & Perris, 2020). Affirming experiences promote greater relational satisfaction, commitment, and relationship maintenance (Davila et al., 2017; Ogolsky et al., 2017). Whilst these arguments are grounded in theoretical and empirical evidence, future research is required to confirm this hypothesis.
Limitations and Future Directions
The current findings must be considered in light of the following limitations. Firstly, despite our strong theoretical reasoning for conceptualising early adaptive schemas as the predictor variable that shape relationship quality, the results are correlational, and causation cannot be inferred. Secondly, the current analyses did not consider the role that partners may play when considering the relationship and sexual satisfaction of individuals. Studies have found that characteristics of both partners in a relationship may shape couples’ relationship functioning (e.g., Hilpert et al., 2016; Riggs et al., 2011; Rodriguez et al., 2019). Future research may benefit from using dyadic research and a longitudinal approach, to confirm the direction of the relationship between variables and control for the contribution of partners. Thirdly, although we have demonstrated the utility of applying schema theory to the quality of romantic relationships, the current research does not inform the mechanisms influencing how early adaptive schemas impact relationship and sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Further empirical examination is required to determine the association between early adaptive schemas and other key measures of relationship functioning which may collectively influence relationship outcomes (e.g., attachment security, conflict resolution, problem-solving, responsiveness, empathy, relationship support, and forgiveness). Lastly, the present research focused on heterosexual couples who reported being in a committed relationship. Future research will need to examine whether the observed effects extend to other couples (i.e., same-sex couples) and remain cross-culturally. Despite limitations, the current study uniquely contributes to the relationship literature by providing a relatively comprehensive and theoretically driven model to explain how greater levels of early adaptive schemas enhance relationship and sexual satisfaction in romantic relationships.
Conclusion
The current study was the first to examine the role of early adaptive schemas in romantic relationship quality and provides theoretical support for early adaptive schemas to be included within schema therapy for couples. Findings indicate that the early adaptive schema of Emotional Fulfilment may enhance romantic relationship quality by increasing perceptions of relationship and sexual satisfaction. Specific early adaptive schemas appear to have differing effects on each component of relationship quality. Overall, findings suggest that clinicians may benefit from strengthening early adaptive schemas in therapeutic interventions.
References
Adamczyk, K., Barr, A. B., & Segrin, C. (2021). Relationship status and mental and physical health among Polish and American young adults: The role of relationship satisfaction and satisfaction with relationship status. Applied Psychology: Health Well-Being, 13(3), 620–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12248
Atkinson, T., & Perris, P. (2020). Schema therapy for couples interventions to promote secure connections. In G. Heath, & Startup, H. (Ed.), Creative methods in schema therapy: Advances and innovation in clinical practice. Routledge.
Arntz, A., & Jacob, G. (2017). Schema therapy in practice: An introductory guide to the schema mode approach. John Wiley and Sons.
Arriaga, X. B. (2013). An interdependence theory analysis of close relationships. In The Oxford handbook of close relationships. (pp. 39–65). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.001.0001
Bellotti, E. (2008). What are friends for? Elective communities of single people. Social Networks, 30(4), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.07.001
Bowlby, J. (1979). The Bowlby-Ainsworth attachment theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2(4), 637–638. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00064955
Byers, E. S., & MacNeil, S. (2006). Further validation of the interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 32(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230500232917
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (3rd ed.). Guildford Press.
Chakhssi, F., Kraiss, J. T., Sommers-Spijkerman, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2018). The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-018-1739-2
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. New York: Chapman and Hall.
Davila, J., Mattanah, J., Bhatia, V., Latack, J. A., Feinstein, B. A., Eaton, N. R., Daks, J. S., Kumar, S. A., Lomash, E. F., McCormick, M., & Zhou, J. (2017). Romantic competence, healthy relationship functioning, and well-being in emerging adults. Personal Relationships, 24(1), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12175
Davis, S. M., & Afifi, T. D. (2014). Harming the relationship while helping the friend: The outcomes of seeking social support about a romantic partner from women friend groups. AMITY: The Journal of Friendship Studies.
de Jong Gierveld, J., & Broese van Groenou, M. (2016). Older couple relationships and loneliness. In Couple relationships in the middle and later years: Their nature, complexity, and role in health and illness, pp. 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/14897-004
Doyle, C., & Cicchetti, D. (2017). From the cradle to the grave: The effect of adverse caregiving environments on attachment and relationships throughout the lifespan. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 24(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12192
Dumitrescu, D., & Rusu, A. S. (2012). Relationship between early maladaptive schemas, couple satisfaction and individual mate value: An evolutionary psychological approach. Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Psychotherapies, 12(1), 63–76.
