Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surface and complex representation of diverse intimate relationships: insights from a content analysis of marriage and family therapy resources

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sexuality & Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Searching online for health information plays a vital role in the decision-making process to seek mental healthcare for relationship and sexual issues, especially among people with marginalized identities. The landscape of intimate arrangements in the U.S. is rapidly changing, yet it is unclear whether diverse intimate relationships are discussed in popular relationship-focused mental health resources. In the present research, we sought to understand how six diverse intimate relationships were represented in a set of online mental health resources focused on relationship and sexuality issues. We conducted a content analysis of 23 mental health articles; articles were coded for surface-level (1) and complex (2 through 5) representation: (1) the frequency at which six diverse relationship types were mentioned, (2) awareness of stigma (prejudicial experiences based on relationship type), (3) unique situations (experiences that are specific to a relationship type), (4) clinical recommendations (suggestions made for a specific relationship type) and (5) inclusive language. Overall, the frequency at which relationships were mentioned (surface-level representation) greatly varied: monogamous relationships (82.61%), singles (39.13%), blended families/stepfamilies (26.09%), same-sex/queer relationships (21.74%), multi-racial/cultural relationships (21.74%), and consensually non-monogamous relationships (0%). Complex representations, including stigma, unique situations, and recommendations for each diverse relationship type were infrequently mentioned (< 14% and, in many cases, never mentioned). These results illustrate that relationships other than monogamy were infrequently mentioned and, if mentioned, content related to diverse relationships lacked relevant and inclusive details, including clinical recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Survey data from the present study is available upon request. The present study utilized a content analysis method to code freely available online sexuality and relationship mental health resources; resources can be found here: https://www.aamft.org/Consumer_Updates/Consumer_Updates.aspx.

Notes

  1. The titles of the 23 mental health resource articles were: Adoption, Domestic Violence, Infertility, Infidelity, Managing Conflict During Divorce, Marital Distress, Marriage Preparation, Online Infidelity, Sexual Health, Caregiving for Later Life Adults, Effect of Anger on Families, Financial Distress and the Family, Grandparents Raising Grandchildren, Grieving the Loss of A Child, Multiracial Families, Pregnancy and Delivery, Stepfamilies, Same-sex Parents and Their Children, Therapeutic Issues for Same-sex Couples, Gender Identity, Female Sexual Problems, Male Sexual Problems, Substance Abuse and Intimate Relationships.

  2. All articles were accessed in 2020–2021 for the present study; the date(s) in which the articles were written is unknown; see: https://www.aamft.org/Consumer_Updates/Consumer_Updates.aspx.

References

Download references

Funding

There is no funding information to report for the present studies. This study was approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ACM and AR contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data analysis were performed by ACM, AR, and ND. The manuscript was written and edited by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy C. Moors Ph.D..

Ethics declarations

Consent to Participate and Publish

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the present study to participate in the survey and publish their responses.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicting financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramos, A., Moors, A.C., Dours, N.O. et al. Surface and complex representation of diverse intimate relationships: insights from a content analysis of marriage and family therapy resources. Sexuality & Culture 26, 1510–1530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09956-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09956-8

Keywords

Navigation