Abstract
Searching online for health information plays a vital role in the decision-making process to seek mental healthcare for relationship and sexual issues, especially among people with marginalized identities. The landscape of intimate arrangements in the U.S. is rapidly changing, yet it is unclear whether diverse intimate relationships are discussed in popular relationship-focused mental health resources. In the present research, we sought to understand how six diverse intimate relationships were represented in a set of online mental health resources focused on relationship and sexuality issues. We conducted a content analysis of 23 mental health articles; articles were coded for surface-level (1) and complex (2 through 5) representation: (1) the frequency at which six diverse relationship types were mentioned, (2) awareness of stigma (prejudicial experiences based on relationship type), (3) unique situations (experiences that are specific to a relationship type), (4) clinical recommendations (suggestions made for a specific relationship type) and (5) inclusive language. Overall, the frequency at which relationships were mentioned (surface-level representation) greatly varied: monogamous relationships (82.61%), singles (39.13%), blended families/stepfamilies (26.09%), same-sex/queer relationships (21.74%), multi-racial/cultural relationships (21.74%), and consensually non-monogamous relationships (0%). Complex representations, including stigma, unique situations, and recommendations for each diverse relationship type were infrequently mentioned (< 14% and, in many cases, never mentioned). These results illustrate that relationships other than monogamy were infrequently mentioned and, if mentioned, content related to diverse relationships lacked relevant and inclusive details, including clinical recommendations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Survey data from the present study is available upon request. The present study utilized a content analysis method to code freely available online sexuality and relationship mental health resources; resources can be found here: https://www.aamft.org/Consumer_Updates/Consumer_Updates.aspx.
Notes
The titles of the 23 mental health resource articles were: Adoption, Domestic Violence, Infertility, Infidelity, Managing Conflict During Divorce, Marital Distress, Marriage Preparation, Online Infidelity, Sexual Health, Caregiving for Later Life Adults, Effect of Anger on Families, Financial Distress and the Family, Grandparents Raising Grandchildren, Grieving the Loss of A Child, Multiracial Families, Pregnancy and Delivery, Stepfamilies, Same-sex Parents and Their Children, Therapeutic Issues for Same-sex Couples, Gender Identity, Female Sexual Problems, Male Sexual Problems, Substance Abuse and Intimate Relationships.
All articles were accessed in 2020–2021 for the present study; the date(s) in which the articles were written is unknown; see: https://www.aamft.org/Consumer_Updates/Consumer_Updates.aspx.
References
American Association for Marriage & Family Therapy (2021). AAMFT: American association for marriage & family therapy. https://www.aamft.org/
American Association for Marriage & Family Therapy. (n.d.). AAMFT diversity, equity, and inclusivity statement. Retrieved from: https://www.aamft.org/About_AAMFT/DI_Statement.aspx
American Psychological Association Task Force on Psychological Practice with Sexual Minority Persons (2021). Guidelines for psychological practice with sexual minority persons. Retrieved from: https://www.apa.org/about/policy/psychological-sexual-minority-persons.pdf
Callahan, E. J., Henderson, C. A., Ton, H., & MacDonald, S. (2016). Utilizing the electronic health record as a tool for reducing LGBT health disparities: An institutional approach. In K. Eckstrand & J. Ehrenfeld (Eds). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Healthcare (pp. 81–91). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19752-4_7
Conley, T. D., Matsick, J. L., Moors, A. C., & Ziegler, A. (2017). Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: Theories, methods, and new directions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616667925
Copen, C. E., Daniels, K., & Vespa, J. (2012). First marriages in the United States; data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. National health statistics reports, (49), 1–21.