Dyrdal, G. M., Roysamb, E., Nes, R. B., & Vitterso, J. (2011). Can a happy relationship predict a happy life? A population-based study of maternal well-being during the life transition of pregnancy, infancy, and toddlerhood. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 947–962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9238-2
Eftekhari, A., Hejazi, M., & Yazdani, K. (2018). Predicting marital satisfaction through early maladaptive schemas and communication styles of couples. International Journal of Psychology, 12(2), 118–146. https://doi.org/10.24200/ijpb.2018.60303
Erol, R. Y., & Orth, U. (2014). Development of self-esteem and relationship satisfaction in couples: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 50(9), 2291–2303. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037370
Esmaili, S. S., Mohammadi, A. Z., & Hakami, M. (2016). Predicting marital satisfaction on the basis of early maladaptive schema in married women, Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 5(6), 262–270.
Fallis, E. E., Rehman, U. S., Woody, E. Z., & Purdon, C. (2016). The longitudinal association of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(7), 822–831. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000205
Farooqi, S. R. (2014). The construct of relationship quality. Journal of Relationships Research. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2014.2
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behaviour Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Fentz, H. N., & Trillingsgaard, T. (2017). Checking up on couples-a meta-analysis of the effect of assessment and feedback on marital functioning and individual mental health in couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 43(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12185
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). Sage.
Fileborn, B., Thorpe, R., Hawkes, G., Minichiello, V., & Pitts, M. (2015). Sex and the (older) single girl: Experiences of sex and dating in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 33, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2015.02.002
Fincham, F. D., Rogge, R., & Beach, S. R. H. (2018). Relationship Satisfaction. In Vangelisti, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (2nd ed.), pp. 422–436. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.033
Fletcher, G. J. O., Simpson, J. A., & Thomas, G. (2016). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
Floud, S., Balkwill, A., Canoy, D., Wright, F. L., Reeves, G. K., Green, J., Beral, V., Cairns, B. J., & Million Women Study, C. (2014). Marital status and ischemic heart disease incidence and mortality in women: A large prospective study. BMC Medicine, 12, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-12-42
Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
Galderisi, S., Heinz, A., Kastrup, M., Beezhold, J., & Sartorius, N. (2015). Toward a new definition of mental health. World Psychiatry, 14(2), 231–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20231
Givertz, M., Woszidlo, A., Segrin, C., & Knutson, K. (2013). Direct and indirect effects of attachment orientation on relationship quality and loneliness in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(8), 1096–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407513482445
Gomez-Lopez, M., Viejo, C., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2019). Well-being and romantic relationships: A systematic review in adolescence and emerging adulthood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132415
Gottman, J. M., & Gottman, J. S. (2008). Gottman method couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed.), pp. 138–164. Guilford Press.
Graham, J. M., Diebels, K. J., & Barnow, Z. B. (2011). Supplemental material for the reliability of relationship satisfaction: A reliability generalization meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022441.supp
Grossmann, K. E., Grossmann, K., & Waters, E. (2006). Attachment from infancy to adulthood the major longitudinal studies. Guilford Press.
Hadden, B. W., Smith, C. V., & Webster, G. D. (2014). Relationship duration moderates associations between attachment and relationship quality: Meta-analytic support for the temporal adult romantic attachment model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501885
Hashemian, S. S., Shayan, S., Omidvar, A., & Modarres Gharavi, M. (2015). Relationship between early maladaptive schemas and sexual satisfaction in working women in Mashhad Ferdowsi University and Shiraz University, Iran. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 17(4), 192–196. https://doi.org/10.22038/JFMH.2015.4552
Hayes, A. F. (1996). Permutation test is not distribution-free: Testing Ho: ρ= 0. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.184
Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Rsearch Methods, 39(4), 709–722.
Herek, G. M. (2004). Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking about sexual prejudice and stigma in the twenty-first century. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 1(2), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2004.1.2.6
Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., Aghraibeh, A. M., Aryeetey, R., Bertoni, A., Bettache, K., Blazejewska, M., Bodenmann, G., Borders, J., Bortolini, T. S., Butovskaya, M., Castro, F. N., Cetinkaya, H., Cunha, D., David, O. A., … Yoo, G. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers Psychology, 7, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106
Janovsky, T., Rock, A. J., Thorsteinsson, E. B., Clark, G. I., & Murray, C. V. (2020). The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and interpersonal problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 27(3), 408–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2439
Johnson, J., & Wood, A. M. (2015). Integrating positive and clinical psychology: Viewing human functioning as continua from positive to negative can benefit clinical assessment, interventions and understandings of resilience. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9728-y
Julien, D., & Markman, H. J. (1991). Social support and social networks as determinants of individual and marital outcomes. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759184006
Kebritchi, A., & Mohammadkhani, S. (2016). The role of marital burnout and early maladaptive schemas in marital satisfaction between young couples. International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 5(12), 239–246.
Kislev, E. (2020). How do relationship desire and sociability relate to each other among singles? Longitudinal analysis of the Pairfam survey. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(8–9), 2634–2650. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520933000
Klein, R. C., & Milardo, R. M. (2000). The social context of couple conflict: Support and criticism from informal third parties. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(4–5), 618–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407500174008
Kojima, G., Walters, K., Iliffe, S., Taniguchi, Y., & Tamiya, N. (2020). Marital status and risk of physical frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 21(3), 322–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.017
Landolt, M. A., Bartholomew, K., Saffrey, C., Oram, D., & Perlman, D. (2004). Gender nonconformity, childhood rejection, and adult attachment: A study of gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ASEB.0000014326.64934.50
Lawrance, K.-A., & Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
Lockwood, G., & Perris, P. (2012). A new look at core emotional needs. In J. B. M. van Vreeswijk, & M. Nador (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of schema theory: Theory, research and science, pp. 41–66. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119962830.ch3
Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217–224.
Louis, J. P., Wood, A. M., Lockwood, G., Ho, M. R., & Ferguson, E. (2018). Positive clinical psychology and schema therapy (ST): The development of the Young Positive Schema Questionnaire (YPSQ) to complement the Young Schema Questionnaire 3 Short Form (YSQ-S3). Psychological Assessment, 30(9), 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000567
MacKinnon, J. G., & White, H. (1985). Some heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7
Mark, K. P., Herbenick, D., Fortenberry, J. D., Sanders, S., & Reece, M. (2014). A psychometric comparison of three scales and a single-item measure to assess sexual satisfaction. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.816261
McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., & Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6
Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137286
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2012). Adult attachment orientations and relationship processes. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 4(4), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00142.x
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2016). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Mirsu-Paun, A., & Oliver, J. A. (2017). How much does love really hurt? A meta-analysis of the association between romantic relationship quality, breakups and mental health outcomes in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Relationships Research, 8(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/jrr.2017.6
Mohammadi, B., & Soleymani, A. (2017). Early maladaptive schemas and marital satisfaction as predictors of marital commitment. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 16–22.
Morry, M. M., Reich, T., & Kito, M. (2010). How do I see you relative to myself? Relationship quality as a predictor of self- and partner-enhancement within cross-sex friendships, dating relationships, and marriages. Journal of Social Psychology, 150(4), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903365471
Mosley-Johnson, E., Garacci, E., Wagner, N., Mendez, C., Williams, J. S., & Egede, L. E. (2019). Assessing the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and life satisfaction, psychological well-being, and social well-being: United States longitudinal cohort 1995–2014. Quality of Life Research, 28(4), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2054-6
Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
Neff, K. D., & Beretvas, S. N. (2013). The role of self-compassion in romantic relationships. Self and Identity, 12(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.639548
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.R. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Obsuth, I., Hennighausen, K., Brumariu, L. E., & Lyons-Ruth, K. (2014). Disorganized behavior in adolescent–parent interaction: Relations to attachment state of mind, partner abuse, and psychopathology. Child Development, 1(85), 370–387.