Croghan, C. F., Moone, R. P., & Olson, A. M. (2015). Working with LGBT baby boomers and older adults: Factors that signal a welcoming service environment. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 58(6), 637–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2015.1072759
De Guzman, F. L. M., Moukoulou, L. N. N., Scott, L. D., & Zerwic, J. J. (2018). LGBT inclusivity in health assessment textbooks. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(6), 483–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2018.03.001
DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 57–83
Fairbrother, N., Hart, T. A., & Fairbrother, M. (2019). Open Relationship Prevalence, Characteristics, and Correlates in a Nationally Representative Sample of Canadian Adults. The Journal of Sex Research, 56(6), 695–704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1580667
Fields, J. (2015). Multiracial families. PA: Simon and Schuster. https://books.google.com/books?id=FZqbDAAAQBAJ&oi
Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Health, 2013, 1–55. https://www.ordinedeimedici.com/documenti/Docs7-cybercondria-PIP-HealthOnline.pdf
Gallup (2017). In U.S., 10.2% of LGBT adults now married to same-sex spouse. https://news.gallup.com/poll/212702/lgbt-adults-married-sex-spouse.aspx
Gallup (2018). In U.S., estimate of LGBT population rises to 4.5%. https://news.gallup.com/poll/234863/estimate-lgbt-population-rises.aspx
Galovan, A. M., Hawkins, A. J., Harris, S. M., & Simpson, D. M. (2021). What are they doing? A national survey of help-seeking and relationship-repair behavior of individuals who are thinking about divorce. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12480
Gesselman, A. N., Franco, C. Y., Brogdon, E. M., Gray, P. B., Garcia, J. R., & Fisher, H. E. (2019). Perceptions of married life among single never-married, single ever-married, and married adults. Personal Relationships, 26(4), 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12295
Grind, K., Schechner, S., McMillan, R., & West, J. (2019). November 19). How Google interferes with its search algorithms and changes your results.The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-google-interferes-with-its-search-algorithms-and-changes-your-results-11573823753
Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability, 4th Edition: The Definitive Guide to Measuring The Extent of Agreement Among Raters. MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC. https://books.google.com/books?id=fac9BQAAQBAJ
Haupert, M., Gesselman, A. N., Moors, A. C., Fisher, H., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(5), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
Hellyer, J. (2021). Homophobia and the home search: Rental market discrimination against same-sex couples in rural and urban housing markets. Journal of Housing Economics, 51, 101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhe.2020.101744
Hogben, M., & Waterman, C. K. (1997). Are all of your students represented in their textbooks? A content analysis of coverage of diversity issues in introductory psychology textbooks. Teaching of Psychology, 24(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2402_3
Hou, J., & Shim, M. (2010). The role of provider–patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities. Journal of Health Communication, 15(3), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.522691
Hsu, J. (2001). Marital therapy for intercultural couples. In W. Tseng, & J. Streltzer (Eds.), Culture and psychotherapy: A guide to clinical practice (pp. 225–242). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. https://books.google.com/books?id=X6QU 7P2nuXsC&oi
Katz, M., & Katz, E. (2021). Reconceptualizing attachment theory through the lens of polyamory. Sexuality & Culture, 26, 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09902-0
Kleynen, M., Braun, S. M., Bleijlevens, M. H., Lexis, M. A., Rasquin, S. M., Halfens, J. … Masters, R. S. W. (2014). Using a delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. PLoS One, 9(6), e100227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100227
Konstam, V., Karwin, S., Curran, T., Lyons, M., & Celen-Demirtas, S. (2016). Stigma and divorce: A relevant lens for emerging and young adult women? Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 57(3), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2016.1150149
Kurdek, L. A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(4), 880–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00060.x
Martin-Uzzi, M., & Duval-Tsioles, D. (2013). The experience of remarried couples in blended families. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 54(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.743828
McDowell, T., & Hernández, P. (2010). Decolonizing academia: Intersectionality, participation, and accountability in family therapy and counseling. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 22(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952831003787834
McGuire, T. G., & Miranda, J. (2008). New evidence regarding racial and ethnic disparities in mental health: Policy implications. Health Affairs, 27(2), 393–403
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674
Meyer, I. H., & Zane, N. (2013). The influence of race and ethnicity in clients’ experiences of mental health treatment. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(7), 884–901. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21580
Miller, G. H. (2020). Future trends in marriage and family. In D. N. Farris & A. J. J. Bourque (Eds.), International Handbook on the Demography of Marriage and the Family (pp. 307–315). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35079-6_21
Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Schechinger, H. A. (2017). Unique and shared relationship benefits of consensually non-monogamous and monogamous relationships. European Psychologist, 22(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000278
Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., Ziegler, A., Rubin, J. D., & Conley, T. D. (2013). Stigma toward individuals engaged in consensual nonmonogamy: Robust and worthy of additional research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12020