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205
Overall, N. C., Fletcher, G. J., Simpson, J. A., & Fillo, J. (2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners’ negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(5), 730–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038987
Pachankis, J. E., Goldfried, M. R., & Ramrattan, M. E. (2008). Extension of the rejection sensitivity construct to the interpersonal functioning of gay men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.306
Pietromonaco, P. R., & Beck, L. A. (2015). Attachment processes in adult romantic relationships. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Volume 3: Interpersonal relations, pp. 33–64. American Psychological Association. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/14344-002
Pizzirani, B., Karantzas, G. C., Roisman, G. I., & Simpson, J. A. (2021). Early childhood antecedents of dehumanization perpetration in adult romantic relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(7), 1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620974892
Poole, J. C., Dobson, K. S., & Pusch, D. (2018). Do adverse childhood experiences predict adult interpersonal difficulties? The role of emotion dysregulation. Child Abuse and Neglect, 80, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.03.006
Riggs, S. A., Cusimano, A. M., & Benson, K. M. (2011). Childhood emotional abuse and attachment processes in the dyadic adjustment of dating couples. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58(1), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021319
Robles, T. F., Slatcher, R. B., Trombello, J. M., & McGinn, M. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859
Rodriguez, L. M., Fillo, J., Hadden, B. W., Overup, C. S., Baker, Z. G., & DiBello, A. M. (2019). Do you see what I see? Actor and partner attachment shape biased perceptions of partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(4), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218791782
Ryan, C., Huebner, D., Diaz, R. M., & Sanchez, J. (2009). Family rejection as a predictor of negative health outcomes in white and latino lesbian, gay, and bisexual young adults. Pediatrics, 123(1), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-3524
Sagkal, A. S., & Ozdemir, Y. (2019). Need satisfaction, partner attachment, and romantic relationship quality: A multiple mediation model. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.520839
Sbarra, D. A., Bourassa, K. J., & Manvelian, A. (2019). Marital separation and divorce: Correlates and consequences. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA handbook of contemporary family psychology: Foundations, methods, and contemporary issues across the lifespan, pp. 687–705. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000099-038
Simeone-DiFrancesco, C., Roediger, E., & Stevens, B. A. (2015). Schema therapy with couples a practitioners guide to healing relationships. John Wiley and Sons.
Simpson, J. A., & Rholes, W. S. (2017). Adult attachment, stress, and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.006
Sommantico, M., Donizzetti, A. R., Parrello, S., & De Rosa, B. (2018). Predicting young adults’ romantic relationship quality: Sibling ties and adult attachment styles. Journal of Family Issues, 40(5), 662–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x18820381
Starks, T., & Parsons, J. (2013). Adult attachment among partnered gay men: Patterns and associations with sexual relationship quality. Archives of Sexual Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0224-8
Steffens, M. C. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes towards lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v49n02_03
Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Trompetter, H. R., de Kleine, E., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2017). Why does positive mental health buffer against psychopathology? An exploratory study on self-compassion as a resilience mechanism and adaptive emotion regulation strategy. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 41(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-016-9774-0
Vollmann, M., Sprang, S., & van den Brink, F. (2019). Adult attachment and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of gratitude toward the partner. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3875–3886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519841712
Waldinger, R. J., Cohen, S., Schulz, M. S., & Crowell, J. A. (2015). Security of attachment to spouses in late life: Concurrent and prospective links with cognitive and emotional wellbeing. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(4), 516–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614541261
Waldinger, R. J., & Schulz, M. S. (2016). The long reach of nurturing family environments: Links with midlife emotion-regulatory styles and late-life security in intimate relationships. Psychological Science, 27(11), 1443–1450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616661556
Wohl, M. J. A., & McLaughlin, K. J. (2014). Self-forgiveness: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(8), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12119
Wood, A. M., Froh, J. J., & Geraghty, A. W. (2010). Gratitude and well-being: A review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005
Wood, A. M., & Tarrier, N. (2010). Positive clinical psychology: A new vision and strategy for integrated research and practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 819–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.003
Yarnell, L. M., & Neff, K. D. (2013). Self-compassion, interpersonal conflict resolutions, and well-being. Self and Identity, 12(2), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2011.649545
Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072
Young, J. E. (1990). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Professional Resource Exchange.
Young, J. E., Klosko, J. S., & Weishaar, M. E. (2003). Schema therapy a practitioners guide. Guilford Press.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. The authors report that no funding was provided for the current research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sundgren, M., Allen, A. The Role of Early Adaptive Schemas in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships. Sexuality & Culture 27, 390–414 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-10018-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-10018-2