Moors, A. C., Ramos, A., & Schechinger, H. (2021). Bridging the science communication gap: The development of a fact sheet for clinicians and researchers about consensually nonmonogamous relationships. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000487
Moors, A. C., Ryan, W., & Chopik, W. J. (2019). Multiple loves: The effects of attachment with multiple concurrent romantic partners on relational functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 147, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.04.023
Moors, A. C., & Schechinger, H. (2014). Understanding sexuality: implications of Rubin for relationship research and clinical practice. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 29(4), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.941347
Morris, W. L., Sinclair, S., & DePaulo, B. M. (2007). No shelter for singles: The perceived legitimacy of marital status discrimination. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081535
Murray, C. E., & Murray, T. L. (2009). Reconsidering the term marriage in marriage and family therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 31(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-009-9091-9
Ortega, J., & Hergovich, P. (2017). The strength of absent ties: Social integration via online dating. Available at SSRN 3044766. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044766
Pew Research Center (2017a). Intermarriage in the U.S. 50 years after Loving v. Virginia. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/05/18/intermarriage-in-the-u-s-50-years-after-loving-v-virginia/
Pew Research Center (2017b). Public views on intermarriage. https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/05/18/2-public-views-on-intermarriage/
Pew Research Center (2021). Rising share of U.S. adults are living without a spouse or partner. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/
Read, S. C., Carrier, M. E., Boucher, M. E., Whitley, R., Bond, S., & Zelkowitz, P. (2014). Psychosocial services for couples in infertility treatment: What do couples really want? Patient Education and Counseling, 94(3), 390–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.025
Rodrigues, D., Fasoli, F., Huic, A., & Lopes, D. (2018). Which partners are more human? Monogamy matters more than sexual orientation for dehumanization in three European countries. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 15(4), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-017-0290-0
Rosenfeld, M. J., Reuben, J., & Falcon, M. (2015). How couples meet and stay together, waves 1, 2, and 3: public version 3.04, plus wave 4 supplement version 1.02 and wave 5 supplement version 1.0 [computer files]. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Libraries
Sabin, J. A., Riskind, R. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Health care providers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward lesbian women and gay men. American Journal of Public Health, 105(9), 1831–1841. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2015.302631
Schechinger, H. A., Sakaluk, J. K., & Moors, A. C. (2018). Harmful and helpful therapy practices with consensually non-monogamous clients: Toward an inclusive framework. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(11), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000349
Seedall, R. B., Holtrop, K., & Parra-Cardona, J. R. (2014). Diversity, social justice, and intersectionality trends in C/MFT: A content analysis of three family therapy journals, 2004–2011. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 40(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12015
Sheedy, C. A. (2016). Clinic and intake forms. In K. Eckstrand & J. Ehrenfeld (Eds). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Healthcare (pp. 51–63). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19752-4_5
Sheff, E. (2014). The polyamorists next door: Inside multiple-partner relationships and families. MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-5896
Silvestrini, M. (2020). “It’s not something I can shake”: The effect of racial stereotypes, beauty standards, and sexual racism on interracial attraction. Sexuality & Culture, 24(1), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-019-09644-0
U.S. Census Bureau (2015). Remarriage in the United States. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2015/acs/acs-30.html
U.S. Census Bureau (2020). Stats for stories: Singles awareness day: February 15, 2020. https://www.census.gov/newsroom/stories/singles-awareness-day.html
Valle, R., & Gait, H. C. (2013). Caregiving across cultures: Working with dementing illness and ethinically diverse populations. NY: Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?id=ApmsAgAAQBAJ&lr
van Eeden-Moorefield, B., Few-Demo, A. L., Benson, K., Bible, J., & Lummer, S. (2018). A content analysis of LGBT research in top family journals 2000–2015. Journal of Family Issues, 39(5), 1374–1395. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.929648
Webb, S. N., & Chonody, J. (2014). Heterosexual attitudes toward same-sex marriage: The influence of attitudes toward same-sex parenting. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 10(4), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2013.832644
Weitzman, G. (2006). Therapy with clients who are bisexual and polyamorous. Journal of Bisexuality, 6(1–2), 137–164
Funding
There is no funding information to report for the present studies. This study was approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ACM and AR contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data analysis were performed by ACM, AR, and ND. The manuscript was written and edited by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Consent to Participate and Publish
Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the present study to participate in the survey and publish their responses.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflicting financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos, A., Moors, A.C., Dours, N.O. et al. Surface and complex representation of diverse intimate relationships: insights from a content analysis of marriage and family therapy resources. Sexuality & Culture 26, 1510–1530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09956-8
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09956-8